Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs OSCAR E. MATUTES, 01-004929PL (2001)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 01-004929PL Visitors: 7
Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD
Respondent: OSCAR E. MATUTES
Judges: LARRY J. SARTIN
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: Miami, Florida
Filed: Dec. 28, 2001
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Monday, May 6, 2002.

Latest Update: Dec. 26, 2024
n eo . . OFYIP C, “EP ED ~ exe coy i is a? STATE OF FLORIDA r Fhe f DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL sapere 2B PH 2: bu CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD DIVISION I DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, Petitioner, Case No. 99-01297 vs. OSCAR E. MATUTES, Respondent. / | ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT Petitioner, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, ("Petitioner"), files-this Administrative Complaint before the Cohstruction tndustry Licensing Board, against OSCAR E. MATUTES, ("Respondent"), and says: so 1. Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating the practice of contracting pursuant to Section 20.165, Florida Statutes, and Chapters 455 and 489, Florida Statutes. 2. Respondent is, and has been at all times material hereto, a Certified General Contractor, in the State of Florida, having been issued license numbers CG CA05286 and CG C005286. 3. Respondent's last known address is 6595 NW 36° Street, Miami, Florida 32166. 4. At all times material hereto, Respondent was the licensed qualifier for Aurora Builders, Inc. (hereinafter A referred to as "Contractor") and was responsible in such capacity for all of its contracting activities. 5. Section 489.1195(1) (a), Florida Statutes, provides that all primary qualifying agents for a business organization are jointly and equally responsible for supervision of all operations of the business organization; for all field work at all sites; and for financial matters, both for the organization in general and for each specific job. COUNT I 6. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one through five as though fully set forth in this Count I. 7. On or about July 14, 1998, the Contractor entered into a contract with Marcelo Miceli (hereinafter referred to as “Customer”} to construct an addition to his home located at 17681 Nw 82"? Court, Hialeah, Florida 33015 for Twenty-Six Thousand, 7 4 ‘Six Hundred dollars ($26,600.00). 8. On or about August 13, 1998, the Customer paid Twenty- Three Thousand, Nine Hundred Forty dollars ($23,940.00) towards the contract price. 9. On or about August 18, 1998, the Contractor was issued permit number 98-106813 from the Miami-Dade County Building & Zoning Department for the construction of the addition to the Customer’s residence. S er aad 10. On or about July 20, 1998, the Contractor commenced work on the Customer’s pro ject. 11. In or around January 2000, the Contractor closed work on the Customer’s project owner. without just cause or notice to the 12. Work that remained to be done, includes, but is not limited to the installatio 13. Based on the for 489,129(1) (k), Florida Sta construction project in wh n of a water heater and plumbing work. egoing, the Respondent violated Section tutes (1997), by abandoning a ich the contractor is engaged or under contract as a contractor. A project may be presumed abandoned after 90 days if the contr just cause or without prop the reason for terminatign cause for 90 consecutive da 14, Petitioner reall set forth in paragraphs on as though fully set forth 15. Section 489.1425 agreement or contract for construction to residentia actor terminates the project without er notification to the owner, including ¥Xor fails to perform work without just ays. COUNT II eges and incorporates the allegations e through five and seven through twelve in this Count II. , Florida Statutes, provides:”(1) Any repair, restoration, improvement, or 1 real property must contain a written statement explaining consumer rights under the Construction Industries Recovery Fund, except where the value of all labor and e materials does not exceed $2,500.00.” 16. The Contractor failed to provide the Customer with written notice of consumer rights under the Construction Industries Recovery Fund. 17. Failing to provide the Customer with written notice of consumer rights under the Construction Industries Recovery Fund constitutes a violation of the foregoing provision of Chapter 489, Florida Statutes. 18. Based on the foregoing, the Respondent violated Section 489.129(1) (j), Florida Statutes (1997), by failing in any material respect to comply with the provisions of this part or ' violating a rule or lawful order of the board. WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the Construction, Industry Ligénding Board entér an Order imposing one or more of the following penalties: place on probation, _. reprimand the -licensee, revoke, suspend, deny the issuance or * enewal of the certificate or registration, require financial restitution to a consumer, impose an administrative fine not to . exceed $5,000 per violation, require continuing education, assess costs associated with investigation and prosecution, impose any or all penalties delineated within Section 455.227(2), Florida Statutes, and/or any other relief that the Board is authorized to impose pursuant to Chapters 489, 455, Florida Statutes, and/or the rules promulgated thereunder. Signed this [{ day of = \ : , 2000. COUNSEL FOR DEPARTMENT: Diane Snell Perera Senior Attorney Department of Business and Professional Regulation 401 NW 2 Avenue #N607 Miami, FL 33128 (305) 377-7115 DSP/sb 4/25/00 Case #99-01297 fer: lu joy at pene! QetZRTHLEEN E “07 DOWD : LEAD CONSTRUCTION ATTORNEY FILED . Department of Business and Professional Regulation AGENCY CLERK CuK Sophy £. Werhum an pate__") -]¥& —Z000 bitin. te

Docket for Case No: 01-004929PL
Issue Date Proceedings
May 06, 2002 Order Closing File issued. CASE CLOSED.
May 03, 2002 Order Denying Continuance issued.
May 03, 2002 Motion to Cancel Hearing and to Relinquish Jurisdiction (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
Apr. 30, 2002 Letter to O. Matutes from T. Gay advising of a document that will be used as an exhibit. (filed via facsimile).
Apr. 16, 2002 Letter to O. Matutes from T. Gay, concerning documents petitioner intend to use as exhibits. (filed via facsimile).
Apr. 08, 2002 Order Closing File (DOAH Case No. 01-4933PL Only) issued.
Apr. 03, 2002 Petitioner`s Motion to Sever and Relinquish Jurisdiction (filed via facsimile).
Mar. 12, 2002 Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing issued (hearing set for May 6 through 10, 2002; 9:30 a.m.; Miami, FL).
Mar. 08, 2002 Letter to Judge Sartin from O. Matutes requesting continuance (filed via facsimile).
Feb. 20, 2002 Order Denying Request for Postponement issued.
Feb. 15, 2002 Letter to Judge Sartin from P. Lense requesting continuance filed.
Jan. 08, 2002 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions issued.
Jan. 08, 2002 Notice of Hearing issued (hearing set for March 18 through 22, 2002; 9:30 a.m.; Miami, FL).
Jan. 07, 2002 Order Granting Petitioner`s Motion to Consolidate issued. (consolidated cases are: 01-004929PL, 01-004930PL, 01-004931PL, 01-004932PL, 01-004933PL, 01-004934PL)
Jan. 04, 2002 Petitioner`s Motion to Consolidate (case nos. 01-4929, 01-4930, 01-4931, 0-4932, 01-4933, 014934) filed via facsimile.
Jan. 04, 2002 Unilateral Response to Initial Order (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
Dec. 31, 2001 Initial Order issued.
Dec. 28, 2001 Administrative Complaint filed.
Dec. 28, 2001 Request for Hearing filed.
Dec. 28, 2001 Agency referral filed.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer