Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY vs. LOIS DRUM, D/B/A HAIR HUB BEAUTY SALON, 75-000524 (1975)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 75-000524 Visitors: 20
Judges: K. N. AYERS
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Latest Update: Jan. 19, 1977
Summary: Letter of admonition issued to beauty salon for allowing cosmetologists to work without a license, which is a technical violation, not intentional.
75-0524.PDF

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


IN RE:The revocation or suspension )

of the license of Lois Drum d/b/a ) CASE NO. 75-524 Hair Hub Beauty Salon )

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


Pursuant to notice, the Division of Administrative Hearings by its duly designated hearing officer, K.N. Ayers held a public hearing on the Above matter on June 16, 1975, in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida.


APPEARANCES: Ronald C. LaFace, Post 0ffice Box 1752, Tallahassee, Florida, for the Board of Cosmetology.


By this complaint the Board of Cosmetology seeks to revoke, annul, withdraw or suspend the license of Lois Drum d/b/a Hair Hub Beauty Salon on the grounds that she did on December 31, 1974 allow Lorraine Hitchcock to practice cosmetology in the Hair Hub Beauty Salon without a license, in violation of Section 477.06(6), Florida Statutes. On an Election of Remedies form Ms. Drum entered a plea of not guilty.


On December 31, 1974 am inspector for the State Board of Cosmetology visited the Hair Hub Beauty Salon on a regular inspection. At this visit he found Lorraine McCormick Hitchcock combing the hair of Dianne Osmond. Upon questioning Ms. Hitchcock, it was discovered that she had no license.


Mrs. Drum testified that she had shampooed Dianne Osmond's hair and left her to go to take care of another patron. While she was thus engaged Dianne asked Ms. McCormick to comb out her hair. She insisted that Ms. Hitchcock was not working for her and had never worked for her. Further, she stated that Ms. Hitchcock had two other jobs, a full time job at Chris Craft, and a part-time job at Sears. She did not know of nor did she condone the combing of Ms.

Osmond's hair by Ms. Hitchcock.


From the foregoing the Hearing Officer concludes that Lois Drum, d/b/a Hair Hub Beauty Salon, is guilty of the complaint as alleged. The Hearing Officer further concludes, that violation of Section 477.02(6)(f) F.S. was a technical violation and not an intentional violation of the statutes. It is, therefore,


RECOMMENDED that Lois Drum, doing business at Hair Hub Beauty Salon, be issued a letter of admonition.

DONE and ENTERED this 3rd day of July, 1975.


K. N. AYERS Hearing Officer

Division of Administrative Hearings Room 530, Carlton Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304


Docket for Case No: 75-000524
Issue Date Proceedings
Jan. 19, 1977 Final Order filed.
Jul. 03, 1975 Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED.

Orders for Case No: 75-000524
Issue Date Document Summary
Sep. 17, 1975 Agency Final Order
Jul. 03, 1975 Recommended Order Letter of admonition issued to beauty salon for allowing cosmetologists to work without a license, which is a technical violation, not intentional.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer