Petitioner: ASSOCIATION OF DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL PROPERTY OWNERS, INC.; ARGUS FOUNDATION, INC.; GULF COAST BUILDERS EXCHANGE, INC.; REMARK SARASOTA QUAY, INC.; AND WYNNTON SARASOTA II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Respondent: CITY OF SARASOTA AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
Judges: D. R. ALEXANDER
Agency: Department of Community Affairs
Locations: Sarasota, Florida
Filed: Mar. 13, 2002
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Wednesday, January 28, 2004.
Latest Update: Nov. 17, 2024
au
y
Bo dewm ieee &
o
an 3
ve Final Order No. DCA04-GM-039
Ap - 11:08
gh MER-9 ANIO STATE OF FLORIDA
_..s: -:DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
nc obstbs
ASSOCIATIGN ‘OF DOWNTOWN
COMMERCIAL PROPERTY OWNERS,
INC,; ARGUS FOUNDATION, INC. ;
GULF COAST BUILDERS EXCHANGE,
INC.; REMARK SARASOTA QUAY,
INC.; and WYNNTON SARASOTA II
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
Petitioners, DOAH Case No. 02-1016GM
Vv.
CITY OF SARASOTA and
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT
OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS,
Respondents.
/
FINAL ORDER
An Administrative Law Judge of the Division of
Administrative Hearings has entered an Order Closing File in this
proceeding. A copy of the Order is attached to this Final Order
as Exhibit A.
BACKGROUND
This is a proceeding to determine whether the City of
Sarasota comprehensive plan amendment adopted by Ordinance No.
02-4349 on December 17, 2001, is “in compliance” with the Local
Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation
Act, Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes.
The Department issued a Notice of Intent to find the
amendment in compliance with the Act. Petitioners filed a
Final Order No. DCA04-GM-039
petition challenging the Department’s Notice of Intent, and
alleged that the plan amendment is not in compliance.
Petitioners, the City, and the Department thereafter entered
into a Stipulated Settlement Agreement. Pursuant to this
Agreement, the City adopted additional, remedial comprehensive
plan amendments, which modified and supplemented the original
amendment. The Department published a Notice of Intent to find
these remedial amendments in compliance.
A citizen of the City who is not a party to this proceeding
Filed a Petition challenging the Department’s Notice of Intent to
find the remedial amendments in compliance. See Hamilton v. City
of Sarasota & Department of Community Affairs, DOAH Case No. 03-
0902GM. Because they were the subject of this administrative
challenge, the remedial amendments could not go into effect until
the challenge was completed and the Department or Administration
Commission issued a final order finding the remedial amendments
in compliance. See Fla. Stat. § 163.3189(2) (a). Accordingly,
this matter was placed into abeyance pending the outcome of
Hamilton.
The Department and City each filed Motions with the
Administrative Law Judge in Hamilton and requested that the
Petition be dismissed and jurisdiction relinquished to the
Department for entry of a final order. The Administrative Law
Page 2 of 4
Final Order No. DCA04-GM-039
Judge granted these Motions. On December 5, 2003, the Department
entered a Final Order in Hamilton dismissing the Petition and
determining the remedial amendments to be in compliance.
Upon resolution of Hamilton, the Administrative Law Judge
issued an Order Closing File in this proceeding.
ORDER
WHEREFORE, it is ORDERED that the above-captioned proceeding
is DISMISSED, and the City of Sarasota comprehensive plan
amendments adopted on December 17, 2001, are determined to be “in
compliance.”
DONE AND ORDERED in Tallahass
eidi Hughes, Interim Secretary
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100
NOTICE OF RIGHTS
EACH PARTY IS HEREBY ADVISED OF ITS RIGHT TO SEEK JUDICIAL
REVIEW OF THIS FINAL ORDER PURSUANT TO SECTION 120.68, FLORIDA
STATUTES, AND FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.030 (b) (1) ®)
AND 9.110.
TO INITIATE AN APPEAL OF THIS ORDER, A NOTICE OF APPEAL MUST
BE FILED WITH THE DEPARTMENT’S AGENCY CLERK, 2555 SHUMARD OAK
BOULEVARD, TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2100, WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE
DAY THIS ORDER IS FILED WITH THE AGENCY CLERK. THE NOTICE OF
APPEAL MUST BE SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE FORM PRESCRIBED BY FLORIDA
RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.900(a). A COPY OF THE NOTICE OF
APPEAL MUST BE FILED WITH THE APPROPRIATE DISTRICT COURT OF
APPEAL AND MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY THE FILING FEE SPECIFIED IN
SECTION 35.22(3), FLORIDA STATUTES.
Page 3 of 4
Final Order No. DCA04-GM-039
YOU WAIVE YOUR RIGHT TO JUDICIAL REVIEW IF THE NOTICE OF
APPEAL IS NOT TIMELY FILED WITH THE AGENCY CLERK AND THE
APPROPRIATE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL.
MEDIATION UNDER SECTION 120.573, FLA. STAT., IS NOT
AVAILABLE WITH RESPECT TO THE ISSUES RESOLVED BY THIS ORDER.
CERTIFICATE OF FILING AND SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the original of the foregoing has been
filed with the undersigned designated Agency Clerk, and that true
and correct copies have been furnished ‘oa he worsens listed
below in the manner described, on this) ¥ es 4 March, 2004.
Ank
Paula Ford
Agency Clerk
Hand Delivery
Shaw P. Stiller
Assistant General Counsel
Department of Community Affairs
2555 Shumard Oak Blvd.
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100
First Class U.S. Mail
Robert M. Fournier, Esquire
Assistant City Attorney
1 S. School Avenue
Suite 700
Sarasota, Florida 34237
Michael J. Furen, Esquire
Icard, Merrill, Cullis, Tim, Furen & Ginsburg, P.A.
P. O. Drawer 4195
Sarasota, Florida 34230
Interagency Mail
The Honorable Donald R. Alexander
Administrative Law Judge
Division of Administrative Hearings
The DeSoto Building
1230 Apalachee Parkway
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060
Page 4 of 4
Docket for Case No: 02-001016GM
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Mar. 09, 2004 |
Final Order filed.
|
Jan. 28, 2004 |
Order Closing File. CASE CLOSED.
|
Oct. 08, 2003 |
Status Report (filed by Respondent via facsimile).
|
Apr. 21, 2003 |
Notice of Substitution of Counsel for the Department of Community Affairs (filed by S. Stiller via facsimile).
|
Jan. 31, 2003 |
Order Granting Continuance and Placing Case in Abeyance issued (parties to advise status by July 31, 2003).
|
Jan. 29, 2003 |
(Joint) Stipulated Settlement Agreement filed.
|
Jan. 29, 2003 |
Notice of Filing Sipulated Settlement Agreement and Request for Stay of Proceedings filed by Petitioner.
|
Dec. 03, 2002 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions issued.
|
Dec. 03, 2002 |
Notice of Hearing issued (hearing set for April 29 through May 2, 2003; 9:00 a.m.; Sarasota, FL).
|
Dec. 02, 2002 |
Status Report and Motion to Extend Required by Order of September 10, 2002 (filed by R. Fournier via facsimile).
|
Sep. 10, 2002 |
Order Continuing Case in Abeyance issued (parties to advise status by December 2, 2002).
|
Sep. 09, 2002 |
Status Report and Motion to Extend Placement of Case in Abeyance for an Additional 65 Days filed by Respondent.
|
Jun. 24, 2002 |
Order Granting Continuance and Placing Case in Abeyance issued (parties to advise status by September 20, 2002).
|
Jun. 21, 2002 |
Motion to Continue Final Hearing filed by Respondent.
|
May 08, 2002 |
(Joint) Notice of Intent to Mediate filed.
|
Mar. 25, 2002 |
Order issued (Sarasota Chamber of Commerce is dismissed as a party in this action).
|
Mar. 25, 2002 |
Petitioners` Response to Initial Order (filed via facsimile).
|
Mar. 25, 2002 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions issued.
|
Mar. 25, 2002 |
Notice of Hearing issued (hearing set for August 5 through 9, 2002; 1:30 p.m.; Sarasota, FL).
|
Mar. 22, 2002 |
Petitioner, Greater Sarasota Chamber of Commerce, Inc.`s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (filed via facsimile).
|
Mar. 21, 2002 |
Joint Response to Initial Order (filed by Respondent via facsimile).
|
Mar. 14, 2002 |
Initial Order issued.
|
Mar. 13, 2002 |
Notice of Intent to Find the City of Sarasota Comprehensive Plan Amendment in Compliance Docket No. 01-2-NOI-5804-(A)-(I) filed.
|
Mar. 13, 2002 |
Petition Challenging Determination of Compliance filed.
|
Mar. 13, 2002 |
Agency referral filed.
|