STATE OF FLORIDA
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND ) EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, DIVISION ) OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION, )
)
Petitioner, )
)
vs. ) Case No. 98-4453
)
ERIC KRISTIANSEN, )
)
Respondent. )
)
RECOMMENDED ORDER
Robert E. Meale, Administrative Law Judge of the Division of Administrative Hearings, conducted the final hearing in Sarasota, Florida, on January 28, 1999.
APPEARANCES
For Petitioner: Louise T. Sadler, Senior Attorney
Department of Labor and Employment Security
307 Hartman Building
2012 Capital Circle, Southeast Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2152
For Respondent: Eric Kristiansen, pro se
3750 Aba Lane
North Port, Florida 34287 STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE
The issue is whether Respondent was an employee engaged in the construction industry and required to obtain workers' compensation insurance while working on the roof of the Myakka Animal Clinic and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
By Notice and Penalty Assessment Order dated August 25, 1998, Petitioner alleged that Eric "Richardson" (later lined out with the penned-in addition, "Kristiansen") was an employer engaged in the construction industry with one or more employees, but failed to carry workers' compensation insurance. The notice proposes a penalty of $1000.
At the hearing, Petitioner called four witnesses and offered into evidence seven exhibits, which were all admitted.
Respondent called no witnesses and offered into evidence no exhibits.
The court reporter filed the Transcript on February 10, 1999.
FINDINGS OF FACT
On August 24, 1998, Petitioner's investigator observed Respondent working on the roof of the Myakka Animal Clinic in Venice, Florida.
At the time, Respondent was regularly employed by Paradise Roofing, Inc., where he had an exemption from workers' compensation insurance coverage. He has never previously been guilty of a violation of the workers' compensation laws.
The contract price was $800. However, the evidence is conflicting as to the identity of the party that entered into the contract with the Myakka Animal Clinic.
The veterinarian testified that her understanding of the agreement was that Respondent was to do the work, but, if any problems arose, he was not alone, and she could go to Paradise Roofing, Inc., to ensure that the labor and materials were satisfactory. Although there are other indications in the record that Respondent may have been working on his own on this job, there is sufficient conflict in the evidence that Petitioner has failed to prove that Respondent was doing the job as a self- employed person, rather than an exempt employee of Paradise Roofing, Inc. Respondent's understanding of the contractual relationship carries less weight than the veterinarian's understanding of this relationship.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the subject matter. Section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes. (All references to Sections are to Florida Statutes.)
Petitioner has the burden of proof in this case.
Petitioner failed to prove that Respondent was self- employed on the subject job, so as to render ineffective his exemption under Paradise Roofing, Inc. Absent such proof, Petitioner has failed to prove that Respondent was not, under Section 440.05(3), exempt from the requirement of obtaining coverage under workers' compensation insurance.
It is
RECOMMENDED that the Division of Workers' Compensation enter a final order dismissing the Notice and Penalty Assessment Order and any related stop work order.
DONE AND ENTERED this 2nd day of April, 1999, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.
ROBERT E. MEALE
Administrative Law Judge
Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building
1230 Apalachee Parkway
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060
(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675
Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us
Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 2nd day of April, 1999.
COPIES FURNISHED:
Edward A. Dion, General Counsel Department of Labor and
Employment Security
307 Hartman Building
2012 Capital Circle, Southeast Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2152
Mary Hooks, Secretary Department of Labor and
Employment Security
303 Hartman Building
2012 Capital Circle, Southeast Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2152
Louise T. Sadler, Senior Attorney Department of Labor and
Employment Security
307 Hartman Building
2012 Capital Circle, Southeast Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2152
Eric Kristiansen 3750 Aba Lane
North Port, Florida 34287
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS
All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within 15 days from the date of this recommended order. Any exceptions to this recommended order must be filed with the agency that will issue the final order in this case.
Issue Date | Proceedings |
---|---|
Jun. 24, 1999 | Final Order filed. |
Apr. 19, 1999 | Petitioner`s Exceptions to Recommended Order filed. |
Apr. 15, 1999 | Petitioner`s Exceptions to Recommended Order filed. |
Apr. 02, 1999 | Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED. Hearing held 01/28/99. |
Feb. 22, 1999 | Petitioner`s Proposed Recommended Order filed. |
Feb. 19, 1999 | Affidavit of Sheryle Birdsong (filed via facsimile). |
Feb. 10, 1999 | Transcript of Proceedings filed. |
Jan. 28, 1999 | CASE STATUS: Hearing Held. |
Jan. 20, 1999 | Amended Notice of Hearing (as to time) sent out. (hearing set for 1/28/99; 2:00pm; Sarasota) |
Jan. 20, 1999 | Subpoena ad Testificandum (L. Sadler); Affidavit of Service filed. |
Dec. 31, 1998 | (Petitioner) Notice of Method of Recording Testimony at Final Hearing filed. |
Oct. 23, 1998 | Notice of Hearing sent out. (hearing set for 1/28/99; 9:00am; Sarasota) |
Oct. 20, 1998 | Joint Response to Initial Order filed. |
Oct. 15, 1998 | (L. Sadler) Notice of Appearance; Motion to Enforce Statutory Requirement to Pay Assessed Penalties or Post Bond filed. |
Oct. 12, 1998 | Initial Order issued. |
Oct. 07, 1998 | Agency Referral Letter; Petition for Formal Hearing or Request for Review; Notice and Penalty Assessment Order; DWC Bureau of Compliance Stop Work Order Authorization filed. |
Issue Date | Document | Summary |
---|---|---|
Jun. 23, 1999 | Agency Final Order | |
Apr. 02, 1999 | Recommended Order | Petitioner failed to prove that roofer was not working under his normal employer, where he had an exemption from workers` compensation coverage. |