Petitioner: AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
Respondent: FANNIE LUE FINKLEY, D/B/A LOVING CARE ALF, A/K/A LOVING CARE RETIREMENT CENTER
Judges: SUZANNE F. HOOD
Agency: Agency for Health Care Administration
Locations: Pensacola, Florida
Filed: Oct. 02, 2002
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Monday, August 11, 2003.
Latest Update: Jan. 03, 2025
OA-B P57
?
STATE OF FLORIDA
ap
a
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE
ADMINISTRATION,
Petitioner,
vs. AHCA NOS. 2002019591
2002009691
2001041081
FANNIE LUE FINKLEY d/b/a,
LOVING CARE ALF, a/k/a,
LOVING CARE RETIREMENT CENTER,
Respondent.
/
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
COMES NOW the AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION (hereinafter
“AHCA”), by and through its undersigned counsel, and files this Administrative Complaint
against FANNIE LUE FINKLEY d/b/a LOVING CARE ALF a/k/a LOVING CARE
RETIREMENT CENTER (hereinafter “Loving Care ALF”), pursuant to Sections 120.569 and
120.57, Florida Statutes (2001), and alleges:
NATURE OF THE ACTION
1. This is an action to revoke Loving Care ALF’s assisted living facility license and
to impose a $46,000.00 fine against Loving Care ALF based on: (a) four (4) class II deficiencies
and nine (9) uncorrected class III deficiencies found at a survey on or about March 13, 2002; (b)
four (4) class II deficiencies found at a survey on or about February 5-6, 2002; and (c) four (4)
class Il deficiencies found at a survey on or about July 1-3, 2001, pursuant to Sections
400.414(1)(e), 400.419(1)(b) and (c) and 400.419(3), Florida Statutes (2001).
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
2. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to Sections 120.569 and 120.57, Florida
Statutes (2001).
3. AHCA has jurisdiction over Loving Care ALF pursuant to Chapter 400, Part Til,
Florida Statutes (2001).
4, Venue shall be determined pursuant to Rule 28-106.207, Florida Administrative
Code (2001).
PARTIES
5. AHCA is the regulatory agency responsible for licensure of assisted living
facilities and enforcement of all applicable Florida laws and rules governing assisted living
facilities pursuant to Chapter 400, Part III, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 58A-5, Florida
Administrative Code.
6. Fannie Lue Finkley is an individual residing in the State of Florida at 5705 West
Shore Drive, Pensacola, Florida 32526.
7. Fannie Lue Finkley owns and operates Loving Care ALF, a fourteen (14) bed
assisted living facility located at 7667 Kipling Street, Pensacola, Florida 32514. Loving Care
ALF is licensed by AHCA as an assisted living facility having been issued license number
AL9659, certificate number 11306, with an effective date of September 24, 2001 and an
expiration date of September 23, 2003.
8. Loving Care ALF is and was at all times material hereto an assisted living facility
required to comply with Chapter 400, Part III, Florida Statutes and Chapter 58A-5, Florida
Administrative Code.
COUNT I
LOVING CARE ALF FAILED TO MAINTAIN
IN RESIDENT #6’S RECORD
PHYSICIAN’S ORDERS FOR MEDICATION.
Rule 58A-5.024(3)(c), Fla. Admin. Code (2001)
CLASS II DEFICIENCY
9. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs one (1) through eight
(8) above as if fully set forth herein.
10. On or about March 13, 2002 AHCA conducted a survey at Loving Care ALF.
One class II deficiency was cited against Loving Care ALF based upon the findings below
involving resident #6.
RESIDENT #6
11. On or about March 13, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed resident #6’s record
and interviewed Loving Care ALF’s Administrator. The record did not contain a physician’s
order for any of the ten (10) medications listed below:
° Nitroglycerin skin patch apply in the morning and take off each
evening.
° Albuterol Inhaler two puffs four times a day.
° Cyproheptadine 4 milligrams twice a day.
e Famotidine 20 milligrams twice a day.
° Metoprolol 50 milligrams % tablet twice a day.
e Potassium Chloride 10 milli equilivents twice a day.
e Enteric Coated Aspirin 325 milligrams in the morning.
e Norvasc 5 milligrams in the moming.
e Triamterene/Hydrochlorothiazide 75/50 in the morning.
e Remeron 15 milligrams at bedtime.
12. During the interview, the Administrator could not produce a physician’s
orders for any of the above-named medications listed on the resident’s medication
observation record.
13. Based on all of the foregoing, Loving Care ALF violated Rule 58A-5.024(3)(c),
Florida Administrative Code, by failing to maintain on the premises resident #6’s record which
record included all health care provider’s orders for medications.
14, Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(b), Florida Statutes, the foregoing violation is a
class II violation because it is related to the personal care of resident #6 and directly threatened
resident #6’s physical or emotional health, safety, or security.
15. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(b), Florida Statutes, AHCA may impose a
$5,000.00 fine against Loving Care ALF for a class II deficiency.
COUNT If
LOVING CARE ALF FAILED TO PROPERLY
ADMINISTER MEDICATION TO RESIDENT #3.
§ 400.4256, Fla. Stat. (2001)
Rule 58A-5.0185(3) and/or (4), Fla. Admin. Code (2001)
CLASS II DEFICIENCY
16. | AHCA re-alleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs one (1) through eight
(8) above as if fully set forth herein.
17, On or about March 13, 2002 AHCA conducted a survey at Loving Care ALF. A
class II deficiency was cited against Loving Care ALF based on the findings below involving
resident #3.
Resident #3
18. On or about March 13, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed resident #3’s record.
Resident #3’s medication observation record revealed that resident #3 received ten (10) units of
insulin every morning. During an interview with the Administrator, the Administrator admitted
to the AHCA surveyor that she draws up the insulin into syringes every week and places them in
the refrigerator for resident #3 to self-administrator.
19. Pursuant to Section 400.4256(4)(b), Florida Statutes, the self-administration of
medication does not include the preparation of syringes for injection. The Administrator is not a
licensed health care professional and therefore should not be preparing syringes for injection.
20. Based on all of the foregoing, Loving Care ALF violated Section 400.4256,
Florida Statutes, and Rule 58A-5.0185(3) and/or (4), Florida Administrative Code, by failing to
properly administer medication to resident #3.
21. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(b), Florida Statutes, the foregoing violation is a
class II violation because it is related to the personal care of resident #3 and directly threatened
resident #3’s physical or emotional health, safety, or security.
22. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(b), Florida Statutes, AHCA may impose a
$2,000.00 fine against Loving Care ALF for a class II deficiency.
COUNT Il
LOVING CARE ALF FAILED TO MAINTAIN AN ACCURATE, DAILY, UP-TO-DATE
MEDICATION OBSERVATION RECORD (“MOR”) FOR RESIDENT #6.
Rule 58A-5.0185(5)(b), Fla. Admin. Code (2001)
CLASS I DEFICIENCY
23. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs one (1) through eight
(8) above as if fully set forth herein.
24, On or about March 13, 2002 AHCA conducted a survey at Loving Care ALF. A
class II deficiency was cited against the Loving Care ALF based on the findings below involving
resident #6.
Resident #6
25. On or about March 13, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed resident #6’s MOR.
According to the MOR, resident #6 was receiving eleven (11) different medications (i.e., the ten
medications listed in Count I above plus Ativan). Although Ativan was listed on the MOR, there
was no documentation on the MOR showing that the medication had been administered to
resident #6.
26. On or about March 13, 2002 the surveyor interviewed the Administrator regarding
the Ativan. The Administrator informed the surveyor that the Ativan had been discontinued. If
the Ativan had been discontinued, there should have been documentation on the MOR showing
this change.
27. Based on all of the foregoing, Loving Care ALF violated Rule 58A-5.0185(5)(b),
Florida Administrative Code, by failing to maintain an accurate, daily, up-to-date MOR for
resident #6.
28. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(b), Florida Statutes, the foregoing violation is a
class II violation because it is related to the personal care of resident #6 and directly threatened
resident #6’s physical or emotional health, safety, or security.
29. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(b), Florida Statutes, AHCA may impose a
$2,000.00 fine against Loving Care ALF for aclass II deficiency.
COUNT IV
LOVING CARE ALF FAILED TO OBTAIN RESIDENT #3’S
HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE MEDICATION IN A TIMELY MANNER.
Rule 58A-5.0185(7)(f), Fla. Admin. Code (2001)
CLASS I DEFICIENCY
30. | AHCA re-alleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs one (1) through eight
(8) above as if fully set forth herein.
31. On or about March 13, 2002 AHCA conducted a survey at Loving Care ALF. A
class II deficiency was cited against Loving Care ALF based on the findings below involving
resident #3.
Resident #3
32. On or about March 13, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed resident #3’s record.
The review revealed that on or about March 7, 2002 resident #3’s physician had ordered
Norvasc, 10 milligrams, every day, and Aspirin, 325 milligrams, every day. The active
ingredient in Norvasc is Amlodipine, which used to treat high blood pressure.
33. As of the date of the survey on or about March 13, 2002 Loving Care ALF had
not obtained resident #3’s prescriptions for either Norvasc or Aspirin. Therefore, resident #3
was not receiving his high blood pressure medication.
34. Based on the foregoing, Loving Care ALF violated Rule 58A-5.0185(7)(f),
Florida Administrative Code, by failing to ensure that resident #3’s prescriptions for Norvasc and
Aspirin were filled in a timely manner.
35. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes, the foregoing is a class II
deficiency because it is related to the personal care of resident #3 and directly threatened resident
#3’s physical or emotional health, safety, or security.
36. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(b), Florida Statutes, AHCA may impose a
$2,000.00 fine against Loving Care ALF for a class II deficiency.
COUNT V
LOVING CARE ALF FAILED TO INCLUDE DEMOGRAPHIC DATA
IN EACH RESIDENT’S RECORD.
Rule 58A-5.024(3)(a), Fla. Admin. Code (2001)
UNCORRECTED CLASS III DEFICIENCY
37. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs one (1) through eight
(8) above as if fully set forth herein.
38. Under Rule 58A-5.024(3)(a), Florida Administrative Code, resident records must
be maintained on the facility’s premises and include the following demographic data: (1) Name;
(2) Sex; (3) Race; (4) Date of birth; (5) Place of birth, if known; (6) Social security number; (7)
Medicaid and/or Medicare number, or name of other health insurance carrier; (8) Name, address,
and telephone number of next of kin, responsible party, or other person the resident would like to
have notified in case of an emergency, and relationship to resident; and (9) Name, address, and
phone number of health care provider, and case manager if applicable,
SURVEY ON OR ABOUT FEBRUARY 5-6, 2002
39. On or about February 5-6, 2002 AHCA conducted a survey at Loving Care ALF.
A class III deficiency was cited against Loving Care ALF based on the findings below involving
resident #1 and resident #2.
Resident #1
40. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed resident #1’s record
and interviewed Loving Care ALF’s Administrator. The record did not contain all of the
required demographic data. The interview with the Administrator revealed no attempt by Loving
Care ALF to obtain this information for resident #1.
Resident #2
41. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed resident #2’s record
and interviewed the Administrator. The record did not contain all of the required demographic
data. The interview with the Administrator revealed no attempt by Loving Care ALF to obtain
this information for resident #2.
42. _ Based on the foregoing, Loving Care ALF violated Rule 58A-5.024(3)(a), Florida
Administrative Code, by failing to include all demographic data in resident #1’s record and/or
resident #2’s record, respectively.
43. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes, the foregoing is a class III
deficiency because it is related to the personal care of resident #1 and/or resident #2 and because
it indirectly or potentially threatened resident #1’s and/or resident #2’s physical or emotional
health, safety, or security.
44. AHCA gave Loving Care ALF a written mandated correction date of March 7,
2002 in accordance with Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes. Loving Care ALF, however,
failed to correct the class III deficiency by the mandated correction date and the same deficiency
was discovered at the survey conducted on or about March 13, 2002. Based on the foregoing,
Loving Care ALF was cited for an uncorrected class III deficiency at the survey on or about
March 13, 2002.
SURVEY ON OR ABOUT MARCH 13, 2002
45, On or about March 13, 2002, AHCA conducted a survey at Loving Care ALF. A
class III deficiency was cited against Loving Care ALF based on the findings below involving
resident #1 and resident #2 (resident #1 and resident #2 below are not the same residents as
resident #1 and resident #2 discussed above for the survey on or about February 5-6, 2002).
Resident #1
46. On or about March 13, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed resident #1’s record
and interviewed the Administrator. The record did not contain all of the required demographic
data. Additionally, during the interview the Administrator was unable to provide the surveyor
with any of the missing demographic data.
Resident #2
47. On or about March 13, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed resident #2’s record
and interviewed the Administrator. Resident #2’s record did not contain all of the required
demographic data. Additionally, during the interview the Administrator was unable to provide
the surveyor with any of the missing demographic data.
48. Based on the foregoing, Loving Care ALF violated Rule 58A-5.024(3)(a), Florida
Administrative Code, by failing to include all demographic data in resident #1’s record and/or
resident #2’s record.
49. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes, the foregoing is a class HI
deficiency because it is related to the personal care of Loving Care ALF’s residents and because
it indirectly or potentially threatened the physical or emotional health, safety, or security of
residents in the facility.
50. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes, AHCA may impose a $500.00
fine against Loving Care ALF for an uncorrected class II deficiency.
COUNT VI
LOVING CARE ALF FAILED TO INCLUDE A COPY OF THE MEDICAL
EXAMINATION REPORT IN EACH RESIDENT’S RECORD.
Section 400.426(4),(5), Fla. Stat. (2001)
Rule 58A-5.024(3)(b), Fla. Admin. Code (2001)
UNCORRECTED CLASS III DEFICIENCY
51. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs one (1) through eight
(8) above as if fully set forth herein.
SURVEY ON OR ABOUT FEBRUARY 5-6, 2002
52. On or about February 5-6, 2002 AHCA conducted a survey at Loving Care ALF.
A class HI deficiency was cited against the Loving Care ALF based on the findings below
involving resident #1, resident #3, resident #5 and resident #6.
Resident #1
53. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed resident #1’s
record. The record did not contain a copy of the medical examination report as required by law.
Loving Care ALF failed to make such report available to AHCA during the survey or upon
request.
Resident #3
54. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed resident #3’s
record. The record did not contain a copy of the medical examination report as required by law.
Loving Care ALF failed to make such report available to AHCA during the survey or upon
request,
11
Resident #5
55. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed resident #5’s
record. The record did not contain a copy of the medical examination report as required by law.
Loving Care ALF failed to make such report available to AHCA during the survey or upon
request.
Resident #6
56. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed resident #6’s
record. The record did not contain a copy of the medical examination report as required by law.
Loving Care ALF failed to make such report available to AHCA during the survey or upon
request.
57. Based on the foregoing, Loving Care ALF violated: (a) Section 400.426(4)
and/or (5), Florida Statutes, by failing to ensure that the medical examination report became a
part of each resident’s record and by failing to make such report available to AHCA during an
inspection or upon request; and (b) Rule 58A-5.024(3)(b), Florida Administrative Code, by
failing to maintain a copy of the medical examination report in each resident’s record.
58. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes, the foregoing is a class HI
deficiency because it is related to the personal care of resident #1, #3, #5, and/or #6 and because
it indirectly or potentially threatened the physical or emotional health, safety, or security or
resident #1, #3, #5, and/or #6.
59. | AHCA gave Loving Care ALF a written mandated correction date of March 7,
2002 in accordance with Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes. Loving Care ALF, however,
failed to correct the class III deficiency by the mandated correction date and the same deficiency
was discovered at the survey conducted on or about March 13, 2002. Based on the foregoing,
Loving Care ALF was cited for an uncorrected class III deficiency at the survey on or about
March 13, 2002.
SURVEY ON OR ABOUT MARCH 13, 2002
60. On or about March 13, 2002 AHCA conducted a survey at Loving Care ALF. A
class Ill deficiency was cited against the Loving Care ALF based on the findings below
involving resident #6.
Resident #6
61. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed resident #6’s
record. The record did not contain a copy of the medical examination report as required by law.
Loving Care ALF failed to make such report available to AHCA during the survey or upon
request.
62. Based on the foregoing, Loving Care ALF violated: (a) Section 400.426(4)
and/or (5), Florida Statutes, by failing to ensure that the medical examination report became a
part of resident #6’s record and by failing to make such report available to AHCA during an
inspection or upon request; and (b) Rule 58A-5.024(3)(b), Florida Administrative Code, by
failing to maintain a copy of the medical examination report in resident #6’s record.
63. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes, the foregoing is a class [I
deficiency because it is related to the personal care of resident #6 and because it indirectly or
potentially threatened the physical or emotional health, safety, or security of resident #6.
13
64. — Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes, AHCA may impose a $500.00
fine against Loving Care ALF for an uncorrected class III deficiency.
COUNT Vil
LOVING CARE ALF FAILED TO ENSURE THAT EACH
RESIDENT WAS FREE FROM COMMUNICABLE DISEASE.
Rule 58A-5.0181(1)(b), Fla. Admin. Code (2001)
UNCORRECTED CLASS III DEFICIENCY
65. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs one (1) through eight
(8) above as if fully set forth herein.
SURVEY ON OR ABOUT FEBRUARY 5-6, 2002
66. On or about February 5-6, 2002 AHCA conducted a survey at Loving Care ALF.
A class III deficiency was cited against Loving Care ALF based on the findings below involving
resident #1, resident #3, resident #5, and resident #6.
Resident #1
67. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed resident #1’s record
and interviewed the Administrator. The record did not contain any documentation showing that
the resident was free from signs and symptoms of any communicable disease, which is likely to
be transmitted to other residents or staff. The interview with the Administrator confirmed the
foregoing.
14
Resident #3
68. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed resident #3’s record
and interviewed the Administrator. The record did not contain any documentation showing that
the resident was free from signs and symptoms of any communicable disease, which is likely to
be transmitted to other residents or staff. The interview with the Administrator confirmed the
foregoing.
Resident #5
69. | Onor about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed resident #5’s record
and interviewed the Administrator. The record did not contain any documentation showing that
the resident was free from signs and symptoms of any communicable disease, which is likely to
be transmitted to other residents or staff. The interview with the Administrator confirmed the
foregoing.
Resident #6
70. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed resident #6’s record
and interviewed the Administrator. The record did not contain any documentation showing that
the resident was free from signs and symptoms of any communicable disease, which is likely to
be transmitted to other residents or staff. The interview with the Administrator confirmed the
foregoing.
71. Based on the foregoing, Loving Care ALF violated Rule 58A-5.0181(1)(b),
Florida Administrative Code, by failing to ensure resident #1, resident #3, resident #5 and/or
resident #6 met the minimum admission criteria of being free from signs and symptoms of any
communicable disease which is likely to be transmitted to other residents or staff.
72. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes, the foregoing is a class III
deficiency because it is related to operation and maintenance of the facility or to the personal
care of resident #1, resident #3, resident #5 and/or resident #6 and because it indirectly or
potentially threatened the physical or emotional health, safety, or security of resident #1, resident
#3, resident #5, and/or resident #6 and other residents in the facility.
73. AHCA gave Loving Care ALF a written mandated correction date of Match 7,
2002, in accordance with Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes. Loving Care ALF, however,
failed to correct the class III deficiency by the mandated correction date and the same deficiency
was discovered at the survey conducted on or about March 13, 2002. Based on the foregoing,
Loving Care ALF was cited for an uncorrected class III deficiency at the survey on or about
March 13, 2002.
SURVEY ON OR ABOUT MARCH 13, 2002
74. Onor about March 13, 2002 AHCA conducted a survey at Loving Care ALF. A
class III deficiency was cited against the Loving Care ALF based on the findings below
involving resident #6.
Resident #6
75. On or about March 13, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed resident #6’s record
and interviewed the Administrator. The record did not contain any documentation showing that
the resident was free from signs and symptoms of any communicable disease, which is likely to
be transmitted to other residents or staff. The interview with the Administrator confirmed the
foregoing.
16
76. Based on the foregoing, Loving Care ALF violated Rule 58A-5.0181(1)(b),
Florida Administrative Code, by failing to ensure that resident #6 met the minimum admission
criteria of being free from signs and symptoms of any communicable disease which is likely to
be transmitted to other residents or staff.
77. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes, the foregoing is a class III
deficiency because it is related to the operation and maintenance of the facility or to the personal
care of resident #6 and because it indirectly or potentially threatened the physical or emotional
health, safety, or security or resident #6 and other residents in the facility.
78. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes, AHCA may impose a $500.00
fine against Loving Care ALF for an uncorrected class III deficiency.
COUNT VIU
LOVING CARE ALF FAILED TO ENSURE THAT
EACH RESIDENT WAS EXAMINED BY A PHYSICIAN
OR ADVANCED REGISTERED NURSE PRACTITIONER (“ARNP”)
WITHIN SIXTY (60) DAYS PRIOR TO ADMISSION
BUT NO LATER THAN THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER ADMISSION.
Section 400.426(4),(5), Fla. Stat. (2001)
Rule 58A-5.0181(2)(a), Fla. Admin. Code (2001)
UNCORRECTED CLASS III DEFICIENCY
79. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs one (1) through eight
(8) above as if fully set forth herein.
SURVEY ON OR ABOUT FEBRUARY 5-6, 2002
80. On or about February 5-6, 2002 AHCA conducted a survey at Loving Care ALF.
A class III deficiency was cited against Loving Care ALF based on the findings below involving
resident #2, resident #3, resident #4, resident #5, and resident #6.
Resident #2
81. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed resident #2’s
record. Resident #2 was admitted to Loving Care ALF on or about March 1, 2000. The medical
examination, however, was not performed until August 14, 2001. Loving Care ALF failed to
ensure that resident #2 received an examination by a physician or ARNP within sixty (60) days
prior to admission but no later than thirty (30) days after admission to the facility.
Resident #3
82. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed resident #3’s
record. Resident #3 was admitted to Loving Care ALF on or about September 18, 2001. As of
the date of the survey on or about February 5-6, 2002, resident #3 had not received a medical
examination by a physician or ARNP. Loving Care ALF failed to ensure that resident #3
received an examination by a physician or ARNP within sixty (60) days prior to admission but
no later than 30 days after admission to the facility.
Resident #4
83. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed resident #4’s
record. Resident #4 was admitted to Loving Care ALF in September of 1999. The medical
examination, however, was not performed until on or about April 27, 2000. Loving Care ALF
failed to ensure that resident #4 received an examination by a physician or ARNP within sixty
(60) days prior to admission but no later than thirty (30) days after admission to the facility.
18
Resident #5
84. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed resident #5’s
record. Resident #5 was admitted to Loving Care ALF on or about October 31, 2001. As of the
date of the survey on or about February 5-6, 2002, resident #5 had not received a medical
examination by a physician or ARNP. Loving Care ALF failed to ensure that resident #5
received an examination by a physician or ARNP within sixty (60) days prior to admission but
no later than thirty (30) days after admission to the facility.
Resident #6
85. | Onor about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed resident #6’s record
and interviewed the Administrator. Resident #6 was admitted to Loving Care ALF on or about
September 13, 2000. As of the date of the survey on or about February 5-6, 2002, resident #6
had not received a medical examination by a physician or ARNP. Loving Care ALF failed to
ensure that resident #6 received an examination by a physician or ARNP with sixty (60) days
prior to admission but no later than thirty (30) days after admission to the facility. During the
interview with the Administrator, the Administrator stated that Loving Care ALF was unable to
obtain a health examination from a physician for resident #6.
86. Based on the foregoing, Loving Care ALF violated Rule 58A-5.0181(2)(a),
Florida Administrative Code, by failing to ensure that each resident received a medical
examination by a physician or ARNP within sixty (60) days prior to admission but no later than
thirty (30) days after admission to the facility.
87. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes, the foregoing is a class [II
deficiency because it is related to the personal care of resident #2, resident #3, resident #4,
resident #5 and/or resident #6 and because it indirectly or potentially threatened the physical or
emotional health, safety, or security of resident #2, resident #3, resident #4, resident #5 and/or
resident #6.
88. | AHCA gave Loving Care ALF a written mandated correction date of March 7,
2002 in accordance with Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes. Loving Care ALF, however,
failed to correct the class III deficiency by the mandated correction date and the same deficiency
was discovered at the survey conducted on or about March 13, 2002. Based on the foregoing,
Loving Care ALF was cited for an uncorrected class III deficiency at the survey on or about
March 13, 2002.
SURVEY ON OR ABOUT MARCH 13, 2002
89. | Onor about March 13, 2002 AHCA conducted a survey at Loving Care ALF. A
class III deficiency was cited against Loving Care ALF based on the findings below involving
resident #6.
Resident £6
90. On or about March 13, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed resident #6’s record.
Resident #6 was admitted to Loving Care ALF on or about December 1, 1999. As of the date of
the survey on or about March 13, 2002 resident #6 had not received a medical examination by a
physician or ARNP. Loving Care ALF failed to ensure that resident #6 received an examination
by a physician or ARNP within sixty (60) days prior to admission but no later than thirty (30)
days after admission to the facility.
20
91. Based on the foregoing, Loving Care ALF violated Rule 58A-5.0181(2)(a),
Florida Administrative Code, by failing to ensure that resident #6 received a medical
examination by a physician or ARNP within sixty (60) days prior to admission but no later than
thirty (30) days after admission to the facility.
92. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes, the foregoing is a class III
deficiency because it is related to the personal care of resident #6 and because it indirectly or
potentially threatened resident #6’s physical or emotional health, safety, or security.
93. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes, AHCA may impose a $500.00
fine against Loving Care ALF for an uncorrected class III deficiency.
COUNT IX
LOVING CARE ALF FAILED TO CONDUCT
LEVEL 1 BACKGROUND SCREENING ON
ALL EMPLOYEES HIRED ON OR AFTER OCTOBER 1, 1998
WHO PERFORM PERSONAL SERVICES.
Section 400.4174(2), Fla. Stat. (2001)
Rule 58A-5.019(3), Fla. Admin. Code (2001)
UNCORRECTED CLASS III DEFICIENCY
94. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs one (1) through eight
(8) above as if fully set forth herein.
SURVEY ON OR ABOUT FEBRUARY 5-6, 2002
95. | On or about February 5-6, 2002 AHCA conducted a survey at Loving Care ALF.
A class ITI deficiency was cited against Loving Care ALF based on the findings below involving
employee #1, employee #2, employee #3, employee #4, employee #5 and employee #6.
21
Employee #1
96. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed employee #1’s
personnel file and interviewed the Administrator. Employee #1 was hired on or after October 1,
1998 and provides personal services to residents. The personnel file did not contain any
evidence of a level 1 background screening for employee #1. During the interview with the
Administrator, the Administrator admitted to the AHCA surveyor that a level 1 background
screening had not been conducted for employee #1 as the Administrator was unaware of this
legal requirement.
Employee #2
97. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed employee #2’s
personnel file and interviewed the Administrator. Employee #2 was hired on or about January
20, 2002 and provides personal services to residents. The personnel did not contain any
evidence of a level 1 background screening for employee #2. During the interview, the
Administrator admitted to the AHCA surveyor that a level 1 background screening had not been
conducted for employee #2 as the Administrator was unaware of this legal requirement.
Employee #3
98. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed employee #3’s
personnel file and interviewed the Administrator. Employee #3 was hired on or after October 1,
1998 and provides personal services to residents. The personnel file did not contain any
evidence of a level 1 background screening for employee #3. During the interview with the
Administrator, the Administrator admitted to the AHCA surveyor that a level 1 background
screening had not been conducted for employee #3 as the Administrator was unaware of this
legal requirement.
22
Employee #4
99. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed employee #4’s
personnel file and interviewed the Administrator. Employee #4 was hired on or after October 1,
1998 and terminated his/her employment with Loving Care ALF on or about January 18, 2002.
Employee #4 provided personal services to residents while employed at Loving Care ALF. The
record did not contain any evidence of a level 1 background screening for employee #4. During
the interview, the Administrator admitted to the AHCA surveyor that a level 1 background
screening had not been conducted for employee #4 as the Administrator was unaware of this
legal requirement.
Employee #5
100. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed employee #5’s
personnel file and interviewed the Administrator. Employee #5 was hired on or after October 1,
1998 and provides personal services to residents. The personnel file did not contain any
evidence of a level 1 background screening for employee #5. During the interview with the
Administrator, the Administrator admitted to the AHCA surveyor that a level 1 background
screening had not been conducted for employee #5 as the Administrator was unaware of this
legal requirement.
Employee #6
101. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed employee #6’s
personnel file and interviewed the Administrator. Employee #6 was hired on or after October 1,
1998 and provides personal services to residents. The personnel file did not contain any
evidence of a level 1 background screening for employee #6. During the interview with the
Administrator, the Administrator admitted to the AHCA surveyor that a level 1 background
23
screening had not been conducted for employee #6 as the Administrator was unaware of this
legal requirement.
102. Based on the foregoing, Loving Care ALF violated Section 400.4174(2), Florida
Statutes, and Rule 58A-5.019(3), Florida Administrative Code, by failing to conduct level 1
background screening on all employees hired on or after October 1, 1998 to provide personal
services to residents.
103. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes, the foregoing is a class Ill
deficiency because it is related to the operation and maintenance of a facility or to the personal
care of residents and because it indirectly or potentially threatened the physical or emotional
health, safety, or security of residents in the facility.
104. AHCA gave Loving Care ALF a written mandated correction date of February 15,
2002 in accordance with Section 400.419(1)(b) and (c), Florida Statutes. Loving Care ALF,
however, failed to correct the deficiency by the mandated correction date and the same
deficiency was discovered at the survey conducted on or about March 13, 2002. Although this
deficiency was classified as a class II deficiency at the survey on or about February 5-6, 2002
AHCA lowered the classification to a class II deficiency at the survey on or about March 13,
2002. Based on the foregoing, Loving Care ALF was cited for an uncorrected class II
deficiency at the survey on or about March 13, 2002.
SURVEY ON OR ABOUT MARCH 13, 2002
105. On or about March 13, 2002 AHCA conducted a survey at Loving Care ALF. A
class III deficiency was cited against the Loving Care ALF based on the findings below
involving employee #3 and employee #4.
24
Employee #3
106. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed employee #3’s
personnel file and interviewed the Administrator. Employee #3 was hired on or after October 1,
1998 and provides personal services to residents. The record did not contain any evidence of a
level 1 background screening for employee #3. During the interview with the Administrator, the
Administrator was unable to produce any documentation evidencing that the background
screening had been performed. Loving Care ALF failed to conduct a level 1 background
screening on employee #3.
Employee #4
107. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed employee #4’s
personnel file and interviewed the Administrator. Employee #4 was hired on or about January
20, 2002 and provides personal services to residents. The record did not contain any evidence of
a level 1 background screening for employee #4. During the interview, the Administrator was
unable to produce any documentation evidencing that the background screening had been
performed. Loving Care ALF failed to conduct a level 1 background screening on employee #4.
108. Based on the foregoing, Loving Care ALF violated Section 400.4174(2), Florida
Statutes, and Rule 58A-5.019(3), Florida Administrative Code, by failing to conduct level 1
background screening on all employees hired on or after October 1, 1998 to provide personal
services to residents.
109. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes, the foregoing is a class III
deficiency because it is related to the operation and maintenance of a facility or to the personal
care of residents and because it indirectly or potentially threatened the physical or emotional
health, safety, or security of residents in the facility.
25
110. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes, AHCA may impose a $500.00
fine against Loving Care ALF for an uncorrected class III deficiency.
COUNT X
LOVING CARE ALF FAILED TO ENSURE THAT EACH STAFF MEMBER’S
PERSONNEL RECORD CONTAINED VERIFICATION OF FREEDOM FROM
COMMUNICABLE DISEASE INCLUDING TUBERCULOSIS.
Section 400.4275(2), (4), Fla. Stat. (2001)
Rule 58A-5.024(2)(a), Fla. Admin. Code (2001)
UNCORRECTED CLASS III DEFICIENCY
111. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs one (1) through eight
(8) above as if fully set forth herein.
SURVEY ON OR ABOUT FEBRUARY 5-6, 2002
112. On or about February 5-6, 2002, AHCA conducted a survey at Loving Care ALF.
A class III deficiency was cited against Loving Care ALF based on the findings below involving
employee #1, employee #2, employee #3, employee #5 and employee #6.
Employee #1
113. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed employee #1’s
personnel record. Employee #1 is a staff member of Loving Care ALF. The record did not
contain verification of freedom from communicable disease including tuberculosis.
Employee #2
114. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed employee #2’s
personnel record. Employee #2 is a staff member of Loving Care ALF. The record did not
contain verification of freedom from communicable disease including tuberculosis.
26
Employee #3
115. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed employee #3’s
personnel record. Employee #3 is a staff member of Loving Care ALF. The record did not
contain verification of freedom from communicable disease including tuberculosis.
Employee #5
116. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed employee #5’s
personnel record. Employee #5 is a staff member of Loving Care ALF. The record did not
contain verification of freedom from communicable disease including tuberculosis.
Employee #6
117. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed employee #6’s
personnel record. Employee #6 is a staff member of Loving Care ALF. The record did not
contain verification of freedom from communicable disease including tuberculosis.
118. Based on the foregoing, Loving Care ALF violated Section 400.4275(2) and (4),
Florida Statutes, and Rule 58A-5.024(2)(a), Florida Administrative Code, by failing to ensure
that each staff member’s personnel record contained verification of freedom from communicable
disease including tuberculosis.
119. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes, the foregoing is a class LI
deficiency because it is related to the operation and maintenance of a facility or to the personal
care of residents and because it indirectly or potentially threatened the physical or emotional
health, safety, or security of residents in the facility.
27
120. AHCA gave Loving Care ALF a written mandated correction date of March 7,
2002 in accordance with Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes. Loving Care ALF, however,
failed to correct the class III deficiency by the mandated correction date and the same deficiency
was discovered at the survey conducted on or about March 13, 2002. Based on the foregoing,
Loving Care ALF was cited for an uncorrected class III deficiency at the survey on or about
March 13, 2002.
SURVEY ON OR ABOUT MARCH 13, 2002
121. On or about March 13, 2002 AHCA conducted a survey at Loving Care ALF. A
class III deficiency was cited against the Loving Care ALF based on the findings below
involving employee #3 and employee #4.
Employee #3
122. On or about March 13, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed employee #3’s
personnel record. Employee #3 is a staff member of Loving Care ALF. The record did not
contain verification of freedom from communicable disease including tuberculosis.
Employee #4
123. On or about March 13, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed employee #4’s
personnel record. Employee #4 is a staff member of Loving Care ALF. The record did not
contain verification of freedom from communicable disease including tuberculosis.
124. Based on the foregoing, Loving Care ALF violated Section 400.4275(2) and (4),
Florida Statutes, and Rule 58A-5.024(2)(a), Florida Administrative Code, by failing to ensure
that each staff member’s personnel record contained verification of freedom from communicable
disease including tuberculosis.
28
125. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes, the foregoing is a class HI
deficiency because it is related to the operation and maintenance of a facility or to the personal
care of residents and because it indirectly or potentially threatened the physical or emotional
health, safety, or security of residents in the facility.
126. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes, AHCA may impose a $500.00
fine against Loving Care ALF for an uncorrected class III deficiency.
COUNT XI
LOVING CARE ALF FAILED TO ENSURE THAT ALL FACILITY EMPLOYEES
COMPLETED BIENNIALLY A CONTINUING EDUCATION COURSE ON HUMAN
IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS/ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROME
(HIV/AIDS) AND FAILED TO ENSURE THAT SUCH TRAINING WAS
DOCUMENTED IN EACH EMPLOYEE’S PERSONNEL RECORD.
Section 400.4275(2) and (4), Fla. Stat. (2001)
Rule 58A-5.0191(3) and (10), Fla. Admin. Code (2001)
Rule 58A-5.024(2)(a)1, Fla. Admin. Code (2001)
UNCORRECTED CLASS ITI DEFICIENCY
127. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs one (1) through eight
(8) above as if fully set forth herein.
SURVEY ON OR ABOUT FEBRUARY 5-6, 2002
128. On or about February 5-6, 2002 AHCA conducted a survey at Loving Care ALF.
A class III deficiency was cited against Loving Care ALF based on the findings below involving
employee #1, employee #3, employee #4, employee #5, employee #6 and employee #7.
ploy! ploy ploy: ploy: ploy: ploy!
29
Employee #1
129. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed employee #1’s
personnel record. The record did not contain documentation of compliance with HIV/AIDS
training.
Employee #3
130. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed employee #3’s
personnel record. The record did not contain documentation of compliance with HIV/AIDS
training.
Employee #4
131. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed employee #4’s
personnel record. The record did not contain documentation of compliance with HIV/AIDS
training.
Employee #5
132. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed employee #5’s
personnel record. The record did not contain documentation of compliance with HIV/AIDS
training.
Employee #6
133. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed employee #6’s
personnel record. The record did not contain documentation of compliance with HIV/AIDS
training.
30
Employee #7
134. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed employee #7’s
personnel record. The record did not contain documentation of compliance with HIV/AIDS
training.
135. Based on the foregoing, Loving Care ALF violated Section 400.4275(2) and (4),
Florida Statutes, and Rule 58A-5.0191(3) and (10) and Rule 58A-5.024(2)(a)1, Florida
Administrative Code, by failing to ensure that all facility employees completed biennially a
continuing education course on HIV/AIDS and that each employee’s personnel record contained
documentation evidencing completion of such training.
136. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes, the foregoing is a class III
deficiency because it is related to the operation or maintenance of the facility or to the personal
care of residents and because it indirectly or potentially threatened the physical or emotional
health, safety, or security of residents in the facility.
137. AHCA gave Loving Care ALF a written mandated correction date of March 7,
2002 in accordance with Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes. Loving Care ALF, however,
failed to correct the class III deficiency by the mandated correction date and the same deficiency
was discovered at the survey conducted on or about March 13, 2002. Based on the foregoing,
Loving Care ALF was cited for an uncorrected class III deficiency at the survey on or about
March 13, 2002.
31
SURVEY ON OR ABOUT MARCH 13, 2002
138. On or about March 13, 2002 AHCA conducted a survey at Loving Care ALF. A
class III deficiency was cited against the Loving Care ALF based on the findings below
involving employee #3 and employee #4.
Employee #3
139. On or about March 13, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed employee #3’s
personnel record. The record did not contain documentation of compliance with HIV/AIDS
training.
Employee #4
140. On or about March 13, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed employee #4’s
personnel record. The record did not contain documentation of compliance with HIV/AIDS
training.
141. Based on the foregoing, Loving Care ALF violated Section 400.4275(2) and (4),
Florida Statutes, and Rule 58A-5.0191(3) and (10) and Rule 58A-5.024(2)(a)1, Florida
Administrative Code, by failing to ensure that all facility employees completed biennially a
continuing education course on HIV/AIDS and that each employee’s personnel record contained
documentation evidencing completion of such training.
142. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes, the foregoing is a class III
deficiency because it is related to the operation or maintenance of the facility or to the personal
care of residents and because it indirectly or potentially threatened the physical or emotional
health, safety, or security of residents in the facility.
143. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes, AHCA may impose a $500.00
fine against Loving Care ALF for an uncorrected class III deficiency.
32
COUNT XII
LOVING CARE ALF FAILED TO ENSURE THAT ALL UNLICENSED PERSONS
WHO ASSIST RESIDENTS WITH THE SELF-ADMINISTRATION OF MEDICATION
RECEIVED A MINIMUM OF FOUR (4) HOURS OF TRAINING PRIOR TO
ASSUMING THIS RESPONSIBILITY.
Section 400.4256, Fla. Stat. (2001)
Section 400.452(5), Fla. Stat. (2001)
Rule 58A-5.0191(5), Fla. Admin. Code (2001)
Rule 58A-5.024(2)(a)1, Fla. Admin. Code (2001)
UNCORRECTED CLASS III DEFICIENCY
144, AHCA re-alleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs one (1) through eight
(8) above as if fully set forth herein.
SURVEY ON OR ABOUT FEBRUARY 5-6, 2002
145. Onor about February 5-6, 2002, AHCA conducted a survey at Loving Care ALF.
A class III deficiency was cited against Loving Care ALF based on the findings below involving
employee #1, employee #2, employee #4, employee #5, and employee #6.
Employee #1
146. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed employee #1’s
personnel record. Employee #1 is not licensed to practice nursing or medicine. Employee #1 is
employed by or under contract with Loving Care ALF. Employee #1 provides assistance to
residents with the self-administration of medication. The record did not contain documentation
showing that employee #1 received a minimum of four (4) hours of training prior to assuming
this responsibility. Employee #1 failed to complete the required training prior to assisting
residents with the self-administration of medication.
33
Employee #2
147. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed employee #2’s
personnel record. Employee #2 is not licensed to practice nursing or medicine. Employee #2 is
employed by or under contract with Loving Care ALF. Employee #2 provides assistance to
residents with the self-administration of medication. The record did not contain documentation
showing that employee #2 received a minimum of four (4) hours of training prior to assuming
this responsibility. Employee #2 failed to complete the required training prior to assisting
residents with the self-administration of medication.
Employee #4
148. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed employee #4’s
personnel record. Employee #4 is not licensed to practice nursing or medicine. Employee #4 is
employed by or under contract with Loving Care ALF. Employee #4 provides assistance to
residents with the self-administration of medication. The record did not contain documentation
showing that employee #4 received a minimum of four (4) hours of training prior to assuming
this responsibility. Employee #4 failed to complete the required training prior to assisting
residents with the self-administration of medication.
Employee #5
149. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed employee #5’s
personnel record. Employee #5 is not licensed to practice nursing or medicine. Employee #5 is
employed by or under contract with Loving Care ALF. Employee #5 provides assistance to
residents with the self-administration of medication. The record did not contain documentation
showing that employee #5 received a minimum of four (4) hours of training prior to assuming
34
this responsibility. Employee #5 failed to complete the required training prior to assisting
residents with the self-administration of medication.
Employee #6
150. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed employee #6’s
personnel record. Employee #6 is not licensed to practice nursing or medicine. Employee #6 is
employed by or under contract with Loving Care ALF. Employee #6 provides assistance to
residents with the self-administration of medication. The record did not contain documentation
showing that employee #6 received a minimum of four (4) hours of training prior to assuming
this responsibility. Employee #6 failed to complete the required training prior to assisting
residents with the self-administration of medication.
151. Based on the foregoing, Loving Care ALF violated Sections 400.4256 and
400.452(5), Florida Statutes, and Rules S8A-5.0191(5) and 58A-5.024(2)(a)1, Florida
Administrative Code, by failing to ensure that each staff member who assists residents with the
self-administration of medication completes a minimum of four (4) hours of training prior to
assuming this responsibility and by failing to ensure that each staff member’s personnel record
contained documentation evidencing completion of such training.
152. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes, the foregoing is a class III
deficiency because it is related to the operation or maintenance of the facility or to the personal
care of residents and because it indirectly or potentially threatened the physical or emotional
health, safety, or security of residents in the facility.
153. AHCA gave Loving Care ALF a written mandated correction date of February 15,
2002 in accordance with Section 400.419(1)(b) and (c), Florida Statutes. Loving Care ALF,
however, failed to correct the deficiency by the mandated correction date and the same
35
deficiency was discovered at the survey conducted on or about March 13, 2002. Although this
deficiency was classified as a class II deficiency at the survey on or about February 5-6, 2002
AHCA lowered the classification to a class III deficiency at the survey on or about March 13,
2002. Based on the foregoing, Loving Care ALF was cited for an uncorrected class III
deficiency at the survey on or about March 13, 2002.
SURVEY ON OR ABOUT MARCH 13, 2002
154. On or about March 13, 2002, AHCA conducted a survey at Loving Care ALF. A
class III deficiency was cited against the Loving Care ALF based on the findings below
involving employee #3 and employee #4.
Employee #3
155. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed employee #3’s
personnel record. Employee #3 is not licensed to practice nursing or medicine. Employee #3 is
employed by or under contract with Loving Care ALF. Employee #5 provides assistance to
residents with the self-administration of medication. The record did not contain documentation
showing that employee #3 was trained to assist residents with the self-administration of
medication. Employee #3 failed to complete the required training prior to assisting residents with
the self-administration of medication.
Employee #4
156. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed employee #4’s
personnel record. Employee #4 is not licensed to practice nursing or medicine. Employee #4 is
employed by or under contract with Loving Care ALF. Employee #4 provides assistance to
residents with the self-administration of medication. The record did not contain documentation
showing that employee #4 was trained to assist residents with the self-administration of
36
medication. Employee #1 failed to complete the required training prior to assisting residents
with the self-administration of medication.
157. Based on the foregoing, Loving Care ALF violated Sections 400.4256 and
400.452(5), Florida Statutes, and Rules 58A-5.0191(5) and 58A-5.024(2)(a)1, Florida
Administrative Code, by failing to ensure that each staff member who assists residents with the
self-administration of medication completes a minimum of four (4) hours of training prior to
assuming this responsibility and that each staff member’s personnel record contained
documentation evidencing completion of such training.
158. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes, the foregoing is a class III
deficiency because it is related to the operation or maintenance of the facility or to the personal
care of residents and because it indirectly or potentially threatened the physical or emotional
health, safety, or security of residents in the facility.
159. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes, AHCA may impose a $500.00
fine against Loving Care ALF for an uncorrected class III deficiency.
COUNT XIII
LOVING CARE ALF FAILED TO ENSURE THAT THE PERSONNEL RECORD FOR
EACH STAFF PERSON HIRED ON OR AFTER OCTOBER 1, 1998 TO PROVIDE
PERSONAL SERVICES TO RESIDENTS CONTAINED DOCUMENTATION OF
COMPLIANCE WITH THE LEVEL 1 BACKGROUND SCREENING REQUIREMENT.
Section 400.4275(2) and (4), Fla. Stat. (2001)
Rule 58A-5.024(2)(a)3, Fla. Admin. Code (2001)
Rule 58A-5.019(3)(b), Fla. Admin. Code (2001)
UNCORRECTED CLASS II DEFICIENCY
160. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs one (1) through eight
(8) above as if fully set forth herein.
37
SURVEY ON OR ABOUT FEBRUARY 5-6, 2002
161. On or about February 5-6, 2002 AHCA conducted a survey at Loving Care ALF.
A class III deficiency was cited against Loving Care ALF based on the findings below involving
employee #1, employee #2, employee #3, employee #4, employee #5 and employee #6.
’ Employee #1
162. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed employee #1’s
personnel file and interviewed the Administrator. Employee #1 was hired on or after October 1,
1998 and provides personal services to residents. The record did not contain any evidence of a
level 1 background screening for employee #1.
Employee #2
163. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed employee #2’s
personnel file and interviewed the Administrator. Employee #2 was hired on or about January
20, 2002 and provides personal services to residents. The record did not contain any evidence of
a level 1 background screening for employee #2.
Employee #3
164. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed employee #3’s
personnel file and interviewed the Administrator. Employee #3 was hired on or after October 1,
1998 and provides personal services to residents. The record did not contain any evidence of a
level 1 background screening for employee #3.
Employee #4
165. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed employee #4’s
personnel file and interviewed the Administrator. Employee #4 was hired on or after October 1,
1998 and terminated his/her employment with Loving Care ALF on or about January 18, 2002.
38
Employee #4 provided personal services to residents whiled employed at Loving Care ALF. The
record did not contain any evidence of a level 1 background screening for employee #4.
Employee #5
166. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed employee #5’s
personnel file and interviewed the Administrator. Employee #5 was hired on or after October 1,
1998 and provides personal services to residents. Employee #5’s personnel record did not
contain any evidence of a level 1 background screening for employee #5.
Employee #6
167. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed employee #6’s
personnel file and interviewed the Administrator. Employee #6 was hired on or after October 1,
1998 and provides personal services to residents. The record did not contain any evidence of a
level 1 background screening for employee #6.
168. Based on the foregoing, Loving Care ALF violated Section 400.4275(2) and (4),
Florida Statutes, and Rules 58A-5.024(2)(a)3 and 58A-5.019(3)(b), Florida Administrative Code,
by failing to maintain documentation of compliance with level 1 background screening including
the results of such screening in each employee’s personnel file.
169. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes, the foregoing is a class III
deficiency because it is related to the operation and maintenance of a facility or to the personal
care of residents and because it indirectly or potentially threatened the physical or emotional
health, safety, or security of residents in the facility.
170. AHCA gave the Loving Care ALF a written mandated correction date of February
15, 2002 in accordance with Section 400.419(1)(b) and (c), Florida Statutes. Loving Care ALF,
however, failed to correct the deficiency by the mandated correction date and the same
39
deficiency was discovered at the survey conducted on or about March 13, 2002. Although this
deficiency was classified as a class II deficiency at the survey on or about February 5-6, 2002
AHCA lowered the classification to a class III deficiency at the survey on or about March 13,
2002. Based on the foregoing, Loving Care ALF was cited for an uncorrected class III
deficiency at the survey on or about March 13, 2002.
SURVEY ON OR ABOUT MARCH 13, 2002
171. Onor about March 13, 2002 AHCA conducted a survey at Loving Care ALF. A
class III deficiency was cited against the Loving Care ALF based on the findings below
involving employee #3 and employee #4.
Employee #3
172. On or about March 13, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed employee #3’s
personnel file and interviewed the Administrator. Employee #3 was hired on or after October 1,
1998 and provides personal services to residents. The record did not contain any evidence of a
level 1 background screening for employee #3. During the interview with the Administrator, the
Administrator was unable to produce any documentation evidencing that the background
screening had been performed.
Employee #4
173. On or about March 13, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed employee #4’s
personnel file and interviewed the Administrator. Employee #4 was hired on or after October 1,
1998 and provides personal services to residents. The record did not contain any evidence of a
level 1 background screening for employee #4. During the interview, the Administrator was
unable to produce any documentation evidencing that the background screening had been
performed.
40
174. Based on the foregoing, Loving Care ALF violated Section 400.4275(2) and (4),
Florida Statutes, and Rules 58A-5.024(2)(a)3 and 58A-5.019(3)(b), Florida Administrative Code,
by failing to maintain documentation of compliance with level 1 background screening including
the results of such screening in each employee’s personnel file.
175. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes, the foregoing is a class II
deficiency because it is related to the operation and maintenance of a facility or to the personal
care of residents and because it indirectly or potentially threatened the physical or emotional
health, safety, or security of residents in the facility.
176. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes, AHCA may impose a
$1,000.00 fine against Loving Care ALF for an uncorrected class III deficiency.
COUNT XIV
LOVING CARE ALF FAILED TO MAINTAIN
PHYSICIAN’S ORDERS FOR MEDICATION IN RESIDENT RECORDS.
Rule 58A-5.024(3)(c), Fla. Admin. Code (2001)
CLASS I DEFICIENCY
177. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs one (1) through eight
(8) above as if fully set forth herein.
178. On or about February 5-6, 2002 AHCA conducted a survey at Loving Care ALF.
One class II deficiency was cited against Loving Care ALF based upon the findings below
involving resident #1, resident #2, resident #3, resident #4, resident #5 and resident #6.
41
Resident #1
179. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed resident #1’s record
and interviewed the owner of Loving Care ALF (the “Owner”). The record did not contain a
physician’s order for any of the medication listed below, which medication was being
administered to resident #1.
e Depakote 500 milligrams
° Klonopin 2 milligrams
e Baclofen 10 milligrams
e Benzotropine
180. During the interview with the Owner, the Owner could not produce a
physician’s orders for any of the above medication.
Resident #2
181. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed resident #2’s record
and interviewed the Owner. The record did not contain a physician’s order for any of the
medication listed below, which medication was being administered to resident #2.
e Prozac 10 milligrams
e Hyzarr 100 milligrams
e Maxzide 25 milligrams
e Pericolace
182. During the interview with the Owner, the Owner could not produce a
physician’s orders for any of the above medication.
42
Resident #3
183. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed resident #3’s record
and interviewed the Owner. The record did not contain a physician’s order for any of the
medication listed below, which medication was being administered to resident #3.
e Gentamycin ointment
e Combivent Inhaler
e Tobramycin eye drops
° Risperdal 3 milligrams
e Depakote 500 milligrams
e Lortab
e Synthyroid
e Prevacid 30 milligrams
e Seroquel 25 milligrams
° Erythromycin
e Klonopin 5 milligrams
e Neurotin
° Clonidine
e Theophylline
184, During the interview with the Owner, the Owner could not produce a
physician’s orders for any of the above medication.
43
Resident #4
185. Onor about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed resident #3’s record
and interviewed the Owner. The record did not contain a physician’s order for any of the
medication listed below, which medication was being administered to resident #4.
° Buspar 15 milligrams
e Remeron 45 milligrams
e Protonix 40 milligrams
e Plavix 75 milligrams
e Thiamine 100 milligrams
186. During the interview with the Owner, the Owner could not produce a
physician’s orders for any of the above medication.
Resident #5
187. Onor about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed resident #5’s record
and interviewed the Owner. The record did not contain a physician’s order for any of the
medication listed below, which medication was being administered to resident #5.
e Klonopin ft milligram
e Tegretol 200 milligrams
e Depakote 500 milligrams
188. During the interview with the Owner, the Owner could not produce a
physician’s orders for any of the above medication.
44
Resident #6
189. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed resident #6’s record
and interviewed the Owner. The record did not contain a physician’s order for any of the
medication listed below, which medication was being administered to resident #6.
e Glyburide 5 milligrams
e Fosmopril N.A. 20 milligrams
e Terazosin HCL 2 milligrams
e Levothyroxide .5 milligrams
e Insulin 10 units
e Aspirin 325 milligrams
e Stertraline 100 milligrams
190. During the interview with the Owner, the Owner could not produce a
physician’s orders for any of the above medication.
191. Based on all of the foregoing, Loving Care ALF violated Rule 58A-5.024(3)(c),
Florida Administrative Code, by failing to include in resident #1’s, resident #2’s, resident #3’s,
resident #4’s, resident #5’s and/or resident #6’s record, respectively, all health care provider’s
orders for medication.
192. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(b), Florida Statutes, the foregoing violation is a
class II violation because it is related to the personal care of resident #1, resident #2, resident #3,
resident #4, resident #5, and/or resident #6 and directly threatened resident #1’s resident #2’s,
resident #3’s, resident #4’s, resident #5’s and/or resident #6’s physical or emotional health,
safety, or security.
45
193. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(b), Florida Statutes, AHCA may impose a
$5,000.00 fine against Loving Care ALF for a class II deficiency.
COUNT XV
LOVING CARE ALF FAILED TO PROPERLY
ADMINISTER MEDICATION TO RESIDENT #6.
§ 400.4256, Fla. Stat. (2001)
Rule 58A-5.0185(3),(4), Fla. Admin. Code (2001)
CLASS IT DEFICIENCY
194. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs one (1) through eight
(8) above as if fully set forth herein.
195. On or about February 5-6, 2002 AHCA conducted a survey at Loving Care ALF.
A class II deficiency was cited against Loving Care ALF based on the findings below involving
resident #6.
Resident #6
196. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed resident #6’s
record. Resident #6’s medication observation record revealed that resident #6 received NPH
Insulin 10 units every morning. During an interview with Loving Care ALF’s
Administrator/Owner, the Administrator/Owner admitted to the AHCA surveyor that she draws
up the insulin into syringes every week and places them in the refrigerator for the resident to
self-administrator.
197. Pursuant to Section 400.4256(4)(b), Florida Statutes, the self-administration of
medication does not include the preparation of syringes for injection. The Administrator is not a
licensed health care professional and should not be preparing syringes for injection.
46
198. Based on all of the foregoing, Loving Care ALF violated Section 400.4256,
Florida Statutes, and Rule 58A-5.0185(3) and/or (4), Florida Administrative Code, by failing to
properly administer medication to resident #6.
199, Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(b), Florida Statutes, the foregoing violation is a
class II violation because it is related to the personal care of resident #6 and directly threatened
resident #6’s physical or emotional health, safety, or security.
200. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(b), Florida Statutes, AHCA may impose a
$5,000.00 fine against Loving Care ALF for a class II deficiency.
COUNT XVI
LOVING CARE ALF FAILED TO MAINTAIN AN ACCURATE, DAILY, UP-TO-DATE
MEDICATION OBSERVATION RECORD (“MOR”) FOR RESIDENT #1, RESIDENT
#2, RESIDENT #4 AND/OR RESIDENT #5.
Rule 58A-5.0185(5)(b), Fla. Admin. Code (2001)
CLASS II DEFICIENCY
201. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs one (1) through eight
(8) above as if fully set forth herein.
202. On or about February 5-6, 2002 AHCA conducted a survey at Loving Care ALF.
A class II deficiency was cited against the Loving Care ALF based on the findings below
involving resident #1, resident #2, resident #4, and resident #5.
Resident #1
203. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed resident #1’s record
and medication. The record review revealed that resident #1 was admitted to Loving Care ALF
on or about February 1, 2002. The review further revealed that resident #1 did not have a MOR
for the four (4) medications he was receiving. The surveyor reviewed resident #1’s medication
and found the following four (4) prescriptions: (1) Depakote, 500 milligrams, 1 tablet in the
47
morning and 1 tablet in the evening; (2) Klonopin, 2 milligrams, 1 tablet three times a day; (3)
Baclofen, 10 milligrams, 1 tablet twice a day; and (4) Benzotropine, 1 tablet twice a day.
204. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor interviewed the
Administrator. The Administrator stated that resident #1 was receiving all four (4) medications
since his admission.
205. Based on the foregoing, Loving Care ALF failed to maintain an accurate, daily,
up-to-date MOR for resident #1.
Resident #2
206. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed resident #2’s
record. The MOR listed the following three (3) medications: (1) Prozac, 90 milligrams, 1
weekly; (2) Hyzar, 100/25, 1 daily; and (3) Pericolace, 1 tablet twice daily. Resident #2 was
scheduled to receive his Prozac on February 3, 2002. The MOR showed resident #2 as receiving
the Hyzar and Pericolace. The MOR, however, did not show resident #2 as receiving his Prozac
on February 3, 2002.
207. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed resident #2’s
medications and found the following prescriptions: (1) Prozac, 90 milligrams, 1 tablet weekly;
(2) Hyzar, 100/25 1 tablet daily; and (3) Maxzide, 25 milligrams, 1 tablet daily.
208. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor interviewed the
Administrator. The stated that resident #2 was receiving Prozac, Hyzar and Maxzide (not
Percolace as shown on the MOR). No Percolace was found in resident #2’s medication.
209. Based on the foregoing, Loving Care ALF failed to maintain an accurate, daily,
up-to-date MOR for resident #2.
48
Resident #4
210. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed resident #4’s
record. The following medications were listed on the MOR: (1) Folic Acid 1 milligram every
day; (2) Plavix 75 milligrams every day; (3) Prinivil 10 milligrams every day; (4) Protonix 10
milligrams every day; (5) Thiamine 100 milligrams every day; (6) Buspar 5 milligrams three
tablets three times a day; and (7) Remeron 45 milligrams one every night at bedtime. According
to the MOR, all of the foregoing medications were administered to resident #4 on or about
February 5-6, 2002. However, six of the seven medications were not found in resident #4’s
medication box as stated in the paragraph below.
211. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor observed the following
medications in resident #4’s medication box: (1) Thiamine 50 milligrams two tablets twice a
day; (2) Aciphex 20 milligrams thirty minutes before every meal; (3) Clonidine 0.1 milligrams
every twelve hours; (4) Lisinopril 10 milligrams every day; and (5) prenatal vitamin every day.
Folic Acid, Plavix, Prinivil, Protonix EC, Buspar, and Remeron were listed on the MOR but
were not in the medication box.
212. Based on the foregoing, Loving Care ALF failed to maintain an accurate, daily,
up-to-date MOR for resident #4.
Resident #5
213. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed resident #5’s
record. The following five medications were listed on the MOR: (1) Depakote 500 milligrams
three tablets every morning and two tablets at bedtime; (2) Tegretol 200 milligrams two tablets
twice a day; (3) Neurontin 100 milligrams three times a day; (4) Albuteral two puffs four times a
day; and (5) Klonopin 1 milligram two tablets at bedtime. According to the MOR, all of the
49
foregoing medications were administered to resident #5 on or about February 5-6, 2002.
However, two of the five medications were not found in resident #5’s medication box as stated in
the paragraph below.
214. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor observed the following
medications in resident #5°s medication box: (1) Klonopin 1 milligram two tablets at bedtime;
(2) Tegretol 200 milligrams two tablets twice a day; and (3) Depakote 500 milligrams three
tablets in the morning and two tablets at bedtime. The Nerontin and Albuterol Inhaler were
listed on the MOR but were not in the resident’s medication box.
215. On or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor interviewed the
Administrator. The Administrator stated that resident #5’s mother may have the Albuterol
Inhaler. The Administrator further stated to the AHCA surveyor that the MOR was inaccurate
because resident #5 did not receive his Albuterol Inhaler on the day of the survey, although the
MOR shows this medication as being administered to the resident.
216. Based on the foregoing, Loving Care ALF failed to maintain an accurate, daily,
up-to-date MOR for resident #5.
217. Based on all the foregoing, Loving Care ALF violated Rule 58A-5.0185(5)(b),
Florida Administrative Code, by failing to maintain an accurate, daily, up-to-date MOR for
resident #1, resident #2, resident #4 and/or resident #5.
218. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(b), Florida Statutes, the foregoing violation is a
class II violation because it is related to the personal care of resident #1, resident #2, resident #4,
and/or resident #5 and directly threatened the physical or emotional health, safety, or security of
resident #1, resident #2, resident #4 and/or resident #5.
50
219. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(b), Florida Statutes, AHCA may impose a
$5,000.00 fine against Loving Care ALF for a class II deficiency.
COUNT XVII
LOVING CARE ALF FAILED TO EMPLOY THE CONSULTANT SERVICES OF A
LICENSED PHARMACIST OR LICENSED REGISTERED NURSE
AND/OR FAILED TO PROVIDE AHCA WITH PROOF OF THE FOREGOING.
Section 400.442, Fla. Stat. (2001)
Rule 58A-5.033(4), Fla. Admin. Code (2001)
CLASS II DEFICIENCY
220. On or about July 1-3, 2001 an AHCA surveyor performed a survey on Loving
Care ALF. At this survey, AHCA documented at least one class II deficiency against Loving
Care ALF regarding medicinal drugs or over-the-counter preparations, including their storage,
use, delivery, or administration.
221. Pursuant to Section 400.442, Florida Statutes, and Rule 58A-5.033(4), Florida
Administrative Code, AHCA notified Loving Care ALF that it was required to hire a licensed
pharmacist consultant or registered nurse no later than July 9, 2001 to address the medication
related problems discovered at the survey on or about July 1-3, 2001.
222. During the survey on or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor reviewed
Loving Care ALF’s records. The records contained no evidence of the employment of a
consultant including, but not limited to, a copy of the consultant’s professional license.
223. During the survey on or about February 5-6, 2002 an AHCA surveyor
interviewed the Administrator. The Administrator was unable to provide any evidence of
the employment by the facility of a consultant.
224, Pursuant to Section 400.442, Florida Statutes, and Rule 58A-45.033(4),
Florida Administrative Code, Loving Care ALF must employ a consultant until the
51
facility receives written notification from AHCA that consultant services are no longer
necessary. AHCA never notified Loving Care ALF that such services were no longer
necessary. Loving Care ALF failed to a employ consultant and/or failed to continue to
employ a consultant until AHCA determined that such consultant services were no longer
necessary.
225. Based on the foregoing, Loving Care ALF violated Section 400.442,
Florida Statutes, and Rule 58A-5.033(4), Florida Administrative Code, by: (a) failing to
employ a consultant; (b) failing to continue to employ a consultant; and/or (c) failing to
have available for review by AHCA evidence of such employment including, but not
limited to, a copy of the consultant’s license.
226. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(b), Florida Statutes, the foregoing violation is a
class II violation because it is related to the operation and maintenance of the facility or to the
personal care of residents and directly threatened the physical or emotional health, safety, or
security of residents in the facility.
227. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(b), Florida Statutes, AHCA may impose a
$5,000.00 fine against Loving Care ALF for a class II deficiency.
COUNT XVIII
LOVING CARE ALF FAILED TO MAINTAIN
PHYSICIAN’S ORDERS FOR MEDICATION
IN RESIDENT #1’S RECORD AND
RESIDENT #3'S RECORD, RESPECTIVELY.
Rule 58A-5.024(3)(c), Fla. Admin. Code (2001)
CLASS IT DEFICIENCY
228. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs one (1) through eight
(8) above as if fully set forth herein.
52
229. On or about July 1-3, 2001 AHCA conducted a survey at Loving Care ALF. One
class II deficiency was cited against Loving Care ALF based upon the findings below involving
resident #1 and resident #3.
Resident #1
230. On or about July 1-3, 2001 an AHCA surveyor reviewed resident #1’s medical
record. The record did not contain a physician’s order for any of the following medications,
which medications were listed on the medication observation record and were present in the
medication container:
° Micro-K 10 milligrams
° Extentabs one daily
° Zyrtec 10 milligrams one daily
e Haldol 2 milligrams one at hour of sleep
Resident #3
231. On or about July 1-3, 2001 an AHCA surveyor reviewed resident #3’s medical
record. The record did not contain a physician’s order for “Plavix 75 milligrams one daily”,
which medication was listed on the medication observation record as being administered to
resident #3.
232. Based on all of the foregoing, Loving Care ALF violated Rule 58A-5.024(3)(c),
Florida Administrative Code, by failing to maintain in resident #1’s medical record and resident
#3’s medical record, respectively, all health care provider’s orders for medication.
53
233. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(b), Florida Statutes, the foregoing violation is a
class II violation because it is related to the personal care of resident #1 and/or resident #3 and
directly threatened resident #1’s and/or resident #3’s physical or emotional health, safety, or
security.
234. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(b), Florida Statutes, AHCA may impose a $2,500
fine against Loving Care ALF for a class II deficiency.
COUNT IXx
LOVING CARE ALF FAILED TO MAINTAIN
A MINIMUM STAFF HOURS OF 212 PER WEEK
FOR A CENSUS OF 6-15 RESIDENTS.
Rule 58A-5.019(4)(a)1, Fla. Admin. Code (2001)
CLASS IH DEFICIENCY
235. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs one (1) through eight
(8) above as if fully set forth herein.
236. On or about July 1-3, 2001 AHCA conducted a survey at Loving Care ALF. One
class II deficiency was cited against Loving Care ALF based upon the findings below.
237. On or about July 1-3, 2001 an AHCA surveyor interviewed Loving Care ALF’s
Administrator. The Administrator was unable to produce a written 24-hour staffing schedule for
the month of July 2001. During the interview, the Administrator stated that the facility
maintained a minimum of 168 staff hours per week with an average daily census of greater than
six (6) residents.
238. On the day of the survey, July 1-3, 2001 the census at Loving Care ALF was
fourteen (14) residents.
54
239. Pursuant to Rule 58A-5.019(4)(a)1, Florida Administrative Code, Loving Care
ALF must maintain a minimum of 212 staff hours per week, not 168 staff hours, for fourteen
(14) residents.
240. Based on all of the foregoing, Loving Care ALF violated Rule 58A-5.019(4)(a)1,
Florida Administrative Code, by failing to maintain 212 minimum staff hours per week as
required for a census of fourteen (14) residents.
241. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(b), Florida Statutes, the foregoing violation is a
class II violation because it is related to the operation and maintenance of the facility or to the
personal care of residents and directly threatened the physical or emotional health, safety, or
security or the Loving Care ALF’s residents.
242. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(b), Florida Statutes, AHCA may impose a
$2,500.00 fine against Loving Care ALF for a class II deficiency.
COUNT XX
LOVING CARE ALF FAILED TO MAINTAIN
AN ACCURATE, DAILY, UP-TO-DATE
MEDICATION OBSERVATION RECORD (“MOR”)
FOR RESIDENT #1 AND RESIDENT #3, RESPECTIVELY.
Rule 58A-5.0185(5)(b), Fla. Admin. Code (2001)
CLASS II DEFICIENCY
243. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs one (1) through eight
(8) above as if fully set forth herein.
244. On or about July 1-3, 2001 AHCA conducted a survey at Loving Care ALF. A
class II deficiency was cited against Loving Care ALF based on the findings below involving
resident #1 and resident #3, respectively.
55
Resident #1
245. On or about July 1-3, 2001 an AHCA surveyor reviewed resident #1’s medical
record and discovered that Loving Care ALF failed to maintain an accurate, daily, up-to-date
MOR for resident #1.
246. At approximately 1:00 p.m. on or about July 1, 2001 an AHCA surveyor reviewed
resident #1’s MOR. “Haldol 2 milligrams one at hour of sleep (8:00 p.m.)” was signed off by
staff as given to resident #1 at 8:00 p.m. that same day, although it was only 1:00 p.m. at the time
of the record review. Additionally, the resident’s chart contained a physician’s order for
“Propoxyphene 650 milligrams twice daily as needed for pain”. Propoxyphene, however, was
not listed on resident #1’s MOR. Therefore, resident #1 was not receiving the Propoxyphene.
Resident #3
247. On or about July 1-3, 2001 an AHCA surveyor reviewed resident #3’s medical
record and discovered that Loving Care ALF failed to maintain an accurate, daily, up-to-date
MOR for resident #3.
248. At approximately 1:00 p.m. on or about July 1, 2001 an AHCA surveyor reviewed
resident #3’s MOR. The MOR listed “Buspar 15 mg. one three times daily (8:00 A.M., 12:00
Noon, 8:00 P.M.).” All three (3) medication administration times were signed off by staff as
given to resident #3 including the 8:00 p.m. administration time even though it was only 1:00
p.m. at the time of the record review. The MOR also listed “Remeron 45 mg. one at hour of
sleep (8:00 p.m.).” Remeron was also signed off by staff as administered to the resident at 8:00
p.m. that day even though it was only 1:00 p.m. at the time of the record review.
56
249. Further, the resident’s chart contained a physician’s order for “Multivitamin one
daily”. The multivitamin, however, was not listed on resident #3’s MOR. Therefore, it is likely
that resident #3 was not receiving the multivitamin.
250. Finally, the MOR listed “Plavix 75 mg. one daily (8:00 A.M.)”, but the
physician’s order contained in resident #3’s medical record was for “one at hour of sleep”. The
MOR was inaccurate as Resident #3 was receiving Plavix in the morning rather than in the
evening as per the physician’s order.
251. Based on all the foregoing, Loving Care ALF violated Rule 58A-5.0185(5)(b),
Florida Administrative Code, by failing to maintain an accurate, daily, up-to-date MOR for
resident #1 and resident #3, respectively.
252. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(b), Florida Statutes, the foregoing violation is a
class II violation because it is related to the personal care of resident #1 and/or resident #3 and
directly threatened the physical or emotional health, safety, or security of resident #1 and/or
resident #3.
253. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(b), Florida Statutes, AHCA may impose a
$2,500.00 fine against Loving Care ALF for a class II deficiency.
COUNT XXI
LOVING CARE ALF FAILED TO ENSURE THAT ALL PRESCRIPTION
DRUGS KEPT BY THE FACILITY WERE PROPERLY LABELED AND DISPENSED.
Rule 58A-5.0185(7)(a), Fla. Admin. Code (2001)
CLASS I DEFICIENCY
254. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs one (1) through eight
(8) above as if fully set forth herein.
57
255. On or about July 1-3, 2001 AHCA conducted a survey at Loving Care ALF. A
class II deficiency was cited against the Loving Care ALF based on the findings below involving
resident #3.
Resident #3
256. On or about July 1-3, 2001 an AHCA surveyor observed medication bottles and
reviewed resident #3’s medical record and discovered that labels on medication bottles differed
from the physician’s order and/or the medication observation record.
257. On or about July 1-3, 2001 the AHCA surveyor observed the medication
Remeron in resident #3’s medication box. “Remeron 15 mg” was written on the box containing
the medication but there was no label on the box with instructions for medication administration.
The medication observation record and the physician’s order listed “Remeron 45 mg. one at
hours of sleep”. Based on the foregoing, there was no way to determine if Resident #3 was
receiving 45 milligrams, not 15 milligrams, of Remeron as prescribed by the physician.
258. The surveyor also discovered differences between what was written on the
medication label and the medication observation record. Lisinopril 10 milligrams was written on
the label and Prinivil 10 milligrams, one daily, was written on the medication observation record.
Prinivil is the brand name for the active ingredient, Lisinopril, used to treat high blood pressure
and heart failure. The medication label was not properly labeled to ensure accurate
administration of the medication.
58
259. Vitamin B-1 50 milligrams was written on the medication bottle and Thiamine
HCL 100 milligrams, one daily, was written on the medication observation record and on the
physician’s order contained in the medical record. Vitamin B-1 is the brand name for the active
ingredient Thiamine. The medication label was not properly labeled to ensure accurate
administration of the medication.
260. Based on all the foregoing, Loving Care ALF violated Rule 58A-5.0185(7)(a),
Florida Administrative Code, by failing to ensure that prescription drugs kept by the facility were
properly labeled and dispensed in accordance with Chapters 465 and 499, Florida Statutes.
261. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(b), Florida Statutes, the foregoing violation is a
class II violation because it is related to the personal care of resident resident #3 and directly
threatened resident #3’s physical or emotional health, safety, or security.
262. Pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(b), Florida Statutes, AHCA may impose a
$2,500.00 fine against Loving Care ALF for a class II deficiency.
CLAIM FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, AHCA respectfully requests the following relief:
1) Make factual and legal findings in favor of AHCA on Counts I though
XX];
2) Impose a $46,000.00 fine against Loving Care ALF pursuant to Sections
400.414(1)(e) and 400.419(1)(b) and (c), Florida Statutes (2001);
3) Revoke Loving Care ALF’s assisted living facility license pursuant to
Section 400.414(1)(e), Florida Statutes (2001); and
4) Grant any other legal and equitable relief as deemed necessary in the
furtherance of justice.
59
NOTICE
Loving Care ALF hereby is notified that it has a right to request an administrative hearing
pursuant to Section 120.569, Florida Statutes. Specific options for administrative action are set
out in the attached Election of Rights (one page) and explained in the attached Explanation of
Rights (one page). All requests for hearing shall be made to the Agency for Health Care
Administration, and delivered to Lori C. Desnick, Senior Attorney, Agency for Health Care
Administration, 2727 Mahan Drive, Mail Stop #3, Tallahassee, Florida, 32308.
THE LOVING CARE ALF IS FURTHER NOTIFIED THAT THE FAILURE TO
REQUEST A HEARING WITHIN TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THIS
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT WILL RESULT IN AN ADMISSION OF THE
FACTS ALLEGED IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT AND THE ENTRY OF
A FINAL ORDER BY ACHA.
Respectfully submitted on this day of July 2002.
+ CO. Degree ky
Lori C. Desnick
Fla. Bar. No. 0129542
Counsel for Petitioner
Agency for Health Care Administration
Building 3, Mail Stop #3
2727 Mahan Drive
Tallahassee, Florida 32308
(850) 921-0071 (office)
(850) 921-0158 (fax)
60
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
J] HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Administrative
Complaint has been sent by U.S. Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested (return receipt #
TMOG 45 VS 124 4- 2060 3324 to Fannie Lou Finkley, Administrator, Fannie Lou
Finkley d/b/a Loving Care ALF a/k/a Loving Care Retirement Center, 7667 Kipling Street,
Pensacola, Florida 32514 on this bladay of July, 2002.
hi _C :
LORI C. DESNICK, ESQUIRE
61
STATE OF FLORIDA
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
EXPLANATION OF RIGHTS UNDER SEC, 120.569, FLORIDA STATUTES
(To be used in conjunction with Election of Rights form — attached)
In response to the allegations set forth in the Administrative Complaint issued by the Agency for
Health Care Administration ("AHCA” or “Agency”), you must make one of the following elections within
twenty-one (21) days from the date of receipt of the Administrative Complaint. Please make your election of
the attached Election of Rights form and return it fully executed to the address listed on the form.
OPTION 1. tf you do nat dispute the allegations in the Administrative Complaint and waive your right to
be heard, you should select OPTION 1 on the election of rights form. A final order will be entered finding you
guilty of the violations charged and imposing the penalty sought in the Complaint. You will be provided a
copy of the final order.
OPTION 2. If you do not dispute any material fact alleged in the Administrative Complaint (you admit
each of them), you may request an informal hearing pursuant to Section 120.57(2), Florida Statutes (2001)
before the Agency. At the informal hearing, you will be given an opportunity to present both written and oral
evidence to reduce the penalty being imposed for the violations set out in the Complaint. For an informal
hearing, you should select OPTION 2 on the Election of Rights form.
OPTION 3. If you dispute the allegations set forth in the Administrative Complaint (you do not admit
them) you may request a formal hearing pursuant to Section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes (2001). To obtain a
formal hearing, select OPTION 3 on the Election of Rights form.
In order to obtain a formal proceeding before the Division of Administrative Hearings under Section
120.57(1), F.S., your request for an administrative hearing must conform to the requirements in Section
28-106.201, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C), and must state the material facts you dispute.
In order to preserve your right to a hearing, your Election of Rights in this matter
must be directed to the Agency by filing within twenty-one (21) days from the date
you receive the Administrative Complaint. If you do not respond at all within
twenty-one (21) days from receipt of the Administrative Complaint, a final order will
be issued finding you guilty of the violations charged and imposing the penalty
sought in the Complaint.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
RE: AHCA v. Fannie Lue Finkley d/b/a Loving Care ALF,
alk/a Loving Care Retirement Center
CASE NOS. 2002019591, 2002009691, and 2001041081
ELECTION OF RIGHTS
PLEASE SELECT ONLY 1 OF THE 3 OPTIONS
An Explanation of Rights is attached.
OPTION ONE (1) 6 ! do not dispute the allegations of fact contained in the Administrative Complaint
and waive my right to object or to be heard. | understand that by waiving my rights, a final order will be
issued that adopts the Administrative Complaint and imposes the sanctions sought.
OPTION TWO (2) 0 I do not dispute and | admit the allegations of fact in the Administrative
Complaint, but do wish to be afforded an informal proceeding, pursuant to Section 120.57(2), Florida
Statutes, at which time | will be permitted to submit oral and/or written evidence to the Agency in mitigation
of the penalty imposed.
OPTION THREE (3) 0 / do dispute the allegations of fact contained in the Administrative Complaint and
request a formal hearing, pursuant to Section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes, before an Administrative Law
Judge appointed by the Division of Administrative Hearings.
If you choose OPTION THREE (3), in order to obtain a formal proceeding before the Division of
Administrative Hearings under Section 120.57(1), F.S., your request for an administrative hearing must
conform to the requirements in Section 28-106.201, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C), and must state
the material facts you dispute.
In order to preserve your right to any hearing, your Election of Rights in this matter must be directed to
the Agency by filing within twenty-one (21) days from the date you receive the Administrative
Complaint. tf you do not respond at all within twenty-one (21) days from receipt of the Administrative
Complaint, a final order will be issued finding you guilty of the violations charged and imposing the
penalty sought in the Complaint.
If you have elected either OPTION TWO (2) or THREE (3) above and you are interested in discussing a
settlement of this matter with the Agency, please also mark this block. 6
Mediation under Section 120.573, Florida Statutes, is not available in this matter.
SEND NO PAYMENT NOW -- REGARDLESS OF THE OPTION SELECTED, PLEASE WAIT UNTIL
YOU RECEIVE A COPY OF A FINAL ORDER FOR INSTRUCTIONS ON PAYMENT OF ANY FINES.
(Please sign and fill in your current address.)
Respondent (Licensee)
Address:
License. No. and facility type: Phone No.
PLEASE RETURN YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO:
Lori C. Desnick, Senior Attorney, Agency for Health Care Administration, (Note: Overnight Deliveries to 2727
Mahan Drive, Mail Stop #3, Tallahassee, Florida 32308 -5403.) Telephone Number: 850/922-5873; FAX 850/413-
9313; TOD 1-800-955-8771.
Docket for Case No: 02-003851
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Aug. 15, 2003 |
Final Order filed.
|
Aug. 14, 2003 |
Letter to J. Daniels from T. Curry enclosing a two-volume transcript for the above-referenced hearing held on June 11-12, 2003 filed.
|
Aug. 11, 2003 |
Order Closing File. CASE CLOSED.
|
Aug. 08, 2003 |
Joint Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction and Close File (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
Jul. 30, 2003 |
Petitioner`s Response to Request for Production (filed via facsimile).
|
Jul. 30, 2003 |
Transcript (2 Volumes) filed. |
Jul. 28, 2003 |
Notice of Appearance and Substitution of Counsel (filed by J. Daniels, Esquire, via facsimile).
|
Jun. 30, 2003 |
Notice of Change of Address filed by N. Collins.
|
Jun. 25, 2003 |
Respondent`s Request for Production of Documents filed.
|
Jun. 20, 2003 |
Notice of Hearing (hearing set for August 13 through 15, 2003; 10:00 a.m.; Pensacola, FL).
|
Jun. 11, 2003 |
CASE STATUS: Hearing Partially Held; continued to August 13, 2003. |
Jun. 11, 2003 |
Notice of Filing Witness List (filed by Respondent via facsimile).
|
Jun. 10, 2003 |
Notice of Filing Amended Witness List (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
Jun. 10, 2003 |
Agency`s Emergency Motion to Compel Depositions (filed via facsimile)
|
Jun. 10, 2003 |
Notice of Filing Witness List (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
Jun. 09, 2003 |
Notice of Taking Depositions (F. Finkley and M. Hills) filed via facsimile.
|
Apr. 01, 2003 |
Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing issued (hearing set for June 11 and 12, 2003; 10:00 a.m.; Pensacola, FL).
|
Mar. 26, 2003 |
Motion for Continuance (filed by Respondent via facsimile).
|
Mar. 24, 2003 |
Notice of Appearance (filed by N. Collins).
|
Jan. 08, 2003 |
Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing issued (hearing set for April 2 and 3, 2003; 10:00 a.m.; Pensacola, FL).
|
Dec. 23, 2002 |
Motion to Reschedule Hearing (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
Dec. 16, 2002 |
Amended Notice of Hearing issued. (hearing set for March 12 and 13, 2003; 10:00 a.m.; Pensacola, FL, amended as to time zone).
|
Dec. 13, 2002 |
Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing issued (hearing set for March 12 and 13, 2003; 10:00 a.m.; Pensacola, FL).
|
Dec. 11, 2002 |
Agency`s Response to Respondent`s Motion for Order, Motion for Continuance (filed via facsimile).
|
Dec. 02, 2002 |
Motion for Order, Motion for Continuance filed by Respondent.
|
Oct. 24, 2002 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions issued.
|
Oct. 24, 2002 |
Notice of Hearing issued (hearing set for December 18 and 19, 2002; 10:00 a.m.; Pensacola, FL).
|
Oct. 10, 2002 |
Joint Response to Initial Order (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
Oct. 03, 2002 |
Initial Order issued.
|
Oct. 02, 2002 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Oct. 02, 2002 |
Request for Formal Hearing filed.
|
Oct. 02, 2002 |
Notice (of Agency referral) filed.
|