Petitioner: AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
Respondent: A. J. GOLINO, M.D., D/B/A PALM BEACH EYE CLINIC
Judges: CLAUDE B. ARRINGTON
Agency: Agency for Health Care Administration
Locations: West Palm Beach, Florida
Filed: Jan. 25, 2005
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Monday, March 7, 2005.
Latest Update: Jan. 03, 2025
STATE OF FLORIDA
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE
ADMINISTRATION,
Petitioner, AHCA No.: 2004009401
Return Receipt Requested:
v. 7004 1350 000 5650 1289
A.J. GOLINO, M.D., OWNER/OPERATOR
d/b/a PALM BEACH EYE CLINIC,
Respondent. (CS -() sy oo
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
COMES NOW the Agency for Health Care Administration
(“AHCA”), by and through the undersigned counsel, and files this
administrative complaint against A.J. Golino, M.D.
Owner/Operator d/b/a Palm Beach Eye Clinic (hereinafter “Palm
Beach Eye Clinic”), pursuant to Chapter 395 and Section 120.60,
Florida Statutes, (2004), and alleges:
NATURE OF THE ACTION
1. This is an action to impose an administrative fine of
$2,800.00 pursuant to Sections 400.414 and 400.419, Florida
Statutes for the protection of the public health, safety and
welfare.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
2. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to Sections
120.569 and 120.57 Florida Statutes, Chapter 28-106, Florida
Administrative Code.
3. Venue lies in Palm Beach County pursuant to Section
120.57 Florida Statutes, Rule 28-106.207, Florida Administrative
Code.
PARTIES
4. AHCA is the regulatory authority responsible for
licensure and enforcement of all applicable statutes and rules
governing assisted living facilities pursuant to Chapter 395,
Florida Statutes (2004).
5. Palm Beach Eye Clinic operates an ambulatory surgical
center located at 130 Butler Street, West Palm Beach, Florida
33407. Palm Beach Eye Clinic is licensed as an ambulatory
surgical center under license number 1007. Palm Beach Eye Clinic
was at all times material hereto a licensed facility under the
licensing authority of AHCA and was required to comply with all
applicable rules and statutes.
counr I
PALM BEACH EYE CLINIC FAILED TO ENSURE NON-PHYSICIAN STAFF HAD
RECEIVED 1-HOUR RISK MANAGEMENT EDUCATION ANNUALLY.
SECTION 395.0197(1) (b)1, FLORIDA STATUTES
(RISK MANAGEMENT EDUCATION AND TRAINING)
6. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs (1)
through (5) as if fully set forth herein.
7. Palm Beach Eye Clinic was cited with four (4)
deficiencies due to a risk management survey conducted on July
6, 2004.
8. An annual risk management survey was conducted on July
6, 2004. Based on review of employee personnel files, review of
the risk management policies and procedures and interview with
the facility Director of Nursing on July 6, 2004, it was
determined the facility's Risk Manager did not ensure the non-
physician staff had timely and current risk management and risk
prevention education and training annually which included the
requirements of the current statute. The findings include the
following:
9. Interview on July 6, 2004 with the facility Director
of Nursing and Risk Manager revealed the Director of Nursing was
not aware of the sexual misconduct investigation reporting
requirements, patient safety requirements, and patient
notification of adverse incidents requirements according to
Section 395.0197(9)({(10), Florida Statutes. She was asked to
obtain a copy of the current Risk Management statute 59A-10. She
stated the facility did not have a current copy.
10. Review of three staff personnel files for the
facility’s Director of Nursing/Circulation Nurse, the facility’s
Registered Nurse Coordinator, and Surgical Technician/Medical
Records staff member revealed annual risk prevention education
and training had not been conducted and or provided since
4/15/03.
11. The Director of Nursing was asked on July 6, 2004 for
a copy of the written plan for risk management education to
ascertain if the content included the requirements of the
current statute. He/She was unable to provide the information
requested. The facility risk manager did not ensure there was a
written plan for the content of the risk management education to
ensure the content included all requirements of the current
statute.
12. The mandated date of correction was designated as
August 6, 2004.
13. A follow-up risk management survey was conducted on
August 17, 2004. Based on review of personnel records and
interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) at the time of the
8/17/04 revisit, it was determined the facility failed to ensure
non-physician staff had received l-hour Risk Management
education annually. The findings are as follows:
14. At the time of the survey, the facility lacked
documentation that the DON, the Registered Nurse Coordinator and
the Surgical Technician had received the annual 1-hour Risk
Management education.
15. Review of the facility plan of correction revealed
non-physician staff would have yearly Risk Management training.
The DON identified a list of personnel highlighted in yellow as
proof of the attendance at Risk management training. The length
of the program, presenter, teaching materials and content of the
presentation was not identified.
16. The DON presented a copy of the State of Florida Risk
Management statute stating at 1:45 P.M. on 8/17/04 that this was
the facility's Risk Management policy and procedure. The
facility was unable to locate any further information at the
time of the survey.
17. This deficiency remained out of compliance from the
survey of July 6, 2004.
18. Based on the foregoing facts, Palm Beach Eye Clinic
violated Section 395.0197(1)({b){1), Florida Statutes (2003),
which warrants an assessed fine of $700.00.
b. Report every allegation of sexual misconduct to
the administrator of the licensed facility; and
c. Notify the family or guardian of the victim, if a
minor, that an allegation of sexual misconduct has been made and
that an investigation is being conducted.
22. Interview with the facility Director of Nursing on
7/6/04 revealed she was not aware of any procedure or policy
that was in place at the facility to address allegations of
sexual misconduct.
23. The mandated date of correction was designated as
August 7, 2004.
24. A follow-up survey was conducted on August 17, 2004.
Based on review of the facility documentation and interview with
the DON conducted at the time of the 8/17/04 survey, it was
determined the facility failed to ensure there was a policy in
accordance to Florida Statute 395.0197(1) and (9) and (10) for
the investigation of sexual misconduct made against a member of
the facility's personnel who has direct patient contact. The
findings are as follows:
25. At the time of the survey, the facility lacked
documentation of a Policy and Procedure for the implementation
of a process to ensure the investigation of allegation(s) of
sexual misconduct made against a member of the facility's
personnel who has direct patient content. The plan of correction
for the deficient practice cited 7/6/04 identifed that the
facility will create a policy.
26. The DON stated at 1:30 P.M. that the copy of the State
of Florida statute is the facility policy.
27. This deficiency remained out of compliance from the
survey of July 6, 2004.
28. Based on the foregoing facts, Palm Beach Eye Clinic
violated Section 395.0197 (1) and (9) and (10), Florida
Statutes, which warrants an assessed fine of $700.00.
COUNT III
PALM BEACH EYE CLINIC FAILED TO ADOPT AND IMPLEMENT A PATIENT
SAFETY PLAN.
SECTION 395.1012(1), FLORIDA STATUTES
(PATIENT SAFETY PLAN)
29. AHCA’ re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs (1)
through (5) as if fully set forth herein.
30. Section 395.1012(1), Florida Statutes (2003), mandates
that a plan be adopted to implement the requirements of 42 Code
of Federal Regulations 482.21(Quality Assurance and Performance
Improvement Plan).
31. An annual risk management survey was conducted on July
6, 2004. Based on review of the facility policies and procedures
and interview with the Director of Nursing on July 6, 2004, it
CLAIM FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, the Agency requests the Court to order the
following relief:
1. Enter a judgment in favor of the Agency for Health
Care Administration against Palm Beach Eye Clinic on Counts I
through III.
2. Assess an administrative fine of $2,100.00 against
Palm Beach Eye Clinic on Counts f through III for the violations
cited above.
3. Assess costs related to the investigation and
prosecution of this matter, if the Court finds costs applicable.
4. Grant such other relief as this Court deems is just
and proper.
Respondent is notified that it has a right to request an
administrative hearing pursuant to Sections 120.569 and 120.57,
Florida Statutes (2004). Specific options for administrative
action are set out in the attached Election of Rights and
explained in the attached Explanation of Rights. All requests
for hearing shall be made to the Agency for Health Care
Administration, and delivered to the Agency Clerk, Agency for
Health Care Administration, 2727 Mahan Drive, MS #3,
Tallahassee, Florida 32308.
10
RESPONDENT IS FURTHER NOTIFIED THAT THE FAILURE TO RECEIV
ical
>
REQUEST FOR A HEARING WITHIN TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS OF RECEIPT OF
THIS COMPLAINT WILL RESULT IN AN ADMISSION OF THE FACTS ALLEGED
IN THE COMPLAINT AND THE ENTRY OF A FINAL ORDER BY THE AGENCY.
urdes A. Naranjo, Esq.
Assistant General Counsel
Agency for Health Care
Administration
8350 N.W. 52 Terrace - #103
Miami, Florida 33166
305-470-6801
Copies furnished to:
Diane Reiland
Field Office Manager
Agency for Health Care Administration
1710 &. Tiffany Drive - Suite 100
West Palm Beach, Florida 33407
(U.S. Mail)
Jean Lombardi
Finance and Accounting
Agency for Health Care Administration
2727 Mahan Drive
Tallahassee, Florida 32308
(Interoffice Mail)
Ambulatory Surgical Center Unit Program
Agency for Health Care Administration
2727 Mahan Drive
Tallahassee, Florida 32308
(Interoffice Mail)
11
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the
foregoing has been furnished by U.S. Certified Mail, Return
Receipt Requested to Diane Stollmar, Administrator, Palm Beach
Eye hy 130 Dew. Street, West Palm Beach, Florida 33407 on
this av ion of , 2004.
pute (here,
des A. Naranjo, Esq.
12
was determined the facility did not adopt and implement a
Patient Safety Plan. The findings include the following:
32. Review of the facility policies and procedures for
Risk Management, Quality Assurance and Governing Body and
interview with the Director of Nursing on July 6, 2004 revealed
the facility did not establish or develop a Patient Safety Plan,
adapted to implement the requirements according to 42 Code of
Federal Regulation 482.21.
33. The mandated date of correction was designated as
August 6, 2004.
34. A follow-up risk management survey was conducted on
August 17, 2004. Based on review of facility documentation and
interview with the DON conducted during the 8/17/04 survey, it
was determined the facility failed to ensure a patient safety
plan had been adopted. The findings are as follows:
35. At the time of the revisit the facility failed to
demonstrate a patient safety plan had been developed.
36. This requirement remained out of compliance from the
survey of July 6, 2004.
37. Based on the foregoing facts, Palm Beach Eye Clinic
violated Section 395.1012(1), Florida Statutes, which warrants
an assessed fine of $700.00.
COUNT II
PALM BEACH EYE CLINIC FAILED TO ENSURE THAT THE FACILITY HAD A
DOCUMENTED PROCESS IN PLACE TO ADDRESS SEXUAL MISCONDUCT.
SECTION 395.0197(1) and (9) and (10), FLORIDA STATUTES
(SEXUAL MISCONDUCT)
19. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs (1)
through (5) as if fully set forth herein.
20. An annual risk management survey was conducted on July
6, 2004. Based on review of the facility Policy and Procedures
and interview with the Director of Nursing, it was determined
the facility had no documented process in place to address
sexual misconduct. The findings include the following:
21. Review of the facility policy and procedure
manual/book for risk management revealed there was no policy and
procedure which directed the risk manager to investigate and
report allegations of sexual misconduct made against a member of
the facility's personnel who has direct patient contact. There
were no procedures/process to:
a. Investigate every allegation of sexual misconduct
which is made against a member of the facility's personnel who
has direct patient contact, when the allegation is that the
sexual misconduct occurred at the facility or on the grounds of
the facility.
Docket for Case No: 05-000342
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Mar. 07, 2005 |
Order Closing File. CASE CLOSED.
|
Mar. 04, 2005 |
Agreed Motion to Close File filed.
|
Mar. 01, 2005 |
Amended Administrative Complaint (filed by Petitioner).
|
Feb. 04, 2005 |
Order Granting Motion to File Amended Administrative Complaint (amended administrative complaint must be filed within ten days of the entry of this Order).
|
Feb. 02, 2005 |
Response to Initial Order filed.
|
Feb. 01, 2005 |
Unopposed Motion for Leave to file Amended Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Jan. 26, 2005 |
Initial Order.
|
Jan. 25, 2005 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Jan. 25, 2005 |
Election of Rights filed.
|
Jan. 25, 2005 |
Petition for Formal Administrative Hearing filed.
|
Jan. 25, 2005 |
Notice (of Agency referral) filed.
|