Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

In re Brookstone Holdings Corp., 10-2256-MN. (2020)

Court: District Court, D. Delaware Number: infdco20200115e85 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jan. 13, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 13, 2020
Summary: RECOMMENDATION Bankruptcy Case No. 18-11780 (BLS). Bankruptcy BAP No. 19-81. MARY PAT THYNGE , Chief Magistrate Judge . At Wilmington this 13 th day of January, 2020. WHEREAS, pursuant to paragraph 2(a) of the Procedures to Govern Mediation of Appeals from the United States Bankruptcy Court for this District dated September 11, 2012, the court conducted an initial review, which included information from counsel, to determine the appropriateness of mediation in this matter; WHEREAS
More

RECOMMENDATION

Bankruptcy Case No. 18-11780 (BLS).

Bankruptcy BAP No. 19-81.

At Wilmington this 13th day of January, 2020.

WHEREAS, pursuant to paragraph 2(a) of the Procedures to Govern Mediation of Appeals from the United States Bankruptcy Court for this District dated September 11, 2012, the court conducted an initial review, which included information from counsel, to determine the appropriateness of mediation in this matter;

WHEREAS, as a result of the above screening process, the issues involved in this case are not amenable to mediation and mediation at this stage would not be a productive exercise, a worthwhile use of judicial resources nor warrant the expense of the process. Both parties agree that this matter is not amendable to mediation and request that this case be removed from the mandatory mediation requirement.

Further since this matter does not involve an economic dispute, both sides agree and request that briefing be stayed in this matter pending the decision on Appellees' motion to dismiss the bankruptcy appeal for failure to prosecute. See D.I. 4

THEREFORE, IT IS RECOMMENDED that, pursuant to paragraph 2(a) Procedures to Govern Mediation of Appeals from the United States Bankruptcy Court for this District and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), this matter be withdrawn from the mandatory referral for mediation.

IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that briefing regarding the appeal be stayed pending the outcome of Appellees' motion found at D.I. 4.

Because the Recommendation herein is consistent with the request of both parties, no objections to this Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), FED. R. CIV. P. 72(a) and D. DEL. LR 72.1, are anticipated.

Local counsel are obligated to inform out-of-state counsel of this Order.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer