Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE
Respondent: ALAN SALTZMAN, D.O.
Judges: LARRY J. SARTIN
Agency: Department of Health
Locations: Lauderdale Lakes, Florida
Filed: Sep. 28, 2004
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Tuesday, December 28, 2004.
Latest Update: Dec. 23, 2024
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH myoen
em ee ad
Oh SEP 28 AMIE SI
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, yin
PETITIONER, :
v. CASE NO. 2002-18568
ALAN SALTZMAN, D.O., iy d 2 4 ] ( L-
RESPONDENT.
ee
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
Petitioner, the Department of Health, by and through undersigned
counsel, files this Administrative Complaint before the Board of Osteopathic
Medicine against Respondent, Alan Saltzman, D.O., and in support thereof
t
states:
« 1. Petitioner is the state department charged with regulating the
practice of osteopathic medicine pursuant to Section 20.43, Florida
Statutes; Chapter 456, Florida Statutes; and Chapter 459, Florida Statutes.
» 2. Respondent is, and has been at all times material hereto, a
licensed osteopathic physician in the State of Florida, having been issued
license number OS 4113.
“3, Respondent's last known address is 5345 NW 125" Avenue,
Coral Springs, Florida 33076.
* 4, On June 27, 2002, Patient J.R., an employee of the Federation
of State Medical Boards, completed a questionnaire through an Internet
site known as pillstore.com (“Internet site”).
+» 5, Atall times material to this Complaint, Patient J.R. informed the
Internet site that he had not completed a physical exam with blood tests
within the last year, that he was six (6) feet tall and weighed one-hundred
eighty five (185) pounds.
6. On June 27, 2002, Patient J.R. ordered ninety (90) pills of 120
mg Xenical Capsules. Xenical is a legend drug pursuant to state and federal
jaw and it is used in the treatment of obesity.
7. On June 27, 2002, Respondent approved the order of Xenical
placed by Patient J.R.
8. On or about June 27, 2002, Respondent issued an electronic
prescription for Xenical. The prescription for Xenical was transmitted
electronically to the dispensing pharmacy.
9, At all times material to this Complaint, Respondent's
prescription for Xenical was not reduced to writing.
| 10. At all times material to this Complaint, Respondent did not
conduct a physical examination of Patient J.R.
11. At all times material to this Complaint, Respondent did not take
the vital signs of Patient J.R.
. 12, At all times material to this Complaint, Respondent did not
obtain a complete history of Patient J.R.
13. At all times material to this Complaint, Respondent did not
adequately assess Patient J.R.’s complaints and symptoms.
14, At all times material to this Complaint, Respondent did not
identify and pursue the appropriate plan and treatment for the condition of
Patient J.R.
i5. At all times material to this Complaint, Respondent did not
make a diagnosis of Patient J.R.
« 16. At all times material to this Complaint, there was no dialogue
between Respondent and Patient J.R.
17. At all times material to this Complaint, Respondent did not
discuss with Patient J.R. the other available options for weight loss and did
not inform Patient J.R. of the potential side effects of Xenical.
: 18. The prescription for Xenical was filled and dispensed by Ancona
Drug Solutions (“Ancona”), 1450 N. US Highway 1, Suite 400, Ormond
Beach, Florida 32174.
» 19, On or about July 2, 2002, Patient J.R. received a vial from
Ancona containing the Xenical Capsules. The label on the vial identified
Respondent as the prescribing physician.
COUNT I - STANDARD OF CARE
BYYVIN! 2 OV ae eee eee eee
1) 20. Petitioner re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs one (1)
through nineteen (19) as if fully set forth herein.
21. Rule 64B15-14.008, Florida Administrative Code, states, in
pertinent part:
(1) Prescribing medications based solely on an electronic
medical questionnaire constitutes the failure to practice osteopathic
medicine with that level of care, skill, and treatment which is
recognized by reasonably prudent osteopathic physicians as being
acceptable under similar conditions and circumstances, as well as
prescribing legend drugs other than in the course of an Osteopathic
physician’s professional practice. Such practice constitutes grounds
for disciplinary action pursuant to Sections 459.015(1)(x) and (t), F.S.
(2) Osteopathic physicians shall not provide treatment
recommendations, including issuing a prescription, via electronic or
other means unless the following elements have been met:
(a) A documented patient evaluation, including history and
physical examination, adequate to establish the diagnosis for
which any drug is prescribed.
(b) Sufficient dialogue between the osteopathic physician and
the patient regarding treatment options and the risks and
benefits of treatment.
(c) Maintenance of contemporaneous medical records
meeting the requirements of Rule 64B15-15.004, F.A.C.
22. Rule 64B15-15.004, Florida Administrative Code, states, in
pertinent part:
(1) For the purpose of implementing the provisions of
subsection 459.015(1)(0), F.S., osteopathic physicians shall maintain
written legible records on each patient. Such written records shall
contain, at a minimum, the following information about the patient:
(a) Patient histories;
(b) Examination results;
(c) Test results;
(d) Records of drugs prescribed, dispensed or administered;
(e) Reports of consultations; and
(f) Reports of hospitalizations.
23. Pursuant to Section 459.015(1)(x), Florida Statutes (2001), an
osteopathic physician’s license is subject to discipline for failure to practice
osteopathic medicine with that level of care, skill, and treatment which is
recognized by a reasonably prudent similar osteopathic physician as being
acceptable under similar conditions and circumstances.
24, Respondent failed to practice osteopathic medicine with that
level of care, skill, and treatment which is recognized by a reasonably
prudent similar osteopathic physician as being acceptable under similar
circumstances, by doing one or more of the following:
(a) by failing to perform a physical examination on Patient
J.R. prior to prescribing Xenical;
(b) by failing to obtain a complete history on Patient J.R.
prior to prescribing Xenical; |
(c) by failing to make a diagnosis or treatment plan for
Patient J.R. prior to prescribing Xenical;
(d) by failing to reduce to writing the prescription for Xenical;
(e) _ by failing to take Patient J.R.’s vital signs;
(f) by failing to adequately assess Patient J.R.’s complaints
and symptoms;
(g) by failing to identify and pursue the appropriate
treatment plan for Patient J.R.’s condition;
(h) by failing to discuss with Patient J.R. other available
options for weight loss and the side effects of Xenical;
(i) by prescribing medication based solely on an electronic
medical questionnaire contrary to the provisions found in Rules
64B15-14.008 and 64B15-15.004, Florida Administrative Code.
“25. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Section
459.015(1)(x), Florida Statutes (2001), by failing to practice osteopathic
medicine with that level of care, skill and treatment which is recognized by
a reasonably prudent similar osteopathic physician as being acceptable
under similar conditions and circumstances.
COUNT II- MEDICAL RECORDS
* 26, Petitioner re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs one (1)
through nineteen (19) and twenty-two (22) as if fully set forth herein.
27. Section 459.015(1)(0), Florida Statutes (2001), provides that an
osteopathic physician’s license is subject to discipline for failure to keep
medical records that justify the course of treatment of the patient,
including, but not limited to, patient histories; examination results; test
results; records of drugs prescribed, dispensed, or administered; and
reports of consultations and hospitalizations.
i, 28. Respondent failed to satisfy the minimum content requirement
of medical records because Respondent's records failed to record Patient
J.R.’s medical history.
. 29. Respondent failed to satisfy the minimum content requirement
of medical records because Respondent’s records to not contain any
information about examinations or test results done on Patient J.R.
« 30. Respondent failed to satisfy the minimum content requirement
of medical records because Respondent’s records to do not contain any
reports of consultations.
i 31. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Section
459.015(1)(0), Florida Statutes (2001), and Rule 64B15-15.004, Florida
Administrative Code, by failing to keep legible, as defined by department
rule in consultation with the board, medical records that identify the
licensed osteopathic physician or the osteopathic physician extender and
supervising osteopathic physician by name and professional title who is or
are responsible for rendering, ordering, supervising, or billing for each
diagnostic or treatment procedure and that justify the course of treatment
of the patient, including, but not limited to, patient histories; examination
results; test results; records of drugs prescribed, dispensed, or
administered; and reports of consultations and hospitalizations.
COUNT III — INAPPROPRIATE PRESCRIBING
32. Petitioner re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs one (1)
through nineteen (19) and twenty one (21) through twenty two (22) as if
fully set forth herein.
33. Pursuant to Section 459.015(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2001), an
osteopathic physician’s license is subject to discipline for:
prescribing, dispensing, supplying, selling, or giving a legend
drug other than in the course of the osteopathic physician's
professional practice.
34, Pursuant to Section 459.015(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2001), it is
legally presumed that inappropriately or in excessive or inappropriate
quantities is not in the best interest of the patient and is not in the course
of the osteopathic physician’s professional practice, without regard to his or
her intent.
+, 35. At all times material to this Complaint, Respondent
inappropriately prescribed Xenical to Patient J.R. because Respondent:
(a) failed to perform a physical examination on Patient J.R.
prior to prescribing Xenical;
(b) _ failed to obtain a complete history on Patient J.R prior to
prescribing Xenical;
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(9)
(h)
(i)
failed to make a diagnosis or treatment plan for Patient
J.R. prior to prescribing Xenical;
failed to reduce to writing the prescription for Xenical;
failed to take Patient J.R.’s vital signs;
failed to adequately assess Patient J.R.’s complaints and
symptoms;
failed to identify and pursue the appropriate treatment
plan for Patient J.R.’s condition;
failed to discuss with Patient J.R. other available options
for weight loss and the side effects of Xenical;
prescribed medication based solely on an electronic
medical questionnaire contrary to the provisions found in
Rules 64B15-14.008 and 64B15-15.004, — Florida
Administrative Code.
» 36. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Section
458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2001), by inappropriately prescribing
Xenical to Patient J.R. other than in the course of the osteopathic
physician's professional practice.
WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests that the Board of
Osteopathic Medicine enter an order imposing one or more of the following
penalties: permanent revocation or suspension of Respondent's license,
restriction of practice, imposition of an administrative fine, issuance of a
reprimand, placement of the Respondent on probation, corrective action,
refund of fees billed or collected, remedial education and/or any other relief
that the Board deems appropriate.
SIGNED this 93° day of _Febwary , 2004.
John O. Agwunobi, M.D., M.B.A.
Secretary, Department of Health
aie
[i
DEPAS yest
oxenileadbaen AS ma
DATE alaszlot
4
Florida Bar No. 647871
DOH Prosecution Services Unit
4052 Bald Cypress Way, Bin C-65
Tallahassee, FL 32399-3265
850.410-3466
850.414.1991 FAX
Reviewed and approved by: O72 _(initials) his o> (date)
PCP: Fb. lw, 200%
PCP Members: Hanke arkrres
Alan Saltzman, D.O., DOH Case No, 2002-18568
Alan Saltzman, D.O., DOH Case No. 2002-18568 ro i fm n
04 SEP 28 AMIN: 52
NOTICE OF RIGHTS ABIVIS 4
al
Respondent has the right to request a hearing: OB Lee a
conducted in accordance with Section 120.569 and 120.57,
Florida Statutes, to be represented by counsel or other qualified
representative, to present evidence and argument, to call and
cross-examine witnesses and to have subpoena and subpoena
duces tecum issued on his or her behalf if a hearing is requested.
NOTICE REGARDING ASSESSMENT OF COSTS
Respondent is placed on notice that Petitioner has incurred
costs related to the investigation and prosecution of this matter.
Pursuant to Section 456.072(4), Florida Statutes, the Board shall
assess costs related to the investigation and prosecution of a
disciplinary matter, which may include attorney hours and costs,
on the Respondent in addition to any other discipline imposed.
PATIENT INDEX
! a Py
: 4 Tove Dad!
DOH v. Saltzman; Case No. 2002-18568 04 SEP 28 AMIN: 52
Patient J.R. Bet
ADMINISTRAT vi
HEARINGS
Please refer to all patients by initials. Patient names and records are
confidential.
Docket for Case No: 04-003497PL
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Dec. 28, 2004 |
Order Closing Files. CASE CLOSED.
|
Oct. 19, 2004 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
|
Oct. 19, 2004 |
Notice of Hearing (hearing set for January 11 through 13, 2005; 9:30 a.m.; Lauderdale Lakes, FL).
|
Oct. 19, 2004 |
Order Granting Consolidation. (consolidated cases are: 04-003495PL, 04-003496PL, 04-003497PL, 04-003498PL)
|
Oct. 07, 2004 |
Petitioner`s Motion to Consolidation (of case nos: 04-3495PL, 04-3946PL, 04-3497PL, 04-3498PL) filed via facsimile.
|
Oct. 05, 2004 |
Petitioner`s Response to Initial Order (filed via facsimile).
|
Sep. 29, 2004 |
Notice of Serving Petitioner`s Request for Admission, Requests for Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents (filed via facsimile).
|
Sep. 28, 2004 |
Initial Order.
|
Sep. 28, 2004 |
Entry of Appearance filed.
|
Sep. 28, 2004 |
Election of Rights filed.
|
Sep. 28, 2004 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Sep. 28, 2004 |
Agency referral filed.
|