Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

VIOLETA RODRIGUEZ AND LUIS SOTO, O/B/O JASMIN SOTO vs FLORIDA BIRTH-RELATED NEUROLOGICAL INJURY COMPENSATION ASSOCIATION, 93-002976N (1993)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 93-002976N Visitors: 18
Petitioner: VIOLETA RODRIGUEZ AND LUIS SOTO, O/B/O JASMIN SOTO
Respondent: FLORIDA BIRTH-RELATED NEUROLOGICAL INJURY COMPENSATION ASSOCIATION
Judges: WILLIAM J. KENDRICK
Agency: Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Association
Locations: Miami, Florida
Filed: Jun. 02, 1993
Status: Closed
DOAH Final Order on Tuesday, December 7, 1993.

Latest Update: Apr. 03, 2000
Summary: By amended petition filed March 29, 1993, petitioners, Jasmin Soto, a minor, by and through her parents and natural guardians, Violeta Rodriguez and Luis Soto, sought benefits pursuant to Sections 766.301 - 766.316, Florida Statutes, the "Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan." In reply to such petition, respondent, Florida Birth- Related Neurological Injury Compensation Association (NICA), filed a response contending that the subject claim was not compensable because the i
More
93-2976


STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


JASMIN SOTO, a minor, by and ) through her parents and natural ) guardians, VIOLETA RODRIGUEZ and ) LUIS SOTO, )

)

Petitioners, )

)

vs. ) CASE NO. 93-2976N

) FLORIDA BIRTH-RELATED NEUROLOGICAL ) INJURY COMPENSATION ASSOCIATION, )

)

Respondent. )

)


FINAL ORDER


This cause came on for consideration of the Amended Petition for Benefits Pursuant to Florida Statute Section 766.301 et seq., respondent's response to the petition for benefits, and the parties' joint stipulation filed December 2, 1993.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE


  1. By amended petition filed March 29, 1993, petitioners, Jasmin Soto, a minor, by and through her parents and natural guardians, Violeta Rodriguez and Luis Soto, sought benefits pursuant to Sections 766.301 - 766.316, Florida Statutes, the "Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan."

  2. In reply to such petition, respondent, Florida Birth- Related Neurological Injury Compensation Association (NICA), filed

    a response contending that the subject claim was not compensable because the infant did not suffer a birth-related neurological injury as defined by law.

    FINDINGS OF FACT


  3. By stipulation filed December 2, 1993, petitioners and respondent stipulated as follows:

    1. That pursuant to Chapter 766.301- 766.316, Florida Statutes, a claim was filed on behalf of the above-styled infant against the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Association (the "Association") on behalf of Jasmin Soto, Violeta Rodriguez and Luis Soto (the "Petitioners") for benefits under Chapter 766.301-766.316 (F.S.) 1988.

    2. That a timely filed claim for benefits complying with the requirements of F.S.

      766.305 was filed by the Petitioners and a timely denial was filed on behalf of the Association.

    3. That the infant, Jasmin Soto, was born at Baptist Hospital on September 29, 1990, and that the said hospital was a licensed Florida Hospital and the attending physician was a participating physician within the meaning of Chapter 766, Florida Statutes.

    4. That the Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction of the parties and the subject matter of this claim.

    5. That Section 766.302(2), Florida Statutes, states that "birth-related neurological injury" means injury to the brain or spinal cord of a live infant weighing at least 2500 grams at birth caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post- delivery in a hospital, which renders the infant permanently and substantially, mentally and physically impaired.

    6. The parties agree that Jasmin Soto suffers from a right brachial plexus injury.

    7. That the parties stipulate to the authenticity of the medical records and/or medical reports of Michael Duchowny, M.D., who appears on behalf of the Respondents and Leon I. Charash, M.D., who appears on behalf of the Petitioner. While Dr. Charash has not been deposed, Dr. Duchowny has been deposed and his deposition is submitted as part of this Stipulation.

    8. The parties stipulate that there are no other pertinent medical facts to be considered by the Division of Administrative Hearings. The parties further Stipulate that if the parties were to proceed to a hearing on the merits no further proof would be offered and traditional burdens of proof would apply.

    9. Based upon this stipulation, the parties request the hearing officer to rule on Petitioner's claim based upon this Stipulation, the attached medical records and the deposition of Dr. Duchowny.


  4. The neurological examinations of Jasmin reveal that she suffered from a "mild" to "moderate" right Erb's palsy related directly to the right brachial plexus injury she received at birth. A brachial plexus injury, the cause of Erb's palsy, is not, however, a brain or spinal cord injury. Moreover, Jasmin's mental functioning is normal and not impaired due to any birth- related complications.

    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


  5. The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the parties to, and the subject of, these proceedings.

    Section 766.301, et seq., Florida Statutes, as amended by Chapter 93-251, Laws of Florida.

  6. The Florida Birth-Related Neurological Compensation Plan (the "Plan") was established by the Legislature "for the purpose of providing compensation, irrespective of fault, for birth- related neurological injury claims" relating to births occurring on or after January 1, 1989. Section 766.303(1), Florida Statutes.

  7. The injured "infant, his personal representative, parents, dependents, and the next of kin," may seek compensation under the Plan by filing a claim for compensation with the Division of Administrative Hearings within five years of the infant's birth. Sections 766.302(2), 766.303(2), 766.305(1) and 766.313, Florida Statutes. The Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Association (NICA), which administers the Plan, has "45 days from the date of service of a complete claim .

    . . in which to file a response to the petition and to submit relevant written information relating to the issue of whether the injury is a birth-related neurological injury." Section 766.305(3), Florida Statutes.

  8. If NICA determines that the injury alleged in a claim is a compensable birth-related neurological injury, it may award compensation to the claimant, provided that the award is approved by the Hearing Officer to whom the claim has been assigned.

    Section 766.305(6), Florida Statutes. If, on the other hand, NICA disputes the claim, as it has in the instant case, the dispute must be resolved by the assigned Hearing Officer in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 120, Florida Statutes. Sections 766.304, 766.307, 766.309 and 766.31, Florida Statutes.

  9. In discharging this responsibility, the Hearing Officer must make the following determinations based upon the available evidence:

    1. Whether the injury claimed is a birth- related neurological injury. If the claimant has demonstrated, to the satisfaction of the hearing officer, that the infant has sustained a brain or spinal cord injury caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury and that the infant was thereby rendered permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired, a rebuttable presumption shall arise that the injury is a birth-related neurological injury as defined in s. 766.302(2).

    2. Whether obstetrical services were delivered by a participating physician in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period in a hospital; or by a certified nurse midwife in a teaching hospital supervised by a participating physician in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period in a hospital.


    Section 766.309(1), Florida Statutes. 1/ An award may be sustained only if the Hearing Officer concludes that the "infant has sustained a birth-related neurological injury and that obstetrical services were delivered by a participating physician at birth." Section 766.31(1), Florida Statutes.

  10. Pertinent to this case, "birth-related neurological injury" is defined by Section 766.302(2), Florida Statutes, to mean:

    . . . injury to the brain or spinal cord of a live infant weighing at least 2,500 grams at birth caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period in a hospital, which renders the infant permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired. This definition shall apply to live births only and shall not include congenital abnormality.


  11. Here, the parties have stipulated that the attending physician who provided obstetric services during the birth of Jasmin Soto was a "participating physician" as that term is defined by Section 766.302(7), Florida Statutes, and as that term is used in Sections 766.301 through 766.316, Florida Statutes. However, the record developed in this case demonstrates that Jasmin Soto has not suffered a "birth-related neurological injury," within the meaning of Section 766.302(2), Florida Statutes. As noted in the findings of fact, the record demonstrated that a right brachial plexus injury was not "a brain or spinal cord injury" and, moreover, that Jasmin Soto was not "permanently and substantially mentally . . . impaired." Accordingly, the subject claim is non-compensable under the Plan. Sections 766.302(2), 766.309(1) and 766.31(1), Florida Statutes.

  12. Where, as here, "the hearing officer determines that . .


. the injury alleged is not a birth-related neurological injury .


. . he [is required to] enter an order [to such effect] and . . . cause a copy of such order to be sent immediately to the parties by registered or certified mail." Section 766.309(2), Florida Statutes. Such an order constitutes final agency action subject to appellate court review. Section 766.311(1), Florida Statutes.

CONCLUSION


Based on the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, it is

ORDERED that the petition for compensation filed by Jasmin Soto, a minor, by and through her parents and natural guardians, Violeta Rodriguez and Lisa Soto, be and the same is hereby denied with prejudice.

DONE AND ORDERED in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida, this 7th day of December 1993.


WILLIAM J. KENDRICK

Hearing Officer

Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1550

(904) 488-9675


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 7th day of December 1993.

ENDNOTE


1/ Where, as here, NICA disputes the claim, the burden rests on the claimant to demonstrate entitlement to compensation. Section 766.309(1)(a), Florida Statutes. See also, Balino v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 348 So.2d 3489, 350 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977), ("the burden of proof, apart from statute, is on the party asserting the affirmative issue before an administrative tribunal").


COPIES FURNISHED:

(By certified mail)


David J. Halberg, Esquire 2701 South Bayshore Drive Miami, Florida 33133-5387


Mark L. Zientz, Esquire Williams & Zientz

Suite 1100 Two Datran Center 9130 South Dadeland Boulevard Miami, Florida 33156


Lynn Dickinson, Executive Director Florida Birth-Related Neurological

Injury Compensation Association Post Office Box 1528 Tallahassee, Florida 32302


NOTICE OF RIGHT TO JUDICIAL REVIEW


A party who is adversely affected by this final order is entitled to judicial review pursuant to Sections 120.68 and 766.311, Florida Statutes. Review proceedings are governed by the Florida Rules Of Appellate Procedure. Such proceedings are commenced by filing one copy of a notice of appeal with the Agency Clerk Of The Division Of Administrative Hearings and a second copy, accompanied by filing fees prescribed by law, with the District Court Of Appeal, First District, or with the District Court Of Appeal in the appellate district where the party resides. The notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of rendition of the order to be reviewed.


