STATE OF FLORIDA
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
RICHARD GOSS, )
)
Petitioner, )
)
vs. ) CASE NO. 77-478
) HARRIE E. SMITH AND DEPARTMENT ) OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION, )
)
Respondent. )
)
RECOMMENDED ORDER
This proceeding came before the undersigned Hearing Officer on the Petition of Richard Goss, protesting the after-the-fact application of Harrie E. Smith to the Department of Environmental Regulation for a permit to construct a dock in Bonefish Bay, Marathon, Monroe County, Florida.
APPEARANCES
For Petitioner: Alfred K. Frigola, Esquire
Post Office Box 177 Marathon, Florida 33040
For Respondent: Ralph Cunningham, Esquire Smith Post Office Box 938
Marathon, Florida 33050
For Respondent: Terry Cole, Esquire
DER Department of Environmental Regulation 2562 Executive Center Circle, East Montgomery Building
Tallahassee, Florida 32301
The formal proceeding was conducted at the Monroe County Branch Courthouse, Marathon, Florida, at 11:00 a.m., June 7, 1977, to consider the allegations of the petition. After listening to the testimony, considering the exhibits and other arguments presented, the following findings are entered.
FINDINGS OF FACT
The Petitioner is the adjoining neighbor of Harrie E. Smith, the applicant, and runs the Coral Lagoon Resort. This is a commercial establishment which consists of rental units fronting on Bonefish Bay with an interior canal and a series of small boat docking facilities which give each unit docking space and water access. The Petitioner keeps two tame porpoises at the end of this canal which are a tourist attraction. The Petitioner's operation is tourist oriented particularly to those who come to the Keys for fishing or diving excursions.
The application to the Department of Environmental Regulation is to the installation of a wooden dock which runs parallel to the Petitioner's northern boundary line. The applicant, Mr. Smith, runs a commercial boat repair facility alongside Mr. Goss' establishment and it is clear there have been misunderstandings between them in the past. The dock has been installed and as noted above, the application to the Department of Environmental Regulation is for an after-the-fact authorization. The department has indicated it intends to grant the permit as it does not see that the dock will degrade water quality or create a condition adverse to the public interest.
The petition maintains that the dock will cause water quality problems in that it will encourage the docking of boats which will spill oil, gas and other contaminants into the waters and thereby degrade water quality. It should be noted that the Petitioner maintains extensive docking facilities in his establishment and could be subjected to the same argument.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The Petitioner has not proven by competent, substantial evidence that the applicant should be denied this permit, which the department intends to issue. No evidence was presented from which a finding could be made that the dock will cause a violation of state water quality standards. The agency with direct responsibility for this question, the Department of Environmental Regulation, has analyzed the application and concluded that the permit should be issued. Petitioner has not demonstrated that the conclusion of the department is erroneous. It is, therefore,
That the permit be granted.
DONE and ENTERED this 12th day of July, 1977, in Tallahassee, Florida.
KENNETH G. OERTEL, Director
Hearing Officer
Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building
1230 Apalachee Parkway
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1550
(904) 488-9675
Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 12th day of July, 1977.
COPIES FURNISHED:
Alfred K. Frigola, Esquire Ralph Cunningham, Esquire Post Office Box 177 Post Office Box 938 Marathon, Florida 33040 Marathon, Florida 33050
Terry Cole, Esquire
Department of Environmental Regulation 2562 Executive Center Circle, East Montgomery Building
Tallahassee, Florida 32301
Issue Date | Proceedings |
---|---|
Aug. 11, 1977 | Final Order filed. |
Jul. 12, 1977 | Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED. |
Issue Date | Document | Summary |
---|---|---|
Aug. 05, 1977 | Agency Final Order | |
Jul. 12, 1977 | Recommended Order | Petitioner failed to show why the permit to build a dock should not be issued. |