Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY vs. RITA L. MATELLO, 75-000532 (1975)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 75-000532 Visitors: 7
Judges: K. N. AYERS
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Latest Update: Jan. 19, 1977
Summary: Cosmetologist was practicing without a license not subject to administrative process. Infraction is under jurisdiction of the courts.
75-0532.PDF

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


IN RE: THE revocation or suspension of )

the license of Rita L. Matello ) CASE NO. 75-532

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


Pursuant to notice, the Division of Administrative Hearings by its duly designated hearing officer, K. N. Ayers, held a public hearing on the above matter on June 16, 1975, In Ft. Lauderdale, Florida.


APPEARANCES: Ronald C. LaFace, Post Office Box 1752, Tallahassee, Florida, for the Board of Cosmetology.


By this complaint the Florida State Board of Cosmetology seeks to revoke, annul, withdraw or suspend the license of Rita L. Matello on the grounds that on March 17, 1975, she did practice cosmetology an the person of Pat Pryor without a Florida cosmetology license at the Safari Hair Emporium, Wilton Manors, Florida, in violation of Section 477.02(1)(3), Florida Statutes.


Violation of Section 477.02 Florida Statutes is a misdemeanor, the jurisdiction over which is vested solely in the judicial system. Accordingly, neither the Board nor the hearing officer has jurisdiction in this matter. It is therefore,


Recommended that the complaint be dismissed.


Entered this 3rd day of July, 1975, Tallahassee, Florida.


K. N. AYERS Hearing Officer

Division of Administrative Hearings Room 530, Carlton Building Tallahassee, Florida

(904) 488-0705


Docket for Case No: 75-000532
Issue Date Proceedings
Jan. 19, 1977 Final Order filed.
Jul. 03, 1975 Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED.

Orders for Case No: 75-000532
Issue Date Document Summary
Sep. 17, 1975 Agency Final Order
Jul. 03, 1975 Recommended Order Cosmetologist was practicing without a license not subject to administrative process. Infraction is under jurisdiction of the courts.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer