Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE
Respondent: STEPHEN E. CHIARELLO, M.D.
Judges: SUSAN BELYEU KIRKLAND
Agency: Department of Health
Locations: Punta Gorda, Florida
Filed: Mar. 11, 2005
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Thursday, April 7, 2005.
Latest Update: Jan. 10, 2025
Received Event (Event Succeeded)
Date: 3/11/2005 Time: 1:55 PM
Pages: 28 Duration: 7 min 53 sec
Sender: 850 414 1989 Company:
Fax Number: Subject:
Type: Fax
MAR-11-200@5 13:52 AHCAZLEGAL MEDICAL 858 414 1989 P.@3
~ ro oa
: STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH,
PETITIONER,
v. CASE NO. 2005-00229
STEPHEN CHIARELLO, M.D., on eat ps
RESPONDENT. O 2 O49 | F L-
ve
COMES NOW, Petitioner, Department of Health, by and through Its ot
undersigned counsel, and files this Administrative Complaint before the
Board of Medicine against Respondent, Stephen Chiarello, and in support
thereof alleges:
1. Patitioner is the state department charged with regulating the
practice of medicine pursuant to Section 20.43, Florida Statutes; Chapter
456, Florida Statutes; and Chapter 458, Florida Statutes.
2. At all times material to this Complaint, Respondent was a
licensed physician within the state of Florida, having been issued license
number ME 34901.
Received Event (Event Succeeded)
Date:
Pages:
Sender:
Time: 1:55 PM
8 as Duration: 7 min 53 sec
850 414 1989 Company:
9893
AHCA/LEGAL MEDICAL 858 414 1
11-2 153
MAR-11-28@85 13:5 mM
3. Respondent's address of record is 200 Doctors Drive, Panama
City, Florida 32405-4559,
4. Respondent is board certified in dermatology and internal
medicine.
- 5. Botox®, which contains Botulinum Toxin Type A, is a legend
drug, which requires a physician’s Prescription for use or administration.
Botulinum Toxin Type A is a drug under section 201(g) of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. § 321(g)(1)(B) and (C), intended
for use in the diagnosis, Cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of
disease in man, or to affect the structure or the function of the body of
man, and biologic, as defined in section 361(i) of the Public Heath Service
Act, 42 U.S.C. § 262, and Section 499.003(17)(b) and (c), Florida Statutes
(2003)(2004), On December 9, 1991, the FDA approved BOTOX®, a
Botulinum Toxin Type A drug manufactured by Allergan of Irvine,
California, for the treatment of cervical dystonia in adults to decrease the
severity of abnormal head position and neck Pain associated with cervical
dystonia and the treatment of strabismus and blepharospasm associated
with dystonia. On April 12, 2002, the FDA approved a supplement to the
Botulinum Toxin Type A license application for treatment of glabellular
lines, commonly referred to as wrinkles. Under this approval, Botulinum
JAPSU\Medical\DIANE\Chiarello\AC 2005-00229.doc 2
P.@4
Received Event (Event Succeeded)
Time: 1:55 PM
: 05
Page 8 m Duration: 7 min 53 sec
ages:
Sender: 850 414 1989 Company:
nhiant os
Few nee 1-2005 13:53 AHCA’LEGAL MEDICAL a58 414 1989 P
M
“o~ oN
Toxin Type A is marketed and labeled for this new indication as BOTOX®
and BOTOX@COSMETIC manufactured by Allergan. No other
manufacturers have been approved by the FDA to produce or distribute
Botulinum Toxin Type A as a drug in the United States,
6. Botulinum Toxin Type A is a neurotoxin produced by the
Clostridium botulinum bacterium, the same bacterium that causes
botulism. Abuse or overdose of Botulinum Toxin Type A can cause
botulism.
7. Botulism is a muscle-paralyzing disease caused by a toxin made
by a bacterium called Clostridium botulinum. Once in the body, the toxin
binds to nerve endings at the point where the nerves join muscies. This
prevents the nerves from signaling the muscles to contract. The result is
weakness and paralysis that descends from the cranium down, affecting,
among other things, the muscles that regulate breathing. Respiratory
dysfunction often follows from the respiratory paralysis. Recovery can be
extremely slow. Assuming the patient receives proper care to ensure
continued breathing, recovery occurs only when the affected nerves grow
new endings, a process that can take several months, although the length
of time varies greatly from case to case. In rare cases, botulism can be
fatal.
JAPSU\MedicafDIANE\Chiarelio\AC 2005-00229. doc 3
Received Event (Event Succeeded)
ime: ‘55 PM
Date: 3/11/2005 Time: 1 56
Pages: 28 Duration: 7 min 53 sec
Sender: 850 414 1989 Company:
Fax Number: Subject:
Type: Fax
MAR-11-2685 13:53
AHCA”LEGAL MEDICAL
oa. oN
8. On or about December 1, 2004, while investigating the genesis
of four cases of botulism that had drawn national attention, the FDA
executed a search warrant on Advanced Integrated Medical Center, Inc.,
(Advanced Integrated). Pursuant to the warrant, the FDA seized
advertisements from Toxin Research International, Inc. (TRI), which
advertised Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A for sale at a price of $1,250.00
for one 500-unit vial or $2,000.00 for two 500-unit vials, The
advertisement included a notation under the TRI logo, which read, “For
Research Purposes Only Not for Human Use.”
9. On or about December 29, 2004, the Department received
communication from the FDA that it had executed a search warrant on
TRI, P.O. Box 89357, Tucson, Arizona, a company advertising and
distributing “Stabilized Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A” to physicians around
the country.
10. TRI does not have a permit to Operate as a prescription drug
manufacturer, pharmacy, prescription drug distributor, or pharmaceutical
wholesaler in Florida.
11, In a statement to FDA Investigators, Chad Livdahl, principal
Owner, Operator, and president of TRI, said that TRI is not registered with
the FDA and has not filed a New Drug Application for its product or an
JAPSU\ Media DTANE\Chrerelto\AC 2005-00229.doc 4
rey
858 414 1989
P.@6
Received Event (Event Succeeded)
Date:
Pages:
Sender:
F
1
Time: 1:55 PM
oe Duration: 7 min 53 sec
ns Company:
a a 858 414 1989 =P. a7
CAL
" ~ 154 AHCA/LEGAL MEDI
MAR-11-2885 13 ae ~
application for approval as an Investigational New Drug because the
Stabilized Botulinum Toxin Type A is marketed “for research Purposes only,
not for human use,”
12. During the execution of the search warrant, the FDA recovered
files from TRI Computers containing invoices of purchasers of the
Stabilized Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A. Respondent was among these
Purchasers, with the following purchases:
Quantity
I vial
Stabilized
Botulinum
Neurotoxin
Type A: 500 IU
5.0 ni
Stabilized
Botulinum
Neurotoxin
Type A: 500 IU
2 vials $2,000
Stabilized 2 vials
Botulinum
Neurotoxin
Type A: 500 Iu
$1,900
In accordance with Mr. Livdahl's Statement, each invoice Respondent
received stated “For research Purposes only, not for human use.” In
addition, the Standard label on the vials from TRI indicated, “For research
J: APSU\Medical\DLANE\Chiarello\ AC 2005-00229.doc 5
Received Event (Event Succeeded)
Date: 3/11/2005 Time: 1:55 PM
Pages: 28 Duration: 7 min 53 sec
Sender: 850 414 1989 Company:
Foy Aliimbar: Cuhiané-
. MAR-11-2885 13:54 AHCA/LEGAL MEDICAL , 858 414 1989 P.28
a . .
purposes only. Not for human use.”
13. Because Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A is the active ingredient
in Botox®, and because Botox® is the only FDA approved form of the
Botulinum Toxin Type A, on or about January 10, 2005, investigators from
the Department inspected Respondent's office to ascertain how
Respondent was using the Stabilized Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A.
14. When investigators interviewed Respondent, he stated that he
“réceived an adveéitisement from TRI, and he believed TRI was a legitimate
company offering botulinum at a reduced price. He further stated that he
received the Stabilized Botulinum Toxin Type A in a concentrated form and
diluted it for use.
15. Respondent admitted that he had used the product on patients
as if it were Botox®. Respondent stated the patient records did not reflect
whether a patient received Botox® or Stabilized Botulinum Neurotoxin
Type A, but he did not use Botox® during the time period in which he
ordered the TRI product.
16. Respondent had no remaining Stabilized Botulinum Neurotoxin
Type A from TRI. Respondent stated that he had destroyed two or three
Vials of Stabilized Botulinum Toxin Type A that he had purchased from TRI.
By his admission, from on or about May 20, 2004, through January 7,
JAPSU\MedicalNDLANE\Chiarello\AC 2005-00229.doc 6
Received Event (Event Succeeded)
Time: 1:55 PM
Date: 3/11/2005 Duration: 7 min 53 sec
Pages: 28 Company:
Sender: 850 414 1989 Shine 858 414 1989
her: IEDICAL
™ Num 11-2ees 1354 BALES M ~
2005, Respondent treated 28 Patients for wrinkles using the Stabilized
Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A.
17. By his admission, Respondent did not denote in patient records
that he was using the TRI product, nor did he inform his patients that he
Was using anything other than Botox®.
18. Respondent and two members of his staff indicated that he
discontinued use of the Stabilized Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A when the
four cases of severe complications associated with the use of unapproved
botulinum toxin were published in the national media.
19. Chapter 499, Florida Statutes, is called the Florida Drug and
Cosmetic Act, According to Section 499.002, Florida Statutes
(2003)(2004), the Purpose of the act is to:
(1) Safeguard the Public health and promote the
public welfare by Protecting the public from injury
by product use and by merchandising deceit
involving drugs, devices, and cosmetics,
(2) Provide uniform legislation to be administered
SO far as practicable in conformity with the
Provisions of, and regulations issued under the
authority of, the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act and that portion of the Federal Trade
Commission Act which expressly prohibits the false
advertisement of drugs, devices, and cosmetics.
(3) Promote thereby uniformity of such state and
federal laws, and their administration and
enforcement, throughout the United States.
I APSU\MedicaNDIANE\Chiarello\AC 2005-00229.doe
9
P.@9g
Received Event (Event Succeeded)
Time: 1:55 PM
Date: 3/11/2005 Duration: 7 min 53 sec
Pages: 28 Company:
Sender: 890 414 1989 Sih 850 414 1989 P10
Numher- . MEDICAL
~~ WMAR-11-2005 13:54 Bead LEGAL ~
20. Administering or dispensing an unapproved drug is inherentiy
dangerous as there js no mechanism for inspection or verification of
product contents, efficacy, or safety. Similarly, purchasing drugs from an
unlicensed source is inherently dangerous as there is no mechanism for
quality assurance. Outside of the parameters of lawful regulatory
Processes, there is no mechanism to ascertain whether a product is safe
~and- effective,—or -adulterated “and hazardous: Members of ‘the public
cannot protect themselves from such dangers as hidden defects in
pharmaceutical products,
21. FDA approval is Critical to establish the safety and efficacy of a
new drug. Biologic Products, such as the botulinum toxin at issue herein,
must be approved by the FDA by a biologic license application (“BLA”).
Without FDA approval, then, there is no assurance that the product has
been appropriately tested for use on humans, or that the manufacturing
process conforms to current good manufacturing Practice. The purity,
potency, stability, and Sterility characteristics of the product may vary batch
by batch.
22. Another serious shortcoming caused by the lack of FDA
approval is the failure of adequate labeling. The lack of approved labeling
FAPSU\Medical\DLANE\Chiarctlo\AC 2005-00229.doc 8
10
Received Event (Event Succeeded)
Date: 3/11/2005 Time: 1:55 PM
Pages: 28 Duration: 7 min 53 sec
Sender: 850 414 1989 Company:
Fax Number: Subject:
Type: Fax
MAR-11-2885 13:55 BuCALEGAL MEDICAL . 85@ 414 1989 P.1i
for the TRI product constituted a serious danger to the patients to whom
the drug was administered. The labeling contained no directions for use in
human beings. There was heightened potential for Injection of excessive
amounts of toxin because the safe and effective dose of the TRI product
was unknown. The units of measurement of Botox® were specific to
Allergan, and the testing method used by Allergan for assaying the potency
of its finished product was proprietary. Thus, one unit of the TRI product
was not equivalent to one unit of Botox®. As there was no established
safe and effective dose of botulinum toxin distinct from Botox®, and the
TRI product was not equivalent to Botox® unit for unit, there was no
established safe and effective dosage of the TRI product. Without an
established safe and effective dosage, the risk of overdose was increased.
This risk was a foreseeable risk Inherent in utilizing a drug that was not
FDA approved.
23. As stated in Section 499.002(1), Horida Statutes (2003)(2004),
Chapter 499, Florida Statutes, is a public welfare statute. The regulatory
provisions of the Florida Food and Drug Act under Chapter 499, Florida
Statutes (2003)(2004), and the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
under 21 U.S.C, § 301, et seq., are strict liability statutes.
JADSU\Modical\DIAND\Chiarello\AC 2005-00229.dos 9
11
Received Event (Event Succeeded)
Time: 1:55 PM
Page 2 Duration: 7 min 53 sec
Pages: 28 Company:
reneer come ies MEDICAL 85@ 414 1989 P.12
, : GAL
| MAR-11~28@5 13:55 preence ~
24. While doctors cannot be guarantors of the safety or efficacy of
drugs they administer, inject, or dispense to their patients, doctors have a
Statutory or legal obligation to their patients to abide by the laws
regulating the distribution of those drugs.
25. The FDA approval status of a drug is readily ascertainable to a
physician. Upon approval of a drug, the FDA adds the drug to its
published list of approved products, and that list is available to the public.
-Similarly, ‘through the -exercise ‘of due’ diligence; “a ‘doctor cari ascertain
whether an entity is licensed to manufacture or distribute a drug in the
State of Florida, Thus, an exercise of due diligence would have revealed
that the TRI product described herein was not FDA approved, or even
pending approval, and that TRI was not a licensed pharmaceutical
wholesaler, pharmacy, or distributor,
26. Under the strict liability regulatory provisions of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, and the Florida Food and Drug Act, it is the
affirmative duty of a doctor to know whether a drug is FDA approved and
to know that the source from which he or she obtained the drug is licensed
to distribute the drug to him or her Prior to, and as a condition of,
administering, injecting, or distributing that drug to a patient.
JAPSU\MedicalNDLANE\Chiarello\AC 2003-00229.doc 10
12
Received Event (Event Succeeded)
Time: 1:55 PM
Date: a Duration: 7 min 53 sec
Pages: Company:
Sender: 850 414 1989 Guhiart aso 414 1989 P.43
For a ent 12005 13:55 AHCA/LEGAL MEDICAL ~
oN
47. Section 499.003(17), Florida Statutes (2003)(2004), defines
“drug” as an article that is:
(a) Recognized in the current edition of the United
States Pharmacopoeia and National Formulary, official
(b) Intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation,
treatment, therapy, or Prevention of disease in humans
or other animals;
(Cc) Intended to affect the structure or any function of
the body of humans or other animals; or
(d) Intended for use as @ component of any article
Specified in paragraph (a), paragraph (b), or paragraph
(€), but does not include devices or their components,
parts, or accessories.
The definition of “drug” under 21 U.S.C. § 321 is the same in all material
respects.
28. Because Stabilized Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A is intended for
use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease
in humans or other animals, or to affect the Structure or the function of the
body of humans or other animals, it is a drug within the meaning of
Section 499.003(17), Florida Statutes (2003)(2004), and 21 U.S.C, § 321.
29. Botulinum Toxin Type A is a “legend drug” under Florida law.
J: ‘APSU\Medical\DIANE\Chiarello\AC 2005-00229, doc ql
13
Received Event (Event Succeeded)
ime: ‘55 PM
Date: 3/11/2005 Time: 1 55
Pages: 28 Duration: 7 min 53 sec
Sender: 850 414 1989 Company:
Snuhiact
_ .14
Few nee 12005 13:56 | PHCA/LEGAL MEDICAL a 858 414 1989 P.t
30. The Stabilized Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A that Respondent
purchased from TRI does not have an approved and effective application
under Section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, and is a
“new drug” under Section 499.023, Florida Statutes (2003)(2004), and
under 21 U.S.C. § 355.
) COUNT ONE
31. Petitioner realleges and incorporates Paragraphs one (1)
through thirty (30) as if fully set forth herein.
32. Section 458.331(1)(g), Florida Statutes (2003)(2004), subjects
@ doctor to discipline for “[flailing to perform any statutory or legal
obligation placed upon a licensed physician.”
33. Section 499.023, Florida Statutes (2003)(2004), states:
499.023 New drugs; sale, manufacture,
repackaging, distribution.—
A person may not sell, offer for sale, hold for sale,
manufacture, repackage, distribute, or give away any
new drug unless an approved application has become
effective under s. 505 of the federal act or unless
otherwise permitted by the Secretary of the United
States Department of Health and Human Services for
shipment in interstate commerce.
34. Section 499.023, Florida Statutes (2003)(2004), places a
statutory or legal obligation upon Respondent to refrain from Selling,
Offering for sale, holding for sale, manufacturing, repackaging, distributing,
12
J APSU\MedicaNDLANE\Chiarello\ac 2005-00229.doo
Received Event (Event Succeeded)
Date: 3/11/2005 Time: 1:55 PM
Pages: 28 Duration: 7 min 53 sec
Sender: 850 414 1989 Company:
Fax Number: Subject:
Type: Fax
MAR-11-2885 13:56 ; JPHCA/LEGAL MEDICAL ; @52 414 1989 P.1S
or giving away a new drug that has no approved application under s. 505
of the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act or that is not otherwise
permitted by the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and
Human Services for shipment in interstate commerce.
35. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Section 499.023,
Florida Statutes (2003)(2004), and, consequently, Section 458.331(1)(Q),
Florida Statutes (2003)(2004), when he sold, offered for sale, held for sale,
manufactured, repackaged, distributed, or gave away the TRI product,
Stabilized Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A, a new drug with no approved and
effective application under Section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act.
COUNT TWO
36. Petitioner realleges and Incorporates paragraphs one (1)
through thirty (30) and paragraph thirty-two (32) as If fully set forth in this
count.
37. Similarly, under 21 U.S.C. § 355, the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act prohibits a person from introducing or delivering a new drug
into interstate commerce, unless there is an effective FDA approval for the
drug.
38. Section 21 U.S.C. § 355 places a statutory or Icgal obligation
JNPSU\Modical\DLANE\Chiarello\AC 2005-00229.doc Is
Received Event (Event Succeeded)
Date:
Pages:
Sender:
3/11/2005 Time: 1:55 PM
28 Duration: 7 min 53 sec
850 414 1989 Company:
" MAR-11-2085 13:56 | PHCA/LEGAL MEDICAL ~ 858 414 1989
upon Respondent to refrain from introducing or delivering a new drug into
interstate commerce, unless there is an effective FDA approval.
39. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Section
458.331(1)(g), Florida Statutes (2003)(2004), by administering,
dispensing, or injecting the TRI product, Stabilized Botulinum Neurotoxin
Type A, into many patients, thereby placing a new drug with no approved
and effective application under Section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act-into-interstate commerce, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 355.
COUNT THREE
40. Petitioner realleges and incorporates paragraphs one (1)
through thirty (30) and paragraph thirty-two (32) as if fully set forth in this
count.
41. Under Section 499.005(1), Florida Statutes (2003)(2004), it is
unlawful to perform or cause the performance of the following acts:
The manufacture, repackaging, sale, delivery, or
holding or offering for sale of any drug, device, or
cosmetic that is adulterated or misbranded or has
otherwise been rendered unfit for human or animal
use.
42. Section 499.005(1), Florida Statutes (2003)(2004), places a
statutory or legal obligation upon Respondent.
}APSU\Medical\DLANE\Chiarello\AC 2005-00229.doc 14
16
P.16
Received Event (Event Succeeded)
Date: 3/11/2005 Time: 1:55 PM
Pages: 28 Duration: 7 min §3 sec
Sender: 850 414 1989 Company:
Few eR 11-2005 13:56 , PHCA/LEGAL MEDICAL Sunines: ~ 858 414 1989
1
43. Under Section 499.006(10), Florida Statutes (2003)(2004), a
drug or device is deemed to be adulterated if it is a legend drug that has
been purchased, held, sold, or distributed at any time by a person not
authorized under federal or state law to do so.
44. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Section
499.005(1), Florida Statutes (2003)(2004), and, consequently, Section
458.331(1)(g), Florida Statutes (2003)(2004), by manufacturing,
repackaging, Selling, delivering, or holding or offering for sale a drug (the
unapproved TRI product, Stabilized Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A) that was
adulterated because it had been purchased, held, sold or distributed bya
person not authorized under federal or state law to do so (TRI).
COUNT FOUR
45. Petitioner realleges and incorporates paragraphs one (1)
through thirty (30) and paragraph thirty-two (32) as if fully set forth in this
count.
46. Under Section 499.005(3), Florida Statutes (2003)(2004), it is
unlawful to perform or cause the performance of the following acts:
The receipt of any drug, device, or cosmetic that is
adulterated or misbranded, and the delivery or
proffered delivery of such drug, device, or cosmetic,
for pay or otherwise.
IAPSU Medical DIANE\Chiarello\AC 2005-00229.doc 15
P.
17
Received Event (Event Succeeded)
Date:
Pages:
Sender:
Fax Number:
3/11/2005 Time: 1:55 PM
28 Duration: 7 min 53 sec
850 414 1989 Company:
Subject:
Type: Fax
a
MAR-11-20@85 13:57
858 414 1989
AHCA’LEGAL MEDICAL
47, Section 499.005(3), Florida Statutes (2003)(2004), places a
statutory or legal obligation upon Respondent.
48. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Section
499,005(3), Florida Statutes (2003)(2004), and, consequently, Section
458.331(1){g), Florida Statutes (2003X2004), by receiving a drug (the
unapproved TRI product, Stabilized Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A) that had
been adulterated because it had been Purchased, held, sold, or distributed
by @ person not authorized under federal or state law to do so (TRI) and
he delivered the drug to patients for pay.
COUNT FIVE
49. Petitioner realleges and incorporates Paragraphs one (1)
through thirty (30) and Paragraph thirty-two (32) as if fully set forth in this
count.
50. Section 499.005(14), Florida Statutes (2003)(2004), makes
unlawful:
The purchase or receipt of a legend drug from a
Person that is not authorized under this chapter to
distribute legend drugs to that purchaser or
recipient.
51, Section 499.005(14), Florida Statutes (2003)(2004), places a
statutory or legal Obligation upon Respondent to refrain from purchasing or
JAPSU\MedicaNDIANE\Chauretin\ AC 2003-00229.doc 16
Received Event (Event Succeeded)
Date: 3/11/2005 Time: 1:55 PM
Pages: 28 Duration: 7 min 53 sec
Sender: 850 414 1989 Company:
Fax Number: Subject:
Type: Fax
; MAR-11-28@85 13:57 AHCA’LEGAL MEDICAL
ay
858 414 1989 P.19
receiving a legend drug from a person that is not authorized under Chapter
499 to distribute a legend drug to him.
52. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Section
499.005(14), Florida Statutes (2003)(2004), and consequently Section
458.331(1)(g), Florida Statutes (2003)(2004), when he purchased and
received a legend drug (the unapproved Stabilized Botulinum Neurotoxin
Type A) from TRI, an entity not licensed in Florida to distribute legend
drugs.
COUNT SIX
53. Petitioner realleges and incorporates paragraphs one (1)
through thirty (30) as if fully set forth in this count.
54. Section 458,331(1)(m), Florida Statutes (2003)(2004), subjects
a doctor to disciptine for:
Failing to keep legible, as defined by department
rule in consultation with the board, medical records
that identify the licensed physician or the physician
extender and supervising physidan by name and
professional title who is or are responsible for
rendering, ordering, supervising, or billing for each
diagnostic or treatment procedure and that justify
the course of treatment of the patient, including,
but not limited to, patient histories; examination
results; test results; records of drugs prescribed,
dispensed, or administered; and reports of
consultations and hospitalizations.
JAPSU Medical DIANE huaretlo\Ac 7904-00229. doc VW
Received Event (Event Succeeded)
Date:
Pages:
Sender:
MAR-11-2885 13:57
3/11/2005 Time: 1:55 PM
28 Duration: 7 min 53 sec
Company:
850 414 1989
AHCA/LEGAL MEDICAL ~ 858 414 1989
55. Rule 64B8-9,003(3), Florida Administrative Code (2003)(2004),
states:
The medical record shall contain — sufficient
information to identify the patient, Support the
diagnosis, justify the treatment and ‘document the
course and results of treatment accurately, by
including, at a minimum, patient histories;
examination results; test results; records of drugs
Prescribed, dispensed, or administered; reports of
consultations and hospitalizations; and copies of
records or reports or other documentation obtained
from other health care practitioners at the request
of the physician and relied upon by the physician in
determining the appropriate treatment of the
patient.
56. Respondent failed to document in patient charts whether he
administered Botox® or the unapproved Stabilized Botulinum Neurotoxin
Type A.
57. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Section
458.331(1)(m), Florida Statutes (2003)(2004), by failing to note in patient
charts whether he administered Botox® or the unapproved Stabilized
Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A, as further required by Rule 64B8-9.003(3),
Florida Administrative Code.
COUNT SEVEN
58, Petitioner realleges and incorporates paragraphs one (1)
through thirty (30) as if fully set forth in this count.
JAPSU\Medical\ DIANE\Chiarelio\AC 2005-00229.doe 1a
20
P.2@
Received Event (Event Succeeded)
Time: 1:55 PM
Date: eo 1/2008 Duration: 7 min 53 sec
Pages: ompany:
Sender: 850 414 1989 canoer SQ 414 1989 PL
Fax NA 12005 13:58 AHCA“LEGAL MEDICAL 8
T ~ oo. oN
59. Section 458.331(1)(p), Florida Statutes (2003)(2004), subjects
a doctor to discipline for:
Performing professional services which have not
been duly authorized by the patient or client, or his
or her legal representative, except as provided in s.
743.064, S. 766.103, or s. 768.13.
60. Respondent prescribed, dispensed, administered, injected,
mixed, or otherwise prepared the Stabilized Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A,
an unapproved product, without notifying the patient, making it impossibie
for the patient to authorize such treatment.
61. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Section
458.331(1)(p), Florida Statutes (2003)(2004), by performing professional
services which were not duly authorized by the patient or client, or his or
her legal representative.
COUNT EIGHT
62. Petitioner realleges and incorporates Paragraphs one (1)
through thirty (30) as if fully set forth in this count.
63. Section 458.331(1)(q), Florida Statutes (2003)(2004), subjects
@ doctor to discipline for:
Prescribing, dispensing, administering, mixing, or
otherwise Preparing a legend drug, including any
controlled substance, other than in the course of
the physician's professional practice. For the
Purposes of this paragraph, it shall be legally
J ‘APSU\Medical\DIANE\Chiarelio\ AC 2005-00229.doc
Received Event (Event Succeeded)
Time: 1:55 PM
Date: 3/11/2005 Duration: 7 min 53 sec
Pages: 28 Company:
Sender: 850 414 1989 Subiect: Q50 414 1989 = P.22
Fax Nine 41-2005 13:58 AHCA/LEGAL MEDICAL
T . os oN
- presumed that prescribing, dispensing,
administering, mixing, or otherwise Preparing
legend drugs, including all controlled substances,
inappropriately or in excessive or inappropriate
quantities is not in the best interest of the patient
and is not in the course of the physician's
Professional practice, without regard to his or her
intent.
64. Prescribing, dispensing, administering, injecting, mixing, or
otherwise preparing an unapproved drug obtained from an unlicensed
source is illegal and is inappropriate and outside the course of a physician‘s
professional practice, Respondent dispensed, administered, injected,
mixed or otherwise prepared a legend drug, the unapproved Stabilized
Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A, obtained from an unapproved source,
inappropriately and outside the course of his Professional practice,
65. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Section
458.331(1)(q), Florida Statutes (2003)(2004), by prescribing, dispensing,
administering, injecting, mixing, or otherwise Preparing an unapproved
drug obtained from an unlicensed source inappropriately and outside the
course of his professional practice.
COUNT NINE
66. Petitioner realleges and incorporates Paragraphs one (1)
through thirty (30) as if fully set forth in this count.
Be APSU\Medical\DLANE\Chiarello\AC 2005-00229. doc 20
22
Received Event (Event Succeeded)
Time: 1:55 PM
Date: 3/11/2005 Duration: 7 min 53 sec
Pages: 28 Company:
Sender: 850 414 1989 Suhiect- 858 414 1989
n° DICAL
Fax Number” 2005 13:58 BHCAYLEGAL ME!
1
o~
67. Section 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2003)(2004), subjects
a physician to discipline for failing to practice medicine with that level of
care, skill, and treatment which is recognized by a reasonably prudent
similar physician as being acceptable under similar conditions and
circumstances.
68. By administering, injecting, or dispensing the unapproved TRI
product to many patients, Respondent has failed to meet the applicable
Standard of care which is recognized by reasonably prudent similar
physicians as being acceptable under similar conditions and circumstances,
69. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Section
458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2003)(2004), by failing to Practice
Medicine with that level of Care, skill, and treatment which is recognized by
a reasonably prudent similar Physician as being acceptable under similar
Conditions and circumstances.
WHEREFORE, the Petitioner respectfully requests that the Board of
Medicine enter an order imposing one or more of the following penalties:
Permanent revocation or Suspension of Respondent's license, restriction of
Practice, imposition of an administrative fine, issuance of a reprimand,
placement of the Respondent on probation, corrective action, refund of
J ‘APSU\MedicaNDLANE\Chiarello\ AC 2005-00229.doc 2]
Received Event (Event Succeeded)
Date: 3/11/2005 Time: 1:55 PM
Pages: 28 Duration: 7 min 53 sec
Sender: 850 414 1989 Company:
Fax Number: Suhbiect-
MAR-11-28@05 13:58 AHCA-LEGAL MEDICAL 858 414 1989 P.24
1
oN
fees bi i
billed or collected, remedial education and/or any other relief that the
Board deems appropriate.
SIGNED this _257* day of Cid Ae ne , 2005
John O. Agwunobi, M.D M.B
, M.D., M.B.A., M.P.H.
Secretary, Department of Health
FILED
4052 Bald Cypress Way-Bin C-65
DEPARTMENT OF
DEPUN Or HEATH Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3265
ae-\ }ekaoum, Florida Bar # 0233285
mare D250 (850) 414-8126
(850) 414-1989 fax
DKK/dkk
Reviewed : ini
and approved DY: Ole (initials) 5 {telex (date)
PCP: Fe br, 25, 2005
PCP Members: 4 4
ers: Mund Ashkar; MD( Chairperson), Mark Ayila, MD, amd John Beebe
J: APSU\MedieallDIANE\ChiarellolAC 2005-00229. doc
22
24
Received Event (Event Succeeded)
Time: 1:55 PM
Date: 3/11/2005 Duration: 7 min 53 sec
Pages: 28 Company:
Sender: 890 414 1989 Shine 850 414 1989.25
Fax Numher- : AHCA/LEGAL MEDICAL
MAR-11-2085 13:59 nHCF
1 o~
Stephen Chiarello, M.D., DOH Case No. 2005-00229
NOTICE OF RIGHTS
Respondent has the tight to request a hearing to be
conducted in accordance with Section 120.569 and 120.57,
Florida Statutes, to be represented by counsel or other qualified
representative, to present evidence and argument, to call and
cross-examine witnesses and to have subpoena and subpoena
duces tecum issued on his or her behalf if a hearing is requested,
NOTICE REGARDING ASSESSMENT OF COSTS
- —-~- ~ Respondent is Placed on notice that Petitioner has incurred
Costs related to the investigation and Prosecution of this matter.
Pursuant to Section 456.072(4), Florida Statutes, the Board shall
assess costs related to the investigation and Prosecution of a
disciplinary matter, which may include attorney hours and costs,
on the Respondent in addition to any other discipline imposed.
J APSU\Medical\DIANE\Chiarello\AC 2005-00229 doc 23
25
Docket for Case No: 05-000951PL
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Apr. 07, 2005 |
Order Closing File. CASE CLOSED.
|
Apr. 06, 2005 |
Joint Motion to Relinquish filed.
|
Apr. 05, 2005 |
Notice of Cancellation of Depostion Duces Tecum of John Taylor filed.
|
Apr. 05, 2005 |
Notice of Cancellation of Deposition Duces Tecum of Expert Dr. Barnett filed.
|
Apr. 01, 2005 |
Notice of Cancellation of Deposition Duces Tecum (M. Ghabriel and J. Clyne) filed.
|
Mar. 31, 2005 |
Notice of Cancellation of Deposition Duces Tecum (J. O`Brien) filed.
|
Mar. 29, 2005 |
Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum (Dr. M. Barnett) filed.
|
Mar. 29, 2005 |
Notice of Taking Telephonic Deposition Duces Tecum (J. Taylor) filed.
|
Mar. 29, 2005 |
Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum (J. O`Brien, M. Ghabriel, and J. Clyne) filed.
|
Mar. 28, 2005 |
Notice of Serving Petitioner`s First Request for Production filed.
|
Mar. 28, 2005 |
Motion to Strike (filed by Petitioner).
|
Mar. 28, 2005 |
Notice of Filing Petitioner`s Requests for Interrogatories, Admissions, and Production filed.
|
Mar. 23, 2005 |
Notice of Hearing (hearing set for April 26 through 28, 2005; 9:00 a.m.; Punta Gorda, FL).
|
Mar. 23, 2005 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
|
Mar. 21, 2005 |
Letter to Judge Harrell clarifying Joint Response to Initial Order filed.
|
Mar. 21, 2005 |
Respondent`s Motion to Permit Interrogatories Exceeding Thirty filed.
|
Mar. 21, 2005 |
Notice of Service of Respondent`s Interrogatories filed.
|
Mar. 18, 2005 |
Joint Response to Initial Order filed.
|
Mar. 18, 2005 |
Respondent`s Notice of Filing filed.
|
Mar. 17, 2005 |
Request for Subpoenas filed.
|
Mar. 14, 2005 |
Initial Order.
|
Mar. 11, 2005 |
Petitioner`s Motion to Expedite Discovery filed.
|
Mar. 11, 2005 |
Request for Expedited Formal Hearing filed.
|
Mar. 11, 2005 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Mar. 11, 2005 |
Agency referral filed.
|