STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES
BRENDA DENISE BROADNAX,
Petitioner, CASE NO.: 99-2603 RENDITION NO. DCF-00-099-FO
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES
Respondent.
/
FINAL ORDER REVERSING CONCLUSION OF LAW REGARDING CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE AND DENYING APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION
THIS CAUSE is before me for entry of a Final Order based on a Recommended Order issued by an Administrative Law Judge assigned by the Division of Administrative Hearings. It concerns a petitioner who is currently disqualified by law from working with children or disabled or elderly adults.
By law, disqualification is the result of a petitioner's past behavior, which constituted either a crime or a finding of delinquency or the commission of an act of domestic violence.
Alternatively, the disqualification may be the result of the existence of a confirmed report naming a petitioner as the perpetrator of the abuse, neglect or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. See Section 435.07, Florida Statutes.
Pursuant to Section 435.07(3), a person who is disqualified from working with children or disabled or elderly adults may seek an exemption from the disqualification. To secure the exemption, which would allow a petitioner to work with children or elderly or disabled adults, he or she must show, by clear and convincing evidence, that the disqualification should be set aside. To show that the disqualification should be set aside, the burden of proof is on a petitioner to set forth sufficient evidence of rehabilitation. Such evidence includes, but is not limited to, the circumstances surrounding the event, the time period that has elapsed since the event, the nature of the harm that the petitioner caused to the victim, and the history of the petitioner indicating that the petitioner will not present a danger to the vulnerable population whose welfare and well-being are, by law, in the hands of the Department to protect.
In the instant case, the Recommended Order concludes that the petitioner presented such clear and convincing evidence. I disagree and hereby reject the Recommended Order's conclusions of law at paragraphs 19 and 20. The Petitioner in the instant case did not meet the standard of proof required to show entitlement to an exemption under Section 435.07(3), Florida Statues.
It is clearly within the Department's discretion whether to grant an exemption. Section 435.07(1), Florida Statutes.
Indeed, in Calvin Phillips v. Department of Juvenile Justice, infra, the District Court of Appeal for the Fourth District of Florida held that the agency was under no obligation to grant an exemption even if Phillip's presentation constituted clear, convincing and unrefuted evidence of rehabilitation. (Emphasis supplied).
In the Phillips case, Phillips supported his application for an exemption with a written explanation of the disqualifying incidents, letters of recommendation from a variety of organizations and individuals, proof of training that he had received, and a psychological evaluation. The various letters of recommendation agreed that Phillips had changed, that he worked to rehabilitate youth into productive members of society, and that he was loyal, dependable, trustworthy, caring and concerned. The psychological evaluation stated that, in terms of violence and aggression, Phillips had "only . . . one" episode of violence in his life, as evidenced by the domestic bakery that constituted one disqualifying event, and that he had successfully completed his probation and anger management classes. The report also stated that Phillips had a long-standing history of working with children and was well-respected by his peers and colleagues.
The agency in the Phillips case presented nothing to counter Phillip's evidence. Still, the Court, relying on Thomas v. Department of Juvenile Justice, 730 So.2d 809 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999), ruled that it ". . . may not substitute its judgment for that of the agency on an issue of discretion." Calvin Phillips v. Department of Juvenile Justice, 736 So2d 118, 119 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).
If Calvin Phillips, with all his evidence, was not entitled to an exemption, then, clearly, neither is the Petitioner, who presented no evidence of rehabilitation except her own testimony.
Petitioner was convicted of drug charges in 1994, and she underwent some treatment at that time. Later, she resumed the use of drugs when she began experiencing personal problems, and she continued to engage in such unlawful conduct until approximately nine months ago, when she had a "spiritual"
awakening. Regardless of how sincere she may now be about living the remainder of her life drug free, Petitioner has not demonstrated sufficient evidence of rehabilitation at the present time to warrant an exemption. Therefore, I reject the Administrative Law Judge's conclusions of law at paragraphs 19 and 20.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that petitioner's application for an exemption from disqualification from employment in a position of trust or responsibility is DENIED.
DONE and ORDERED this 13th day of March, 2000, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.
KATHLEEN A. KEARNEY, Secretary
Department of Children and Family Services
A PARTY WHO IS ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY THIS FINAL ORDER IS ENTITLED TO A JUDICIAL REVIEW WHICH SHALL BE INSTITUTED BY FILING ONE COPY OF A NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH THE AGENCY CLERK OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, AND A SECOND COPY ALONG WITH FILING FEE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW, WITH THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL IN THE APPELLATE DISTRICT WHERE THE AGENCY MAINTAINS ITS HEADQUARTERS OR WHERE A PARTY RESIDES. REVIEW PROCEEDINGS SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FLORIDA APPELLATE RULES. THE NOTICE OF APPEAL MUST BE FILED WITHIN 30 DAYS OF RENDITION OF THE ORDER TO BE REVIEWED.
Copies furnished to:
Stuart M. Lerner Administrative Law Judge
Division of Administrative Hearings 1230 Apalachee Parkway
Tallahassee, FL 32399-3060
Mardella Nottebaum
Background Screening Coordinator District 11 Legal Office Department of Children and
Family Services
401 Northwest 2nd Avenue Miami, FL 33128
Rosemarie Rinaldi, Esquire District 11 Legal Office Department of Children and
Family Services
401 Northwest 2nd Avenue Miami, FL 33128
Brenda Denise Broadnax
2171 Northwest 70th Terrace Miami, FL 33147
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing FINAL ORDER has been sent by U. S. Mail or hand delivery to each of the above-named persons this 14th, day of March, 2000.
Teresa G. Walsh for Virginia Daire, Agency Clerk Department of Children and
Family Services 1317 Winewood Blvd.
Tallahassee, FL 32399-0700
(850) 488-2381
Issue Date | Proceedings |
---|---|
Mar. 15, 2000 | Final Order Reversing Conclusions of Law Regarding Clear and Convincing Evidence and Denying Application for Exemption filed. |
Oct. 28, 1999 | Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED. Hearing held 9/13/99. |
Oct. 25, 1999 | Respondent`s Proposed Recommended Order (filed via facsimile). |
Oct. 08, 1999 | Order sent out. (proposed recommended orders shall be filed no later than 10/25/99) |
Oct. 07, 1999 | (Respondent) Motion for Extension of Time to File Proposed Order (filed via facsimile). |
Sep. 23, 1999 | Notice of Filing; (Volume 1 of 1) DOAH Court Reporter Final Hearing Transcript filed. |
Sep. 13, 1999 | CASE STATUS: Hearing Held. |
Sep. 09, 1999 | (R. Rinaldi) Notice of Filing; Respondent`s Exhibits (numbers 1-2) filed. |
Jul. 20, 1999 | Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference sent out. (Video Hearing set for 9:00am; Miami; 9/13/99) |
Jul. 15, 1999 | Respondent`s Response to Initial Order (filed via facsimile). |
Jul. 06, 1999 | Initial Order issued. |
Jun. 30, 1999 | Notice; Agency Action Letter; Request for Hearing (letter) filed. |
Issue Date | Document | Summary |
---|---|---|
Mar. 14, 2000 | Agency Final Order | |
Oct. 28, 1999 | Recommended Order | Petitioner met her burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that she was rehabilitated and should be granted an exemption from disqualification from employment. |