Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

ATTORNEY GENERAL AND STATEWIDE PROSECUTOR vs PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RELATIONS COMMISSION, 96-003318RX (1996)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 96-003318RX Visitors: 24
Petitioner: ATTORNEY GENERAL AND STATEWIDE PROSECUTOR
Respondent: PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RELATIONS COMMISSION
Judges: WILLIAM J. KENDRICK
Agency: Public Employee Relations Commission
Locations: Tallahassee, Florida
Filed: Jul. 12, 1996
Status: Closed
DOAH Final Order on Tuesday, July 30, 1996.

Latest Update: Jul. 30, 1996
Summary: By petition filed July 12, 1996, petitioners, the Attorney General and the Statewide Prosecutor, sought a determination that Rule 38D-17.023(2)(b), Florida Administrative Code, was an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority because, inter alia, respondent, Public Employees Relations Commission, had exceeded its grant of rulemaking authority and the challenged rule enlarged, modified or contravened the specific provisions of law implemented. On July 23, 1996, the parties filed a joint
More
96-3318

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


ATTORNEY GENERAL and STATEWIDE ) PROSECUTOR, )

)

Petitioners, )

)

vs. ) CASE NO. 96-3318RX

)

PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RELATIONS )

COMMISSION, )

)

Respondent. )

)


FINAL ORDER


This cause came on for consideration of the petition for administrative determination of the invalidity of Rule 38D-17.023(2)(b), Florida Administrative Code, and the joint motion and stipulation of the parties, filed July 23, 1996.


STATEMENT OF THE CASE


  1. By petition filed July 12, 1996, petitioners, the Attorney General and the Statewide Prosecutor, sought a determination that Rule 38D-17.023(2)(b), Florida Administrative Code, was an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority because, inter alia, respondent, Public Employees Relations Commission, had exceeded its grant of rulemaking authority and the challenged rule enlarged, modified or contravened the specific provisions of law implemented.


  2. On July 23, 1996, the parties filed a joint motion for final order wherein they stipulated that "the passage of [Section] 447.203(3)(j), Florida Statutes, which excludes from the definition of public employee those persons who by virtue of their positions of employment are regulated by the Florida Supreme Court pursuant to s. 15, Article V of the State Constitution removes the Respondent's statutory authority to promulgate or maintain the challenged rule." The parties further stipulated that "the most cost effective and expeditious manner of settling this case is to ask the hearing officer to enter a final order declaring rule 38D-17.023(2)(b), F.A.C., invalid."


    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


  3. The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the parties to, and the subject matter of, these proceedings. Section 120.56, Florida Statutes.


  4. Here, petitioners have challenged the validity of Rule 38D- 17.023(2)(b), Florida Administrative Code, which accords Respondent authority to define a bargaining unit of State employed attorneys. The predicate for petitioners challenge is their contention that upon the enactment of Section 447.203(3)(j), Florida Statutes, respondent's authority to define a bargaining

    unit of state-employed attorneys was repealed and, therefore, the existent rule is invalid. Respondent concurs with petitioners' analysis.


  5. Pursuant to Chapter 447, Florida Statutes, respondent is authorized to define a bargaining unit for public employees. However, Section 447.203(3)(j), Florida Statutes, effective March 30, 1994, expressly excluded from the term "public employee," "[t]hose persons who by virtue of their positions of employment are regulated by the Florida Supreme Court pursuant to s. 15, Art. V of the State Constitution."


  6. Given the enactment of Section 447.203(3)(j), Florida Statutes, respondent's authority to define a bargaining unit of state-employed attorneys has been repealed. Consequently, Rule 38D-17.023(2)(b), Florida Administrative Code, is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.


RECOMMENDATION


Based on the foregoing, it is


ORDERED that the subject petition to determine the invalidity of Rule 38D- 17.023(2)(b), Florida Administrative Code, is granted, and Rule 38D- 17.023(2)(b), Florida Administrative Code, is found to be an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.


DONE AND ORDERED this 30th day of July, 1996, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.



WILLIAM J. KENDRICK, Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1550

(904) 488-9675


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 30th day of July, 1996.


COPIES FURNISHED:


Claire D. Dryfuss, Esquire

M. Catherine Lannon, Esquire Office of the Attorney General The Capitol, Plaza Level 01 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1050


Jack E. Ruby, Esquire

2596 Seagate Drive, Suite 100

Tallahassee, Florida 32301-5032


Carroll Webb, Executive Director Administrative Procedures Committee Holland Building, Room 120 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1300


NOTICE OF RIGHT TO JUDICIAL REVIEW


A party who is adversely affected by this final order is entitled to judicial review pursuant to Section 120.68, Florida Statutes. Review proceedings are governed by the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. Such proceedings are commenced by filing one copy of a Notice of Appeal with the Agency Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings and a second copy, accompanied by filing fees prescribed by law, with the District Court of Appeal, First District, or with the District Court of Appeal in the appellate district where the party resides. The Notice of Appeal must be filed within 30 days of rendition of the order to be reviewed.


Docket for Case No: 96-003318RX
Issue Date Proceedings
Jul. 30, 1996 CASE CLOSED. Final Order sent out. Hearing held 07/23/96.
Jul. 23, 1996 Joint Motion for Final Order (filed via facsimile).
Jul. 19, 1996 Order of Assignment sent out.
Jul. 17, 1996 Letter to Liz Cloud & Carroll Webb from M. Lockard w/cc: Agency General Counsel sent out.
Jul. 17, 1996 (PERC) Motion for Protective Order filed.
Jul. 12, 1996 Petition for Administrative Determination of the Invalidity of an Existing Rule; Petitioners' Motion for Expedited Discovery Schedule; Notice of Service of Petitioners' First Set of Interrogatories; Petitioners' First Request for Admissions; Petitioners'

Orders for Case No: 96-003318RX
Issue Date Document Summary
Jul. 30, 1996 DOAH Final Order Public Employees Relations Commission rule defining a bargaining unit of state employed attorney's held invalid.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer