Petitioner: ALL AMERICAN COMPANIES
Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Judges: CHARLES A. STAMPELOS
Agency: Department of Environmental Protection
Locations: Tallahassee, Florida
Filed: Jul. 12, 2002
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Tuesday, September 24, 2002.
Latest Update: Oct. 25, 2002
Summary: At issue in this proceeding is whether the Department of Environmental Protection's decision to reject all bids submitted for the project entitled BDRS 52-01/02 was illegal, arbitrary, dishonest, or fraudulent.Department`s rejection of all bids was not illegal, arbitrary, dishonest, or fraudulent where bid specifications were ambiguous and confusing.
C24 -02
nr . “s
Lyn +
STATE OF FLORIDA 1+ Oop 2 1
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION S hy
ALL AMERICA COMPANIES,
Petitioner,
DOAH CASE NO. 02-2776BID
(As-CLoseol
Tite
vs.
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION,
Respondent.
ALL AMERICA HOMES OF GAINESVILLE,
INC., a Florida Corporation, individually and
d/bla ALL AMERICA COMPANIES,
Petitioner,
OGC CASENO. 02-1644
DOAH CASE NO. 02-2777BID
vs.
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION, BUREAU OF DESIGN AND
RECREATION SERVICES,
Respondent.
meee we we ww we See ar OOOO TOOT”
FINAL ORDER
.On September 24, 2002, an Administrative Law Judge with the Division of
Administrative Hearings ("DOAH") submitted his Recommended Order to the
Department of Environmental Protection (“DEP”) in these proceedings. The
Recommended Order reflects that copies thereof were served upon Allen E. Stine,
President of All America Homes of Gainesville, Inc. (“All America”), and upon counsel
for DEP. A copy of the Recommended Order is attached as Exhibit A. The matter is
now before the Secretary of DEP for final agency action.
BACKGROUND
In November of 2001, an Invitation to Bid (“ITB”) was issued by DEP’s Bureau of
Design and Recreation (“Bureau”) on Project No. BDRS 52-01/02. The ITB requested
bids from contractors to provide the necessary equipment, labor, materials, and
supervision to construct a new concession building at the Hillsborough River State Park
and to modify the existing concession building (the “Project”). In December of 2001, the
Bureau issued “Addendum No. One (1)” to the ITB for the Project. This Project
addendum notified bidders to include an allowance of $25,000 in their base bids for
renovation of the existing concession building, in the event that DEP requested such
renovation work.
The bids for the Hillsborough River State Park Project were opened on
December 18, 2001. DEP's Bureau staff determined that the lowest base bid
($355,478.00) was submitted by Nelco Diversified, Inc. (“Nelco”), but the staff had a
question as to whether Nelco had included the $25,000.00 allowance in its base bid.
The Bureau staff also determined that the secand lowest base bid ($362,000.00) was
submitted by All America. After consulting with Nelco’s Project Manager to verify the
fact that Nelco had included the $25,000.00 allowance in their base bid, DEP posted the
Tabulation of Bids showing the anticipated award of the Project to Nelco.
All America then filed a written formal bid protest, precipitating a review of the
Project documents and bid procedures by DEP’s Bureau staff. Based on the number of
questions received concerning the Project addendum and the hand-written notes on
several of the bid forms, DEP’s Bureau Chief determined that the Project bid documents
were confusing and ambiguous. Accordingly, on May 13, 2002, DEP posted a rejection
of all bids on the Project. On May 16, 2002, All America filed a formal written protest of
this rejection by DEP of all the Project bids.
After some unsuccessful settlement negotiations between DEP and All America,
the matter was forwarded to DOAH for formal proceedings. Administrative Law Judge,
Charles A. Stampelos (“ALJ”), was assigned to conduct a formal administrative hearing.
A DOAH final hearing in these consolidated cases was held in Tallahassee on August
8, 2002. Testimony and exhibits were admitted into evidence at the final hearing on
behalf of All America and DEP.
RECOMMENDED ORDER
In his Recommended Order, the ALJ found that DEP’s determination that the
Project bid documents were confusing and ambiguous was supported by the weight of
the evidence presented at the final hearing. The ALJ also found that this confusion and
ambiguity in the bid documents constituted a valid rationale for DEP rejecting all the
Project bids under these circumstances. See, e.g., Caber Systems, Inc. v. Dept. of
General Services, 530 So.2d 325 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).
The ALJ thus concluded that All America did not prove that DEP “acted in a way
that was illegal, arbitrary, dishonest, or fraudulent” in rejecting all the bids. The ALJ
also concluded that All America was not a prevailing party and that DEP had not
participated in these proceedings for an “improper purpose” under § 120.595(1), Florida
Statutes. The ALJ ultimately recommended that DEP enter a final order “dismissing All
America’s Petition to Prevent Rejection of Bids and to Award Contract to Petitioner and
denying All America’s request for attorney's fees and costs.”
CONCLUSION
The Recommended Order now on administrative review upholds the preliminary
determination of DEP’s Bureau of Design and Recreation that all the Project bids should
be rejected because the bid documents were confusing and ambiguous. The
Recommended Order also rejects all of the claims raised by All America in the DOAH
proceedings. Nevertheless, All America failed to file any Exceptions to this adverse
Recommended Order. Having considered the unchallenged Recommended Order and
having reviewed the applicable law,
It is hereby ORDERED:
A. The ALJ’s Recommended Order is adopted in its entirety and incorporated by
reference herein.
B. All America’s Petition to Prevent Rejection of Bids and Award Contract to
Petitioner is DENIED.
C. All America’s related request for attorney’s fees and costs is also DENIED.
Any party to this proceeding has the right to seek judicial review of the Final
Order pursuant to Section 120.68, Florida Statutes, by the filing of a Notice of Appeal
pursuant to Rule 9.110, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, with the clerk of the
Department in the Office of General Counsel, 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, M.S. 35,
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000; and by filing a copy of the Notice of Appeal
accompanied by the applicable filing fees with the appropriate District Court of Appeal.
The Notice of Appeal must be filed within 30 days from the date this Final Order is filed
with the clerk of the Department.
DONE AND ORDERED this?day of October, 2002, in Tallahassee, Florida.
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT
OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
CDE bub
DAVID B. STRUHS
Secretary
Marjory Stoneman Douglas Building
3900 Commonwealth Boulevard
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000
FILED ON THIS DATE PURSUANT TO § 1204
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
| HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing Final Order has been sent by
United States Postal Service to:
Allen E. Stine, President
All American Homes, Inc. of Gainesville
40424 Southwest 8" Lane
Gainesville, FL 32607
Ann Cole, Clerk and
Charles A. Stampelos, Administrative Law Judge
Division of Administrative Hearings
The DeSoto Building
1230 Apalachee Parkway
Tallahassee, FL 32399-1550
and by hand delivery to:
Jerome |. Johnson, Esquire
Suzanne B. Brantley, Esquire
Department of Environmental Protection
3900 Commonwealth Bivd., M.S. 35
Tallahassee, FL. 32399-3000
this A Y Thay of October, 2002.
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT
OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
. TERRELL WILLIAMS
Assistant General Counsel
g Coot. W/Dbeam
3900 Commonwealth Blvd., M.S. 35
Tallahassee, FL 32399-3000
Telephone 850/245-2242
Docket for Case No: 02-002776BID
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Oct. 25, 2002 |
Final Order filed.
|
Sep. 24, 2002 |
Recommended Order cover letter identifying hearing record referred to the Agency sent out.
|
Sep. 24, 2002 |
Recommended Order issued (hearing held August 8, 2002) CASE CLOSED.
|
Sep. 17, 2002 |
Letter to Judge Stampelos from A. Stine enclosing pages 7 and 8 of PRO filed 09/16/02 (filed via facsimile).
|
Sep. 17, 2002 |
Department of Environmental Protection`s Proposed Recommended Order (filed via facsimile).
|
Sep. 16, 2002 |
(Proposed) Recommended Order (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
Sep. 06, 2002 |
Transcript (2 Volumes) filed. |
Sep. 06, 2002 |
Notice of Filing Transcript sent out.
|
Aug. 08, 2002 |
CASE STATUS: Hearing Held; see case file for applicable time frames. |
Aug. 07, 2002 |
Prehearing Stipulation of the Parties (filed via facsimile).
|
Aug. 06, 2002 |
Notice of Appearance (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
Aug. 06, 2002 |
Notice of Additional Counsel filed by Respondent.
|
Aug. 01, 2002 |
Order Granting Motion to Withdraw issued.
|
Jul. 31, 2002 |
(Proposed) Order on Motion to Withdraw as Counsel (filed via facsimile).
|
Jul. 31, 2002 |
Amended Motion to Withdraw as Counsel (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
Jul. 30, 2002 |
(Proposed) Order on Motion to Withdraw as Counsel (filed via facsimile).
|
Jul. 30, 2002 |
Motion to Withdraw as Counsel (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
Jul. 26, 2002 |
Petition to Prevent Rejection of Bids and Award Contract to Petitioner (filed via facsimile).
|
Jul. 22, 2002 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions issued.
|
Jul. 22, 2002 |
Notice of Hearing issued (hearing set for August 8, 2002; 10:00 a.m.; Tallahassee, FL).
|
Jul. 19, 2002 |
Order Consolidating Cases issued. (consolidated cases are: 02-002776BID, 02-002777BID)
|
Jul. 17, 2002 |
Letter to M. Renard from A. Stine requesting review of the bid tabulation (filed via facsimile).
|
Jul. 12, 2002 |
Petition filed.
|
Jul. 12, 2002 |
Agency referral filed.
|
Orders for Case No: 02-002776BID
Issue Date |
Document |
Summary |
Oct. 22, 2002 |
Agency Final Order
|
|
Sep. 24, 2002 |
Recommended Order
|
Department`s rejection of all bids was not illegal, arbitrary, dishonest, or fraudulent where bid specifications were ambiguous and confusing.
|