Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs. WATSON REXALL DRUG, 75-000289 (1975)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 75-000289 Visitors: 9
Judges: DELPHENE C. STRICKLAND
Agency: Department of Transportation
Latest Update: Jan. 04, 1977
Summary: Whether Respondent had violated Section 479.07(1), Florida statutes, in that no permits were secured for subject sign for the years 1973, 1974 and 1975.Respondent didn't get permits for sign for years. Recommend removal of the sign unless Respondent removes/gets permit first.
75-0289.PDF

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, )

)

Petitioner, )

) CASE NO. 75-289T

vs. ) DOCKET NO. 75-127-OA

)

WATSON REXALL DRUG, )

)

Respondent. )

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


After notice to the parties, a formal administrative hearing, pursuant to the Florida Administrative Procedures Act, was held in the County Commissioners Meeting Room, Bay County Courthouse Annex, Panama City, Florida, on May 9, 1975, before Delphene Strickland, Hearing Examiner.


APPEARANCES


For Petitioner: Dennis LaRosa, Esquire

James W. Jordan Jim Williams


For Respondent: No appearance


ISSUES


Whether Respondent had violated Section 479.07(1), Florida statutes, in that no permits were secured for subject sign for the years 1973, 1974 and 1975.


FINDINGS OF FACT


No permits were applied for or secured.


CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


Respondent is subject to the penalties of Section 479.17 and Section 479.10, Florida Statutes, inasmuch as the failure to secure permits is for the year 1973-1975.

RECOMMENDED ORDER


Dismiss petition inasmuch as Respondent has now applied for a permit for subject signs.


DELPHENE STRICKLAND

Hearing Examiner



Date: 5/14/75


Docket for Case No: 75-000289
Issue Date Proceedings
Jan. 04, 1977 Final Order filed.
May 13, 1975 Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED.

Orders for Case No: 75-000289
Issue Date Document Summary
May 15, 1975 Agency Final Order
May 13, 1975 Recommended Order Respondent didn't get permits for sign for years. Recommend removal of the sign unless Respondent removes/gets permit first.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer