Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY vs. EVA M. DUKES AND BEULAH JACKSON, 75-001006 (1975)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 75-001006 Visitors: 18
Judges: DELPHENE C. STRICKLAND
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Latest Update: Jan. 19, 1977
Summary: Whether Respondents operated their cosmetology salon in violation of the rule then in effect in which each cosmetology salon owner or manager should send to the Board every five (5) years a certificate from a licensed electrician showing that the electrical equipment in said salon is in safe operating condition. Regulation 21F-3.02, of the rules and regulations of the State Board of Cosmetology. Whether Respondents' license should be revoked, annulled, withdrawn or suspended.Rule requiring elect
More
75-1006

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


STATE BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) CASE NO. 75-1006

)

EVA M. DUKES AND BEULAH )

JACKSON, )

)

Respondents. )

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


After due notice a public hearing was held before Delphene Strickland, Hearing Officer, Department of Administration, Division of Administrative Hearings, on June 25, 1975, at 11:15

    1. in the Cosmetology Offices at 308 Avenue A, Southwest, Winter Haven, Florida.


      APPEARANCES


      For Petitioner: Ronald C. LaFace

      Counsel for the Board of Cosmetology

      Witness: Aartie Leigh Mitchell For Respondent: Eva M. Dukes

      Beulah Jackson


      ISSUES


      Whether Respondents operated their cosmetology salon in violation of the rule then in effect in which each cosmetology salon owner or manager should send to the Board every five (5) years a certificate from a licensed electrician showing that the electrical equipment in said salon is in safe operating condition. Regulation 21F-3.02, of the rules and regulations of the State Board of Cosmetology.

      Whether Respondents' license should be revoked, annulled, withdrawn or suspended.


      FINDINGS OF FACT


      1. The witness and Respondents were duly sworn.


      2. The Notice of Service and Complaint were entered without objection and marked Exhibit 1. The Election of Remedies and Electrical Certificate were entered into evidence as Exhibit 2 without objection.


      3. Respondents held a license as required by Board of Cosmetology Rule 21F-3.02, which was dated 1969.


      4. A notice of violation was written up by the Board at the five-year expiration of said license which was in 1974.


      5. Since the writing of the violation notice, the Board has rescinded the rule requiring an electrical certificate and Respondnets not having procured a certificate in a timely fashion did not then attempt to secure said certificate inasmuch as the rule had been rescinded.


        CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


      6. The certificate of Respondents could be withdrawn, revoked, or suspended, for violations of the rules in effect at the time of the notice of violation.


RECOMMENDED ORDER


Dismiss the complaint.


August 27, 1975 Date DELPHENE C. STRICKLAND

Hearing Officer

Division of Administrative Hearings Room 530, Carlton Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304

(904) 488-9675

COPIES FURNISHED:


Eva M. Dukes

1107 Southwest Sixth Street Ocala, Florida


Beulah M. Jackson

1821 Southwest Sixth Street Ocala, Florida


Artie Leigh Mitchell

427 Roosevelt Avenue Merritt Island, Florida


Ronald C. LaFace, Esquire Post Office Box 1752 Tallahassee, Florida

================================================================= AGENCY FINAL ORDER

=================================================================


STATE OF FLORIDA

FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY


STATE BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY,


Petitioner,


vs. CASE NO. 75-1006


EVA M. DUKES AND BEULAH JACKSON,


Respondents.

/


FINAL ORDER


The Florida State Board of Cosmetology adopts as part of the agency's Final Order the conclusion of law, interpretation of Administrative Rules and findings of fact set forth in the Recommended Order of the Hearing Examiner dated August 27, 1975, copies of which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.


The State Board of Cosmetology feels that the recommended penalty would be unduly harsh under the circumstances and therefore reduces the recommended penalty in the Hearing Examiner's Order of 30 day suspension of salon license to the following:


Strong letter of Reprimand.


That the entry and publication of this Final Order shall constitute a reprimand or warning to the Respondent not to engage in a course of conduct in the future which would violate the Florida Cosmetology Law, Section 477, Florida Statutes or the Rules and Regulations of the State Board of Cosmetology.


A copy of this Final Order including the reprimand contained herein shall become a part of the Respondent's permanent files.


ENTERED the 22nd day of October, 1975.



Grace Bliss, Chairman

Florida State Board of Cosmetology


Copies Mailed to:


Ms. Eva M. Dukes

1107 Southwest Sixth Street Ocala, Florida


Beulah M. Jackson

1107 Southwest Sixth Street Ocala, Florida


Docket for Case No: 75-001006
Issue Date Proceedings
Jan. 19, 1977 Final Order filed.
Aug. 27, 1975 Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED.

Orders for Case No: 75-001006
Issue Date Document Summary
Oct. 22, 1975 Agency Final Order
Aug. 27, 1975 Recommended Order Rule requiring electrical certificate has been rescinded. Therefore the complaint charging noncompliance should be dismissed.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer