Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO vs. CLIFFORD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, 78-001805 (1978)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 78-001805 Visitors: 57
Judges: ROBERT T. BENTON, II
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Latest Update: Nov. 17, 1978
Summary: Respondent is not culpably responsible in delivery to unlicensed premises made by employee for corporation. Culpable responsibility would mean knowledge of act by officer. Dismiss.
78-1805.PDF

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC )

BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) CASE NO. 78-1805

) DABT NO. 33463-A CLIFFORD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, )

)

Respondent. )

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


This matter came on for hearing in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, before the Division of Administrative Hearings, by its duly designated Hearing Officer, Robert T. Benton, II, on October 24, 1978.


APPEARANCES


For Petitioner: Mary Jo M. Gallay, Esquire

Staff Attorney

725 South Bronough Street Tallahassee, Florida 32304


For Respondent: Mr. Bernard Bernstein


By notice to show cause dated April 25, 1978, petitioner alleged that respondent sold beer to Aki-San Japanese Restaurant, Inc. (Aki-San) on October 25, 1977, on November 2, 1977, on November 21, 1977, and on December 30, 1977, even though Aki-San had failed to renew its "alcoholic beverage license for the 1977-78 license year until January 16, 1978, contrary to F.S. 562.12, to wit

561.14."


FINDINGS OF FACT


  1. Aki-San held an alcoholic beverage license which expired October 1, 1977. Only on January 10, 1978, did Aki-San make application for "delinquent renewal" of its license. In the unlicensed interim, one of respondent's truckdrivers continued to deliver Kirin beer to Aki-San. At all pertinent times, respondent was licensed as a distributor of alcoholic beverages.


  2. Respondent employs numerous truckdrivers to distribute alcoholic beverages to some 2,000 licensees under the beverage law. Each driver has a route book containing the license number of each of the customers for which he is responsible. The truck drivers have standing instructions to insure, before delivering alcoholic beverages, that the licensees they serve have renewed their licenses for the year. Posted on a bulletin board on respondent's premises, in October of 1977, was a notice reminding the drivers to ascertain whether their customers' licenses had been renewed.

    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


  3. Respondent's license authorizes it "to sell and distribute alcoholic beverages at wholesale to persons who are licensed to sell alcoholic beverages," Section 561.14(2), Florida Statutes (1977), but does not authorize it to sell alcoholic beverages to persons who are not so licensed. Section 562.12, Florida Statutes (1977), makes it a misdemeanor for "any licensee to sell alcoholic beverages . . . in any matter except that permitted by his license." Section 561.29, Florida Statutes (1977), authorizes petitioner to take disciplinary action against the license of any licensee guilty of this or any other offense against the laws of Florida.


  4. Where it is the employee of a licensee who violates the law, however, the law authorizes disciplinary action against the license only where the licensee is "found to have been culpably responsible for such violation through or as a result of his own negligence, intentional wrongdoing or lack of diligence." Taylor v. State Beverage Department, 194 So.2d 321, 325 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967), Accord, Cohen v. Schott, 48 So. 154 (Fla. 1950); Woodbury v. State Beverage Department, 219 So.2d 47 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969). In the case of a corporate licensee, "culpable responsibility" of an officer of the corporation must be demonstrated.


  5. No evidence was adduced in the present case to show that respondent had sold any other unlicensed person alcoholic beverages at any time since it obtained its wholesaler's license. Petitioner did not in any other way demonstrate negligence, intentional wrongdoing or a lack of diligence on the part of respondent's management.


RECOMMENDATION


Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is RECOMMENDED:

That petitioner dismiss the notice to show cause issued in this case.


DONE and ENTERED this 17th day of November, 1978, in Tallahassee, Florida.


ROBERT T. BENTON, II

Hearing Officer

Division of Administrative Hearings Room 530, Carlton Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304

(904) 488-9675


COPIES FURNISHED:


Clifford Distributing Company 990 S.W. 21st Terrace

Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

Mary Jo M. Gallay Staff Attorney

725 South Bronough Street Tallahassee, Florida 32304


Docket for Case No: 78-001805
Issue Date Proceedings
Nov. 17, 1978 Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED.

Orders for Case No: 78-001805
Issue Date Document Summary
Nov. 17, 1978 Recommended Order Respondent is not culpably responsible in delivery to unlicensed premises made by employee for corporation. Culpable responsibility would mean knowledge of act by officer. Dismiss.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer