Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs ALLEN M. BREGMAN, 96-004847 (1996)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 96-004847 Visitors: 22
Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD
Respondent: ALLEN M. BREGMAN
Judges: SUSAN BELYEU KIRKLAND
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: Tallahassee, Florida
Filed: Oct. 14, 1996
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Thursday, December 2, 1999.

Latest Update: Jul. 15, 2004
Summary: General contractor did not have a license to do roofing work, but contracted to perform roofing repair. No permit was pulled for the project.
[2 -2b-04 STATE OF FLORIDA CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD Final Order No. BPR-2000-01053 Date: $= 14-00 FILED DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND Department of Business and Professional Regulation PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, AGENCY CLERK p at Prada. Wachman, Agency Clerk Petitioner, wy nada MM dé j he -VS- CASE NO.: 95-16327 DOAH CASE NO.: 96-4847 2. LICENSE NO.: CG C013101 Sb -C bo ALLEN M. BREGMAN, Respondent. FINA E THIS MATTER came before the Construction Industry Licensing Board (hereinafter referred to as the “Board”) pursuant to Section 120.57(1)(j), F.S., on February 10, 2000, in Atlantic Beach, Florida, for consideration of the Recommended Order (a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference) issued by the Administrative Law Judge in the above styled case. The Petitioner was represented by Cate O'Dowd, Esq. The Respondent was not present at the Board meeting. Upon consideration of the Administrative Law Judge’s Recommended Order and the arguments of the parties and after a review of the complete record in this matter, the Board makes the following findings: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The Administrative Law Judge’s Findings of Fact are hereby approved and adopted and incorporated herein by reference. 2. There is clear and convincing evidence to support the Administrative Law Judge’s Findings of Fact. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. The Board has jurisdiction of this matter pursuant to the provisions of Section 120.57(1), and Chapter 489, Florida Statutes. 2. The Administrative Law Judge’s Conclusions of Law, are hereby approved and adopted in toto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. There is clear and convincing evidence to support the Board’s findings and conclusions. THEREFORE, IT iS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. Counts Il, Hl and IV of the Administrative Complaint are DISMISSED. 2. Respondent is hereby placed on PROBATION for a period of one (1) year. (A) The licensee shall be required to appear before the Probation Committee of the Board at such times as directed by the Board Office, approximately every six (6) months. In connection with each probation appearance, the licensee shall answer questions under oath and shall provide copies of all construction related monthly bank statements, financial statements reflecting a minimum net worth requirement as reflected in Rule 61G4- 15.005(3)(a), F.A.C., permit applications, contracts, and operations questionnaires since the entry of the final order if it is the first probation appearance or since the last probation appearance if it is other than the first probation appearance. In addition, the licensee shall provide such other information or documentation as is requested by either the Department, the Board or the Probation Committee. The licensee shall forward said documentation to the Board in advance of the probation appearance. (B) The burden shall be solely upon the licensee to remember the requirement for said appearance and to take the necessary steps in advance of said appearance to contact the Board office and ascertain the specific time, date, and place of said appearance. The licensee shall not rely on getting notice of said appearance from the Board or the Department. (C) Should the licensee violate any condition of the probation, it shall be considered a violation of Section 489.129(1){j), Florida Statutes, and shall result in further disciplinary action by the Board. (D) Should the licensee’s licensure to practice contracting be suspended or otherwise placed on inactive status, or if the licensee leaves the practice of contracting for thirty (30) days or more, the probation period shail be tolled and shall resume running at the time the licensee reactivates the license or returns to the active practice of contracting, and the licensee shall serve the time remaining in the term of probation. (E) To ensure successful completion of probation, the licensee’s licensure to practice contracting shall be suspended for the period of probation, with the suspension stayed for the period of probation. The time of the suspension and the stay shall run concurrently with the period of probation. If the licensee successfully completes probation, the suspension shall terminate. If the licensee fails to comply with the requirements set forth in the Final Order imposed in this case, or fails to make satisfactory appearances as Determined by the Board, the stay shall be lifted. Once the stay is lifted, the license shall remain in suspended status unless and until a further stay is granted by the Board. 3. Respondent shall pay costs in the amount of Five Hundred Sixty-Four Dollars and Eighteen Cents ($564.18) to the Board within thirty (30) days after the date of filing of the Final Order. 4. Respondent shall pay restitution in the amount of Fifteen Thousand Seven Hundred Eighty-Seven Dollars and Fifty Cents ($15,787.50) to Steve Natale within thirty (30) days after the date of filing of the Final Order. To assure payment of the costs, it is further ordered that all of Respondent's licensure to practice contracting shall be suspended with the imposition of the suspension being stayed for thirty (30) days of the date of filing of the Final Order. If the ordered costs are paid within that thirty (30) day period, the suspension imposed shall not take effect. Upon payment of the costs after the thirty (30) days, the suspension imposed shall be lifted. If the licensee does not pay the costs, within said period, then immediately upon expiration of the stay, he shall surrender his licensure to the investigator of the Department of Business and Professional Regulation or shall mail it to the Board office at 7960 Arlington Expressway, Suite 300, Jacksonville, Florida 32211-7467. A change in your licensure status, including the suspension, revocation, voluntary relinquishment, or involuntary relinquishment of your license does not relieve you of your obligation to pay any fines, costs, interest, or restitution imposed in this order. Pursuant to Section 120.68, Florida Statutes, the Parties are hereby notified that they may appeal this Order by filing an original Notice of Appeal with the Clerk of The Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Northwood Centre, 1940 N. Monroe Street, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0792, and by filing the filing fee and one copy of the Notice of Appeal with the District Court of Appeal within thirty (30) days of the effective date of this Order. This Order shall become effective upon filing with the clerk of the Department of Business and Professional Regulation. 2 4, day oad. We GAA, 2000. Pilate basa DONE AND ORDERED this Z RICHARD T. COWART, Chair Construction Industry Licensing Board CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE | HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Final Order has been provided by U.S. Mail to: Allen M. Bregman, 19209 Black Mangrove Court, Boca Raton, Florida, 33498, and by hand delivery/United States Mail to the Construction Industry Licensing Board, 7960 Arlington Expressway, Suite 300, Jacksonville, Florida 32211-7467, and to Cate O’Dowd, Esq., Lead Construction Attorney, 1940 we Monroe +h Street, Suite 60, Tallahassee Florida 32399, on or before 5:00 p.m., this \4 day of Y Y larch , 2000. bomb

Docket for Case No: 96-004847
Issue Date Proceedings
Jul. 15, 2004 Final Order filed.
Dec. 02, 1999 Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED. Hearing held August 7, 1998 and June 25, 1999.
Nov. 23, 1999 (Petitioner) Notice of Filing Respondent`s Exhibits #1 - #6 (filed via facsimile).
Nov. 09, 1999 (Petitioner) Notice of Filing; cc: Transcript of the Telephonic Hearing held on 8/13/99 filed.
Oct. 27, 1999 Petitioner`s Proposed Recommended Order (filed via facsimile).
Sep. 15, 1999 (Petitioner) Motion to Exclude Sworn Testimony and Admitted Exhibits (filed via facsimile).
Sep. 15, 1999 (Petitioner) Response to Respondent`s Motion for a Continuance (filed via facsimile).
Sep. 13, 1999 Respondent`s Motion for A Continence for Filing Recommended Orders on or Before September 27th, 1999 (filed via facsimile).
Sep. 13, 1999 Respondent`s Answer to Objections of Exhibits 8 and 9 (filed via facsimile).
Sep. 09, 1999 Petitioner`s Exhibit 8 & 10 w/cover letter filed.
Aug. 18, 1999 Order sent out. (parties shall file their proposed recommended orders within 10 days of the issuance of an order ruling on Respondent`s objections)
Aug. 13, 1999 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Aug. 13, 1999 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Aug. 10, 1999 (Petitioner) Response to Order filed.
Aug. 06, 1999 (Petitioner) Motion to Extend Time to File Proposed Recommended Orders filed.
Aug. 05, 1999 Order sent out. (counsel for Petitioner shall take Mr. Van Splinter`s testimony by telephonic conference by 8/23/99)
Aug. 04, 1999 Transcript filed.
Aug. 04, 1999 Transcript filed.
Jun. 25, 1999 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Jun. 23, 1999 Letter to C. Tunnicliff from A. Bregman Re: Settlement Agreement; Settlement Stipulation (filed via facsimile).
Jun. 18, 1999 Amended Notice of Hearing (Scheduling hearing for video teleconference sent out. (hearing set for 12:00pm; Ft. Laud) 6/25/99)
May 05, 1999 Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing sent out. (hearing set for 6/25/99; 9:00am; Ft. Laud)
Feb. 09, 1999 Amended Notice of Hearing sent out. (Video Hearing set for 5/12/99; 9:00am; Ft. Lauderdale)
Dec. 22, 1998 (Petitioner) Motion for Clarification filed.
Dec. 21, 1998 Notice of Hearing sent out. (hearing set for 5/12/99; 9:00am; Ft. Lauderdale)
Nov. 18, 1998 (Petitioner) Status Report filed.
Oct. 06, 1998 Letter to SBK from C. Tunnicliff Re: Order Continuing Abeyance dated 10/5/98; (Respondent) Status Report filed.
Oct. 05, 1998 Order Continuing Abeyance sent out. (parties to file status report by 12/1/98)
Sep. 17, 1998 Transcript filed.
Sep. 17, 1998 (Petitioner) Status Report (filed via facsimile).
Aug. 07, 1998 Video Hearing Held; case placed in abeyance; see case file for applicable time frames.
Aug. 03, 1998 (Petitioner) Prehearing Stipulation (filed via facsimile).
Jul. 29, 1998 (Petitioner) Notice of Withdrawal of Settlement Offer filed.
Jul. 09, 1998 (Petitioner) Notice of Substitute Counsel filed.
Jul. 01, 1998 Notice of Hearing by Video sent out. (Video Hearing set for 8/7/98; 9:00am; Ft. Lauderdale & Tallahassee)
Jul. 01, 1998 Petitioner`s Status Report and Related Motion Requesting Hearing (filed via facsimile).
Apr. 10, 1998 Order Cancelling Hearing and Placing Case in Abeyance sent out. (parties to file status report by 6/16/98)
Apr. 10, 1998 Petitioner`s Motion to Continue and to Hold in Abeyance (filed via facsimile).
Dec. 18, 1997 Notice Scheduling Hearing by Video sent out. (Video Final Hearing set for 4/14/98; 10:00am; Ft. Lauderdale & Tallahassee)
Nov. 13, 1997 Notice of Hearing sent out. (hearing set for 4/14/98; 10:00am; Ft. Lauderdale)
Nov. 07, 1997 Petitioner`s Status Report filed.
Oct. 27, 1997 Status Report as per October 14, 1997 filed.
Oct. 27, 1997 Status Report as per October 14, 1997 (Respondent) (filed via facsimile).
Oct. 14, 1997 Order Granting Continuance and Requiring Response sent out. (hearing cancelled; parties to file status report by 10/24/97)
Oct. 07, 1997 (Petitioner) Agreed Motion for Continuance; Notice of Substitution of Petitioner`s Counsel (filed via facsimile).
Jun. 24, 1997 Order Granting Continuance and Rescheduling Hearing sent out. (hearing set for 10/17/97; 9:00am; Ft. Lauderdale)
Jun. 24, 1997 (Petitioner) Agreed Motion for Continuance (filed via facsimile).
Apr. 08, 1997 Notice of Hearing by Video sent out. (hearing set for 7/2/97; 9:00am; Ft. Lauderdale)
Mar. 20, 1997 Petitioner`s Status Report (filed via facsimile).
Mar. 17, 1997 Order of Continuing Hearing and Requiring Response sent out.
Mar. 17, 1997 (Respondent) Status Report as Per Order March 3, 1997 filed.
Feb. 27, 1997 Agreed Motion for Continuance filed.
Feb. 20, 1997 Amended Notice of Hearing By Video sent out. (Video Final Hearing set for 3/11/97; 9:00am; Ft. Lauderdale)
Oct. 28, 1996 Order of Prehearing Instructions sent out.
Oct. 28, 1996 Notice of Hearing sent out. (hearing set for 3/11/97; 10:30am; Ft. Lauderdale)
Oct. 25, 1996 Petitioner`s Response to Initial Order (filed via facsimile).
Oct. 17, 1996 Initial Order issued.
Oct. 14, 1996 Agency referral letter; Administrative Complaint; Election of Rights filed.

Orders for Case No: 96-004847
Issue Date Document Summary
Mar. 14, 2000 Agency Final Order
Dec. 02, 1999 Recommended Order General contractor did not have a license to do roofing work, but contracted to perform roofing repair. No permit was pulled for the project.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer