STATE OF FLORIDA
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
FRANKLIN W. HUDSON, )
)
Petitioner, )
)
vs. ) CASE NO. 83-233L
)
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND )
REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, )
)
Respondent. )
)
RECOMMENDED ORDER
This matter came on for hearing in Pensacola, Florida, before the Division of Administrative Hearings by its duly designated Hearing Officer, Robert T. Benton, II, on February 16, 1983.
APPEARANCES
For Petitioner: Appeared on his own behalf For Respondent: Maureen McGill, Esquire
Department of Health and
Rehabilitative Services
160 Governmental Center Pensacola, Florida 32522
The question in this case is whether Mr. Hudson's household is eligible for benefits under the Low Income Energy Assistance Program administered by respondent pursuant to Emergency Rule 10C-ER-83-1 and Rule 10E-29.01, et seq., Florida Administrative Code.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Mr. Hudson and his wife are long time residents of Pensacola. They live alone together in a house heated with natural gas. They still have not paid last month's gas bill in the amount of $74. Their combined gross monthly income amounts to $606, of which $147 is a social security payment and $3 is interest on savings. The remainder is "retirement checks", two pension payments attributable to the Hudsons' employment when they were younger. Neither is employed now.
Insurance premiums and perhaps other items are deducted monthly, and these deductions aggregate almost one hundred dollars.
Mr. Hudson has recently learned that he has cancer of the throat. He has undergone radiation therapy and incurred considerable medical expenses. He paid Baptist Hospital $260 just before last Christmas and spent $140 on drugs shortly after Christmas.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
Mr. and Mrs. Hudson would be eligible for home energy assistance in a single payment, if their household income were not so high. The parties stipulated that the Hudson household gross monthly income is $606. Although "[t]wenty percent of gross earned income," Rule 10C-29.09(2)(d), Florida Administrative Code, is excluded from consideration, there is no corresponding exclusion for unearned income, regardless of any deductions for insurance premiums or the like. Applying the maxim inclusio unius, exclusio alterius, medical expenses cannot be deducted from household income. Rule 10C-29.09(2), Florida Administrative Code.
For a household with two persons like the Hudsons' the maximum income consistent with eligibility for benefits under the Low Income Energy Assistance Program may be as high as $518.00, as stated by respondent's representatives at the hearing, or as low as $474. See Rule 10C-29.13(5), Florida Administrative Code. Since the Hudsons' income exceeds these amounts significantly, they are ineligible for benefits at this time.
Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is RECOMMENDED:
That respondent deny petitioner's application for benefits under the Low Income Energy Assistance Program.
DONE AND ENTERED this 23rd day of February, 1983, in Tallahassee, Florida.
ROBERT T. BENTON II
Hearing Officer
Division of Administrative Hearings The Oakland Building
2009 Apalachee Parkway
Tallahassee, Florida 32301
(904) 488-9675
Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 23rd day of February, 1983.
COPIES FURNISHED:
Franklin William Hudson 1607 E. Cervantes Street Pensacola, Florida 32501
Maureen McGill, Esquire Department of Health and
Rehabilitative Services
160 Governmental Center Pensacola, Florida 32522
David Pingree, Secretary Department of Health and
Rehabilitative Services 1323 Winewood Boulevard
Tallahassee, Florida 32301
Alicia Jacobs General Counsel
Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services
1323 Winewood Boulevard
Tallahassee, Florida 32301
Susan B. Kirkland, Esquire Department of Health and
Rehabilitative Services 1323 Winewood Boulevard
Tallahassee, Florida 32301
Issue Date | Proceedings |
---|---|
Feb. 23, 1983 | Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED. |
Issue Date | Document | Summary |
---|---|---|
Feb. 23, 1983 | Recommended Order | Petitioner is not entitled to low income energy assistance because monthly income too high. |
EUGENE CASH vs. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, 83-000233 (1983)
ADELE S. CONOVER vs. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, 83-000233 (1983)
BETTYE JEAN JENKINS vs. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, 83-000233 (1983)
AUDREY O. WIGGINS vs. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, 83-000233 (1983)
MURIEL L. LANTON vs. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, 83-000233 (1983)