Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

LAVONDRA STEADMAN, O/B/O JOHN STEADMAN vs DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES, DIVISION OF RETIREMENT, 04-001843 (2004)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 04-001843 Visitors: 114
Petitioner: LAVONDRA STEADMAN, O/B/O JOHN STEADMAN
Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES, DIVISION OF RETIREMENT
Judges: STEPHEN F. DEAN
Agency: Department of Management Services
Locations: Mount Dora, Florida
Filed: May 21, 2004
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Friday, June 4, 2004.

Latest Update: Sep. 03, 2004
Summary: Respondent`s compliance with the rule can be determined from the pleadings and written record. Respondent has complied, and the Petitioner must file the requested documents to received benefits.
lo H-O4 2. STATE OF FLORIDA a DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES y @ DIVISION OF RETIREMENT Qo SEL “, (s] wh LAVONDRA STEADMAN, o/b/o JOHN a an STEADMAN, Cp - Final Order No. DMS — o4-0f % Petitioner, EN vs. DOAH CASE NO. 04-1843 DMS DORO3-49 DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT Ar ee SERVICES, DIVISION OF olf D-C os RETIREMENT, Respondent. FINAL ORDER This case came before me for the purpose of issuing a final agency order. The Administrative Law Judge, Stephen F. Dean, assigned by the Division of Administrative Hearings (DOAH) to the above-styled case, entered his Recommended Order dated June 4, 2004. In the Recommended Order, the Administrative Law Judge explained that the Division of Retirement could not process the Petitioner’s Petition for Benefits absent a judicial order issued by a court of competent jurisdiction determining heirs and a judicial order of guardianship of minor heirs. At the time the Recommended Order was issued, the Petitioner had not submitted either order to the Division of Retirement. The Administrative Law Judge recommended that the Division of Retirement allow the Petitioner to submit the required judicial orders within 45 days of the date of the order. In addition, the Administrative Law Judge recommended the Division’s dismissal of the Petition for Benefits, upon Petitioner's failure to provide the judicial orders within the 45 day time period. Prior to the Administrative Law Judge’s Recommended Order, the Petitioner submitted an Order Determining Beneficiaries to the Division of Retirement. Rather than submit the judicial orders identified by the Administrative Law Judge in response to the Recommended Order, the Petitioner filed a Notice of Exception stating that documents submitted prior to the Recommended Order fulfilled the requirements of the Recommended Order. Those documents were part of the application for benefits that the Administrative Law Judge determined are inadequate to support the Petition for Benefits. Because the exception is not responsive to the Recommended Order, it is rejected. The Division hereby adopts and incorporates by reference the Recommended Order issued by the Administrative Law Judge on June 4, 2004. A copy of that Recommended Order is attached hereto and made a part hereof as “Exhibit A.” Based upon the foregoing, it is ORDERED and DIRECTED that the application filed by Lavondra Steadman o/b/o John Steadman is rejected and the request for retirement benefits is hereby Denied. DONE and ORDERED this A k day of l , 2004, at Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida. Soult. Serra SARABETH SNUGGS ~~ State Retirement Director Division of Retirement Cedars Executive Center, Building C 2639 North Monroe Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1560 (850) 488-5541 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO JUDICIAL REVIEW A PARTY WHO IS ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY THIS FINAL ORDER IS ENTITLED TO JUDICIAL REVIEW PURSUANT TO SECTION 120.68, FLORIDA STATUTES. REVIEW PROCEEDINGS ARE GOVERNED BY THE FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE. SUCH PROCEEDINGS ARE COMMENCED BY FILING ONE COPY OF A NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH THE AGENCY CLERK OF THE DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES, 4050 ESPLANADE WAY, SUITE 260, TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-0950, AND A SECOND COPY, ACCOMPANIED BY FILING FEES PRESCRIBED BY LAW, WITH THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST DISTRICT, OR WITH THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL IN THE APPELLATE DISTRICT WHERE THE PARTY RESIDES. THE NOTICE OF APPEAL MUST BE FILED WITHIN 30 DAYS OF RENDITION OF THE ORDER TO BE REVIEWED. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE | HEREBY CERTIFY that this Final Order was filed in the official records of the Department of Management Services and copies were furnished to: Larry D. Scott, Assistant General Counsel, Department of Management Services, 4050 Esplanade Way, Suite 260, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0950; James L. Homich, Esquire, 621 East Fifth Avenue, Mount Dora, Florida 32757, and Judge Stephen F. Dean, Division of Administrative Hearings, The DeSoto Building, 1230 Apalachee Parkway, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060, the Ih day of Assi f , 2004. ) pf. Vv j; ihn Adve ) Debbie Shoup — We Clerk Department of Management Services (850) 1082

Docket for Case No: 04-001843

Orders for Case No: 04-001843
Issue Date Document Summary
Aug. 04, 2004 Agency Final Order
Jun. 04, 2004 Recommended Order Respondent`s compliance with the rule can be determined from the pleadings and written record. Respondent has complied, and the Petitioner must file the requested documents to received benefits.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer