Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY vs. JACK D. RETHERFORD, D/B/A HAIRWORKS, 75-000591 (1975)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 75-000591 Visitors: 31
Judges: DELPHENE C. STRICKLAND
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Latest Update: Jan. 19, 1977
Summary: Whether Respondent violated Sections 477.02(6); 477.15(8); 477.27(1), Florida Statutes by allowing an unlicensed person to practice cosmetology in the Respondent's salon. Whether Respondent's license should be revoked, annulled, withdrawn or suspended.Recommend dismissal where Respondent employed person with Georgia license who now holds current Florida license. Infraction was too insignificant for punishment.
75-0591.PDF

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


IN RE: The revocation or )

suspension of the license of ) CASE NO. 75-591 Jack D. Retherford d/b/a )

Hairworks, )

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


After due notice a public hearing was held before Delphene Strickland, Hearing Officer, Department of Administration, Division of Administrative Hearings, on June 23, 1975, at 1:30

    1. in Suite 820, Barnett Bank Building, Tallahassee, Florida.


      APPEARANCES


      For Petitioner: Ronald C. LaFace

      Counsel for the Board of Cosmetology Post Office Box 1752

      Tallahassee, Florida 32302


      For Respondent: Jack D. Retherford

      600 East Business Highway 98 Panama City, Florida 32401


      Ellen Retherford, Witness for Respondent 600 East Business Highway 98

      Panama City, Florida 32401


      ISSUE


      Whether Respondent violated Sections 477.02(6); 477.15(8); 477.27(1), Florida Statutes by allowing an unlicensed person to practice cosmetology in the Respondent's salon. Whether Respondent's license should be revoked, annulled, withdrawn or suspended.


      FINDINGS OF FACT


      1. Respondent is the owner-manager of the salon doing business as Hairworks, 600 East Business Hwy. 98, Panama City, Florida.

      2. Respondent appeared and admitted the fact of the two violations with which the Florida Board of Cosmetology had charged him and which were the subject of this hearing.


      3. Respondent admitted allowing Mary Whitfield to practice cosmetology in his salon with a valid cosmetology license.


      4. Said Mary Whitfield, has, as of the date of this hearing, a current Florida Cosmetology License No. 19649.


        CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


      5. Respondent appeared at the designated time and place for hearing and submitted to the jurisdiction of the Hearing Officer.


      6. Respondent violated the provisions of Section 477.02(6) and Section 477.27, Florida Statutes, which prohibit and make it a misdemeanor the employment of a person who does not hold a valid, unexpired, or unrevoked certificate of registration inasmuch as he employed Mary Whitfield to practice cosmetology in his salon without a current Florida cosmetologist license.


RECOMMENDED ORDER


Dismiss the complaint inasmuch as the Respondent had employed a person who had had a current Georgia cosmetologist license and now has a current Florida cosmetologist license. The violation is not of sufficient gravity, under the circumstances of this case, to require the enforcement of Section 477.15, Florida Statutes, Suspension or revocation of certificate.


July 10, 1975 Date DELPHENE C. STRICKLAND

Hearing Officer

Division of Administrative Hearings Room 530, Carlton Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304

(904) 488-9675


COPIES FURNISHED:


Ronald C. LaFace, Counsel for the Board Jack D. Retherford, Respondent

Executive Director, Board of Cosmetology

================================================================= AGENCY FINAL ORDER

=================================================================


STATE OF FLORIDA

FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY


IN RE: The revocation or

suspension of the license of CASE NO. 75-591 Jack D. Retherford d/b/a

Hairworks,

/


FINAL ORDER


The Florida State Board of Cosmetology adopts as the agency's Final Order the Recommended Order of the Hearing Officer dated July 10, 1975, copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.


That the entry and publication of this Final Order shall constitute a reprimand or warning to the Respondent not to engage in a course of conduct in the future which would violate the Florida Cosmetology Law, Section 477, Florida Statutes or the Rules and Regulations of the State Board of Cosmetology.


A copy of this Final Order including the reprimand contained herein shall become a part of the Respondent's permanent file.


ENTERED the 17th day of September, 1975.



Grace Bliss, Chairman

Florida State Board of Cosmetology


Copies Mailed to:


Jack D. Retherford 1112 Carolina Avenue

Lynn Haven, Florida 32344


Docket for Case No: 75-000591
Issue Date Proceedings
Jan. 19, 1977 Final Order filed.
Jul. 10, 1975 Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED.

Orders for Case No: 75-000591
Issue Date Document Summary
Sep. 17, 1975 Agency Final Order
Jul. 10, 1975 Recommended Order Recommend dismissal where Respondent employed person with Georgia license who now holds current Florida license. Infraction was too insignificant for punishment.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer