Judges: DELPHENE C. STRICKLAND
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Latest Update: Jan. 19, 1977
Summary: Whether Respondent, Nancy Jo Gupton, allowed a non- licensed person to practice cosmetology in her beauty salon contrary to Florida Statutes. Whether Respondent's license should be revoked, annulled, withdrawn or suspended.Respondent left salon to take customer to hospital and unlicensed person practiced cosmetology in her absence. Dismiss because she is not employee of Respondent.
75-0595.PDFSTATE OF FLORIDA
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
IN RE: The revocation or suspension of )
the license of Nancy Jo Gupton d/b/a ) CASE NO. 75-595 Nancy Jo's Hair Stylist ) LICENSE NO. 8042
)
RECOMMENDED ORDER
After due notice a public hearing was held before Delphene Strickland, Hearing Officer, Department of Administration, Division of Administrative Hearings, on June 23, 1975, at 2:30 p.m. in Suite 820, Barnett Bank Building, Tallahassee, Florida.
APPEARANCES
Ronald C. LaFace, Counsel for the Board of Cosmetology Post Office Box 1752
Tallahassee, Florida 32302
Mary Jo Gupton, Respondent
22 Tallulah Avenue Jacksonville, Florida 32218
Florence Latham, Witness for Respondent
317 Bernard Road Jacksonville, Florida 32218
Madge Edwards, Inspector 8309 Calento Street Jacksonville, Florida
ISSUE
Whether Respondent, Nancy Jo Gupton, allowed a non- licensed person to practice cosmetology in her beauty salon contrary to Florida Statutes.
Whether Respondent's license should be revoked, annulled, withdrawn or suspended.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Respondent is doing business as Nancy Jo's Hair Stylist in Jacksonville, Florida.
Respondent was working in said salon and left the salon to take a customer to the hospital.
Sue Dalton, a non-registered person washed and set the hair of one Mrs. Latham, a customer of said salon.
Sue Dalton was not employed to serve as a cosmetologist.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
Chapter 477, Florida Statutes, requires each person practicing cosmetology to have a certificate of registration. Sue Dalton was practicing cosmetology in Respondent's salon and had no certificate to practice cosmetology contrary to the statute.
RECOMMENDED ORDER
Dismiss the complaint. The evidence shows that Sue Dalton was not employed as a cosmetologist although she did perform such service in Respondent's Beauty salon.
July 10, 1975
Date DELPHENE C. STRICKLAND
Hearing Officer
Division of Administrative Hearings Room 530, Carlton Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304
(904) 488-9675
COPIES FURNISHED:
Ronald C. LaFace, Counsel for the Board Nancy Jo Gupton, Respondent
Executive Director, Board of Cosmetology
Docket for Case No: 75-000595
Orders for Case No: 75-000595
| Issue Date |
Document |
Summary |
|
Oct. 07, 1975 |
Agency Final Order
|
|
|
Jul. 10, 1975 |
Recommended Order
|
Respondent left salon to take customer to hospital and unlicensed person practiced cosmetology in her absence. Dismiss because she is not employee of Respondent.
|
