Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

ALICE MAYE ATKINS vs BOARD OF ARCHITECTURE AND INTERIOR DESIGN, 91-006983 (1991)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 91-006983 Visitors: 4
Petitioner: ALICE MAYE ATKINS
Respondent: BOARD OF ARCHITECTURE AND INTERIOR DESIGN
Judges: ROBERT T. BENTON, II
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: Tallahassee, Florida
Filed: Oct. 30, 1991
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Thursday, May 14, 1992.

Latest Update: Oct. 23, 1992
Summary: Whether petitioner has abandoned her application for licensure as an interior designer?Applicant's failure to appear at hearing requires denial of application.
91-6983.PDF

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


ALICE MAYE ATKINS, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) CASE NO. 91-6983

) DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL ) REGULATION, BOARD OF ) ARCHITECTURE AND INTERIOR ) DESIGN, )

)

Respondent. )

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER

This matter came on for hearing in Tallahassee, Florida, before Robert T. Benton, II, Hearing Officer of the Division of Administrative Hearings, on April 27, 1992. Neither petitioner nor anybody on her behalf appeared.


APPEARANCES


For Petitioner: No appearance


For Respondent: Arthur R. Wiedinger, Jr.

Assistant Attorney General Suite 1603, The Capitol Tallahassee, FL 32399-1050


STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE


Whether petitioner has abandoned her application for licensure as an interior designer?


PRELIMINARY STATEMENT


By letter dated August 21, 1991, respondent advised petitioner that her application for registration or licensure as an interior designer had been denied. The letter stated:


The Board notified you by certified mail, if you did not comply with all the requested information for reconsideration by the deadline, your file would be abandoned. Your deadline has passed and your file remains incomplete.


In accordance with Section 120.60, Florida Statutes, you have the right to request a hearing on the denial of your application. The hearing will be conducted pursuant to Section 120.57(1), F.S. and Rule 22I-6.004, F.A.C.

Petitioner did request a formal hearing, and the matter was referred to the Division of Administrative Hearings for hearing, in accordance with Section 120.57(1)(b)3, Florida Statutes (1991).


FINDINGS OF FACT


  1. At the time and place scheduled for hearing petitioner failed to appear and put on proof.


    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


  2. The courts view it "as fundamental that an applicant for a license or permit carries 'the ultimate burden of persuasion' of entitlement through all proceedings, of whatever nature, until such time as final action has been taken by the agency." Florida Department of Transportation v. J.W.C. Co., Inc., 396 So.2d 778, 787 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Zemour, Inc., v. State Division of Beverage,

347 So.2d 1102 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977) (lack of good moral character found "from evidence submitted by the applicant"). See generally Balino v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 348 So.2d 349 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). Petitioner failed to carry her burden in this case.


RECOMMENDATION


It is, accordingly, RECOMMENDED:

That respondent deny petitioner's application, without prejudice to the filing of a subsequent application.


DONE and ENTERED this 14th day of May, 1992, in Tallahassee, Florida.



COPIES FURNISHED:


ROBERT T. BENTON, II

Hearing Officer

Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, FL 32399-1550

(904) 488-9675


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 14th day of May, 1992.


Arthur R. Weidinger, Jr., Esquire Department of Legal Affairs Suite 1603-The Capitol Tallahassee, FL 32399-1050


Alice Maye Atkins

155 Marilyn Drive #47-A Baton Rouge, LA 70815-5609

Angel Gonzalez, Executive Director

Board of Architecture and Interior Design 1940 North Monroe Street

Tallahassee, FL 32399-0792


Jack McRay, General Counsel Department of Professional Regulation 1940 North Monroe Street

Tallahassee, FL 32399-0792


NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS


ALL PARTIES HAVE THE RIGHT TO SUBMIT WRITTEN EXCEPTIONS TO THIS RECOMMENDED ORDER. ALL AGENCIES ALLOW EACH PARTY AT LEAST 10 DAYS IN WHICH TO SUBMIT WRITTEN EXCEPTIONS. YOU SHOULD CONTACT THE AGENCY THAT WILL ISSUE THE FINAL ORDER IN THIS CASE CONCERNING AGENCY RULES ON THE DEADLINE FOR FILING EXCEPTIONS TO THIS RECOMMENDED ORDER. ANY EXCEPTIONS TO THIS RECOMMENDED ORDER SHOULD BE FILED WITH THE AGENCY THAT WILL ISSUE THE FINAL ORDER IN THIS CASE.


Docket for Case No: 91-006983
Issue Date Proceedings
Oct. 23, 1992 (Final) Order filed.
May 14, 1992 Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED. Hearing held 04/27/92.
Apr. 22, 1992 (Respondent) Prehearing Statement filed.
Jan. 14, 1992 Respondent`s Notice of Serving Interrogatories w/Interrogatories to Petitioner, Alice Maye Atkins filed.
Dec. 10, 1991 Order sent out. (hearing set for April 27, 1992).
Dec. 10, 1991 Notice of Hearing sent out. (hearing set for April 27, 1992; 10:00am; Tallahassee).
Nov. 25, 1991 Letter to RTB from Alice Maye Atkins (re: Initial Order) filed.
Nov. 04, 1991 Initial Order issued.
Oct. 30, 1991 Agency referral letter; Request for Administrative Hearing, letter form; Agency Action Letter filed.

Orders for Case No: 91-006983
Issue Date Document Summary
Sep. 30, 1992 Agency Final Order
May 14, 1992 Recommended Order Applicant's failure to appear at hearing requires denial of application.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer