Petitioner: AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
Respondent: GULF COAST HEALTH CARE, INC., D/B/A THE INN AT SARASOTA BAY CLUB
Judges: CAROLYN S. HOLIFIELD
Agency: Agency for Health Care Administration
Locations: Sarasota, Florida
Filed: Aug. 29, 2002
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Tuesday, November 5, 2002.
Latest Update: Feb. 07, 2025
24 -~BV 00,
rN a »,
. Wp. by
STATE OF FLORIDA 79
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION ly 2.
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ?
ADMINISTRATION, 4
Petitioner,
vs. Case Nos, 2002030441
2002024461
2002024451
GULF COAST HEALTH CARE, INC.,
d.b.a. INN AT SARASOTA BAY CLUB
Respondent. /
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
COMES NOW the AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION (hereinafter
Agency), by and through the undersigned counsel, and files this Administrative Complaint
against the GULF COAST HEALTH CARE, INC., d.b.a. INN AT SARASOTA BAY CLUB
(hereinafter Sarasota), pursuant to Section 120.569, and 120.57, Florida Statutes, (2001), and
alleges:
NATURE OF THE ACTION
This is an action to change Sarasota’s licensure status from Standard to Conditional effective
March 27, 2002, pursuant to §§ 400.23(7)(b) and 400.102(d) Fla. Stat., and an action to impose
administrative fines in the total amount of $21,000.00 against Sarasota, pursuant to §§ 400.23(8)
and 400.102, Fla, Stat., and assess costs related to the investigation and prosecution. of this case,
Pursuant to § 400.121(10), Fla, Stat.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to § 120.60, Fla. Stat.
2. Venue lies in this court pursuant to § 120.60 Fla. Stat.
2B FDVd VOHYV Gppieggrze Tt'6@ 2882/GE/20
wo™ “nN
PARTIES
3. The Agency is the regulatory agency responsible for licensure of nursing homes and
enforcement of all applicable federal regulations, state statutes and rules goveming skilled
nursing facilities pursuant to the Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 1987, Title IV, Subtitle C (as
amended); Chapter 400, Part Il, Florida Statutes, and; Chapter 59A-4 Fla. Admin. Code,
respectively.
4, Sarasota operates a 60-bed nursing home located at 1303 N. Tamiami Trail, Sarasota, FL
34236, and is licensed as a skilled nursing facility, license number SNF16370968, certificate
number 8569, effective through December 3 1, 2002.
5. Sarasota was at all times material hereto a licensed facility under the licensing authority
of the Agency, and was required to comply with all applicable rules, and statutes,
COUNT I
SARASOTA FAILED TO FOLLOW ITS WRITTEN POLICIES
AND PROCEDURES THAT RESULTED IN NEGLECT OF
RESIDENTS CAUSING, OR WAS LIKELY TO CAUSE,
SERIOUS INJURY, HARM, OR IMPAIRMENT TO THOSE
RESIDENTS.
42 CFR. § 483.13 (c)(1)(i); § 400.23 (8) Fla. Stat.; Fla. Admin. Code R. 59A-4.1288
Class I Deficiency
6. The Agency re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs (1) through (5) as if fully set forth
herein.
7. On March 25-27, 2002, the Agency conducted a licensure and re-certification survey and
first revisit of a complaint investigation of Sarasota.
8. During those surveys, based upon observation, interview and record review, the Agency
discovered that the facility failed to notify the physician and seck medical intervention for
significant changes in a resident's medical condition in 2 of 16 active sampled residents.
€@ FoVd VOHY ObbIzcorzz TT:6@ 2862/86/28
oy r™,
9. _ Resident # 12 was admitted to Sarasota on 11/09/01 with multiple diagnoses including,
but not limited to, Arteriosclerotic Heart Disease, Hypertension and Coronary Heart Disease.
10. During the period from admission to 3/26/02, Resident # 12 experienced a 17.2% weight
gain and 4+ edema of which Sarasota had failed to notify the resident's physician.
1]. Resident # 2 was admitted to Sarasota on 2/13/02 following a hospital stay for urosepsis
and hypokalemia.
12. During the period from admission to 3/07/02, Resident # 2 experienced 4+ edema, low
urinary output, vaginal discharge and respiratory congestion of which Sarasota failed to notify
the resident's physician.
13. Resident # 2 visited the physician on 3/07/02 and was started on an antibiotic for a
urinary tract infection. It was noted the resident had a 2-3+ pedal edema.
14. During the Period 3/08/02 to 3/20/02, Resident # 2 experienced a 7.5% weight increase
and 4+ edema of which Sarasota failed to notify the resident's physician,
15. Sarasota's Standards of Care (SOC) policies and Procedures express the intent that it will
Policies and procedures of its SOC for two residents.
16. Sarasota's failure to notify the resident's Physician prior to the resident's deterioration, as
b@ FOV" VYOHY Gprlzssezz TT-6@ 2882/BE/28
or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to the residents involved, a
Class I isolated deficiency, subject to a civil penalty of $10,000.00,
WHEREFORE, the Agency intends to impose an administrative fine in the amount of
$10,000 against Sarasota, a skilled nursing facility in the State of Florida, pursuant to §§
400.23(8) and 400.102, Fla. Stat., and assess costs related to the investigation and prosecution of
this case, pursuant to § 400.121(10), Fla. Stat.
COUNT II
SARASOTA FAILED TO IMMEDIATELY CONSULT WITH
RESIDENT'S PHYSICIANS WHEN THERE WAS A
SIGNIFICANT CHANGE IN THE RESIDENT'S PHYSICAL
STATUS THAT COMPROMISED THE RESIDENT'S ABILITY
TO MAINTAIN OR REACH THE RESIDENT'S HIGHEST
PRACTICABLE PHYSICAL, MENTAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL
WELL BEING.
42 CFR. § 483.10(b)(11); § 400.23 (8) Fla. Stat.; Fla. Admin. Code R. 59A-4.1288
Class HI Deficiency
17. The Agency re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs (1) through (5) as if fully set forth
herein,
18. On March 25-27, 2002, the Agency conducted a licensure and re-certification survey and
first revisit of a complaint investigation of Sarasota.
19. During those Surveys, based upon observation, interview and record review, the Agency
discovered that Sarasota failed to consult the resident's physician following significant changes
in a resident's medical condition in 4 of 16 active sampled residents,
20, Resident # 12 was admitted to Sarasota on 11/09/01 with multiple diagnoses including,
but not limited to, Arteriosclerotic Heart Disease, Hypertension and Coronary Heart Disease,
SB FOVd VOHY ObpTz2ssgzzz TT?6@ 2682/06/20
21. During the period from admission to 3/25/02, Resident # 12 experienced a 33 Ib
Progressive weight gain and 4+ edema of which Sarasota had failed to consult with the resident's
physician.
22. ‘Resident # 2 was admitted to Sarasota on 2/13/02 following a hospital stay for urosepsis
and hypokalemia.
23. During the period from admission to 3/07/02, Resident # 2 experienced 4+ edema, low
urinary output, vaginal discharge and respiratory congestion of which Sarasota failed to notify
the resident's physician.
24. Resident # 2 visited the physician on 3/07/02 and was started on an antibiotic for a
urinary tract infection. It was noted the resident had a 2-3+- pedal edema.
25. During the period 3/08/02 to 3/20/02, Resident # 2 experienced a 7.5% weight increase
and 4+ edema of which Sarasota failed to notify the resident's physician.
26. Resident # 16 was admitted on 6/24/01 with multipie diagnoses including, but not limited
to, Congestive Heart Failure, Atrial Fib and Pacemaker.
27. On 3/27/02, Resident # 16's Tight hand was observed with 4 + edema, Clinical records
from 2/01/02 through 3/27/02 were reviewed that revealed no documentation that the resident's
physician had been consulted about the resident's condition,
28. —_ Resident # 6 was admitted on 1/04/02 with multiple diagnoses including, but not limited
to Parkinson, Depression Hypothyroidism and Gastric Esophageal Reflux Disease.
29. _ Review of Resident # 6's Medical Administration Records (MAR's) revealed the resident
refused medications during the 9:00 am. medication pass on 1/18/02, 1/19/02, 1/21/02 and
1/25/02 and the resident's physician had not been notified of the refusals.
98 39Vd VOHY ObbIZsGe2z TT:68 288Z/0E/20
30. Sarasota's failure to immediately notify the resident's physicians when there was a
significant change in the resident's physical status, violates 42 CER. 483.10(b)(1 1). That failure
to immediately notify the resident's physician compromised the resident’s ability to attain, or
maintain, the highest practicable level of well being; a Class 1 isolated violation subject to a
civil penalty of $2,500.00 under § 400.23(8)(b), Fla. Stat.
WHEREFORE, the Agency intends to impose an administrative fine in the amount of
$2,500.00 against Sarasota, a skilled nursing facility in the State of Florida, pursuant to §§
400.23(8) and 400.102, Fla. Stat, and assess costs related to the investigation and Prosecution of
this case, pursuant to § 400.121(10), Fla. Stat.
COUNT it
SARASOTA FAILED TO IMPLEMENT APPROPRIATE
PLANS OF ACTION TO CORRECT IDENTIFIED QUALITY
DEFICIENCIES FOLLOWING A COMPLAINT
RESIDENTS CAUSING, OR WAS LIKELY TO CAUSE,
SERIOUS INJURY, HARM, OR IMPAIRMENT TO THOSE
RESIDENTS.
42 CER. § 483.75(0)(2)(ii); § 400.23 (8) Fla. Stat.; Fla, Admin. Code R. 59A-4.123(2)
Class IT Deficiency
31. The Agency re-alleges and incorporates Paragraphs (1) through (5) as if fully set forth
herein.
32. On March 25-27, 2002, the Agency conducted a licensure and re-certification survey and
first revisit of a complaint investigation of Sarasota,
33. During those Surveys, based upon observation, interview and record review, the Agency
discovered that Sarasota failed to implement quality assurance Measures sufficient to correct
quality deficiencies,
28 300d YOHV ObpTescéze IT?6@ 2882 /@E/20
van o
34. On 2/26/02, as a result of a complaint investigation, Sarasota received & citation for
failing to notify a physician. At that time, the Citation was at a scope and severity level of D, On
the revisit and annual survey, the citation was found to be uncorrected and at a scope and
severity level G, as noted in Count IL
35. Sarasota’s plan of correction for the citation of 2/26/02 stated that it would educate the
licensed staff in notification of physicians and revise its policy and procedure regarding nursing
assessments and documentation and that these actions would be monitored through a quality
assurance review,
36. — Sarasota's failure to implement plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies
violates 42 C.F.R. 483.75(0)(2)(ii). That failure to implement those plans of action compromised
residents’ ability to attain, or maintain, the highest practicable level of well being: a Class 1
isolated violation subject to a civil penalty of $2,500.00 under § 400.23(8)(b), Fla. Stat.
WHEREFORE, the Agency intends to impose an administrative fine in the amount of
$2,500.00 against Sarasota, a skilled nursing facility in the State of Florida, pursuant to §§
400.23(8) and 400.102, Fla. Stat., and assess costs related to the investigation and Prosecution of
this case, pursuant to § 400.121(10), Fla. Stat.
COUNT IV
SARASOTA HAS BEEN CITED FOR A CLASS I DEFICIENCY
STEMMING FROM AN ANNUAL SURVEY TO DETERMINE
ITS COMPLIANCE WiTH FLORIDA STATUTES AND RULES
PROMULGATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THOSE
STATUTES.
§ 400.19(3) Fla. Stat.
37. The Agency re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs (1) through (5) as if fully set forth
herein. :
8@ 39Vd
VOHY abpizssezz TT:68 2082/06/20
38. On March 25-27, 2002, the Agency conducted a licensure and re-certification survey and
first revisit of a complaint investigation of Sarasota.
39. As a result of that survey and compliant investigation, Sarasota was cited for a Class L
isolated deficiency of Scope and severity level J,
40. Sarasota's Class I citation violates § 400.19(3) and subjects Sarasota to the six month
survey cycle and a civil penalty of $6,000.00.
WHEREFORE, the Agency intends to impose an administrative fine in the amount of
$6,000.00 against Sarasota, a skilled nursing facility in the State of Florida, pursuant to §
400,19(3), and assess costs related to the investigation and Prosecution of this case, pursuant to §
400.121(10), Fla. Stat.
COUNT V
§ 400.23(7)(b) Fla. Stat.
41. The Agency re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs (1) through (5) as if fully set forth
herein,
42. On March 25-27, 2002, the Agency conducted a licensure and re-certification survey and
first revisit of a complaint investigation of Sarasota,
43. During that sutvey and complaint investigation, the Agency determined that Sarasota was
not in compliance with criteria established under Part II of Florida Statute 400 or the rales
adopted by the Agency in that it failed to implement its policies, a Class I deficiency; failed to
immediately notify resident's physicians following a significant change in the resident's Status, a
68 35d VOHV GppTtaggez2 TT:6@ Zaez/eE/20
Class IT deficiency, and: failed to implement plans of correction following a citation, a Class IT
deficiency,
400.23(7)(b), Fla. Stat.
WHEREFORE, the Agency intends to assign a conditional licensure status to Sarasota, a
skilled nursing facility in the State of Florida, pursuant to §§ 400.23(7) commencing March 27,
2002.
Respectfully submitted this QE aay Re
ay,
Gerald 1. Pickett
Fla. Bar. No. 559334
Counsel for Petitioner
Agency for Health Care Administration
525 Mirror Lake Drive, 330L
St. Petersburg, FL 33701
727.552.1526 (office)
727.552.1440 (fax)
DISPLAY OF LICENSE
SASS LAY OF LICENSE
@T 39vd YOHY GbpTzgsezz TE*68 4 2802/BE/28
to the Agency for Health Care Administration, Sebring Bldg., 330L, 525 Mirror Lake Drive, St.
Petersburg, FL 33701; Attention: Gerald L. Pickett, Senior Attorney,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
MERLE ATE OF SERVICE
THEREBY CERTIFY that 4 true and correct copy of the foregoing has been served by
certified mail on July 29, 2002 to; Administrator, Gulf Coast Health Care, Inc., d/b/a/ Inn at
Sarasota Bay Club, 1303 N. Tamiami Trail, S » Florida 34236,
Copies to:
Jane Davis, Administrator
Inn at Sarasota Bay Club
1303 N. Tamiami Trail
Sarasota, FL 34236
(U.S. Certified Mail)
Elizabeth W. McArthur, Esq.
106 East College Avenue #1200
Tallahassee, FL 3230]
(U.S. Mail)
Wendy Adams
Agency for Health Care Administration
2727 Mahan Drive, Bldg #3 MS #3
Tallahassee, FL 32308
(Interoffice Mail)
Molly McKinstry
Long Term Care
Agency for Health Care Administration
2727 Mahan Drive, Bidg #1, MS Code #33
Tallahassee, Florida 32308
(Interoffice Mail)
10
TI 390d VOHV Orb tzggez TT:68 2982/@E/20
OC eee
x
MEN ON
PON ANCES,
‘
mise ys
ONCE NSE
Aten) Drea Bue a8) paserepy Jo worszar ‘hemes Amdog OOCTERT -ALv NOLLVUIdXd FSNAory
COOCLEIED “aLva HALLOg4aa NOLLOY
SMBS uy oBueyD
‘Spoq “OT Gt
StPE “Td ‘VLOSVUYS
TIVUL DAVIAVE *N £061
427) AVG VLOSVUYS LY NNI
*Buymoyjoy ayp ayerado 0} pezuomne
| ALITIOVA DNISHON GaTIDS
ALTTVNO HLTWaH GNV RaVO GEOVNVW dO NOISIAIG
NOILVULSININGY auVD HILTVdH YOd AONTDW
EPH41OLJ JO azejg
) “HOOOLESTANS™ :y ASNAOM CE -¥ aLvouTiNa |
1T:6@ 2aaz/ee/Za-
GbPTecceae
eT 300d
Docket for Case No: 02-003406
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Dec. 06, 2002 |
Final Order filed.
|
Nov. 05, 2002 |
Order Closing File issued. CASE CLOSED.
|
Nov. 01, 2002 |
Joint Motion to Cancel Hearing and Relinquish Jurisdiction filed by Respondent.
|
Oct. 10, 2002 |
The Inn`s Motion to Compel Discovery from AHCA filed.
|
Sep. 13, 2002 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions issued.
|
Sep. 13, 2002 |
Notice of Hearing issued (hearing set for November 13 through 15, 2002; 10:00 a.m.; Sarasota, FL).
|
Sep. 06, 2002 |
Joint Response to Initial Order filed.
|
Sep. 03, 2002 |
Notice and Certificate of Service of The Inn`s First Set Interrogatories to AHCA filed by Respondent.
|
Sep. 03, 2002 |
The Inn`s First Request to AHCA for Production of Documents filed.
|
Aug. 30, 2002 |
Initial Order issued.
|
Aug. 29, 2002 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Aug. 29, 2002 |
Respondent`s Amended Request for Formal Administrative Hearing filed.
|
Aug. 29, 2002 |
Notice (of Agency referral) filed.
|