STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

STATE OF FLORIDA, DIVISION OF ) ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) CASE NO. 77-1190

) MARDI GRAS DE TAMPA, INC., t/a ) TIGERS DEN A GO GO, )

)

Respondent. )

)

RECOMMENDED ORDER

Pursuant to notice, a hearing was held before Charles C. Adams, a Hearing Officer with the Division of Administrative Hearings at 9:00 A.M., July 20, 1977, at 5600 Mariner Street, Suite 102, Tampa, Florida.

APPEARANCES

For Petitioner: William Hatch, Esquire

Division of Beverage

725 South Bronough Street Tallahassee, Florida 32304

For Respondent: Tom Whitaker, Esquire

403 North Morgan Street Tampa, Florida 33602

ISSUE

Whether or not, on or about January 25, 1977, in the licensed premises located at 1600 North Dale Mabry Highway, Tampa, Hillsborough County, Florida, the licensed premises of the Respondent, the Respondent's employee, agent, servant, or entertainer, to wit: Linda Sue Richardson and/or Gayle Jeanette Landrum, allegedly employed at the licensed premises or employed on a contractual basis by the Respondent to entertain, perform, or work on the licensed premises known as, Tigers Den A Go Go, did commit or engage in a lewd and lascivious performance by a live person by committing obscene and indecent acts in violation of 847.011, F.S. and thereby subject the licensee to the penalty provisions of s. 561.29, F.S.

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. At present and at all times pertinent to this cause, to include January 25, 1977, the Respondent, Mardi Gras De Tampa, Inc., was the holder of license no. 39-0246, series 4-COP, held with the State of Florida, Division of Beverage. This license was held to trade as Tigers Den A Go Go in a premises located at 1600 North Dale Mabry Highway, Tampa, Hillsborough County, Florida.

2. On January 25, 1977, officers of the Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office entered the licensed premises. The officers were Detectives Ridgeway and Coakley. While in the licensed premises the officers observed an entertainer Linda Sue Richardson dancing. In the course of the dancing Richardson inserted a plastic straw into the g-string costume which she was wearing, and simulated masturbation. The officers also observed Richardson, in the course of the dance, take a napkin and rub it on her vagina, and then roll the napkin up and place it in her mouth and simulate oral sexual activity.

   
   

3. At the time the officers were in the licensed premises and on the same date, they observed the dancing of a second female entertainer, one Gayle Jeanette Landrum. They saw Landrum place her hand in her g-string costume and simulate masturbation. Landrum also fondled her breasts in a provocative manner.

   
   

4. The exact location within the licensed premises where the above described dancing took place is not specifically known, beyond the fact that one dancer was dancing on a large stage behind the bar and the other dancer was dancing on a smaller stage which was placed in the area where patrons would be seated. The dancing took place at a time that customers were in the licensed premises. The two women were arrested and charged with lewd and lascivious conduct and both were convicted of a violation of s. 847.011, F.S.

   
   

5. On the date of the arrest of the two dancers, Carol Alcorn was in charge of the licensed premises in the capacity of manager. Alcorn was also serving as bartender on that occasion. The two female entertainers were employed on January 25, 1977 for compensation by the Respondent, Mardi Gras De Tampa, Inc. The two women were operating under the specific instructions of the Respondent on the subject of their conduct while performing. These instructions were generally to not commit acts which would be considered lewd and lascivious within the meaning of the "Florida Law". In addition the dancers were not to touch themselves or fondle themselves or let customers touch them. The women had been told these basic rules in individual conferences. Another policy which the management had, was to call the performers attention to any improper conduct, and dismiss performer if the performer failed to abide by management rules on the subject of proper conduct. In fact, the Respondent's management employees had corrected dancers before.

   
   

6. On the occasion when the officers observed the conduct of Richardson and Landrum, it is unclear what period of time was encompassed to achieve the acts described. In the normal course of events the women would have been dancing for the duration of three records, which would be approximately nine minutes. They would have been dancing as a part of a group of six to eight dancers. The bartender would have been able to see any dancer performing on the stage behind the bar or performing on the stage in the area where the patrons were seated. The view of the two stages from the location the bartender would have behind the bar would have been unobstructed. Whether or not the bartender, Carol Alcorn, actually saw the subject dancing of Richardson and Landrum can not be determined from the facts offered in the hearing. What was shown was that the bartender went to the restroom, which was away from the bar itself, and was confronted by the two officers when leaving the restroom area. This confrontation was for the purposes of complaining about the activities the officers had observed on the apart of Richardson and Landrum.

   
   

7. The acts which took place in the course of the dancing, by Linda Sue Richardson and Gayle Jeanette Landrum, constitute lewd and lascivious conduct within the meaning of s. 847.011, F.S. From the facts presented in the course

   of the hearing, it has not been shown that the Respondent, Mardi Gras De Tampa, Inc., has violated s. 561.29, F.S., as a result of the acts of their employees Linda Sue Richardson and Gayle Jeanette Landrum. The facts do not show that the Respondent is responsible for those acts of the employees either through its own negligence, intentional wrongdoing, or lack of diligence.

   
   

   CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

   
   

8. The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction in this cause.

   
   

9. Based upon the facts as shown, it is concluded as a matter of law, that the Petitioner has failed to establish that the Respondent, Mardi Gras De Tampa, Inc., is responsible for the unlawful acts of Linda Sue Richardson and Gayle Jeanette Landrum, when they violated 847.011, F.S., while employed on the licensed premises on January 25, 1977; such that the Respondent is subject to the penalties provided in 561.29, F.S. The Petitioner has failed to show that the Respondent is responsible for the acts of those individuals, either through its own negligence, intentional wrongdoing, or lack of diligence. See Taylor vs. State Beverage Department, 194 So.2d 321 (2d DCA 1967) and Trader John, Inc. vs. State Beverage Department, 119 So.2d 735 (1st, DCA, 1960)

RECOMMENDATION

It is recommended that the charge filed by the Petitioner against the license of Mardi Gras De Tampa, Inc., t/a Tigers Den a Go Go, under license no. 39-0246, series 4-COP, as set forth above, be dismissed.

DONE AND ENTERED this 28th day of July, 1977, in Tallahassee, Florida.

CHARLES C. ADAMS, Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings The Oakland Building

2009 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32301

(904) 488-9675

COPIES FURNISHED:

William Hatch, Esquire Tom Whitaker, Esquire

Division of Beverage 403 North Morgan Street

725 South Bronough Street Tampa, Florida 33602 Tallahassee, Florida 32304

Docket for Case No: 77-001190

Orders for Case No: 77-001190