Petitioner: AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
Respondent: DAWSON ADULT CARE, INC., D/B/A DAWSON ADULT CARE
Judges: STUART M. LERNER
Agency: Agency for Health Care Administration
Locations: West Palm Beach, Florida
Filed: Sep. 25, 2002
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Monday, November 25, 2002.
Latest Update: Nov. 19, 2024
STATE OF FLORIDA
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
STATE OF FLORIDA
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE
ADMINISTRATION,
AHCA Nos: 2001024631,
Petitioner, 2001012041, 2002013971,
2002029561
Vv.
Return Receipt Requested:
7000 1670 0011 4845 7649
DAWSON ADULT CARE, INC., d/b/a
7000 1672 0011 4845 7632
DAWSON ADULT CARE,
Respondent.
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
COMES NOW the Agency for Health Care Administration
(hereinafter “AHCA” or the “Agency”), by and through
undersigned counsel, and files this Administrative
d/b/a Dawson
Complaint against Dawson Adult Care, Inc.,
Adult Care (hereinafter “Dawson Adult Care” or “Dawson”),
pursuant to Chapter 400, Part III, and Section 120.60,
Florida Statutes, (2001), and alleges:
NATURE OF THE ACTION
1. This is an action to impose an administrative
fine totaling $28,000.00, pursuant to Sections 400.414,
400.419, Florida Statutes (2000), for the protection of the
public health, safety and welfare.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
2. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to Sections
120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 28-166,
Florida Administrative Code.
3. Venue lies in Palm Beach County, pursuant to
Section 120.57, Fla. Stat. and Rule 28-106.207, Florida
Administrative Code.
PARTIES
4. AHCA is the regulatory authority responsible for
licensure and enforcement of all applicable statutes and
rules governing assisted living facilities, pursuant to
Chapter 400, Part III, Florida Statutes (2001), and Chapter
58A-5, Florida Administrative Code.
5. Dawson Adult Care operates a 3l-bed assisted living
facility located at 669 West 6° Street, Riviera Beach,
Florida 33404. Dawson Adult Care is licensed as an assisted
living facility; license number AL5821, with an expiration
date of June 9, 2004. Dawson Adult Care was at all times
material hereto a licensed facility under the licensing
authority of AHCA and was required to comply with all
applicable rules and statutes.
COUNT I
DAWSON FAILED TO MAINTAIN THE FACILITY TO PROMOTE A
RESIDENTIAL, NON-MEDICAL ENVIRONMENT, AND PROVIDE FOR THE
SAFE CARE OF ALL RESIDENTS.
(PURSUANT TO A SURVEY CONDUCTED ON 3/1/01)
58A-5.023(1) (a), F.A.C.
(PHYSICAL PLANT STANDARDS)
CLASS I VIOLATION
6. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs (1)
through (5) as if fully set forth herein.
7. Based on observation at the time of the survey
conducted on 03/01/01, the Agency’s surveyor determined
that Dawson failed to maintain the facility to promote a
residential, non-medical environment, and provide for the
safe care of all residents. Findings include the
following:
a) The surveyor observed that the door track of the
patio doors leading to the patio were warped, rusted,
broken, bent and twisted. The footing was very uneven.
The surveyor herself had actually tripped on the warped,
rusted, broken, bent and twisted door tracks. The surveyor
believed that the warped, rusted, broken, bent and twisted
door tracks presented an imminent danger to residents
and/or guests. The surveyor warned the facility that the
warped, rusted, broken, bent and twisted door tracks were a
hazard and presented an imminent danger to residents and/or
guests. The surveyor warned the facility that the doorway
was unsafe and needed to be attended to immediately. The
surveyor believed that other residents or guests had
tripped on the door tracks. Shortly thereafter, on the day
of the survey, Resident #4 tripped on the warped, rusted,
broken, bent and twisted tracks, fell out the door onto the
concrete patio, and sustained head injuries to the back and
left sides of his/her head. The resident appeared dazed
from the fall and had slurred speech. The resident was
taken to the hospital and admitted on 3/01/01.
b) The surveyor also found that the facility had
several sharp and rusted gardening tools on the patio.
There were rakes, shovels, hoes and blades. This situation
also presented a hazard to residents, and presented an
imminent danger to the residents.
8. Based on the foregoing, Dawson Adult Care
violated Rule 58A-5.023(1) (a), Florida Administrative Code,
a Class I violation, pursuant to Section 400.419(1) (a),
Fla. Stat., which carries, in this case, an assessed fine
of $10,000.00.
COUNT II
DAWSON FAILED TO MAINTAIN THE FACILITY TO PROMOTE A
RESIDENTIAL, NON-MEDICAL ENVIRONMENT, AND PROVIDE FOR THE
SAFE CARE OF ALL RESIDENTS.
58A-5.023(1) (a), F.A.C.
(PHYSICAL PLANT STANDARDS)
UNCORRECTED CLASS II VIOLATION
9. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs (1)
through (5) as if fully set forth herein.
10. Based on observation at the time of a survey
conducted on 01/16/01, the Agency’s surveyor determined
that Dawson failed to maintain the facility to promote a
residential, non-medical environment, and provide for the
safe care of all residents. Findings include the
following:
(a) The surveyor found unattended gallons of
bleach, insecticide, and caustic cleaning supplies
throughout the facility on tables, chairs and on the floors
in the hallways. The cleaning supplies and insecticide
were not in use, as there were no staff members on duty or
volunteers observed to be cleaning. During interview with
the surveyor, a resident stated that is where the
insecticide is usually kept (outside of Room 2).
(b) The surveyor observed broken, discarded
furniture throughout the facility, both inside and outside.
wu
Some of the furniture had rusted metal and splintered wood,
with many dangerous, jagged edges. There were broken
chairs, with missing legs, arms and some were unsteady,
without cushions. They presented a danger to any resident
that would attempt to use them and were a tripping hazard,
as they littered the walkways and could prevent exit in
case of emergency. Two of the rooms had broken dressers,
with handles missing from drawers that would not close.
(c) The surveyor found that the floors of two
bathrooms were wet and soaked with a liquid that had a
strong urine odor. This presented a slipping hazard as well
as an unsanitary, non-residential condition. There were no
towels or toilet paper observed in any of the bathrooms for
resident/staff use. Mandated correction date: 01/18/01.
11. As a result of a follow-up survey conducted
on 01/24/01, and based on observation, the Agency’s
surveyor again found that Dawson failed to maintain the
facility to promote a residential, non-medical environment,
and provide for the safe care of all residents. Findings
include the following:
(a) Bottles of caustic cleaning supplies were
observed on a cart/table on the open patio area between the
two buildings of the facility. There were several bottles
of bleach, six quart bottles of ammonia, approximately
eighteen large bottles of a bright yellow cleaning solution
and approximately 25 small 2802 bottles of this cleaning
solution stored on the cart/table.
(b) Two space heaters were observed; one was
sitting on a chair in the entry room and the other space
heater was observed in a public bathroom.
(c) The surveyors found that the above-cited
conditions or occurrences in paragraphs 10 and 11 directly
threatened the physical or emotional health, safety, or
security of the residents.
12. Based on the foregoing, Dawson Adult Care
violated Rule 58A-5.023(1) (a), Florida Administrative Code,
an uncorrected Class II violation, pursuant to Section
400.419(1) (b), Fla. Stat. (2000), which carries, in this
case, an assessed fine of $5,000.00.
COUNT IIT
DAWSON ADULT CARE FAILED TO OBTAIN WRITTEN CONSENT
AGREEMENTS FROM RESIDENTS BEFORE CHARGING THEM FOR SEPARATE
SERVICES (SERVICES NOT PROVIDED AS PART OF THE STANDARD
MONTHLY RATE).
400.427(5), Fla. Stat.
(FISCAL STANDARDS)
UNCORRECTED CLASS III VIOLATION
13. BHCA re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs (1)
through (5) as if fully set forth herein.
14. During an appraisal visit conducted on 01/16/01,
and based upon review of the available record for the month
of December (year not specified) and interview with the
owner at the time of the survey on 01/16/0lthe Agency's
surveyor found that Dawson failed to obtain written consent
agreements from residents before charging them for separate
services (services not provided as part of the standard
monthly rate). The surveyor found that residents were
charged various fees for personal loans, hair repair, cable
TV, and podiatry services without any specific written
consent agreement from the residents. B Findings include
the following:
(a) One resident was charged $10.00 for hair
repair on 11/29. He appeared to be due $33.00 for the month
of December.
(ob) One resident was charged for December:
cable-$11.00, Podiatry- $15.00 (6/16/00) and personal loan-
$5.00, for a total of $31.00. He appeared to be due $12.00
for the month of December.
(c) One resident was charged: 11/22-$35.00-
(1/2)=$18.00 for hair repair, 12/9- Podiatry $30.00-1/2 =
$15.00, and 12/14- personal loan $5.00, for a total of
$38.00. He appeared to be due $5.00 for December.
(d) One resident had a $15.00 Podiatry balance
from 6/16 and a 1/2 Podiatry balance from 12/9, for a total
due of $30.00. He appeared to be due $13.00 for December.
(e) One resident had a charge of $30.00 for
Podiatry on 12/-9 and appeared to be due $217.00 for the
month of December and previous months.
15. There were no written consents given by these
residents for these specific charges and the owner was
unable to show evidence that the funds due were provided to
the residents. The personal funds due the residents for the
month of January were not as of the date of the survey
(01/16/01) provided to the residents. The owner stated that
she had not had time to get to the bank.
Correction Date Given: 2/14/01
16. When a follow-up visit was conducted on 3/01/01,
the surveyor determined that this deficiency/violation
remained out of compliance since the survey of 1/16/01,
even though the facility was supposed to have corrected the
deficiency/violation by 2/14/01. Findings include:
(a) Based on a review of 3 resident records, the
surveyor determined that the facility did not have written
consent to manage the residents’ funds.
(b) There was no written consent in any of the
residents’ files giving the facility the right to manage
residents’ funds.
(c) There was no statement of the costs of
services or supplies to a resident while at the facility.
17. Based on the foregoing, Dawson Adult Care
violated Section 400.427(5), Fla. Stat., an uncorrected
Class III violation, which carries, in this case an
assessed fine of $1,000.00.
COUNT IV
DAWSON ADULT CARE FAILED TO MAINTAIN LIABILITY INSURANCE
COVERAGE AT ALL TIMES
400.4275(3), Fla. Stat., and/or Rules 58A-5.021(8), and/or
58A-5.024(1) (g), F.A.C.
(FACILITY RECORDS STANDARDS)
UNCORRECTED CLASS III VIOLATION
18. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs (1)
through (5) as if fully set forth herein.
19, At the time of survey on 01/16/01, the Agency’s
surveyor found that the facility was not able to provide
evidence of current liability coverage and/or failed to
maintain liability insurance coverage at all times. The
surveyor called the facility on 01/18/01 and spoke with the
Administrator, who stated that he would fax a copy of their
proof of insurance. The surveyor made a follow-up call to
the Administrator later that day, when only an insurance
10
bill was provided, and the surveyor found that the
facility’s insurance policy was never renewed by the
facility and had in fact expired on 11/25/00.
Correction Date: 02/14/01.
20. On the follow-up survey conducted on 3/1/01, the
surveyor found that the deficiency/violation remained out
of compliance, even though the facility was supposed to
have corrected the deficiency/violation by 2/14/01.
21. Based on an interview with the owner, the
surveyor found that the facility had been unable to obtain
insurance coverage. The facility's insurance coverage had
expired on 11/25/00.
22. Based on the foregoing, Dawson Adult Care
violated Section 400.4275(3), Fla. Stat., and/or Rules 58A-
5.021(8), and/or 58A-5.024(1) (g), F.A.C., an uncorrected
Class III violation, which carries, in this case an
assessed fine of $1,000.00.
COUNT V
DAWSON ADULT CARE FAILED TO HAVE A STAFF MEMBER AWAKE AT
ALL HOURS OF THE DAY AND NIGHT
Rule 58A-5.0191(4) (a) (3), F.A.C.
(STAFFING STANDARDS)
UNCORRECTED CLASS II VIOLATION
11
23. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs (1)
through (5) as if fully set forth herein.
24. Based upon interview with the owner at the time
of the survey conducted on 01/16/01, the Agency’s surveyor
found that the facility failed to have a staff member awake
at all hours of the day and night. The surveyor found that
no staff members were scheduled to be on duty and awake
from 11:00 pm to 6:00 am for five nights (Monday to
Friday). The surveyor found that on Saturday, no staff
members are scheduled to be on duty and awake from 10:00 pm
to Sunday morning. The schedule provided only one employee
working on Sundays from 11:00 am to 4:00 pm. The surveyor
called the facility’s owner for clarification and to
inquire about who was scheduled to be on duty and awake
each night, and the owner told the surveyor that she is on
duty each night and lives upstairs. The owner, who stated
that that she is on duty each night, also stated that she
slept during the night, while she is on duty. Correction
date assigned: 01/18/01.
25. Based upon interview with the owner at the time
of the follow-up survey conducted on 01/24/01, the Agency’s
surveyor again found that the facility failed to have a
staff member awake at all hours of the day and night. The
owner of the facility again stated that she lives on the
12
premises and does not require much sleep. She stated that
she is awake most of the night and can be on duty both day
and night. This is an uncorrected violation from the
1/16/01 survey.
26. Based on the foregoing Dawson Adult Care violated
Rule 58A~-5.0191(4) (a) (3), F.A.C., n uncorrected Class II
violation pursuant to Section 400.419(1) (ob), Fla. Stat.
(2000), which carries in this case an assessed fine of
$5,000.00.
COUNT VI
DAWSON ADULT CARE FAILED TO ENSURE THAT EACH RESIDENT HAS A
SIGNED CONTRACT, EXECUTED PRIOR TO OR AT ADMISSION.
400.424(1) (5), Fla. Stat., and/or 58A-5.024(3) (1), and/or
58A-5.025(1), F.A.C.
(RESIDENT RECORDS STANDARDS)
REPEATED CLASS III VIOLATION
27. AHCA re~alleges and incorporates paragraphs (1
through (5) as if fully set forth herein.
28. During the survey conducted on 02/18/02 and based
on record review, the Agency’s surveyor determined that one
of the three records reviewed did not have a contract
present. Resident #3, who was admitted on 12/02/01, did
not have a contract. When requested to by the surveyor,
the administrator was unable to produce this required
contract and confirmed that it was not present.
13
29. Based on the foregoing Dawson Adult Care violated
Section 400.424(1) (5), Fla. Stat., and/or Rules 58A-
5.024(3) (i), and/or 58A-5.025(1), F.A.C., a repeated Class
III violation from the surveys of 1/16/01 and 3/16/00,
which carries in this case an assessed fine of $1,000.00.
COUNT VII
DAWSON ADULT CARE FAILED TO ENSURE THAT RESIDENTS’ MEDICAL
EXAMINATION REPORTS, OR HEALTH ASSESSMENTS, WERE COMPLETE
AND CONTAINED ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION.
58A-5.0181(2) (a), F.A.C.
(ADMISSION CRITERIA STANDARDS)
REPEATED CLASS III VIOLATION
30. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs (1)
through (5) as if fully set forth herein.
31. During the survey conducted on 2/18/02 and based
upon review and interview, the Agency’s surveyor found that
Dawson failed to ensure that residents’ health assessments,
or medical examination reports, were complete and contained
all required information.
32. The surveyor found that two of three resident
records reviewed contained incomplete medical examination
reports, or health assessments. These reports/assessments
were not dated, and did not have the name, address, and
phone number of the examining physician or ARNP. The
administrator confirmed that these records were not
complete.
14
33. Based on the foregoing, Dawson Adult Care
violated Rule 58A-5.0181(2) (a), F.A.C., a repeated class
III violation from the survey of 3/16/00, which carries in
this case an assessed fine of $1,000.00.
COUNT VIII
DAWSON ADULT CARE FAILED TO ENSURE THAT STAFF
PERSONNEL RECORDS CONTAINED DOCUMENTED THAT STAFF WERE FREE
FROM COMMUNICABLE DISEASES ON AN ANNUAL BASIS
58A-5.019(2) (a), F.A.C.
(STAFF RECORDS STANDARDS)
REPEATED CLASS III VIOLATION
34. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs (1)
through (5) as if fully set forth herein.
35. During the survey conducted on 2/18/02 and based
upon record review, the Agency’s surveyor determined that
two of four staff records did not contain any evidence that
they had been tested during the past year and were free
from tuberculosis/communicable diseases. These staffs had
been hired in 9/01 and 2/01.
36. Based on the foregoing, Dawson Adult Care
violated Rule 58A-5.019(2) (a), F.A.C., a repeated Class III
from the survey of 3/06/00, which carries in this case an
assessed fine of $1,000.00.
COUNT IX
DAWSON ADULT CARE FAILED TO ENSURE THAT EACH RESIDENT HAD A
SIGNED CONTRACT, EXECUTED PRIOR TO OR AT ADMISSION.
400.424(1) (5), Fla. Stat., and/or 58A-5.024(3) (i), and/or
58A-5.025(1), F.A.C.
(RESIDENT RECORDS STANDARDS)
UNCORRECTED CLASS III VIOLATION
37. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs (1)
through (5) as if fully set forth herein.
38. During the survey, the Agency’s surveyor found
that the facility failed to ensure that each resident had a
signed contract present in the record, that had been
completed at or prior to admission. Findings include the
following:
(a) One of three records reviewed did not have a
contract present. Resident #3, who was admitted on
12/01/01, did not have a contract. When requested to by the
surveyor, the administrator was unable to produce this
required contract and confirmed that it was not present.
This is a repeat violation from the surveys of 1/16/01 and
3/16/00. Correction date given: 3/20/02.
39. During the follow-up survey conducted on 4/09/02
and based upon review and interview, the surveyor found
that the facility again did not ensure that each resident
had a signed contract, executed at or prior to admission.
Findings include the following:
(a) A signed contract was not present in the
record of resident #3. When requested to by the surveyor,
16
the administrator was unable to produce this required
document and verified that it was not present. This
resident is the same resident for whom a contract was not
present during the Re-licensure survey of 2/18/02, and was
supposed to be corrected by 3/20/02.
This is an uncorrected violation from the survey of
2/18/02.
40. Based on the foregoing, Dawson Adult Care
violated Section 400.424(1) (5), Fla. Stat., and/or Rules
58A-5.024(3) (i), and/or 58A-5.025(1), F.A.C., herein
classified as an uncorrected Class III violation, which
carries in this case an assessed fine of $1,000.00.
COUNT X
DAWSON ADULT CARE FAILED TO ENSURE THAT STAFF RECEIVED THE
REQUIRED TRAINING IN: RESIDENT BEHAVIOR AND NEEDS, AND
PROVIDING ASSISTANCE WITH ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING
58A-5.0191(2) (d) and/or 58A-5.0191(10) (e), F.A.C.
(STAFF TRAINING REQUIREMENTS)
UNCORRECTED CLASS III VIOLATION
41. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs (1)
through (5) as if fully set forth herein.
42. During the survey conducted on 2/18/02 and based
upon record review and interview, the Agency’s surveyor
found that that the facility failed to ensure that staff
received the required training in: resident behavior and
needs, and providing assistance with activities of daily
living. Findings include the following:
(a) Two of four staff records did not contain
any evidence of this required training. These staff members
had start dates in 9/01 and 2/01. During interview, the
administrator confirmed that this training had not been
provided to the respective staff members.
Mandated Correction Date: 3/20/02
43. During the follow-up survey conducted on 4/09/02
and based upon record review and interview, the surveyor
found that the facility again failed to ensure that staff
received the required training in: resident behavior and
needs, and providing assistance with activities of daily
living. Findings include the following:
(a) Two of two staff records did not contain any
evidence of this required training. These staffs had start
dates in 9/01 and 2/01. When requested to by the surveyor,
the administrator was unable to produce any evidence of
this required training having been accomplished.
This is an uncorrected violation from the survey of
2/18/02.
44. Based on the foregoing, Dawson Adult Care
violated Rules 58A~-5.0191(2) (ad), and/or 58A-5.0191(10) (e),
18
F.A.C., an uncorrected Class III violation that carries in
this case an assessed fine of $1,000.00.
COUNT XI
DAWSON ADULT CARE FAILED TO ENSURE THAT THE ADMINISTRATOR
RECEIVED THE REQUIRED ADDED CORE TRAINING
400.452(8), Fla. Stat.
(STAFFING STANDARDS)
UNCORRECTED CLASS III VIOLATION
45. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs (1)
through (5) as if fully set forth herein.
46. During the survey of 2/18/02 and based upon
record review and interview, the surveyor found that the
facility did not ensure that there was significant
compliance with assisted living regulations, and failed to
ensure that the administrator received required added core
training. Findings include the following:
(a) Based upon the citations received as a
result of this survey, the repeat citations involved, and
the citations received during surveys conducted during this
past year (on 1/15/02, 1/16/01 & 1/24/01) and the
administrator’s evident lack of familiarity with the
regulations, he/she was required to re-take in its entirety
the core training for ALF operation.
Mandated Correction Date: 3/20/02.
47. When a follow-up survey was conducted on 4/09/02
and based upon record review and interview, the surveyor
found that the facility’s administrator did not receive the
required added Core Training, even though he/she was
required to correct or re-take the training by 3/20/02,
(a) The administrator, as a result of the
deficiencies received in the Re-licensure survey of 2/18/02
and other citations, had been required to repeat in its
entirety the Core Training for ALF operation. The
administrator was unable to produce any evidence that this
training had been accomplished and confirmed that he/she
had not attended this training.
This is an uncorrected violation from the survey of
2/18/02.
48. Based on the foregoing, Dawson Adult Care
violated Section 400.452, Fla. Stat., an uncorrected Class
III violation, which carries in this case an assessed fine
of $1,000.00.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, the Petitioner, State of Florida Agency for
Health Care Administration requests the following relief:
20
A. Make factual and legal findings in favor of
the Agency on Counts I through XI.
B. Assess administrative fines totaling
$28,000.00 against Dawson Adult Care on Counts I through
XI.
Cc. Grant such other relief as this Court deems
is just and proper.
Respondent is notified that it has a right to request an
administrative hearing pursuant to Sections 120.569 and
120.57, Florida Statutes (2001). Specific options for
administrative action are set out in the attached Election
of Rights and explained in the attached Explanation of
Rights. All requests for hearing shall be made to the
Agency for Health Care Administration, and delivered to the
Agency for Health Care Administration, Manchester Building,
First Floor, 8355 N. W. 53rd Street, Miami, Florida, 33166;
Attn: Kathryn F. Fenske.
RESPONDENT IS FURTHER NOTIFIED THAT THE FAILURE TO REQUEST
A HEARING WITHIN 21 DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THIS COMPLAINT WILL
RESULT IN AN ADMISSION OF THE FACTS ALLEGED IN THE
COMPLAINT AND THE ENTRY OF A FINAL ORDER BY THE AGENCY.
21
Copies furnis
Diane Reiland
hed to:
Field Office Manager
Agency for He
Administratio
1710 East Tif
West Palm Bea
Gloria Collin
Finance and A
Agency for He
Administratio
2727 Mahan Dr
Tallahassee,
alth Care
n
Kathryn F. Fenske
Assistant General Counsel
Agency for Health Care
Administration
Florida Bar # 0142832
8355 N. W. 53 Street
Miami, Florida 33166
(305) 499-2165
fany Drive, Suite 100
ch, FL 33407
s
ccounting
alth Care
n
ive
Florida 32308
Assisted Living Facility Unit Program
Agency for Health Care
Administration
2727 Mahan Dr
Tallahassee,
ive
Florida 32308
22
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the
foregoing has been furnished by U.S. Certified Mail, Return
Receipt Requested to Eric Dawson, Administrator, Dawson
Adult Care, 669 W. 6° Street, Riviera Beach, Florida 33404,
and to Doloris Dawson, 1220 w 3'4 Street, Riviera Beach,
Florida 33404 on . / , 2002,
KatHryn“F. Fenske
23
“a,
i
STATE OF FLORIDA fF fee
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION 02 Sep
_
f
om
Kes,
B)
RE: CASE NAME: Dawson Adult Care CASE No. s0z0raeereeee a20at 3: 5/
2002013971;'2402029561,
IP ge lie
ELECTION OF RIGHTS
PLEASE SELECT ONLY 1 OF THE 3 OPTIONS
An Explanation of Rights is attached.
OPTION ONE (1) 0 ! do not dispute the allegations of fact contained in the Administrative Complaint
and waive my right to object or to be heard. | understand that by waiving my rights, a final order will be
issued that adopts the Administrative Complaint and imposes the sanctions sought.
OPTION TWO (2) 0 ! do not dispute and | admit the allegations of fact in the Administrative
Complaint, but do wish to be afforded an informal proceeding, pursuant to Section 120.57(2), Florida
Statutes, at which time | will be permitted to submit oral and/or written evidence to the Agency in mitigation
of the penalty imposed.
OPTION THREE (3) 8 1! do dispute the allegations of fact contained in the Administrative Complaint and
request a formal hearing, pursuant to Section 120. 57(1), Florida Statutes, before an Administrative Law
Judge appointed by the Division of Administrative Hearings.
If you choose OPTION THREE (3), in order to obtain a formal proceeding before the Division of
Administrative Hearings under Section 120.57(1), F.S., your request for an administrative hearing must
Conform to the requirements in Section 28-106.201, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C), and must state
the material facts you dispute.
er to preserve your right to any hearing, your Election of Rights in this matter must be directed to
by filing within twenty-one (21) days from the date you receive the Administrative
penalty sought in the Complaint.
If you have elected either OPTION TWO (2) or THREE (3) above and you are interested in discussing a
settlement of this matter with the Agency, please also mark this block. 6
Mediation under Section 120.573, Florida Statutes, is not available in this matter.
SEND NO PAYMENT NOW .-. REGARDLESS OF THE OPTION SELECTED, PLEASE WAIT UNTIL
YOU RECEIVE A COPY OF A FINAL ORDER FOR INSTRUCTIONS ON PAYMENT OF ANY FINES.
(Please sign and fill in your current address.)
Respondent (Licensee)
Address:
License. No. and facility type: Phone No.
PLEASE RETURN YOUR COMPLETED FORM To:
Agency for Health Care Administration, Kathryn F. Fenske, Assistant General Counsel, 8355 NW 537 Street, Miami
Florida 33166 Telephone Number: (305) 499-2165 _; FAX (805) 499-2195 _; TDD 1-800-955-8771.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
the attached Election of Rights form and return it fully &xecuted to the address listed On the form,
If you dispute the allegations in the Administrative Complaint and wai Your right to
be heard, You should Select OPTION 7 ©n the election Of rights form. A final Order will be entered finding you
Quilty of the Violations charged and imposing the Penalty Sought in the Complaint, You will be Provided a
Copy of the fina} order,
If you qi the allegations Set forth in the Administrative Complaint (you do Not admit
them) you May request a formal hearing Pursuant to Section 120.57( 1), Florida Statutes (1999). To obtain a
formal hearing, Select OPTION 3 on the Election of Rights form,
In order to obtain a formal Proceeding before the Division of Administrative Hearings under Section
120.57(4), F.S., your request for an administrative hearing Must conform to the requirements in Section
28-106.201, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C), and must State the material facts you dispute,
In order to Preserve your right to a hearing, your Election of Rights in this matter
must be directed to the Agency by filing Within twenty-one (21) days from the date
You receive the Administrative Compiaint. If you do not respond at ail Within
be issueg finding YOu guilty of the Violations Charged and imposing the penalty
Sought in the Complaint.
Docket for Case No: 02-003772
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Nov. 25, 2002 |
Order Closing File issued. CASE CLOSED.
|
Nov. 22, 2002 |
Joint Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
Nov. 12, 2002 |
Respondent`s Response to Petitioner`s Request for Admissions filed.
|
Nov. 12, 2002 |
Response to First Set of Interrogatories filed by Respondent.
|
Oct. 25, 2002 |
Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing issued (hearing set for December 13, 2002; 9:00 a.m.; West Palm Beach, FL).
|
Oct. 24, 2002 |
Notice of Service of Petitioner`s Second Set of Request for Admissions and for Production of Documents (filed via facsimile).
|
Oct. 22, 2002 |
Motion for Continue (filed by R. Novell via facsimile).
|
Oct. 17, 2002 |
Agency for Health Care Administration`s Objections to Respondent`s Request for Production (filed via facsimile).
|
Oct. 15, 2002 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions issued.
|
Oct. 15, 2002 |
Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference issued (video hearing set for November 8, 2002; 9:00 a.m.; West Palm Beach and Tallahassee, FL).
|
Sep. 26, 2002 |
Initial Order issued.
|
Sep. 25, 2002 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Sep. 25, 2002 |
Answer and Petition for Evidentiary Hearing Involving Disputed Issues of Material Fact filed.
|
Sep. 25, 2002 |
Notice (of Agency referral) filed.
|