Petitioner: ESPIMAR CORPORATION, D/B/A MARQUEZ PHARMACY
Respondent: AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
Judges: STUART M. LERNER
Agency: Agency for Health Care Administration
Locations: Miami, Florida
Filed: Nov. 14, 2002
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Friday, March 14, 2003.
Latest Update: Dec. 25, 2024
STATE OF FLORIDA SER
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
ESPIMAR CORPORATION d/b/a
MARQUEZ PHARMACY,
Petitioner, 4
SM) - Clos
vs. CASE NO. 02-4414MPI ASO
“Pendithan NO AGA (DAA SMBC
STATE OF FLORIDA, ; 2
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE oO
ADMINISTRATION, me "9
vo ww
Respondent. = -
—_ / ne
ra oD
FINAL ORDER a
‘THE PARTIES resolved all disputed issues and executed a Settlement
Agreement, which is incorporated by reference. The parties are directed to
comply with the terms of the attached settlement agreement. Based on the
foregoing, this file is CLOSED.
DONE and ORDERED on this the 4 day of Chexeok __, 2003,
in Tallahassee, Florida.
kn Rhond Al) Med s, MD, Secretary
Agency Health Care Administration
A PARTY WHO IS ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY THIS FINAL ORDER IS
ENTITLED TO A JUDICIAL REVIEW WHICH SHALL BE INSTITUTED BY
FILING ONE COPY OF A NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH THE AGENCY CLERK OF
AHCA, AND A SECOND COPY ALONG WITH FILING FEE AS PRESCRIBED BY
LAW, WITH THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL IN THE APPELLATE DISTRICT
WHERE THE AGENCY MAINTAINS ITS HEADQUARTERS OR WHERE A PARTY
RESIDES. REVIEW PROCEEDINGS SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE FLORIDA APPELLATE RULES. THE NOTICE OF
APPEAL MUST BE FILED WITHIN 30 DAYS OF RENDITION OF THE ORDER
TO BE REVIEWED.
Copies furnished to:
L. William Porter II, Esquire
Agency for Health Care
Administration
(Interoffice Mail)
Juan C. Bermudez, Esquire
Bermudez & Tome
8300 N.W. 53 Street, Suite 300
Miami, Florida 33166
(U.S. Mail)
Stuart Lerner
Administrative Law Judge
Division of Administrative Hearings
The DeSoto Building
1230 Apalachee Parkway
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060
Tim Byrnes, Chief, Medicaid Program Integrity
Kathryn Holland, Medicaid Program Integrity
John Hoover, Finance and Accounting
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has
been furnished to the above named addressees by U.S. Mail on this the | | day
of fi Ue LOE, 2003.
Chante Uheudsen
-PRLealand McCharen, Esquir®
Agency Clerk
State of Florida
Agency for Health Care Administration
2727 Mahan Drive, Building #3
Tallahassee, Florida 32308-5403
(850) 922-5873
STATE OF FLORIDA
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
ESPIMAR CORPORATION d/b/a
MARQUEZ PHARMACY,
Petitioner,
vs. CASE NO. 02-4414MPI
STATE OF FLORIDA,
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE
ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
STATE OF FLORIDA, AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
(“AHCA” or “the Agency”), and Espimar Corporation d/b/a Marquez Pharmacy
(“PROVIDER”), by and through the undersigned, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
1. This Agreement is entered into between the parties for the purpose of resolving
the disputes between them and avoiding the costs and burdens of further litigation. Neither party
concedes the other’s position.
2. PROVIDER is a Medicaid provider in the State of Florida, provider number
103116300 and was a provider during the audit period.
3. In its final agency audit report (final agency action) dated October 12, 1998,
AHCA notified PROVIDER that review of Medicaid claims performed by Medicaid Program
Integrity (MPI), Office of the Inspector General, indicated that certain claims, in whole or in
part, were not covered by Medicaid. The Agency sought recoupment of this overpayment, in the
amount of $124,823.88. In response to the audit letter dated October 12, 1998, PROVIDER filed
operas Up ier emer Hage 6 tee ie
Settlement Agreement
a petition for an informal administrative hearing, which was assigned AHCA Case No. 01-
199PH. It was later determined that their were facts in dispute so the matter was referred to the
Division of Administrative Hearings and assigned DOAH case number 02-4414MFI.
4. As the pre-trial phase of the case took place, the Agency became aware. of
additional facts and circumstances conceming the drug inventory issues. As a result, AHCA
agreed to resolve this matter for a total repayment of $92,370.00, as set forth below.
5. In order to resolve this matter without further administrative proceedings,
PROVIDER and the AHCA expressly agree as follows:
(1) | AHCA agrees to accept the payment set forth herein in settlement of the
overpayment issues arising from the MP] review.
(2) Within thirty days of receipt of the final order, PROVIDER agrees to
make the first installment to repay ninety thousand dollars ($90,000.00) in
overpayment and two thousand three hundred seventy dollars ($2,370.00)
in investigative costs for a total payment of ninety two thousand three
hundred seventy dollars ($92,370.00) plus 10% interest per year to be
made in three (3) monthly payments in full and complete settlement of all
claims in the proceedings before the Division of Administrative Hearings
(DOAH Case No. 02-4414MPI). AHCA retains the right to perform a 6-
month follow-up review.
‘a
LLOpern cnet Nene peeee aE emer rerene perenne sem roe
Settlement Agreement
(3) PROVIDER and AHCA agrec that full payment as set forth above will
resolve and settle this case completely and release both parties from all
liabilities arising from the findings in the audit referenced as CI. 97-0391-
000-3.
(4) PROVIDER agrees that it will not rebiJ] the Medicaid Program in any
manner for claims that were not covered by Medicaid, which are the
subject of the audit in this case.
6. Payment shall be made to:
AGENCY FOR HEALTHCARE ADMINISTRATION
Medicaid Accounts Receivable
Post Office Box 13749
Tallahassee, Florida 32317-3749
7. PROVIDER agrees that failure to pay any monies due and owing under the terms
of this Agreement shall constitute PROVIDER’S authorization for the Agency, without further
notice, to withhold the total remaining amount due under the terms of this agreement from any
monies due and owing to PROVIDER for any Medicaid claims.
8, AHCA reserves the right to enforce this Agreement under the laws of the State of
Florida, the Rules of the Medicaid Program, and all other applicabje rules and regulations.
9. This settlement does not constitute an admission of wrongdoing or error by either
party with respect to this case or any other matter.
10. Each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs, if any.
11. The signatories to this Agreement, acting in a representative capacity, represent
that they are duly authorized to enter into this Agreement on behalf of the respective parties.
Seitlement Agreement
12. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the provisions of the laws
of Florida. Venue for any action arising from this Agreement shall be in Leon County, Florida.
13. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between PROVIDER and the
AHCA, including anyone acting for, associated with or employed by them, concerming all
matters and supersedes any prior discussions, agreements or understandings; there are no
promises, representations or agreements between PROVIDER and the AHCA other than as set
forth herein. No modification or waiver of any provision shall be valid unless a wnitten
amendment to the Agreement is completed and properly executed by the parties.
14. This is an Agreement of settlement and compromise, made in recognition that the
parties may have different or incorrect understandings, information and contentions, as to facts
and law, and with each party compromising and settling any potential correctness or
incorrectness of its understandings, information and contentions as to facts and law, so that no
misunderstanding or misinformation shall be a ground for rescission hereof.
15. | PROVIDER expressly waives in this matter its right to any hearing pursuant to
sections 120.569 or 120.57, Florida Statutes, the making of findings of fact and conclusions of
law by the Agency, and all further and other proceedings to which it may be entitled by law or
rules of the Agency regarding this proceeding and any and all issues raised herein. PROVIDER
further agrees that it shall not challenge or contest any Final Order entered in this matter which is
consistent with the terms of this settlernent agreement in any forum now or in the future available
to it, including the right to any administrative proceeding, circuit or federal court action or any
appeal.
16. This Agreement is and shall be deemed jointly drafted and written by all parties to
it and shall not be construed or interpreted against the party originating or preparing it.
ween meee ree qa tte ne
Settlement Agreement
17, To the extent that any provision of this Agreement is prohibited by law for any
reason, such provision shall be effective to the extent not so prohibited, and such prohibition
shall not affect any other provision of this Agreement.
18. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding on each party’s
successors, assigns, heirs, administrators, representatives and trustees.
19. All times stated herein are of the essence of this Agreement.
20. This Agreement shall be in ful) force and effect upon execution by the respective
parties in counterpart.
ESPIM. CORPORATION d/b/a MARQUEZ PHARMACY
Dated: Apel 1*7 2003
__ Print name)
ITS: PResv ston fo
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE
ADMINISTRATION
2727 Mahan Drive, Mail Stop #3
Tallahassee, FL 32308-5403
—_—_ Gite Dated: agate od , 2003
RufusNobie Sua + . He
Inspector General
Dated: fo Af 2003
Dated: j Le- » 2003
Assistant General Counse
STATE O@ RIDA
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
~ October 12, 1998
VIA._ CERTIFIED U.S. MAIL iE JEG EDS
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED | EEE 7 IT
Espimar Corporation -
d/b/a Marquez Pharmacy. °
5901 W. 16" Avenue ..- - —
Hialeah, Florida 33012
Wl RINNE gaa yaee
Aa fie ACEOUNTING
Lt
Re: Agency Audit C.I. No. 97-0391-000-3
Provider No. 1031163-00
Dear Provider: oe
nia oe
-The--Office of Medicaid Program Integrity (“MPI”) has completed its review of claims
submitted under your Medicaid Provider number 1031163-00 for the time period beginning
July 14, 1995, through and including January 9, 1997. This audit found chat Medicaid
overpaid you in the amount of $124,823.88.
This audit revealed that certain services billed under your provider number could not have
been provided with your inventory and purchases of pharmaceuticals. Given these findings,
this agency is compelled to seek a resolution of this matter.
In an effort to expedite and simplify this process, we will extend to you the opportunity to
settle this matter: Any settlement at this juncture will save both you and this office the burden
and expense of litigation, as well as minimize the public airing with regard to any improper
claims. The final terms of any settlement will be incorporated into a written agreement, and
will effectively bring this matter to a close. Please be advised however, that in resolving
situations involving false Medicaid claims, this agency may seek interest, investigative costs,
or penalties as part of any negotiated settlement.
Finally, please be advised that should we be unable to settle this matter, this office will
consider proceeding under the Florida False Claims Act (section 68.081, Florida Statutes, er
seq.) Successful prosecution of such a case for any false claims sudmitted on or after July 1,
1994, would result in full restitution of the moneys in question plus the award of treble
damages (triple the amount paid) together with a mandatory minimum $5,000 penalty per false
claim - the maximum penalty per false claim is $10,000. If an agreement is reached between
the appropriate parties, however, this agency would forego filing an action.
OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL
Fort Knox Building 3. *« 2727 Mahan Drive
TALLAHASSEE. FLORIDA 32308-5403
LAWTON CHILES, GOVERNOR
Should you wish to discuss settlement of this matter, please call me at (850) 922-5873 by
October 30, 1998. If I do not hear from you, I will assume that you are not interested in
discussing this matter and will pursue any and all remedies available.
Yours Truly,
LEE. -
Costas Miskis
Assistant General Counsel
Office of the General Counsel
(VIA U.S. MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED)
Rosa Marquez
1030 W. 53” Street, Hialeah, FL
Elio Marquez
1030 W. 53 Street, Hialeah, FL
David Marquez
1030 W. 53™ Street, Hialeah, FL
Elio L. Marquez ;
850 W. 53 Street Hialeah, FL
cc:
.
bee: Edward Turner, Chief, Medicaid Program Integrity
Elinor Schroeder, Medicaid Accounts Receivable
Kathryn Holland, Medicaid Program Integrity
Docket for Case No: 02-004414MPI
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Aug. 13, 2003 |
Final Order filed.
|
Mar. 14, 2003 |
Order Closing File issued. CASE CLOSED.
|
Mar. 13, 2003 |
Joint Motion to Hold Case in Abeyance (filed by Respondent via facsimile).
|
Jan. 14, 2003 |
Order Granting Continuance and Placing Case in Abeyance issued (parties to advise status by March 11, 2003).
|
Jan. 06, 2003 |
Joint Motion to Hold Case in Abeyance (filed by Respondent via facsimile).
|
Jan. 06, 2003 |
Cancellation of Deposition, E. Marquez (filed by Respondent via facsimile).
|
Dec. 20, 2002 |
Joint Report to Court Regarding Pretrial Stipulation and Conference of Counsel (filed by Respondent via facsimile).
|
Dec. 16, 2002 |
Amended Notice of Deposition, E. Marquez (filed by Respondent via facsimile).
|
Dec. 16, 2002 |
Notice of Deposition, E. Marquez (filed by Respondent via facsimile).
|
Nov. 26, 2002 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions issued.
|
Nov. 25, 2002 |
Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference issued (video hearing set for January 17, 2003; 9:00 a.m.; Miami and Tallahassee, FL).
|
Nov. 21, 2002 |
Joint Response to Initial Order (filed by Respondent via facsimile).
|
Nov. 15, 2002 |
Initial Order issued.
|
Nov. 14, 2002 |
Agency Audit Report filed.
|
Nov. 14, 2002 |
Joint Motion to Refer Case to Division of Administrative Hearings filed.
|
Nov. 14, 2002 |
Order Relinquishing Jurisdiction filed.
|
Nov. 14, 2002 |
Re-Notice (of Agency referral) filed.
|