Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF ACUPUNCTURE
Respondent: JOHN O`NEILL, A/K/A JOHN O`NEIL
Judges: SUSAN BELYEU KIRKLAND
Agency: Department of Health
Locations: Tampa, Florida
Filed: Aug. 20, 2001
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Friday, September 28, 2001.
Latest Update: Dec. 24, 2024
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
Petitioner,
vs. Case No. 1996-12376
JOHN O°NEILL, aka JOHN O’NEIL, . 0) I. 33 I9 '
Respondent.
/
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
Department of Health, hereinafter referred to as “Petitioner,” files this
Administrative Complaint before the Board of Acupuncture against JOHN O’NEILL,
a.k.a. JOHN O’NEIL, hereinafter referred to as “Respondent,” and alleges:
1. Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating the practice of
moe acupuncture pursuant to Section 20.43, Chapter 456 (formally known as Chapter 455 Part
Jb see Chapter 2000-160, Laws of Florida), and Chapter 457, Florida Statutes. Pursuant
to the authority of Section 20.43(3)(g), Florida Statutes, Petitioner has contracted with the
nt |
Agency for Health Care Administration to provide consumer compl
2. Respondent is, and has been at all time material hereto, a licensed
acupuncturist in the State of Florida, having been issued license number AP 00269.
Respondent’s last known address is 2454 McMullen Booth Road, Clearwater, Florida
33759.
stigative and
prosecutorial services required by the Division of Medical Quality Assurance, councils,
see
ot BURRESS ore
3. From in or about December 1995 to in or ‘or about May 1996 Respondent
employed physician HB.
4. Respondent entered into an oral contract with physician H.B. to split H.B.’s
fees with Respondent. Physician H.B. was to receive eighty (80) percent of patient fees.
Respondent was to receive twenty (20) percent. However, physician H.B. actually
received forty (40) percent of patient fees and Respondent received sixty (60) percent.
5. Respondent billed insurance companies for services and laboratory tests that
were not provided to patients under the name and provider number of physician H.B.
during H.B.’s period of employment.
6. On or about May 3, 1996 physician H.B. terminated his employment with
Respondent.
7. Respondent continued to bill insurance companies for services and laboratory
tests performed after May 3, 1996 that were not provided to patients under the name and
Provider number of physician H.B., after H.B. left the Respondent’s clinic on or about
Y
May 3, 1996.
8. From i in or ab
companies for modalities that he di didn't perform, for more
ually charged to patients.
9. Respondent also instructed employee B.W. to bill medicare and insurance
companies for services and laboratory tests that were not provided to patients by
Respondent under the name and provider number of physician L.C.
ee
—
cer ee ee sr REE ENE teense
10. Respondent instructed employee B.W. to continue to Dill medicare and
insurance companies for services and laboratory tests that were not provided to patients
under the name and provider number of physician H.B., after she was no longer
employed by the Respondent’s clinics.
11. From in or about May 1995 to in or about November 1995 Respondent
employed J.F. as his office manager. During her period of employment Respondent
instructed J F. to bill Medicare under physician H.B.’s provider number for services and
laboratory tests not rendered by physician H.B. even after H.B. was no longer employed
by Respondent.
12. Respondent also instructed employee J.F. to fabricate dates of patient service
to cover patient deductibles.
13. During her period of employment, Employee J.F. advised Respondent that she
suffered from migraine headaches and back pain. Respondent’ s treatment of employee
LF. included a chiropractic spinal adjustment and the injection of an unknown substance
i
into her lower s spine.
an C.E.
: employed chiropré tic p ays
15. Respondent entered into an oral contract with chiropractic C.E. to split C.E.’s
fees with Respondent. Chiropractic physician C.E. was to receive sixty (60) percent of
patient fees. Respondent was to receive forty (40) percent.
16. From in or about December 1994 to in or about May 1996 Respondent
performed chiropractic manipulations on patients. Respondent is not a licensed
chiropractic physician.
ab ut ‘November 1995 Respondent
- oer
17, From in or about December 1994 to in or about May 1996 Respondent
treatment of patients included injections of unknown substances, Respondent is not a
licensed medical doctor.
18. From in or about December 1994 to in or about May 1996 Respondent failed
to properly dispose of biohazardous waste. Specifically, Respondent disposed of
acupuncture needles in regular trash receptacles rather than utilizing a biohazardous
waste disposal container.
19. From on or about December 29, 1989 Respondent was issued license number
AP00269. Said license contained an incorrect spelling of Respondent’s name, to wit:
O’Neil”. Respondent has failed to notify the Board of the error.
20, From in or about April 1995 to in or about May 1996 Respondent provided
clinical instruction to acupuncture: interns. Said instruction included chiropractic
techniques such as performing spinal adjustments.
21. From in or about December 1994 to in or about December 1995 Respondent
employed P. P as a a massage therapist. P. P is a licensed massage therapist. Respondent
~ entered into an oral contract with P-P. to split fees with Respondent. P.P. was to receive.
sixty (60) percent of patient fees. Respondent was to receive forty (40) percent.
22. From in or about April 1995 to in or about May 1996 Respondent treated
patient’s M.T., W.K., and C.S.
23. Respondent is unable to locate and produce patient records for patient’s M.T.,
W.K. and C.S.
~ COUNTI
24. Petitioner realleges and incorporates by reference the foregoing allegations
as if fully set forth herein.
25. Based on the foregoing, Respondent’s license to practice acupuncture in the
State of Florida is subject to discipline pursuant to Section 457.109(1)(q), Florida
Statutes, by practicing or offering to practice beyond the scope permitted by law or
accepting and performing professional responsibilities which the licensee knows or has
reason to know that he or she is not competent to perform.
COUNT
26. Petitioner realleges and incorporates by reference the foregoing allegations in
paragraphs one (1) through twenty- “three (23) as if fully set forth herein.
27. Based on the foregoing, Respondent’ s license to practice acupuncture in the
State of Florida is subject to discipline pursuant to Section 457. 10918), Florida
‘Statutes, by violating any provision o of this chapter, ora rule of the department, to wit: @)
Rule 64B1-8.004 by -failing to properly dispose of biohazardous waste; and (b) Rule
64B1-10.001(1) and (2) by failing to maintain written medical records justifying the
course of treatment of each patient and maintaining such records for a period of five (5)
years from the date of last entry to the record. |
COUNT HI
28. Petitioner realleges and incorporates by reference the foregoing allegations in
paragraphs one (1) through twenty-three (23) as if fully set forth herein.
29. Based on the foregoing, Respondent’s license to practice acupuncture in the
State of Florida is subject to discipline pursuant to.Section 457.109(1)(a), Florida
ronan nana ae SS ee ey et
Statutes, by attempting to obtain, obtaining, or renewing a license to practice acupuncture
by fraudulent misrepresentations or through an error of the department.
“COUNT IV
30. Petitioner realleges and incorporates by reference the foregoing allegations in
paragraphs one (1) through twenty-three (23) as if fully set forth herein.
31. Based on the foregoing, Respondent’s license to practice acupuncture in the
State of Florida is subject to discipline pursuant to Section 45 7.109(1)(mn), Florida
Statutes, by failing to keep written medical records justifying the course of treatment of
the patient.
- COUNTY Vv
32. Petitioner realleges « and i incorporates by reference the foregoing allegations in
paragraphs one > ( 1) through twenty-three (23) as if fully set forth herein.
33. - Based on the foregoing Respondent’ s license to practic acupuncture in the
State of Flori a is “subject to discipline pursuant to Section 457 109(1)(u), Florida :
Statutes, by fraud or deceit or gross negligence, incompetence or misconduct i in the
operation of a course sof study,
COUNT VI
34. Petitioner realleges and incorporates by reference the foregoing allegations in
paragraphs one (1) through twenty-three (23) as if fully set forth herein.
35. Based on the foregoing, Respondent’s license to practice acupuncture in the
State of Florida is subject to discipline pursuant to Section 457.109(1)(w), Florida
Statutes, by failing to comply with any rule of the board relating to health and safety,
including, but not limited to, the sterilization of needles and equipment and the disposal
of potentially infectious materials.
COUNT Vi
36. Petitioner realleges and incorporates by reference the foregoing allegations in
paragraphs one (1) through twenty-three (23) as if fully set forth herein.
37. Based on the foregoing, Respondent’s license to practice acupuncture in the
State of Florida is subject to discipline pursuant to Section 456.054, Florida Statutes, by
offering, paying, soliciting, or receiving a kickback, directly or indirectly, overtly or
covertly, i in cash or in kind, for referring or soliciting patients.
WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the Board of Acupuncture to enter
an order imposing one or more of the following penalties: revocation or suspension of the
Respondent’s license, restriction of the Respondent’s practice, imposition of an
administrative fine and assessment of costs related to investigation and Prosecution of
: this. case © (including, but not limited to costs associated with attorney time), issuance of a
reprimand, placement of the Respondent on 1 probation, and/or any other relief that the
Board deems appropriate.
SIGNED this { $1 day ot De tienen , 2000.
Robert G. Brooks, M.D.
Secretary, Department of Health
FILED
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
DEPUTY CLERK
. CLERK em Lad ‘Y Ay BY: Nancy M. Snurkowski, Chief Attorney
Agency for Health Care Administration
Office of General Counsel-MQA
Practitioner Regulation-Legal
COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER:
Michael P. Sasso"yn pf
Senior Attorney
Fla. Bar No: 167363
Agency for Health Care Administration
General Counsel-MQA
Practitioner Regulation-Legal
P.O. Box 14229
Tallahassee, Florida 32317-4229
Telephone: (850) 487-9670
Case No. AP 1996-12376 (O’Neill)
pe: VE / AK
PCP Date: Mista
Fa ome reer
Docket for Case No: 01-003319PL
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Sep. 28, 2001 |
Order Closing File issued. CASE CLOSED.
|
Sep. 27, 2001 |
Petitioner`s Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction (filed via facsimile).
|
Sep. 26, 2001 |
Order issued (Respondent`s Motion to Dismiss and in the Alternative, a Motion to Strike Certain Counts of the Administrative Complaint and/or Require a More Definite Statement is denied).
|
Sep. 25, 2001 |
Petitioner`s Certificate of Service of Petitioner`s Responses to Respondent`s First Set of Interrogatories (filed via facsimile).
|
Sep. 24, 2001 |
Petitioner`s Response to Respondent`s Second Request to Produce and Request for public Recoreds (filed via facsimile).
|
Sep. 24, 2001 |
Petitioner`s Response to Respondent`s First Request for Admissions (filed via facsimile).
|
Sep. 19, 2001 |
Order Granting Motions for Official Recognition issued.
|
Sep. 19, 2001 |
Petitioner`s Response to Respondent`s Motion to Dismiss and in the Alternative, a Motion to Strike Certain Counts of the Administrative Complaint and/or Require a More Definite Statement (filed via facsimile).
|
Sep. 14, 2001 |
Respondent`s Motion for official Recognition filed.
|
Sep. 13, 2001 |
Respondent`s Motion to Dismiss and in the Alternative, a Motion to Strike Certain Counts of the Administrative Complaint and/or Require a More Definite Statement (filed via facsimile).
|
Sep. 13, 2001 |
Respondent`s Second Motion for Official Recognition (filed via facsimile).
|
Aug. 30, 2001 |
Order Granting Motion to Extend Time to File Motions in Opposition to the Administrative Complaint issued. (respondetn shall have until 10/2/01, in which to file any motions in opposition to the administrative complaint)
|
Aug. 30, 2001 |
Notice of Hearing issued (hearing set for October 16 and 17, 2001; 9:00 a.m.; Tampa, FL).
|
Aug. 30, 2001 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions issued.
|
Aug. 28, 2001 |
Joint Response to Initial Order filed.
|
Aug. 24, 2001 |
Letter to Judge Kirkland from J. Pellett, requesting subpoenas filed.
|
Aug. 24, 2001 |
Respondent`s First Request for Admissions (filed via facsimile).
|
Aug. 24, 2001 |
Respondent`s Second Request to Produce and a Request for Public Records (filed via facsimile).
|
Aug. 24, 2001 |
Notice of Serving Interrogatories (filed by Respondent via facsimile).
|
Aug. 22, 2001 |
Motion to Extend Time to File Motions in Opposition to the Administrative Complaint (filed by Respondent via facsimile).
|
Aug. 22, 2001 |
Request to Produce and in the Alternative Public Records Request (filed by Respondent via facsimile).
|
Aug. 22, 2001 |
Notice of Filing (filed by Respondent via facsimile).
|
Aug. 22, 2001 |
Respondent`s Notice of Unavilability (filed via facsimile).
|
Aug. 21, 2001 |
Initial Order issued.
|
Aug. 20, 2001 |
Order filed.
|
Aug. 20, 2001 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Aug. 20, 2001 |
Agency referral filed.
|