Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

WILLIAM E. SHEARER vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 92-002391RX (1992)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 92-002391RX Visitors: 14
Petitioner: WILLIAM E. SHEARER
Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Judges: K. N. AYERS
Agency: Department of Corrections
Locations: Tallahassee, Florida
Filed: Apr. 20, 1992
Status: Closed
DOAH Final Order on Thursday, April 30, 1992.

Latest Update: Feb. 11, 1993
Summary: Held petition alleged complaint of action taken by deptartmentand not a challenge to a rule.
92-2391

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


WILLIAM E. SHEARER, )

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) CASE NO. 92-2391RXP

)

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, )

)

)

Respondent. )

)


FINAL

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION


By Petition for an Administrative Hearing dated April 15, 1992, William E. Shearer, Petitioner, alleges that in transferring him from DeSoto Correctional Institution to Hendry Correctional Institution the Department of Corrections, Respondent, violated provisions of Section 33-6, Florida Administrative Code.

On April 24, 1992, the Department of Corrections filed a Motion to Dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.


Although the Petition was accepted by the Division of Administrative Hearings as a rule challenge and assigned to the undersigned Hearing Officer, a careful reading of the Petition fails to disclose Petitioner even desires to contest the validity of Chapter 33-6, Florida Administrative Code. The complaint is merely that the Department failed to follow its rules in transferring Petitioner from DeSoto Correctional Institution to Hendry Correctional Institution.


This is an allegation that Petitioner is a person whose substantial interests have been adversely affected by the Department's action, and he desires to contest that action. This is the type action brought in a Section 120.57, Florida Statutes, proceeding in which the substantial interests of a party are determined by an agency. However, Section 120.52(12)(d) precludes prisoners from participating in a Section 120.57(12)(d) proceeding. No rule is here alleged to be an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority, and the Division of Administrative Hearings is without jurisdiction to entertain a Section 120.57(1) petition from an inmate of a Florida Correctional Institution. It is, therefore,


ORDERED that the Petition for an Administrative Hearing filed by William E. Shearer be dismissed.

DONE and ORDERED this 30th day of April, 1992, in Tallahassee, Florida.



K. N. AYERS Hearing Officer

Division of Administrative Hearings The Desoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, FL 32399-1550

(904) 488-9675


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 30th day of April, 1992.


Copies furnished to:


William E. Shearer 100859

Hendry Correctional Institution Route 2, Box 13-A MB 845

Immokalee, FL 33934


Louis A. Vargas, Esquire Department of Corrections 2601 Blairstone Road

Tallahassee, FL 32399-2500


Claire Dryfuss, Esquire Assistant Attorney General The Capitol, Suite 1603 Tallahassee, FL 32399-1050


Carroll Webb, Executive Director Administrative Procedures Committee Holland Building, Room 120 Tallahassee, FL 32399-1300


Donna Malphurs

Department of Corrections 2601 Blairstone Road

Suite 439

Tallahassee, FL 32399-2500

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO JUDICIAL REVIEW


A PARTY WHO IS ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY THIS FINAL ORDER IS ENTITLED TO JUDICIAL REVIEW PURSUANT TO SECTION 120.68, FLORIDA STATUTES. REVIEW PROCEEDINGS ARE GOVERNED BY THE FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE. SUCH PROCEEDINGS ARE COMMENCED BY FILING ONE COPY OF A NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH THE AGENCY CLERK OF THE DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND A SECOND COPY, ACCOMPANIED BY FILING FEES PRESCRIBED BY LAW, WITH THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST DISTRICT, OR WITH THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL IN THE APPELLATE DISTRICT WHERE THE PARTY RESIDES. THE NOTICE OF APPEAL MUST BE FILED WITHIN 30 DAYS OF RENDITION OF THE ORDER TO BE REVIEWED.


Docket for Case No: 92-002391RX
Issue Date Proceedings
Feb. 11, 1993 BY ORDER OF THE COURT (appeal dismissed) filed.
Sep. 21, 1992 Index, Record, Certificate of Record sent out.
Jul. 22, 1992 Index & Statement of Service sent out.
Jun. 12, 1992 Order Certifying Indigency sent out.
Jun. 12, 1992 Order Certifying Indigency sent out. (petitioner appears to be indigent, is hereby certified as being entitled to receive services of the courts, sheriffs and clerks of this state with respect to these proceedings without charges.
Jun. 10, 1992 Letter to DOAH from DCA filed. DCA Case No. 1-92-1900.
Jun. 04, 1992 Certificate of Notice of Appeal sent out.
Jun. 02, 1992 Notice of Appeal filed.
Apr. 30, 1992 Final Order (hearing held , 2013). CASE CLOSED.
Apr. 30, 1992 Final Order Dismissing Petition sent out.
Apr. 27, 1992 (Respondent) Motion to Dismiss For Lack of Jurisdiction w/Motion to Dismiss filed.
Apr. 22, 1992 Order of Assignment sent out.
Apr. 21, 1992 Letter to Liz Cloud & Carroll Webb from Marguerite Lockard
Apr. 20, 1992 Petition for An Administrative Hearing filed.

Orders for Case No: 92-002391RX
Issue Date Document Summary
Apr. 30, 1992 DOAH Final Order Held petition alleged complaint of action taken by deptartmentand not a challenge to a rule.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer