Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE vs. DANIEL L. REED, 77-001802 (1977)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 77-001802 Visitors: 5
Judges: MICHAEL R. N. MCDONNELL
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Latest Update: Oct. 03, 1978
Summary: Petitioner failed to prove Respondent knew or participated in advance fee scam through his broker. Recommend dismissal of complaint.
77-1802.PDF

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) CASE NO. 77-1802

) P.D. NO. 3081

DANIEL L. REED, )

)

Respondent. )

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


Pursuant to notice, an administrative hearing was held before Michael R.N. McDonnell, Hearing Officer for the Division of Administrative Hearings, at 11:00 a.m., on June 22, 1978, at 717 Ponce de Leon Boulevard, Third Floor, Coral Gables, Florida.


Petitioner was represented by John L. Huskins, Esquire, Florida Real Estate Commission, 400 West Robinson Street, Post Office Box 1900, Orlando, Florida.

Respondent appeared in his own behalf.


Petitioner, Florida Real Estate Commission (hereafter FREC), seeks to revoke, suspend or otherwise discipline Respondent, Daniel L. Reed (hereafter Reed), for alleged violations of Chapter 475, Florida Statutes, the Florida Real Estate License Law. It is alleged that Reed was, while registered as a real estate salesman, involved in an "advance fee" real estate operation in which Reed misrepresented to prospective clients that:


  1. the property could be sold for several times the purchase price,

  2. the property would be advertised nationwide and in foreign countries,

  3. the Company had foreign buyers wanting to purchase United States property listed with the Company.


It is further alleged that Reed knew that no bona fide effort would be made to sell any of the properties listed with his company, First Allstate Realty Corporation (hereafter FAR) and that, therefore, Reed conspired with FAR to engage in dishonest dealings.


Finally, it is alleged that, because of the alleged misrepresentations and the alleged conspiracy, Reed is guilty of dishonest and untruthful conduct and that, therefore, money, property, transactions and rights of investors or those with whom he may sustain a confidential relation may not safely be entrusted to him.


At the final hearing, Petitioner's Motion to Amend the Administrative Complaint was granted adding the additional allegation that Reed was guilty of a violation of a duty imposed by law by virtue of Reed's being found guilty of

violating Section 501.204, Florida Statutes, by engaging in unfair and deceptive trade practices and unfair methods of competition.


FINDINGS OF FACT


  1. From December 29, 1975, to January 13, 1976, Reed was a registered real estate salesman in the employ of FAR, a registered corporate broker, located in Dade County, Florida. During that period of time, FAR was engaged in an enterprise whereby advanced fee listings were obtained from Florida property owners. Salesmen known as "fronters or qualifiers" were employed to place calls to Florida property owners whose names and phone numbers had been provided to the salesmen by FAR. The prospects were asked if they cared to list their real estate with FAR in anticipation of resale. It was explained that there would be a refundable fee to be paid by the property owner for the listing. The refund was to occur upon sale of the property. If the prospect was interested, then certain literature was mailed out to them.


  2. Other salesmen were employed as "drivers" who would make the second contact of the prospect who indicated an interest in listing his property. The driver would secure a signed listing agreement along with a check for $375.00 which constituted the refundable listing fee.


  3. There was no evidence that any of the listings obtained by FAR were ever resold. There were, however, three parcels of land in negotiation for sale when the operations of FAR were terminated in June, 1976. There was to be a division separate and apart from the "fronters" and "drivers" to do the actual selling of the property.


  4. The listings were advertised in the Fort Lauderdale area but there was no evidence to establish whether or not other advertising occurred.


  5. Respondent's correct name is Daniel L. Reed and no evidence of pseudonyms or aliases was introduced. While there was evidence introduced to indicate that a Mr. and Mrs. Norman G. Schmidt of McLean, Virginia, had telephone conversations with a representative of FAR named Reed, the first names do not coincide. The Schmidts testified that the first name of the Reed that they talked with was Ben and not Daniel.


  6. There was a total absence of evidence and, hence, a failure of proof as to the allegations of misrepresentations by Reed. FREC introduced no evidence to show that Reed represented that the property could be sold for several times the purchase price, that it would be advertised nationwide and in foreign countries or that the company had foreign buyers wanting to purchase United States property listed with the company. There was no evidence introduced to show that Reed either made the representations or knew them to be false. There was no evidence introduced to show that Reed knew than no bona fide effort would be made to sell the property listed. There was no evidence of any nature introduced by FREC to show that Reed was dishonest or untruthful.


  7. No evidence was introduced to establish the amended allegation that Reed was guilty of a violation of a duty imposed by law.


CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


Based on the foregoing findings of fact, it is concluded that FREC has failed to establish that Reed violated Chapter 475, Florida Statutes. It is, accordingly,

RECOMMENDED that no action be taken to revoke, suspend or otherwise discipline Reed's license or Reed's right to practice thereunder.


DONE and ENTERED this 3 day of October, 1979, in Tallahassee, Florida.


MICHAEL R. N. MCDONNELL

Hearing Officer

Division of Administrative Hearings Room 530, Carlton Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304

(904) 488-9675


COPIES FURNISHED:


John L. Huskins, Esquire Florida Real Estate Commission

400 West Robinson Street Post Office Box 1900 Orlando, Florida 32801


Daniel L. Reed 17910 West Drive

Apartment 103

Miami, Florida 33141


Docket for Case No: 77-001802
Issue Date Proceedings
Oct. 03, 1978 Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED.

Orders for Case No: 77-001802
Issue Date Document Summary
Oct. 03, 1978 Recommended Order Petitioner failed to prove Respondent knew or participated in advance fee scam through his broker. Recommend dismissal of complaint.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer