Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

MARTA GONZALEZ AND REMBERTO GOMEZ vs AMERICANA VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., 05-001912 (2005)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 05-001912 Visitors: 51
Petitioner: MARTA GONZALEZ AND REMBERTO GOMEZ
Respondent: AMERICANA VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.
Judges: STUART M. LERNER
Agency: Florida Commission on Human Relations
Locations: Miami, Florida
Filed: May 25, 2005
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Friday, July 29, 2005.

Latest Update: Sep. 23, 2005
Summary: Whether Respondent committed a discriminatory housing practice by denying Petitioners the opportunity to rent or purchase and ordering them to vacate their unit immediately and, if so, what relief should the Florida Commission on Human Relations provide Petitioners.Petitioners who failed to appear at the hearing did not meet their burden of proving that Respondent committed the discriminatory housing practice alleged in the Petition for Relief.
05-1912.PDF

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


MARTA GONZALEZ and REMBERTO ) GOMEZ, )

)

Petitioners, )

)

vs. ) Case No. 05-1912

) AMERICAN VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM ) ASSOCIATION, )

)

Respondent. )

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


Pursuant to notice, a hearing was conducted in this case on July 29, 2005, by video teleconference at sites in Miami and Tallahassee, Florida, before Stuart M. Lerner, a duly-designated Administrative Law Judge of the Division of Administrative

Hearings.


APPEARANCES


For Petitioners: No appearance


For Respondent: Robert E. Paige, Esquire

9500 South Dadeland Boulevard, Suite 550

Miami, Florida 33156 STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE

Whether Respondent committed a discriminatory housing practice by denying Petitioners the opportunity to rent or purchase and ordering them to vacate their unit immediately and,

if so, what relief should the Florida Commission on Human Relations provide Petitioners.

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT


Petitioners filed a Housing Discrimination Complaint with the Florida Commission on Human Relations (Commission) on February 11, 2005. The complaint, which was written entirely in English, was docketed as FCHR Case No. 24-91517H.

On March 25, 2005, the Commission, through its Executive Director, issued a Determination of No Cause in FCHR Case No. 24-91517H advising that, following an investigation, the Commission had "determined that reasonable cause does not exist to believe that a discriminatory housing practice has occurred."

On April 25, 2005, Petitioners, using a Commission pre- printed form, filed a Petition for Relief (Petition) in FCHR Case No. 24-91517H. None of the entries made on the form were in the English language.

On April 28, 2005, the Division of Administrative Hearings (Division) received a Transmittal of Petition from the Commission, the body of which read as follows:

Please be advised that the Florida Commission on Human Relations has received [in FCHR Case No. 24-91517H] a Petition for Relief from an Unlawful Practice by MARTA GONZALEZ & REMBERTO GOMEZ. Pursuant to the Fair Housing Act, Sections 760.20-760.37, Florida Statutes (1997), and Rule 60Y- 25.004, Florida Administrative Code, the Commission requests the Division of

Administrative Hearings to assign this matter to an administrative law judge and conduct all necessary proceedings required under the law and submit recommended findings to the Commission. Copies of all relevant pleadings and papers heretofore filed in this proceeding are attached to this notice.


The Clerk of the Division docketed the Transmittal of Petition as DOAH Case No. 05-1549.

On May 9, 2005, the undersigned issued an Order in DOAH Case No. 05-1549 relinquishing jurisdiction to the Commission "so that it [could] (1) give Petitioners the opportunity to file an amended Petition [for Relief] in English or a certified verbatim English translation of the Petition they ha[d] already filed; and (2) 'carefully review' what it receive[d] from Petitioners to determine whether Petitioners ha[d] substantially complied with the applicable pleading requirements."

On May 16, 2005, the Commission filed with the Division a certified English translation of Petitioners' Petition, along with a Notice of Filing Certificate of Certified Translation.

On May 24, 2005, the undersigned received a letter from the Clerk of the Commission in which she stated, in pertinent part, that "the [Commission's] filing of [the certified English translation of Petitioners' Petition, along with the Notice of Filing Certificate of Certified Translation, on May 16, 2005]

relinquished jurisdiction [of DOAH Case No. 05-1549] back to the Division of Administrative Hearings "

On May 26, 2005, the undersigned issued an order reopening DOAH Case No. 05-1549 as DOAH Case No. 05-1912 "for further proceedings."

The final hearing in DOAH Case No. 05-1912 was scheduled by video teleconference at sites in Miami and Tallahassee for

July 29, 2005, commencing at 9:00 a.m. Petitioners and the Respondent were provided with written notice of the scheduled hearing in accordance with Section 120.569(2)(b), Florida Statutes. Such notice was in the form of a Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference mailed on May 26, 2005, to Petitioners and the Respondent's counsel of record, Robert E. Paige, Esquire.

Respondent appeared at the hearing, which was held as scheduled on July 29, 2005, through its counsel of record, Mr. Paige. Petitioners, on the other hand, did not make an appearance at the hearing, either in person or through counsel or any other authorized representative.

After waiting approximately 35 minutes for Petitioners to appear, and not having heard from them, the undersigned went on the record. Mr. Paige, on behalf of the Department, declined to present any evidence, arguing, persuasively, that it was Petitioners, not Respondent, that had the burden of proof and that therefore Petitioner's failure to appear at the hearing and

offer evidence in support of their Petition should result in the Commission's dismissing their Petition. The undersigned indicated that he agreed and that he would issue an order recommending that the Commission take such action. The hearing was thereupon concluded.

FINDINGS OF FACT


  1. Because no evidence was offered at the final hearing held in the instant case, no findings of fact are made.

    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


  2. DOAH has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this proceeding and of the parties hereto pursuant to Chapter 120, Florida Statutes.

  3. Florida's Fair Housing Act (Act) is codified in Sections 760.20 through 760.37, Florida Statutes.

  4. Among other things, the Act makes certain acts "discriminatory housing practices" and gives the Commission the authority, if it finds (following an administrative hearing conducted by an administrative law judge) that such a "discriminatory housing practice" has occurred, to issue an order "prohibiting the practice" and providing "affirmative relief from the effects of the practice, including quantifiable damages and reasonable attorney's fees and costs."

    § 760.35(3)(b), Fla. Stat.

  5. In the instant case, Petitioners have claimed, in their Petition, that they were the victims of a discriminatory housing practice committed by Respondent.

  6. Pursuant to Section 760.34(5), Florida Statutes, it was Petitioners' burden to prove at the final hearing held in this matter that this discriminatory housing practice in fact occurred.

  7. Petitioners, however, failed to make an appearance at the hearing and present any evidence in support of their allegation of discrimination, despite having been afforded proper notice of the hearing.

  8. Accordingly, Petitioners' Petition must be dismissed.


RECOMMENDATION


Based upon the foregoing, it is hereby


RECOMMENDED that the Commission issue a Final Order dismissing Petitioners' Petition.

DONE AND ENTERED this 29th day of July, 2005, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.

S

STUART M. LERNER

Administrative Law Judge

Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675

Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 29th day of July, 2005.


COPIES FURNISHED:


Denise Crawford, Agency Clerk Florida Commission on Human Relations 2009 Apalachee Parkway, Suite 100

Tallahassee, Florida 32301


Cecil Howard, General Counsel Florida Commission on Human Relations 2009 Apalachee Parkway, Suite 100

Tallahassee, Florida 32301


Remberto Gomez Marta Gonzalez

15220 Southwest 300th Street, Lot 534

Miami, Florida 33033


Robert E. Paige, Esquire

9500 South Dadeland Boulevard, Suite 550

Miami, Florida 33156

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS


All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within

15 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will issue the Final Order in this case.


Docket for Case No: 05-001912
Issue Date Proceedings
Sep. 23, 2005 Final Order Dismissing Petition for Relief from a Discriminatory Housing Practice filed.
Aug. 24, 2005 Undeliverable envelope returned from the Post Office.
Jul. 29, 2005 Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
Jul. 29, 2005 Recommended Order (hearing held July 29, 2005). CASE CLOSED.
Jun. 03, 2005 Order on Petitioner`s June 3, 2005 Submission.
Jun. 03, 2005 Petitioners` notification that they wish Jonathan Spicer included as a Respondent in this proceeding filed.
May 31, 2005 Agency`s court reporter confirmation letter filed with the Judge.
May 26, 2005 Order on Respondent`s Motion for Clarification.
May 26, 2005 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
May 26, 2005 Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (video hearing set for July 29, 2005; 9:00 a.m.; Miami and Tallahassee, FL).
May 26, 2005 Order Reopening File (formerly DOAH Case No. 05-1549).
May 24, 2005 Agency referral filed.
Apr. 28, 2005 Housing Discrimination Complaint filed.
Apr. 28, 2005 Notice of Determination of No Cause filed.
Apr. 28, 2005 Determination filed.
Apr. 28, 2005 Petition for Relief filed.
Apr. 28, 2005 Transmittal of Petition filed by the Agency.

Orders for Case No: 05-001912
Issue Date Document Summary
Sep. 23, 2005 Agency Final Order
Jul. 29, 2005 Recommended Order Petitioners who failed to appear at the hearing did not meet their burden of proving that Respondent committed the discriminatory housing practice alleged in the Petition for Relief.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer