Petitioner: AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
Respondent: EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY, D/B/A KISSIMMEE GOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH CARE CENTER
Judges: DANIEL MANRY
Agency: Agency for Health Care Administration
Locations: Kissimmee, Florida
Filed: Dec. 20, 2004
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Friday, May 27, 2005.
Latest Update: Dec. 23, 2024
STATE OF FLORIDA
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE
ADMINISTRATION,
Petitioner,
Vv.
EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD
SAMARITAN SOCIETY d/b/a
KISSIMMEE GOOD SAMARITAN
HEALTH CARE CENTER,
Respondent.
AHCA No.: 2004008349
AHCA No.: 2004007283
Return Receipt Requested:
7003 1680 0006 9825 9974
7003 1680 0006 9825 9981
7003 1680 0006 9825 9998
(E> YO |
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
COMES NOW the
(hereinafter “AHCA”),
and files this
Agency for
administrative
Health Care
complaint against
Administration
by and through the undersigned counsel,
Evangelical
Lutheran Good Samaritan Society d/b/a Kissimmee Good Samaritan
Health Care Center
Care Center”)
60, Florida Statutes,
(hereinafter
pursuant to Chapter 400,
“Kissimmee Good Samaritan Health
(2004) and hereinafter alleges:
NATURE OF THE ACTIONS
Part II and Section 120-
1. This is an action to impose an administrative fine in
the amount of $31,000.00
[$25,000.00 fine +
$6,000.00
survey
fee] pursuant to Section 400.23(8)(b), Florida Statutes and
Section 400.19, Florida Statutes [AHCA No.: 2004007283].
2. This is an action to impose a conditional licensure
rating pursuant to Section 400.23(7) (b), Florida Statutes [AHCA
No. 2003008929].
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
3. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to Section
120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statutes and Chapter 28-106, Florida
Administrative Code.
4. Venue lies in Osceola County, pursuant to Section
400.121 Florida Statutes and Chapter 28.106.207, Florida
Administrative Code.
PARTIES
5. AHCA is the enforcing authority with regard to skilled
nursing facilities licensure pursuant to Chapter 400, Part II,
Florida Statutes and Rule 59A-4, Florida Administrative Code.
6. Kissimmee Good Samaritan Health Care Center is a
skilled nursing facility located at 1500 Southgate Drive,
Kissimmee, Florida 34746 and is licensed under Chapter 400, Part
II, Florida Statutes and Chapter 59A-4, Florida Administrative
Code.
COUNT I
KISSIMMEE GOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH CARE CENTER FAILED TO ASSESS
SKIN CONDITION WHEN USING A MOIST HOT PACK ON A RESIDENT THEREBY
CAUSING A BURN.
TITLE 42 SECTION 483.25, CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS
RULE 59A-4.1288, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
(QUALITY OF CARE)
CLASS II
7. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates (1) through (5) as if
fully set forth herein.
8. Because Kissimmee Good Samaritan Health Care Center
participates in Title XVIII or XIX, it must follow the
certification rules and regulations found in Title 42 Code of
Federal Regulation 483.
9. A recertification survey was conducted from July 12,
2004 through July 15, 2004. Based upon observation, interview
and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to
assess skin condition when using a moist hot pack, thereby
causing a burn on 1 out of 24 sampled residents. The findings
are as follows:
10. A review of Resident #5's clinical record indicated
diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, cerebral artery stenosis,
cerebral atherosclerosis, cerebral vascular accident (CVA) and
left sided paralysis.
ll. A review of the 06/01/04 minimum data set (MDS)
indicated that Resident #5 was moderately impaired cognitively,
non-ambulatory and totally dependent on staff for all activities
of daily living (ADL).
12. A review of the facility's Braden Scale for Predicting
Pressure Sore Risk, dated 03/19/04, indicated a score of 14 and
identified him/her at risk for skin breakdown.
13. A review of the physical therapy evaluation and plan
of treatment dated from 06/02/04 to 07/01/04 indicated that
Resident #5 was referred for a severe left knee and hip
contracture. The plan of care identified hot/cold modalities, to
increase left knee extension by 10-15 degrees, and to establish
a restorative nursing program (RNP) for range of motion and
splinting. At the end of the 4 weeks the resident would then
demonstrate increased left knee extension up to 45-50 degrees,
and tolerate the left knee brace up to 8 hours.
14. Therapy documentation revealed that Resident #5
received from the therapist a contrast bath (moist heat pack)
seven (7) times along with left knee brace applications on
06/03/04, 06/04/04, and 06/07-11/04. The resident increased
his/her tolerance in wearing the knee brace from 2 hours to 4
hours.
15. Further record review indicated that Resident #5 met
most of the physical therapy goals. His/Her left knee extension
was 25 degrees. He/She was able to tolerate the knee brace for 4
hours and was referred to RNP for lower extremity stretching and
bracing. Eventually, Resident # 5 was discharged from therapy on
06/11/04.
16. A RNP (Restorative Nursing Program) was developed and
initiated on 06/14/04. The treatment plan identified the
following: 1. Provide patient with moist heating pad to the left
knee prior to stretching 2. Gently stretch left knee towards
extension for about 10-15 minutes 3. Apply left knee brace
properly and keep for up to 4 hours. Increase time as patient
tolerates. Check skin after removal of brace for any pressure
areas and adjust brace as ROM (range of motion) increases. A
review of the 06/04 RNP aides’ treatment sheet indicated
Resident #5 received a moist heat pack for 10 minutes and that a
splint was applied on 06/14/04.
17. A review of the 06/15/04, 11:00 a.m. interdisciplinary
progress note (IPN) revealed that the RNP aides notified the
nurse of a red area on the left knee. The heat pad had been
applied. An open red area on the kneecap measured 5 centimeters
(cm.) by 5 cm. with a second open area measuring 3 cm. by 2 cm.
lateral to the knee. The IPN indicated at 4:00 p.m. that the
left knee had an open area and was red with slight weeping of
clear fluid. The 06/16/04 IPN indicated at 9:00 a.m. that the
area on the knee continued to weep was red in color and measured
9 cm. by 7 cm.
18. A review of the physician's progress note of 06/16/04
identified a second-degree burn to the left knee sustained from
a heat pad measuring 6 cm. by 7 cm. The 06/17/04 progress note
identified a second-degree burn measuring 6 cm. by 9 cm. with
serosanguineous (serum and blood) drainage.
19. An interview was conducted with the risk manager on
07/13/04 at 8:22 a.m. He/She stated that after conducting
investigation and interviews, it was determined that the RNP
aide failed to follow the physical therapy policy by not
checking the skin every 5 minutes when a moist heat pad was
applied. The risk manager stated that the RNP aide left the heat
pad on 8 minutes, removed the pack, towels and noticed a
reddened area. The risk manager stated upon assessment, Resident
#5 received a burn and the top layer of skin came off the left
knee.
20. An interview with the physical therapist on 07/13/04
at 4:39 p.m. revealed that the RNP aide applied the moist heat
pack to the resident's left knee. The pack continued to drop off
the knee. Therefore, it was reapplied and remained on the knee
for 8 minutes. There was not any checking of the skin at 5
minute intervals as required according to Hydrocollator Pack
Policy. Therefore, Resident #5 sustained a burn. The physical
therapist stated that due to the burn, the knee brace had not
been applied since 06/15/04 to allow for healing. The therapist
stated that the resident had received prior heat pad
application, even the day before on 06/14/04, without any
incident occurring.
21. The RNP aide was interviewed on 07/14/04 at 10:15 a.m.
He/She stated that the heat pad was applied and continued to
fall off. So it was reapplied and remained on the knee
approximately 6-8 minutes. The aide stated the skin was not
observed at the 5 minute interval per the policy. When the pack
and towels were removed, the skin was loose.
22. An observation of Resident # 5’s left knee on 07/13/04
at 10:34 a.m. revealed a distinct area, measuring approximately
6 cm. of intact, clean, pink tissue.
23. A review of the facility's Heat Application
(Hydrocollator Packs) Procedure, dated 02/04 was conducted.
Under Procedure #6, one is to visually inspect application site
at least every 5 minutes for signs of burning or discomfort.
24. Based on the foregoing facts, Kissimmee Good Samaritan
HealthCare Center violated 483.25, Code of Federal Regulation as
incorporated by Rule 59A-4.1288, Florida Administrative Code,
herein classified as a Class II violation pursuant to Section
400.23(8), Florida Statutes, which carries, in this case, an
assessed fine of $5,000.00. This also gives rise to conditional
licensure status pursuant to Section 400.23(7)(b), Florida
Statutes.
COUNT IT
KISSIMMEE GOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH CARE CENTER FAILED TO
CONSISTENTLY FOLLOW THE PLAN OF CARE AND SUPERVISE RESIDENT,
WHICH RESULTED IN THE RESIDENT LEAVING THE FACILITY TWICE
UNNOTICED FOR AN UNDETERMINED AMOUNT OF TIME.
483.25(h) (2), CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATION
RULE 59A-4.1288, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
(RESIDENT SUPERVISION)
CLASS fT
25. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs (1)
through (5) as if fully set forth herein.
26. A recertification survey was conducted from July 12,
2004 through July 15, 2004. Based upon interview and record
review, it was determined that the facility failed to
consistently follow the plan of care and supervise 1 resident
(#15) in a sample of 24 thereby allowing the resident to leave
the facility twice unnoticed, for an undetermined amount of time
and cross roads at busy intersections. The resident did not
receive supervision resulting in findings of Immediate Jeopardy.
The findings are as follows:
27. Resident #15 was admitted with a diagnosis of
Alzheimer's disease in its, early stages. Record review revealed
that the resident had documented episodes of wandering behavior.
The resident's 9/11/03 care plan directed that the resident was
to wear a "Code Alert" and that staff was to check for placement
every shift.
28. On 12/27/03, the resident left the facility unnoticed,
went through the gates surrounding the facility and walked to a
grocery store across the street from the facility. At 2:50 p.m.,
facility staff realized the resident was not in the building.
The resident was located at the grocery store and was returned
by local police.
29. On 2/21/04 at 2:00 p.m., a nurse's progress note
documented that the resident was found out of the building. A
note faxed to the resident's physician on 2/21/04 at 2:00 p.m.
noted that the resident was located at a local pharmacy, again
outside the gates surrounding the facility and across the street
from the facility. The resident was brought back to the facility
by an employee. This progress note also documented that the
resident "often takes off the code alert monitor". There was no
documentation on how long the resident was gone from the
facility.
30. Although the care plan directed staff to check for
placement of the "Code Alert", it was not until the resident
eloped a second time that nursing required staff to document
that they check for placement each shift. It was not until
4/21/04 that staff began doing weekly function tests on the
"Code Alert" bracelet.
31. Staff was supposed to document exit seeking behavior
every shift on the Behavior Documentation log. On the day the
resident eloped in December (12/27/03), the night shift failed
to document any exit seeking behaviors on this sheet or
elsewhere in the record.
32. Two (2) months after the first elopement, the resident
eloped again. After the second incident, the intervention
implemented was to have staff document that they check for
placement of the "Code Alert" monitor each shift. Two (2) months
later, 4/21/04, staff were directed to check weekly that the
monitor was in working order.
33. On 7/14/04 at 1:04 p.m., the unit Manager (UM) was
interviewed. The UM stated that staff were to check for the
monitor. However, the UM did not know if the facility had an
Elopement policy and procedure or where to find it. The UM had
to ask two (2) nurses before the policy and procedure was
located.
34. Based on the foregoing facts, Kissimmee Good Samaritan
Health Care Center Nursing violated 483.25(h) (2), Code of
Federal Regulation, as incorporated by Rule 59A-4.1288, Florida
Administrative Code herein classified as a Class I violation
pursuant to Section 400.23(8), Florida Statutes, which carries,
10
in this case an assessed fine of $20,000.00 due to demonstrated
confirmed past non-compliance. This also gives rise to
conditional licensure status pursuant to Section 400.23(7) (b),
Florida Statute.
SURVEY FEE
Pursuant to Section 400.419, Florida Statutes, Kissimmee
Good Samaritan Health Care Center qualifies for a 6-month survey
cycle fee of $6,000.00.
DISPLAY OF LICENSE
Pursuant to Section 400.25(7), Florida Statutes Kissimmee
good Samaritan Health Care Center shall post the license in a
prominent place that is clear and unobstructed public view at or
near the place where residents are being admitted to the
facility.
The conditional License is attached hereto as Exhibit “A”
EXHIBIT “A”
Conditional License
License # SNF 1267096; Certificate No.:
Effective date: 07/15/2004
Expiration date: 07/31/2004
Conditional License
License # SNF 1267096; Certificate No.:
Effective date: 08/01/2004
Expiration date: 07/31/2005
Conditional License
11674
11675
License # SNF 1267096; Certificate No.: 11676
Effective date: 08/24/2004
Expiration date: 07/31/2005
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, the Petitioner, State of Florida Agency for
Health Care Administration requests the following relief:
1. Make factual and legal findings in favor of the Agency
on Counts I and II.
2. Assess against Kissimmee Good Samaritan Health Care
Center an administrative fine of $25,000.00 fine for the
violations cited above.
3. Assess against Kissimmee Good Samaritan Health Care
Center a conditional license in accordance with Section
400.23(7), Florida Statutes.
4. Assess a 6-Month Survey Cycle fee of $6,000.00 against
Kissimmee Good Samaritan Health Care Center pursuant to Section
400.419, Florida Statutes.
5. Assess costs related to the investigation and
prosecution of this matter, if applicable.
6. Grant such other relief as the court deems is just and
proper.
Respondent is notified that it has a right to request an
administrative hearing pursuant to Sections 120.569 and 120.57,
Florida Statutes (2003). Specific options for administrative
action are set out in the attached Election of Rights and
explained in the attached Explanation of Rights. All requests
13
for hearing shall be made to the Agency for Health Care
Administration and delivered to the Agency Clerk, Agency for
Health Care Administration, 2727 Mahan Drive, MS #3,
Tallahassee, Florida 32308.
RESPONDENT IS FURTHER NOTIFIED THAT FAILURE TO RECEIVE A
REQUEST A HEARING WITHIN TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THIS
COMPLAINT, PURSUANT TO THE ATTACHED ELECTION OF RIGHTS, WILL
RESULT IN AN ADMISSION OF THE FACTS ALLEGED IN THE COMPLAINT AND
THE ENTRY OF A FINAL ORDER BY THE AGENCY.
Agency for Health Care
Administration
8350 N.W. 52 Terrace - #103
Miami, Florida 33166
305-470-6800
Copies furnished to:
Joel Libby
Field Office Manager
Agency for Health Care Administration
400 West Robinson Street - Suite $309
Orlando, Florida 32801
(U.S. Mail)
Long Term Care Program Office
Agency for Health Care Administration
2727 Mahan Drive
Tallahassee, Florida 32308
(Interoffice Mail)
14
Jean Lombardi
Finance and Accounting
Agency for Health Care Administration
2727 Mahan Drive, Mail Stop #14
Tallahassee, Florida 32308
(Interoffice Mail)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
——— eo eee
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the
foregoing has been furnished by U.S. Certified Mail, Return
Receipt Requested to Orin K. Eimers, Administrator, Kissimmee
Good Samaritan Health Care Center, 1500 Southgate Drive,
Kissimmee, Florida 34746; Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan
Society, P. ©. Box 5038, Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57117; Chief
Financial Officer, 200 E. Gaines Street, Tallahassee, Florida
32399 on this /4fh aay of , 2004,
Docket for Case No: 04-004507
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
May 27, 2005 |
Order Closing File. CASE CLOSED.
|
May 26, 2005 |
Unopposed Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction filed.
|
Apr. 13, 2005 |
Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing (hearing set for June 28 and 29, 2005; 9:30 a.m.; Kissimmee, FL).
|
Mar. 31, 2005 |
(Proposed) Order (Agreed Motion to Continue) filed.
|
Mar. 31, 2005 |
Agreed Motion to Continue filed.
|
Mar. 15, 2005 |
Notice of Appearance and Substitution of Counsel (filed by J. Fowler, Esquire).
|
Feb. 09, 2005 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
|
Feb. 09, 2005 |
Notice of Hearing (hearing set for April 13 and 14, 2005; 9:30 a.m.; Kissimmee, FL).
|
Feb. 02, 2005 |
Response to Initial Order.
|
Jan. 26, 2005 |
Order Granting Extension of Time (responses to the Initial Order due no later than February 2, 2005).
|
Jan. 21, 2005 |
Motion to Extend Time to File Response to Initial Order filed.
|
Jan. 07, 2005 |
Order Granting Extension of Time (parties have to January 21, 2004, to respond to Initial Order).
|
Jan. 04, 2005 |
Motion to Extend Time to File Response to Initial Order filed.
|
Dec. 20, 2004 |
Motion to Extend Time to File Response to Initial Order filed.
|
Dec. 20, 2004 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Dec. 20, 2004 |
Election of Rights for Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Dec. 20, 2004 |
Petition for Formal Administrative Hearing filed.
|
Dec. 20, 2004 |
Notice (of Agency referral) filed.
|
Dec. 20, 2004 |
Initial Order.
|