Docket for Case No: 93-002976N
Issue Date Proceedings
Apr. 03, 2000 Order filed.
Dec. 07, 1993 CASE CLOSED. Final Order sent out. (facts stipulated)
Dec. 02, 1993 (joint) Stipulation w/CC Deposition of Michael Duchowny, M.D. & Exhibits 1-3 filed.
Dec. 01, 1993 Order sent out. (Re: Qualified Representative)
Nov. 15, 1993 (Respondent) Motion to Act as a Qualified Representative Before the Division of Administrative Hearings filed.
Sep. 02, 1993 Notice of Hearing sent out. (hearing set for 11/23/93; 8:30am; Miami)
Aug. 23, 1993 Notice of Appearance filed. (From Mark L. Zientz)
Aug. 19, 1993 (Respondent) Compliance With Order Dated July 29th, 1993 filed.
Aug. 16, 1993 (Petitioners) Compliance With Order Dated July 29, 1993 filed.
Jul. 29, 1993 Order sent out. (Status report due 8/13/93)
Jun. 22, 1993 Notification card sent out.
Jun. 15, 1993 Notice of Appearance filed.
Jun. 15, 1993 Notification of Claim sent to Dr. Charlot c/o Baptist Hospital by the Agency filed.
Jun. 15, 1993 Letter to L. Dickinson from M. Stallworth (regarding amended petition) filed.
Jun. 15, 1993 (J. Nelson) Order filed.
Jun. 15, 1993 (Compensation Claim) Order filed.
Jun. 15, 1993 Notice of Hearing (Pretrial) filed.
Jun. 15, 1993 Notice of Hearing (hearing held 10/16/92) filed.
Jun. 15, 1993 Letter to L. Dickinson from D. Davis (receipt of claim by the Division of Workers` Compensation) filed.
Jun. 15, 1993 Notice of Hearing (set for 2/5/93) filed.
Jun. 15, 1993 Letter dated November 13, 1993 to D. Davis from D. Halberg enclosing medical records filed.
Jun. 15, 1993 Notice of Rehearing (set for 10/21/92; 2:45 p.m.) filed.
Jun. 15, 1993 Letter to D. Halberg from L. Dickinson (advising that J. Soto did not suffer a birth-related neurological injury as defined in section 766.302(3), Florida Statutes) filed.
Jun. 15, 1993 NICA Notice of Hearing set for August 7, 1993 filed.
Jun. 15, 1993 (Petitioner) Request for Admissions filed.
Jun. 15, 1993 Re-Notice of Hearing (set for 3/26/93; 3:00pm) (signed 2/9/93) filed.
Jun. 15, 1993 Letter to L. Dickinson from M. Stallworth (regarding amended petition) filed.
Jun. 15, 1993 Claim Acknowledgement (2nd Amended) filed.
Jun. 15, 1993 Petitioner`s Witness List (signed 4/23/93) filed.
Jun. 15, 1993 Respondent`s Witness List (signed 4/26/93) filed.
Jun. 15, 1993 Notice to Bureau of Records of Transfer of File (6/3/93) filed.
Jun. 15, 1993 (LES) Notice of Hearing (set for 10/16/92) filed.
Jun. 15, 1993 (NICA) Motion to Dismiss filed.
Jun. 15, 1993 Letter to D. Davis from D. Halberg (dated 11/13/91with medical records attached) filed.
Jun. 15, 1993 Notice of Filing; Witness deposition of Jean B. L. Charlot filed.
Jun. 15, 1993 Claim Acknowledgement (2/28/92) filed.
Jun. 15, 1993 Letter to L. Dickinson from M. Stallworth dated 12/1/92 (+ enclosed copy of amended petition) filed.
Jun. 07, 1993 Claimants` Notice of Hearing (3/23/93) filed.
Jun. 02, 1993 NICA Medical Records filed (not available for viewing).
Jun. 02, 1993 Claim Acknowledgement (09/23/92) filed.
Jun. 02, 1993 Letter to D. Davis from D. Halberg (second amended petition) filed.
Jun. 02, 1993 Letter to J. Baptiste Charlot from M. Stallworth (notice of receipt of amended petition) filed.
Jun. 02, 1993 Claim Acknowledgement (12/09/92) filed.
Jun. 02, 1993 Letter to D. Davis from D. Halberg (amended petition for compensation) filed.
Jun. 02, 1993 Memo from M. Stallworth from J. Duell (enclosing Dr. Duchowny`s medical evaluation) filed.
Jun. 02, 1993 Letter to L. Dickinson from M. Stallworth referencing amended petition (no enclosures) filed.
Jun. 02, 1993 Letter to J. P. Batiste Charlot from M. Stallworth (re: amended claim for compensation) filed.
Jun. 02, 1993 Letter dated November 16, 1992 to D. Davis from D. Halberg filed.
Jun. 02, 1993 Claim Acknowledgement filed. (4/13/93)
Jun. 02, 1993 Agency Referral Letter filed.
Jun. 02, 1993 ***CASE FORWARDED TO DOAH FROM LES*****

Orders for Case No: 93-002976N
Issue Date Document Summary
Dec. 07, 1993 DOAH Final Order Brachial plexus injury not found to be an injury to the brain or spinal cord and therefore not a birth-related neurological injury as defined by law.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer