Petitioner: HEALTH CARE CENTER OF NAPLES, D/B/A THE ARISTOCRAT
Respondent: AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
Judges: LAWRENCE P. STEVENSON
Agency: Agency for Health Care Administration
Locations: Naples, Florida
Filed: Apr. 01, 2002
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Tuesday, May 14, 2002.
Latest Update: Dec. 25, 2024
JA-1303
STATE OF FLORIDA
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION...
Ue APR ~ fo AM 29
STATE OF FLORIDA
AGENCY FOR HEALTH
CARE ADMINISTRATION,
Petitioner,
vs. AHCA NO: 2001061341
08-01-0283-NH
THE HEALTH CENTER OF NAPLES, INC.,
d/b/a THE ARISTOCRAT
Respondent.
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
COMES NOW the Agency for Health Care Administration
(hereinafter “AHCA’), by and through the undersigned
counsel, and files this Administrative Complaint against
The Health Center of Naples, Inc., d/b/a The Aristocrat,
(hereinafter “Respondent” or “The Aristocrat”) and alleges:
NATURE OF THE ACTION
1. This is an action to impose an administrative
fine in the amount of two thousand five hundred ($2,500)
dollars pursuant to Section 400.23 (8) (b) Florida
Statutes.
Jurisdiction
2. The Agency has jurisdiction over the Respondent
pursuant to Chapter 400, Part II, Florida Statutes.
3. Venue lies in Collier County, Division of
Administrative Hearings, Pursuant to 120.57 Florida
Statutes, and Chapter 28 F.A.C,
Il, Florida Statutes and Rules S9A~4, Florida
Administrative Code.
5. Respondent, The Aristocrat, is a nursing home
located at 10949 Parny Street, Naples, Florida 34101. The
facility is licenseg under Chapter 400, Part TI, Florida
Statutes and Chapter S9A-4, Florida Administrative Code,
6. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates (1) through (5)
as if fully set forth herein.
7. The facility was cited for the deficiency set
eee
8. Based upon the Annual Health Licensure and
Recertification Survey for a Skilled Nursing Facility
conducted on or about October 8 through October 10, 2001,
it was determined that the facility failed to adequately
assess and develop a plan of care to maintain acceptable
nutritional parameters for 1 (Resident #1) of 6 residents
reviewed for nutritional concerns. This is evidenced by:
1) The facility failed to adequately assess and develop a
Plan of care to prevent the resident from significant
weight loss. 2) The facility failed to assess and develop
adequate care plan after the resident had a significant
weight loss of 5.3% of her body weight in less than 2
weeks, 3) The facility failed to adequately assess,
evaluate and revise the care plan, to address the
resident's risk for weight loss, after she had a
significant weight loss of 9.93 in less than a month.
The findings include:
a. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on
7/30/01 with diagnosis to include but not limited to
Status Post (S/P) Left Hip Fracture, S/P Left Shoulder
Fracture, Esophageal Reflux Disease, Osteoporosis,
Pyloric Gastritis, and Depressive Disorder.
a? ec SS ce sey snasasesssentans seen
b. Review of the 5 Day Minimum Data Set (MDS)
completed on 8/5/01 and the 14 day MDS completed
8/13/01, revealed she required extensive to total
assistance with all Activities of Daily Living (ADL's)
which includes eating. She is frequently incontinent
of both bowel and bladder. The resident's cognitive
skills for daily living was coded as modified
independence. Further review of the MDS revealed that
she was not exhibiting behavior problems.
c. The resident weighed 136 lbs upon admission
and is 60 inches tall. Review of the RAP (Resident
Assessment Protocol) completed on 8/13/01, revealed
she triggered for nutritional status. The RAP summary
stated, "recent weight loss due to not eating 75%."
d. Review of the resident's meal consumption
for the month of August 2001, revealed that the
resident's breakfast intake was approximately 443,
Lunch 55% and Dinner was 43.5%.
e. Review of the care plan developed on 8/15/01
Stated under problem, "weight concerns as related to:
leaves 25% or more of food uneaten at most meals."
The goal stated, "have increased food intake as
evidenced by stable weight of 131." ‘The approaches
included, "provide increased calories and or protein",
eee eee ensnetene sana ene
"diet as ordered" and "encourage good intake of diet,
Supplements, fluid."
f. Review of the dietary Progress notes lacked
documentation indicating that calories and protein
were increased to meet the resident's nutritional
needs.
g. Interview with the Dietary Manager (DM) on
10/9/01 at 3:10 P.M., revealed that they had changed
the resident's diet on 8/6/01, from mechanical soft to
regular consistency without a physician's order.
h. Clinical record review lacked documentation
that the resident received nutritional Supplements as
specified in her care plan until 8/23/01.
i. Review of resident's weight record revealed
that she weighed 128.8 lbs on 8/11/01. This indicates
a significant weight loss of 7.2 lbs or 5.3% of her
total body weight since her admission on 7/30/01
(within a 12 day period). Clinical record review
lacked documentation that indicated that a Registered
loss. Furthermore there was no assessment of the
resident's caloric and protein needs based on her
current weight (128.8 lbs) and activity.
lbs. This indicates a Significant weight loss of 13.5
these Supplements would Provide adequate Calories
based on the resident's nutritional needs,
1. Further review of the dietary Progress notes
weight loss,
m. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON)
come out of her room. However, this is not Teflective
in the tesident's comprehensive assessments that were
5S9A-4,.1288 F.A.C., adopting by reference 42 CFR
483.25 (g) (2), This is a Class If violation and the Agency
is authorized to impose the fine amount of $2,500.00
Pursuant to Section 400.23 (8) (b) Florida Statutes.
an administrative hearing Pursuant to Section 120.569,
Florida Statutes, Specific options for administrative
action are set out and explained in the attached
Explanation of Rights (one Page) and Election of Rights
(one page). All requests for hearing Shall be made to the
Agency for Health Care Administration, and delivered to the
Agency for Health Care Administration, 525 Mirror Lake
Drive, St. Petersburg, Florida, 33701; Dennis L,. Godfrey,
Senior Attorney.
AGENCY.
espectfully Submitted,
nnis L. God rey
Senior Attorney
Agency for Health Care
Administration
FBN: 0158100
525 Mirror Lake Dr.
St. Petersburg, FL 33701
(727) 552-1525
by U.S. Certified Mail Return Receipt No. 7001 2510 0007
5976 5605, to Corporation Service Company, Registered Agent
for The Health Center of Naples, Inc., 1201 Hays Street,
Tallahassee, FL 32301-2525, and by U.S, Mail, postage
prepaid, to Mr. Derek Deeter, Administrator, The
Aristocrat, 10949 Parnu Street, Naples, FL 34109 on this
BT oy of March, 2002.
nnis L. Godfrey
Copies furnished to:
Mr. Derek Deeter, Administrator
The Aristocrat
10949 Parnu Street
Naples, FL 34109
(U.S. Mail)
Corporation Service Company
Registered Agent
for The Health Center of
Naples, Inc.
1201 Hays Street
Tallahassee, FL 32301-2525
(U.S. Certified Mail)
Dennis L. Godfrey
Senior Attorney
Agency for Health Care
Administration
525 Mirror Lake Dr. North
Suite 310L
St. Petersburg, FL 33701
Docket for Case No: 02-001303
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
May 15, 2003 |
Final Order filed.
|
May 14, 2002 |
Order Closing File issued. CASE CLOSED.
|
May 13, 2002 |
Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction (filed by Respondent via facsimile).
|
Apr. 17, 2002 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions issued.
|
Apr. 17, 2002 |
Notice of Hearing issued (hearing set for June 18, 2002; 9:00 a.m.; Naples, FL).
|
Apr. 01, 2002 |
Initial Order issued.
|
Apr. 01, 2002 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Apr. 01, 2002 |
Petition for Formal Administrative Hearing filed.
|
Apr. 01, 2002 |
Notice (of Agency referral) filed.
|