Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY vs. CARRIE SHINGLES, 75-001000 (1975)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 75-001000 Visitors: 21
Judges: DELPHENE C. STRICKLAND
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Latest Update: Jan. 19, 1977
Summary: Whether Respondent practiced cosmetology in a salon in Florida without a cosmetologist license as required by Chapter 477, Florida Statutes. Whether the Board has jurisdiction over Respondent. Whether the Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over Respondent.Respondent cited for unlicensed practice of cosmetology. Recommend dismissal. Petitioner must seek relief in courts. The Division of Administrative Hearings (DOAH) has no jurisdiction.
75-1000.PDF

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


IN RE: State Board of Cosmetology, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) CASE NO. 75-1000

)

Carrie Shingles, )

)

Respondent. )

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


After due notice a public hearing was held before Delphene C. Strickland, Hearing Officer, Department of Administration, Division of Administrative Hearings, on June 25, 1975, at 10:13 a.m. in the Cosmetology Offices at 308 Avenue A, Southwest, Winter Haven, Florida.


APPEARANCES


For Petitioner: Ronald C. LaFace

Counsel for the Board of Cosmetology


Witness: Artie Leigh Mitchell Respondent: Carrie Shingles Witness: Bernice Benbow

ISSUES


  1. Whether Respondent practiced cosmetology in a salon in Florida without a cosmetologist license as required by Chapter 477, Florida Statutes.


  2. Whether the Board has jurisdiction over Respondent.


  3. Whether the Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over Respondent.


FINDINGS OF FACT


  1. Respondent was practicing cosmetology by shampooing the hair of a customer of Bernice Benbow d/b/a Bernice's Beauty Salon at a time when Respondent, Carrie Shingles had no certificate to practice cosmetology. Respondent admitted she was not a registered cosmetologist; that she did shampoo the hair of a customer in Bernice's Beauty Salon; that she performed such work without the permission of Bernice Benbow, the owner of the salon; that she did not know said action was contrary to the Florida Statutes or the rules and regulations of the Board of Cosmetology.


  2. Notice of Service was entered without objection and marked Exhibit 1.

  3. The witnesses were duly sworn


    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


  4. The Division of Administrative Hearings has no jurisdiction in this matter. The Board may seek relief against Respondent under Section 477.28, Florida Statutes, in a court of law for the violation of which Respondent was charged in this case.


RECOMMENDATION


Dismiss the complaint.


August 27, 1975 date DELPHENE C. STRICKLAND

Hearing Officer

Division of Administrative Hearings Room 530, Carlton Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304

(904) 488-9675


COPIES FURNISHED:


Ms. Bernice Benbow 702 Magnolia Street Cocoa, Florida


Ms. Carrie Shingles 606 Poinsett

Post Office Box 1752 Tallahassee, Florida 32302


Ronald C. LaFace, Esquire Post Office Box 1752 Tallahassee, Florida 32302


Ms. Artie Leigh Mitchell

427 Roosevelt Avenue Merritt Island, Florida


Ms. Mary Alice Palmer Executive Director Board of Cosmetology Post Office Box 9087

Winter Haven, Florida 33880


Docket for Case No: 75-001000
Issue Date Proceedings
Jan. 19, 1977 Final Order filed.
Aug. 27, 1975 Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED.

Orders for Case No: 75-001000
Issue Date Document Summary
Oct. 22, 1975 Agency Final Order
Aug. 27, 1975 Recommended Order Respondent cited for unlicensed practice of cosmetology. Recommend dismissal. Petitioner must seek relief in courts. The Division of Administrative Hearings (DOAH) has no jurisdiction.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer