Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DANE LUCAS, D/B/A RIVER ENTERTAINMENT AND RIVER CRUISES, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, 99-000246 (1999)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 99-000246 Visitors: 15
Petitioner: DANE LUCAS, D/B/A RIVER ENTERTAINMENT AND RIVER CRUISES, INC.
Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
Judges: D. R. ALEXANDER
Agency: Department of Revenue
Locations: Jacksonville, Florida
Filed: Jan. 15, 1999
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Thursday, August 12, 1999.

Latest Update: Aug. 12, 1999
Summary: The issue is whether Petitioners are liable for the sales and use tax audit assessment and charter transit system surtax audit assessment, as reflected in Respondent's Notices of Reconsideration dated March 17, 1998.Taxpayer offered no proof in opposition to the tax assessments proposed by Respondent; assessments sustained.
99-0246.PDF

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


DANE W. LUCAS, d/b/a RIVER ) ENTERTAINMENT, and RIVER ) CRUISES, INC., )

)

Petitioners, )

)

vs. ) Case No. 99-0246

)

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, )

)

Respondent. )

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


Pursuant to notice, this matter was heard before the Division of Administrative Hearings by its assigned Administrative Law Judge, Donald R. Alexander, on June 2, 1999, in Jacksonville, Florida.

APPEARANCES


For Petitioners: Dane W. Lucas, pro se

1511 Montana Avenue

Jacksonville, Florida 32207-8642


For Respondent: Eric J. Taylor, Esquire

Department of Legal Affairs

28 West Central Boulevard, Suite 310 Orlando, Florida 32801


STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE


The issue is whether Petitioners are liable for the sales and use tax audit assessment and charter transit system surtax audit assessment, as reflected in Respondent's Notices of Reconsideration dated March 17, 1998.

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT


This matter began on January 28, 1997, when Respondent, Department of Revenue, issued two Notices of Proposed Assessment of tax, penalty, and interest on deficiencies revealed by an audit on the records of Petitioner, Dane W. Lucas, d/b/a River Entertainment. The audits covered the period from October 1, 1991, through December 31, 1993. On July 22, 1997, Respondent issued another two Notice of Proposed Assessments of tax, penalty, and interest on deficiencies after conducting an audit on the records of River Cruises, Inc., the successor corporation to Dane W. Lucas' unincorporated business. That audit covered the five year period from March 1, 1990, through February 28, 1995. After informal efforts to resolve the matters were unsuccessful, Petitioners requested a formal hearing under Section 120.569, Florida Statutes, to contest the assessment.

The matter was referred by Respondent to the Division of Administrative Hearings on January 15, 1999, with a request that an Administrative Law Judge be assigned to conduct a formal hearing.

By Notice of Hearing dated February 1, 1999, a final hearing was scheduled on June 2, 1999, in Jacksonville, Florida. On June 1, 1999, the case was transferred from Administrative Law Judge Don W. Davis to the undersigned.

At final hearing, Petitioners' owner and president, Dane W. Lucas, represented the taxpayers and presented testimony on their

behalf. Respondent presented the testimony of Ralph E. Roland, a former tax auditor III. Also, the parties offered Joint Exhibits 1-6, which were received in evidence.

The Transcript of the hearing was filed on June 21, 1999. Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law were filed by Petitioners and Respondent on June 24 and July 3, 1999, respectively, and they have been considered by the undersigned in the preparation of this Recommended Order.

FINDINGS OF FACT


Based upon all of the evidence, the following findings of fact are determined:

  1. From 1988 through 1993, Petitioner, Dane W. Lucas (Lucas), operated the Annabelle Lee, a cruise boat, under the name of River Entertainment. On January 1, 1994, Lucas incorporated his business under the name of River Cruises, Inc. (the corporation), which is also a Petitioner in this cause. In 1996, Respondent, Department of Revenue (DOR), conducted an audit of the records of both Petitioners to determine whether all sales and use taxes and charter transit system surtaxes had been properly reported and paid.

  2. As a result of the audit, DOR issued two proposed assessments dated January 28, 1997, against Lucas individually and two assessments dated July 22, 1997, against the corporation. However, the latter two assessments reflect the combined liability of both Lucas individually as well as the corporation

    and cover the five-year audit period from March 1, 1990, through February 28, 1995. After a protest letter was filed by Petitioners, DOR issued two Notices of Reconsideration on March 17, 1998.

  3. As to Lucas individually, the Notice of Reconsideration reflects that as of March 11, 1998, he owed $44,083.56 for sales and use taxes, with interest to accrue from that date at the rate of $7.26 per day. It further asserted that he owed $3,290.35 in charter transit system surtaxes as of the same date, with interest to accrue at the rate of $.058 per day.

  4. As to the corporation, the Notice of Reconsideration reflects that as of March 11, 1998, it was liable for $17,906.53, with interest to accrue as of March 11, 1998, at the rate of

    $2.97 per day. Also, it asserts that as of March 11, 1998, the corporation was liable for $5,839.94 for charter transit system surtaxes, with interest to accrue at the rate of $0.25 per day.

  5. On April 24, 1998, Petitioners remitted a check in the amount of $9,626.92, which represented what they believed was the proper tax assessment. As to the remaining portion, they deny that any moneys are owed; alternatively, they have requested that the amounts be compromised on the basis that they have no ability to pay the amount claimed by DOR.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


  1. The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the subject matter and the parties hereto

    pursuant to Sections 120.569 and 120.57(1), Florida Statutes.


  2. Section 120.80(14)(b)2., Florida Statutes (Supp. 1998), provides that in a tax assessment proceeding such as this, the "department's burden of proof . . . shall be limited to a showing that an assessment has been made against the taxpayer and the factual and legal grounds upon which the . . . department made the assessment." The ultimate burden of persuasion, however, rests upon the taxpayer to show that it is not liable for the proposed assessment.

  3. In this case, DOR has satisfied the requirement that it provide the "factual and legal grounds" upon which the assessment has been made. Conversely, the taxpayer failed to adduce any proof that the assessment is without merit. This being so, the assessment should be sustained.

RECOMMENDATION


Based on the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, it is

RECOMMENDED that the Department of Revenue enter a final order sustaining its original assessment against Petitioner.

DONE AND ENTERED this 12th day of July, 1999, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.


DONALD R. ALEXANDER

Administrative Law Judge

Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675

Fax Filing (850) 921-6847


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 12th day of July, 1999.


COPIES FURNISHED:


Linda Lettera, General Counsel Department of Revenue

204 Carlton Building Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0100


Eric J. Taylor, Esquire Department of Legal Affairs

28 West Central Boulevard, Suite 310 Orlando, Florida 32801


Dane W. Lucas

1511 Montana Avenue

Jacksonville, Florida 32207-8642


Larry Fuchs, Executive Director Department of Revenue

104 Carlton Building Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0100


NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS


All parties have the right to submit written exceptions to this Recommended Order within fifteen days of this order. Any exceptions to this Recommended Order should be filed with the Department of Revenue.


Docket for Case No: 99-000246
Issue Date Proceedings
Aug. 12, 1999 Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED. Hearing held 6/2/99.
Aug. 02, 1999 Respondent, Department of Revenue`s Proposed Recommended Order (filed via facsimile).
Jul. 27, 1999 Order sent out. (Respondent shall have until 8/2/99 to file its proposed recommended Order)
Jul. 20, 1999 (E. Taylor) Request for Extension of Time to File Recommended Order (filed via facsimile).
Jun. 24, 1999 Letter to Judge Alexander from W. Lucas Re: Position of a small businessman; Letter to E. Taylor from W. Lucas Re: Last appeal toward settling and closing case without further delays filed.
Jun. 21, 1999 Transcript filed.
Jun. 02, 1999 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
May 28, 1999 (E. Taylor) Subpoena Ad Testificandum (filed via facsimile).
Mar. 26, 1999 (Respondent) Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum filed.
Feb. 01, 1999 Order of Prehearing Instructions sent out.
Feb. 01, 1999 Notice of Hearing sent out. (hearing set for 6/2/99; 11:00am; Jacksonville)
Jan. 28, 1999 Petitioner Dane Lucas` and Respondent Department of Revenue`s Joint Response to Initial Order (filed via facsimile).
Jan. 22, 1999 Initial Order issued.
Jan. 20, 1999 Notice of Proposed Assessment (letter); Closing Agreement; Notice of Reconsideration (letter) (filed via facsimile).
Jan. 15, 1999 Agency Referral Letter; Request for Hearing (letter form) rec`d

Orders for Case No: 99-000246
Issue Date Document Summary
Nov. 09, 1999 Agency Final Order
Aug. 12, 1999 Recommended Order Taxpayer offered no proof in opposition to the tax assessments proposed by Respondent; assessments sustained.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer