Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

PAUL T. MYERS vs. FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION, 89-003112 (1989)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 89-003112 Visitors: 2
Judges: ROBERT T. BENTON, II
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Latest Update: Dec. 07, 1989
Summary: Whether respondent should grant petitioner's application for licensure as a real estate salesman or deny the same for the reasons set out in respondent's letter to petitioner dated June 7, 1989?Applicant failedd to carry burden to show entitlement to salesman's license.
89-3112

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


PAUL T. MYERS, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) CASE NO. 89-3112

) DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL ) REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ) ESTATE, )

)

Respondent. )

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


This matter came on for hearing in Jacksonville, Florida before Robert T. Benton, II, Hearing Officer of the Division of Administrative Hearings on November 7, 1989. Nobody appeared on behalf of petitioner.


APPEARANCES


For Respondent: Manuel E. Oliver, Esquire

Department of Legal Affairs

400 West Robinson, Suite 212 Orlando, Florida 32801


STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE


Whether respondent should grant petitioner's application for licensure as a real estate salesman or deny the same for the reasons set out in respondent's letter to petitioner dated June 7, 1989?


PRELIMINARY STATEMENT


After petitioner made application for a real estate salesman's license, respondent's counsel wrote him on June 7, 1989, advising him that the "Commission denied your application for licensure ... based on your answer to Question #7 of the licensing application and/or your criminal record according to the appropriate law enforcement agency."


In response, petitioner made timely request for a formal administrative hearing. In accordance with Section 120.57(1)(b) 3., Florida Statutes (1987), respondent transmitted petitioner's request to the Division of Administrative Hearings. Accordingly, "the Division has jurisdiction over the formal proceeding." Section 120.57(1)(b)3., Florida Statutes (1987).

FINDINGS OF FACT


Respondent introduced the only evidence offered at hearing, a copy of the application petitioner filed on March 7, 1989, including his answer to Question No. 7 on the application which consisted of several pages of documentation of an extensive criminal record. A partial list includes:


CHARGE(s)

DATE(s)

DISPOSITION(s)

DISORDERLY INTOX

06/06/79

NOL PROS

DRINKING OF VENDORS PREMISES

DISORDERLY INTOX

06/06/79


06/06/79

NOL PROS


NC ADJ. G. SENT 30 DAYS

CON OF ALC. BEV. ON

06/06/79

NC ADJ. G. SENT 30 DAYS

CITY PROPERTY

DISORDERLY INTOX


08/22/78


REC.


IN


CO. CLERK OFFICE

DRINKING ON VENDORS

08/22/78

REC.

IN

CO. CLERK OFFICE

PREMISES

DISORDERLY INTOX


04/13/78


SENT


30


DAYS NPT

NO VALID D.L.

04/13/78

SENT

30

DAYS NPT

DISORDERLY INTOX

04/07/78

SENT 2 DAYS NPT

DWI

05/27/77

NC SENT 30 DAYS

NO VALID D.L.

05/27/77

NOL PROS

DISORDERLY INTOX

05/03/77

NOL PROS

DISORDERLY INTOX

04/01/77

NOL PROS

DISORDERLY INTOX

03/02/77

SENT 15 DAYS NPT

LOITERING

03/02/77

NOL PROS

DISORDERLY INTOX

01/07/77

SENT 10 DAYS NPT

DISORDERLY INTOX

01/05/77

NC SENT 30 DAYS SUSPENDED

DISORDERLY INTOX

01/04/77

PG SENT 10 DAYS SUSPENDED

DISORDERLY INTOX

11/10/76

PG SENT 10 DAYS S/S

DISORDERLY INTOX

07/15/76

SENT 30 DAYS

DISORDERLY CONDUCT FIGHTING

DISORDERLY INTOX

07/15/76


04/16/76

NOL PROS


SENT 30 DAYS

F.T.A. ON DISORDERLY

04/16/76

DISCHARGED

INTOX

DISORDERLY INTOX 06/12/75 REC. IN CO. CLERKS OFFICE DISORDERLY INTOX 05/17/75 DISCH.

PUBLIC PROFANITY 05/17/75 DISCH.

MAKING THREATS 05/17/75 SENT 30 DAYS NPT VIOLATION OF FINANCIAL 05/17/75 REC. IN CO. CLERKS OFFICE

REST. LAW

DISORDERLY INTOX

03/19/75

NOL PROS

DWI

10/28/74

SENT 6 MOS. NPT

NO D.L.

10/28/74

SENT 3 MOS. NPT

WORTHLESS CHECK

05/26/74

SENT 60 DAYS NPT

DWI

05/26/74

SENT 90 DAYS NPT

NO D.L.

05/26/74

SENT 90 DAYS NPT

IMPROPER TURN

05/26/74

SENT 10 DAYS NPT

CARELESS DRIVING

04/11/74

PG SENT 10 DAYS NPT

DWI

04/11/74

PG SENT 10 DAYS NPT

NO D.L.

04/11/74

PG SENT 10 DAYS NPT

INDECENT EXPOSURE

04/11/74

PG SENT 10 DAYS NPT

LOITERING

03/10/74

NOL PROS

PUBLIC INTOX

03/10/74

SENT 10 DAYS NPT

PUBLIC INTOX

11/03/73

SENT 1 DAY NPT

PUBLIC INTOX

10/19/73

REC. IN CO. CLERK OFFICE

DISORDERLY CONDUCT

04/04/72

SENT

30

DAYS


DRUNK





PUBLIC INTOX

04/14/73

SENT

60

DAYS

FIGHTING

04/14/73

REC.

IN

CO. CLERKS

OFFICE

ASSAULT TO MURDER

07/22/72

REC.

IN

CO. CLERKS

OFFICE

FUGITIVE

03/16/72

SENT

20

DAYS


DISORDERLY CONDUCT

03/15/72

SENT

75

DAYS S/S


DRUNK

DISORDERLY CONDUCT 11/13/71 SENT 60 DAYS DRUNK

DISORDERLY CONDUCT 11/10/71 SENT 60 DAYS S/S DRUNK

PROFANITY


11/10/71

DISCH.


DISORDERLY

CONDUCT

08/20/71

SENT 30

DAYS

DRUNK





DISORDERLY

INTOX

05/03/77

NOL PROS



DISORDERLY

INTOX

04/01/77

NOL PROS



DISORDERLY

INTOX

03/02/77

SENT 15

DAYS

NPT


Respondent's Exhibit No. 1. Other skirmishes with the law date to 1950 and have occurred as recently as 1984. Without evidence of rehabilitation since these problems with the criminal law, there is no basis for any finding other than the fact of petitioner's admitted criminal violations.


CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


The courts view it "as fundamental that an applicant for license or permit carries `the ultimate burden of persuasion' of entitlement through all proceedings, of whatever nature, until such time as final action has been taken by the agency. Florida Department of Transportation v. J.W.C. Co., Inc., 396 So.2d 778, 787 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Zemour, Inc., v. State Division of Beverage,

347 So.2d 1102 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977)(lack of good moral character found "from evidence submitted by the applicant"). See generally Balino v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 348 So.2d 349 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).


After respondent apprised petitioner of the basis for its intended denial of his application for a license as a real estate salesman, it was incumbent upon petitioner to demonstrate, if he could, entitlement. But, at the time and place appointed for hearing, petitioner failed to appear, and no proof was adduced on his behalf.


RECOMMENDATION


It is accordingly, RECOMMENDED:

That respondent deny petitioner's application for a real estate salesman's license.

DONE and ENTERED this 7th day of December, 1989, in Tallahassee, Florida.


ROBERT T. BENTON, II

Hearing Officer

Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1550

(904) 488-9675


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 7th day of December, 1989.


COPIES FURNISHED:


Paul T. Myers

4550 Crescent Street, Apt. 6

Jacksonville, Florida 32205


Manuel E. Oliver, Esquire Department of Legal Affairs

400 West Robinson, Suite 212 Orlando, Florida 32801


Docket for Case No: 89-003112
Issue Date Proceedings
Dec. 07, 1989 Recommended Order (hearing held , 2013). CASE CLOSED.

Orders for Case No: 89-003112
Issue Date Document Summary
Dec. 07, 1989 Recommended Order Applicant failedd to carry burden to show entitlement to salesman's license.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer