STATE OF FLORIDA
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
IN RE:The revocation or suspension )
of the license of Lois Drum d/b/a ) CASE NO. 75-524 Hair Hub Beauty Salon )
)
RECOMMENDED ORDER
Pursuant to notice, the Division of Administrative Hearings by its duly designated hearing officer, K.N. Ayers held a public hearing on the Above matter on June 16, 1975, in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida.
APPEARANCES: Ronald C. LaFace, Post 0ffice Box 1752, Tallahassee, Florida, for the Board of Cosmetology.
By this complaint the Board of Cosmetology seeks to revoke, annul, withdraw or suspend the license of Lois Drum d/b/a Hair Hub Beauty Salon on the grounds that she did on December 31, 1974 allow Lorraine Hitchcock to practice cosmetology in the Hair Hub Beauty Salon without a license, in violation of Section 477.06(6), Florida Statutes. On an Election of Remedies form Ms. Drum entered a plea of not guilty.
On December 31, 1974 am inspector for the State Board of Cosmetology visited the Hair Hub Beauty Salon on a regular inspection. At this visit he found Lorraine McCormick Hitchcock combing the hair of Dianne Osmond. Upon questioning Ms. Hitchcock, it was discovered that she had no license.
Mrs. Drum testified that she had shampooed Dianne Osmond's hair and left her to go to take care of another patron. While she was thus engaged Dianne asked Ms. McCormick to comb out her hair. She insisted that Ms. Hitchcock was not working for her and had never worked for her. Further, she stated that Ms. Hitchcock had two other jobs, a full time job at Chris Craft, and a part-time job at Sears. She did not know of nor did she condone the combing of Ms.
Osmond's hair by Ms. Hitchcock.
From the foregoing the Hearing Officer concludes that Lois Drum, d/b/a Hair Hub Beauty Salon, is guilty of the complaint as alleged. The Hearing Officer further concludes, that violation of Section 477.02(6)(f) F.S. was a technical violation and not an intentional violation of the statutes. It is, therefore,
RECOMMENDED that Lois Drum, doing business at Hair Hub Beauty Salon, be issued a letter of admonition.
DONE and ENTERED this 3rd day of July, 1975.
K. N. AYERS Hearing Officer
Division of Administrative Hearings Room 530, Carlton Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304
Issue Date | Proceedings |
---|---|
Jan. 19, 1977 | Final Order filed. |
Jul. 03, 1975 | Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED. |
Issue Date | Document | Summary |
---|---|---|
Sep. 17, 1975 | Agency Final Order | |
Jul. 03, 1975 | Recommended Order | Letter of admonition issued to beauty salon for allowing cosmetologists to work without a license, which is a technical violation, not intentional. |
BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY vs. WILLIAM R. ENGELLEITER, 75-000524 (1975)
BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY vs. BEFORE AND AFTER, INC., D/B/A DESIGN OF MIAMI, 75-000524 (1975)
VIVIANA GADDIS vs CREATIVE HAIR DRESSERS, INC., 75-000524 (1975)
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION vs CHIC AND SASSY, 75-000524 (1975)