Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ALL AMERICAN COMPANIES vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 02-002776BID (2002)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 02-002776BID Visitors: 17
Petitioner: ALL AMERICAN COMPANIES
Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Judges: CHARLES A. STAMPELOS
Agency: Department of Environmental Protection
Locations: Tallahassee, Florida
Filed: Jul. 12, 2002
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Tuesday, September 24, 2002.

Latest Update: Oct. 25, 2002
Summary: At issue in this proceeding is whether the Department of Environmental Protection's decision to reject all bids submitted for the project entitled BDRS 52-01/02 was illegal, arbitrary, dishonest, or fraudulent.Department`s rejection of all bids was not illegal, arbitrary, dishonest, or fraudulent where bid specifications were ambiguous and confusing.
C24 -02 nr . “s Lyn + STATE OF FLORIDA 1+ Oop 2 1 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION S hy ALL AMERICA COMPANIES, Petitioner, DOAH CASE NO. 02-2776BID (As-CLoseol Tite vs. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, Respondent. ALL AMERICA HOMES OF GAINESVILLE, INC., a Florida Corporation, individually and d/bla ALL AMERICA COMPANIES, Petitioner, OGC CASENO. 02-1644 DOAH CASE NO. 02-2777BID vs. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, BUREAU OF DESIGN AND RECREATION SERVICES, Respondent. meee we we ww we See ar OOOO TOOT” FINAL ORDER .On September 24, 2002, an Administrative Law Judge with the Division of Administrative Hearings ("DOAH") submitted his Recommended Order to the Department of Environmental Protection (“DEP”) in these proceedings. The Recommended Order reflects that copies thereof were served upon Allen E. Stine, President of All America Homes of Gainesville, Inc. (“All America”), and upon counsel for DEP. A copy of the Recommended Order is attached as Exhibit A. The matter is now before the Secretary of DEP for final agency action. BACKGROUND In November of 2001, an Invitation to Bid (“ITB”) was issued by DEP’s Bureau of Design and Recreation (“Bureau”) on Project No. BDRS 52-01/02. The ITB requested bids from contractors to provide the necessary equipment, labor, materials, and supervision to construct a new concession building at the Hillsborough River State Park and to modify the existing concession building (the “Project”). In December of 2001, the Bureau issued “Addendum No. One (1)” to the ITB for the Project. This Project addendum notified bidders to include an allowance of $25,000 in their base bids for renovation of the existing concession building, in the event that DEP requested such renovation work. The bids for the Hillsborough River State Park Project were opened on December 18, 2001. DEP's Bureau staff determined that the lowest base bid ($355,478.00) was submitted by Nelco Diversified, Inc. (“Nelco”), but the staff had a question as to whether Nelco had included the $25,000.00 allowance in its base bid. The Bureau staff also determined that the secand lowest base bid ($362,000.00) was submitted by All America. After consulting with Nelco’s Project Manager to verify the fact that Nelco had included the $25,000.00 allowance in their base bid, DEP posted the Tabulation of Bids showing the anticipated award of the Project to Nelco. All America then filed a written formal bid protest, precipitating a review of the Project documents and bid procedures by DEP’s Bureau staff. Based on the number of questions received concerning the Project addendum and the hand-written notes on several of the bid forms, DEP’s Bureau Chief determined that the Project bid documents were confusing and ambiguous. Accordingly, on May 13, 2002, DEP posted a rejection of all bids on the Project. On May 16, 2002, All America filed a formal written protest of this rejection by DEP of all the Project bids. After some unsuccessful settlement negotiations between DEP and All America, the matter was forwarded to DOAH for formal proceedings. Administrative Law Judge, Charles A. Stampelos (“ALJ”), was assigned to conduct a formal administrative hearing. A DOAH final hearing in these consolidated cases was held in Tallahassee on August 8, 2002. Testimony and exhibits were admitted into evidence at the final hearing on behalf of All America and DEP. RECOMMENDED ORDER In his Recommended Order, the ALJ found that DEP’s determination that the Project bid documents were confusing and ambiguous was supported by the weight of the evidence presented at the final hearing. The ALJ also found that this confusion and ambiguity in the bid documents constituted a valid rationale for DEP rejecting all the Project bids under these circumstances. See, e.g., Caber Systems, Inc. v. Dept. of General Services, 530 So.2d 325 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). The ALJ thus concluded that All America did not prove that DEP “acted in a way that was illegal, arbitrary, dishonest, or fraudulent” in rejecting all the bids. The ALJ also concluded that All America was not a prevailing party and that DEP had not participated in these proceedings for an “improper purpose” under § 120.595(1), Florida Statutes. The ALJ ultimately recommended that DEP enter a final order “dismissing All America’s Petition to Prevent Rejection of Bids and to Award Contract to Petitioner and denying All America’s request for attorney's fees and costs.” CONCLUSION The Recommended Order now on administrative review upholds the preliminary determination of DEP’s Bureau of Design and Recreation that all the Project bids should be rejected because the bid documents were confusing and ambiguous. The Recommended Order also rejects all of the claims raised by All America in the DOAH proceedings. Nevertheless, All America failed to file any Exceptions to this adverse Recommended Order. Having considered the unchallenged Recommended Order and having reviewed the applicable law, It is hereby ORDERED: A. The ALJ’s Recommended Order is adopted in its entirety and incorporated by reference herein. B. All America’s Petition to Prevent Rejection of Bids and Award Contract to Petitioner is DENIED. C. All America’s related request for attorney’s fees and costs is also DENIED. Any party to this proceeding has the right to seek judicial review of the Final Order pursuant to Section 120.68, Florida Statutes, by the filing of a Notice of Appeal pursuant to Rule 9.110, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, with the clerk of the Department in the Office of General Counsel, 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, M.S. 35, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000; and by filing a copy of the Notice of Appeal accompanied by the applicable filing fees with the appropriate District Court of Appeal. The Notice of Appeal must be filed within 30 days from the date this Final Order is filed with the clerk of the Department. DONE AND ORDERED this?day of October, 2002, in Tallahassee, Florida. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION CDE bub DAVID B. STRUHS Secretary Marjory Stoneman Douglas Building 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 FILED ON THIS DATE PURSUANT TO § 1204 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE | HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing Final Order has been sent by United States Postal Service to: Allen E. Stine, President All American Homes, Inc. of Gainesville 40424 Southwest 8" Lane Gainesville, FL 32607 Ann Cole, Clerk and Charles A. Stampelos, Administrative Law Judge Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building 1230 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, FL 32399-1550 and by hand delivery to: Jerome |. Johnson, Esquire Suzanne B. Brantley, Esquire Department of Environmental Protection 3900 Commonwealth Bivd., M.S. 35 Tallahassee, FL. 32399-3000 this A Y Thay of October, 2002. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION . TERRELL WILLIAMS Assistant General Counsel g Coot. W/Dbeam 3900 Commonwealth Blvd., M.S. 35 Tallahassee, FL 32399-3000 Telephone 850/245-2242

Docket for Case No: 02-002776BID
Issue Date Proceedings
Oct. 25, 2002 Final Order filed.
Sep. 24, 2002 Recommended Order cover letter identifying hearing record referred to the Agency sent out.
Sep. 24, 2002 Recommended Order issued (hearing held August 8, 2002) CASE CLOSED.
Sep. 17, 2002 Letter to Judge Stampelos from A. Stine enclosing pages 7 and 8 of PRO filed 09/16/02 (filed via facsimile).
Sep. 17, 2002 Department of Environmental Protection`s Proposed Recommended Order (filed via facsimile).
Sep. 16, 2002 (Proposed) Recommended Order (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
Sep. 06, 2002 Transcript (2 Volumes) filed.
Sep. 06, 2002 Notice of Filing Transcript sent out.
Aug. 08, 2002 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held; see case file for applicable time frames.
Aug. 07, 2002 Prehearing Stipulation of the Parties (filed via facsimile).
Aug. 06, 2002 Notice of Appearance (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
Aug. 06, 2002 Notice of Additional Counsel filed by Respondent.
Aug. 01, 2002 Order Granting Motion to Withdraw issued.
Jul. 31, 2002 (Proposed) Order on Motion to Withdraw as Counsel (filed via facsimile).
Jul. 31, 2002 Amended Motion to Withdraw as Counsel (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
Jul. 30, 2002 (Proposed) Order on Motion to Withdraw as Counsel (filed via facsimile).
Jul. 30, 2002 Motion to Withdraw as Counsel (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
Jul. 26, 2002 Petition to Prevent Rejection of Bids and Award Contract to Petitioner (filed via facsimile).
Jul. 22, 2002 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions issued.
Jul. 22, 2002 Notice of Hearing issued (hearing set for August 8, 2002; 10:00 a.m.; Tallahassee, FL).
Jul. 19, 2002 Order Consolidating Cases issued. (consolidated cases are: 02-002776BID, 02-002777BID)
Jul. 17, 2002 Letter to M. Renard from A. Stine requesting review of the bid tabulation (filed via facsimile).
Jul. 12, 2002 Petition filed.
Jul. 12, 2002 Agency referral filed.

Orders for Case No: 02-002776BID
Issue Date Document Summary
Oct. 22, 2002 Agency Final Order
Sep. 24, 2002 Recommended Order Department`s rejection of all bids was not illegal, arbitrary, dishonest, or fraudulent where bid specifications were ambiguous and confusing.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer