Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY vs. RICHARD J. PAYSEUR, D/B/A SHOWPLACE, 76-001037 (1976)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 76-001037 Visitors: 9
Judges: DELPHENE C. STRICKLAND
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Latest Update: Oct. 06, 1977
Summary: Whether the salon license of Richard J. Payseur, No. 20140-OB should be revoked, annulled, suspended or withdrawn because he did not display a proper sign in his salon.Respondent failed to display a sign in his salon and went out of business and was never notified his personal license could be disciplined. Warn Respondent.
76-1037.PDF

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF ) PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, )

(BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY), )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) CASE NO. 76-1037

) Salon License No. 20140-OB RICHARD J. PAYSEUR, d/b/a ) Master License No. 0083341 SHOWPLACE )

)

Respondent. )

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


After due notice, this cause came before Delphene C. Strickland, Hearing Officer, Division of Administrative Hearings, Department of Administration, June 28, 1976 at 11:00 a.m. in the offices of the Board of Cosmetology, 308 Avenue A, Southwest, Winter Haven, Florida.


APPEARANCES


For Petitioner: Ronald C. LaFace, Esquire

101 East College Avenue Tallahassee, Florida


ISSUE


Whether the salon license of Richard J. Payseur, No. 20140-OB should be revoked, annulled, suspended or withdrawn because he did not display a proper sign in his salon.


FINDINGS OF FACT


  1. Mrs. Mary Francis Pfeiffer, Inspector for the Board, testified that Respondent Richard Payseur had been the proprietor of the beauty salon under the name "Showplace Beauty Salon", New Port Richey, Florida. At her last visit, the salon was under a new proprietorship and that to the best of the Inspector's knowledge, Mr. Payseur does not operate a beauty salon in the State.


  2. The Respondent Mr. Payseur holds a Masters License No. 0083341.


  3. Mr. Payseur, the Respondent, had been issued a violation notice after a visit to the salon on January 17, 1976 and again on March 20, 1976.


    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


  4. Mr. Payseur was issued a violation notice inasmuch as he was in violation of Rule 8-3.10 F.A.C.. Respondent has gone out of business and the salon he operated in violation of the said rule is now under new ownership. Mr.

Payseur holds a Masters License but has been issued no violation notice advising him that his personal license may be revoked, annulled or suspended.


RECOMMENDATION


Dismiss the present complaint and warn Respondent that a violation of the State laws and regulations governing cosmetologists could jeopardize his personal license.


DONE and ORDERED this 5th day of August, 1976 in Tallahassee, Florida.


DELPHENE C. STRICKLAND

Hearing Officer

Division of Administrative Hearings Room 530, Carlton Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304

(904) 488-9675


COPIES FURNISHED:


Ronald C. LaFace, Esquire

101 East College Avenue Tallahassee, Florida


Richard J. Payseur Box 667 Route 4

Brooksville, Florida 33512


Docket for Case No: 76-001037
Issue Date Proceedings
Oct. 06, 1977 Final Order filed.
Aug. 05, 1976 Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED.

Orders for Case No: 76-001037
Issue Date Document Summary
Sep. 28, 1976 Agency Final Order
Aug. 05, 1976 Recommended Order Respondent failed to display a sign in his salon and went out of business and was never notified his personal license could be disciplined. Warn Respondent.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer