Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

In re Alcor Energy Solutions, LLC, 19-597-RGA. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Delaware Number: infdco20190426a60 Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 25, 2019
Summary: RECOMMENDATION BK Case No. 18-12839 (CSS). BAP No. 19-19. ADV No. 19-50097 (CSS). MARY PAT THYNGE , Chief Magistrate Judge . At Wilmington this 25 th day of April, 2019. WHEREAS, pursuant to paragraph 2(a) of the Procedures to Govern Mediation of Appeals from the United States Bankruptcy Court for this District dated September 11, 2012, the court conducted an initial review, which included information from counsel, to determine the appropriateness of mediation in this matter; WHE
More

RECOMMENDATION

BK Case No. 18-12839 (CSS).

BAP No. 19-19.

ADV No. 19-50097 (CSS).

At Wilmington this 25th day of April, 2019.

WHEREAS, pursuant to paragraph 2(a) of the Procedures to Govern Mediation of Appeals from the United States Bankruptcy Court for this District dated September 11, 2012, the court conducted an initial review, which included information from counsel, to determine the appropriateness of mediation in this matter;

WHEREAS, as a result of the above screening process, the issues involved in this case are not amenable to mediation and mediation at this stage would not be a productive exercise, a worthwhile use of judicial resources nor warrant the expense of the process. Although the parties do not agree on the appropriateness of mediation, from their joint submission is was clear that mediation would be futile.

The parties request that should the court not require mediation, that they have the opportunity to meet and confer regarding a briefing schedule.

THEREFORE, IT IS RECOMMENDED that, pursuant to paragraph 2(a) Procedures to Govern Mediation of Appeals from the United States Bankruptcy Court for this District and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), this matter be withdrawn from the mandatory referral for mediation and proceed through the appellate process of this Court. Since this Recommendation is consistent with the parties' request, no objections pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), FED. R. CIV. P. 72(a) and D. DEL. LR 72.1 are anticipated.

Local counsel are obligated to inform out-of-state counsel of this Order.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer