Petitioner: AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
Respondent: UNITED HOME CARE SERVICES, INC., D/B/A UNITED HOME CARE SERVICES OF PALM BEACH
Judges: CLAUDE B. ARRINGTON
Agency: Agency for Health Care Administration
Locations: Boynton Beach, Florida
Filed: Jun. 09, 2005
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Monday, June 20, 2005.
Latest Update: Dec. 23, 2024
APR-LS-ZUUS (HON) = L2SU8 UNSTED HUME CAKE Pb (FAR) 9b1 1427994 PUUL/ ULE
STATE OF FLORIDA
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE
ADMINISTRATION,
Petitioner, AHCA No.: 2005001580
Return Receipt Requested:
ve 7002 2410 0001 4234 0068
7002 2410 0001 4234 0075
UNITED HOME CARE SERVICES, INC.
d/b/a UNITED HOME CARE SERVICES OF
PALM BEACH, a 5) j 0)
Respondent.
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
COMES NOW the Agency for Health Care Administration
(“AHCA”), by and through the undersigned counsel, and files this
administrative complaint against United Home Care Services, Inc,
d/b/a United Home Care Services of Palm Beach (hereinafter
“United Home Care Services of Palm Beach”), pureuant to Chapter
400, Part IV, and Section 120.60, Florida Statutes.
NATURE OF THE ACTION
1. This is an action to impose an administrative fine of
$1,500.00 pursuant to Section 400.464, Florida Statutes for the
protection of public health, safety and welfare.
EXHIBIT "B"
APK-JB-ZUUS(HON) = L2:U8 UNITED HUME CAKE PB TEAK) 9b1 421994 P.UUS/ULE
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
2. AHCA has jurisdiction pursuant to Chapter 400, Part
IV, Florida Statutes.
3. Venue lies in Palm Beach County pursuant to Rule
28.106.207, Florida Administrative Code.
PARTIES
4. AHCA is the regulatory authority xesponsible fer
licensure and enforcement of all applicable statutes and rules
governing home health agencies, pursuant to Chapter 400, Part
Iv, Florida Statutes and Chapter 59A-8 Florida Administrative
Code.
5. United Home Care Services of Palm Beach operates a
home health agency located at 2400 High Ridge Road, Boynton
Beach, Florida 33426. United Home Care Services of Palm Beach is
licensed as a home health agency under license number 299991563.
United Home Care Services of Palm Beach was at all times
Material hereto a licensed facility under the licensing
authority of AHCA and was required to comply with all applicable
rules and statutes.
APRLB-ZUUS (HON) = V2-UY UNITED HOME CARE Pb (EAR) D1 142994 P.UU4/ ULE
COUNT I
UNITED HOME CARE SERVICES OF PALM BEACH FAILED TO PROPERLY
ESTABLISH AND FOLLOW PHYSICIAN TREATMENT ORDERS.
SECTION 400.487 (2), FLORIDA STATUTES
59A-8.0215 (2), FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
(PHYSICIAN ORDERS)
CLASS IIrt
6. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs (1)
through (5) as if fully set forth herein.
7. United Home Care Services of Palm Beach was cited with
two (2) Class III deficiencies due to a recertification and
licensure survey conducted from March 22, 2004 through March 26,
2004,
8. A recertification and licensure survey was conducted
from March 22, 2004 through March 26, 2004. Based on record
review, it was determined that physician treatment orders were
not established, nor followed, nor put into writing, nor signed
and dated with the date of receipt, in 2 out of 15 sampled
patients. (#4 and #7). The findings include the following:
9. A xrecord review of the Plan of Care (POC) dated
2/2/04-4/1/04 for Patient #4 xrevealed orders for physical
therapy (PT) to be held two times in one week and three times
during four weeks, However, a review of PT notes revealed that
the therapist documented only one visit the first week and two
visits during the third week. There was no explanation for the
APR B-2UUS(HON) = LZ SU9 UNITED HOME CARE Pb (FAK) VDL /421994 PUUS/ULS
two missed visits, nor any evidence that the physician was aware
of the missed visits,
10. A record review of the Poc dated 3/8/04-5/6/04 for
Patient #7 revealed a diagnosis of decubitus ulcer but no wound
care orders from the physician. A review of subsequent physician
orders did not reveal any orders to provide care to the
decubitus. Skilled nursing documentation on more than one visit
revealed that the skilled nurse was cleansing with saline, uBing
mepilex, tegaderm and/or mefix to a stage II pressure ulcer near
the patient’s thoracic spine.
11. The mandated date of correction was Gesignated as
April 25, 2004.
12. A re-licensure survey was conducted from January 24,
2005 through January 27, 2005. Based on, record review and
interview, it was determined that the home health agency did not
follow the physician's treatment orders contained in the plan of
care and did not notify the physician if changes were needed in
the plan of care in 1 out of 15 sampled patiente. (#6)... The
findings include the following:
13. Patient #6 was admitted to the agency on 10/2/04 with
Qiagnoses including an open wound on the trunk and diabetes
mellitus. As of 10/28/04, there were wound care orders to the
bilateral lower extremities in addition to daily wound care to
the right trunk area. A review of the POC dated 10/2/04-11/30/04
4
APR-L8-2005(HON) = 12:09 UNITED HOWE CARE PB (FAX) 5b1 7427554 PUUO/ULE
and 12/1/04-1/29/05 revealed orders for daily skilled nursing
(SN) visits to provide wound care. However, record review
revealed that most of the daily sn visits were conducted by a
licensed practical nurse (LPN).
14. Clinical recorg review also revealed Physician orders
dated 10/21/04 to change wound care to the right trunk. a review
ef clinical decumentation of LPN visits did not refleet
compliance with the change in orders during four visits. Again
on 10/28/04, there was a physician order for skilled nursing to
provide daily wound care to bilateral lower legs, compression
wraps, unna boots and Aquacel gauze to the leg in order to
decrease volume in legs and allow for ulcers to heal. However, a
review of SN documentation revealed no evidence that wound care
was provided to lower extremities until 11/1/04.
15. A review of daily SN . documentation from 12/1/04-
1/22/04 revealed More than twenty intermittent visits, Yet,
there was no documentation regarding the use of Aquacel
dressings and or wound care to the lower extremities. There was
also no evidence of physician follow-up for change in orders or
LPN/RN communication,
16. During a home visit conducted on 1/25/05 with the rn
case manager, it wag observed that there were no Aquacel
@ressings to be applied to the bilateral lower extremities of
Patient #6. The RN Opened a plastic bag in the patient's supply
5
APR-18-2005(HON} = 12:10 UNITED HOME CARE Pb (FAX) 5017427954 PUT / ULB
box of dressings, observed what appeared to be "soiled Aquacel",
and discarded the bag. While observing the RN removing dressings
from the patient's bilateral lower extremities, it was noted
that there were no Aquacel dressings on the right lower
extremity. Instead, there were Aquacel dressings on the lower
left calf area only. The RN was also unable to reapply Aquacel
dressings since there was none available in the home.
17. A review of the physician orders revealed that the
Aquacel was to be applied to bilateral lower extremities. This
is a repeat deficiency from the survey of March 26, 2004.
18. Based on the foregoing facts, United Home Care
Services of Palm Beach violated Section 400.487 (2), Florida
Statutes, and/or 59A-8.0215(2) Florida Administrative Code,
herein classified as a repeat Class III deficiency, which
carries, in this case, an assessed fine of $500.00 [one (1)
patient x $500.00 per patient].
counT If
UNITED HOME CARE SERVICES OF PALM BEACH FAILED TO DEVELOP AN
INDIVIDUALIZED PLAN OF CARE THAT INCLUDED ALL PERTINENT
TREATMENT ORDERS AND GOALS FOR SAMPLED PATIENTS.
RULE 59A-8.0215 (1), FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE.
(PLAN OF CARE)
CLASS III
APR-{8-2005(MON) = 12:10 UNITED HOME CARE PB (FAX) 5617427534 PUUG/UES
19. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs (1)
through (5) as if fully set forth herein.
20. A recertification and licensure survey was conducted
from March 22, 2004 through March 26, 2004. Based on record
review and interview, it was determined that the agency failed
to develop an individualized plan of care that included all
Pertinent treatment orders and goals for 3 out of 15 sampled
patients (#4, #9, #10). The findings include the following:
21. A review of the PoC dated 2/2/04-4/1/04 for Patient #4
revealed two diagnoses: gait abnormality and pr, Further pPoc
review revealed that the patient was new to Isosorbide and Lasix
medication, but there was no corresponding diagnoses on the Poc,
A review of a comprehensive assessment revealed that the patient
had been discharged from the hospital prior to admission to home
care status. The patient had post hysterectomy, cardio
respiratory and gastrointestinal postoperative complications
requiring the use of oxygen continuously at night. However, the
Poc did not have an order for oxygen.
22. A review of the Poc dated 1/22/04-3/21/04 for Patient
#9 revealed skilled nursing frequency every 3 weeks but without
Mention of its duration. A review of specific goals for Patient
#9 revealed that pain would be controlled with decreased
Tylenol, and that the Patient would be knowledgeable of comfort
measures to decrease pain, However, a review of the medications
APR-{8-2005(MON) = 12:10 UNITED HOME CARE Pb (FAX) 5617427594 PUYY/ UE
revealed that the patient was not taking Tylenol. Also, a review
of assessment and subsequent nursing notes revealed that the
patient had no pain. In addition, the medication section did not
include a dosage of Haldol Decanoate to be administered
intramuscularly by the sN.
23. A review of the POC dated 1/31/04-3/30/04 for Patient
#10 revealed an incomplete description of medication being
administered via a Medtronic pump. According to locator 10 as it
relates to medication, the medication was Baclofen 2000.0 UG 1M~L
simple continuous 27.9 with route being documented as "thecal."
However, a review of SN documentation revealed that the patient
was receiving a continuous infusion of 35,4 ug /per hour of
Baclofen as directed by the physician via intrathecal route.
24. The mandated date of correction was designated as
April 25, 2004.
25. A follow-up survey was conducted on January 17, 2005.
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the
agency failed to develop an individualized Plan of care that
included all pertinent diagnoses and functional limitations in
the plan of care for 2 out of is Sampled patients (#4, #8). The
findings include the following:
26. Patient #4 was admitted to the agency on 12/24/04 with
Giagnoses including gastrointestinal hemorrhage and diabetes
mellitus. A review of a comprehensive start of care OASIS
APR-{8-2005(HON) 12:41 UNITED HOWE CARE PB (PAK) 5617427594 PULU/DLS
assessment completed by a xegistered nurse (who was also
reported to be the patient's daughter) revealed that the patient
had left eye cataract surgery on 12/20/04. This surgery waa
unsuccessful and the patient was blind in the left eye. Further
review of the comprehensive assessment (MO 390) as related to
vision revealed that the patient's vision was severely impaired.
In fact, the patient could not locate objects without hearing or
touching them. A review of the Plan of care (POC) dated
12/24/04-2/21/05 revealed no diagnoses velated to recent
unsuccessful cataract surgery and no evidence of any functional
limitation related to vision, During an interview with the
Director of Profession Services (DPS) on 1/26/05 at
approximately 3:00 PM, it was agreed that pertinent diagnoses
and functional limitations were omitted from this Poc for
unknown reasona,.
27. A review of the Poc dated 1/6/05-3/6/05 for Patient #6
revealed diagnoses of gait abnormality, bronchopneumonia and
herpes zoster. A review of the medication list revealed that as
of 1/6/05 there were new cardiac medications listed to include
Norvasc 5 mg daily and Atenolol 25 mg twice daily. A review of
the start of care comprehensive assessment dated 1/6/05 revealed
that the patient was treated for hypertension in hospitalization
prior to start of home health care. During record review with
the DPS, it wae reported that the diagnoses of hypertension
9
APR-(8-2005 (HON) 12:11 UNITED HOWE CARE PB (FAN}5 617427554 PULL/ULS
should have been included on the POC as a pertinent diagnoses
for home health services and that it was omitted for unknown
reasons.
28. Based on the foregoing facts, United Home Care
Services of Palm Beach violated Rule 59A-8.0215 (1), Florida
Administrative Code, herein classified as a repeat Clase III
deficiency, which carries, in this case, an assessed fine of
$1,000.00 [two (2) patients x $500.00].
CLAIM FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, the Agency requesta the Court to order the
following relief:
1. Enter a judgment in favor of the Agency for Health
Care Administration against United Home Care Services of Palm
Beach on Counts I and II.
2, Assess against United Home Care Services of Palm Beach
an administrative fine of $1,500.00 on Counts I and II for the
violations cited above.
3. Assess costs related to the investigation and
prosecution of this matter, if applicable.
4. Grant such other relief as the court deems is just and
proper on Counts I and II.
10
APR-{8-2005(WON) 2:11 UNITED HOME CARE PB (FAX) 5617427554 PULZ/ UL
Respondent is notified that it has a right to request an
administrative hearing pursuant to Sections 120.569 and 120.57,
Florida Statutes. Specific options for administrative action are
set out in the attached Election of Rights and explained in the
attached Explanation of Rights. All requests for hearing shall
be made to the Agency for Health Care Administration and
delivered to the Agency Clerk, Agency for Health Care
Administration, 2727 Mahan Drive, MS #3, Tallahassee, Florida
32308.
RESPONDENT IS FURTHER NOTIFIED THAT THE FAILURE TO RECEIVE A
REQUEST FOR A HEARING WITHIN TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS OF RECEIPT OF
THIS COMPLAINT WILL RESULT IN AN ADMISSION OF THE FACTS ALLEGED
IN THE COMPLAINT AND THE ENTRY OF A FINAL ORDER BY THE AGENCY.
Agency for Health Care
Administration
8355 N.W. 52 Terrace - #103
Miami, Florida 33166
305-470-6800
Copies furnished to:
Diane Reiland
Field Office Manager
Agency for Health Care Administration
1710 East Tiffany Drive
West Palm Beach, Florida 33407
(U.S. Mail)
11
APR-18-2005(WON) 12:12 UNITED HOWE CARE Pb (FAK)561 742754 PULS/08
Jean Lombardi
Finance and Accounting
Agency for Health Care Administration
2727 Mahan Drive
Tallahassee, Florida 32308
(Interoffice Mail)
Home Health Agency Unit Program
Agency for Health Care Administration
2727 Mahan Drive
Tallahassee, Florida 32308
(Intexroffice Mail)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the
foregoing has been furnished by U.S. Certified Mail, Return
Receipt Requested to Tina Kae Peery, Administrator, United Home
Care Services of Palm Beach, 2400 High Ridge Road, Boynton
Beach, Florida 33426; Jose R. Fox, Registered Agent, 5255 N. W.
87 Avenue - Suite 400, Miami, Florida 33178 on this th day
of , 2005.
Docket for Case No: 05-002101
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Jul. 18, 2005 |
Final Order filed.
|
Jun. 20, 2005 |
Order Closing File. CASE CLOSED.
|
Jun. 20, 2005 |
Agreed Motion to Close File filed.
|
Jun. 10, 2005 |
Initial Order.
|
Jun. 09, 2005 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Jun. 09, 2005 |
Respondent`s Answer to Administrative Complaint, Request for Formal Hearing and Request for Mediation filed.
|
Jun. 09, 2005 |
Notice of Appearance filed.
|
Jun. 09, 2005 |
Notice of Appearance filed. |
Jun. 09, 2005 |
Election of Rights for Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Jun. 09, 2005 |
Order of Dismissal without Prejudice Pursuant to Sections 120.54 and 120.569, Florida Statues and Rules 28-106.111 and 28-106.201, Florida Administrative Code to allow for Amendment and Resubmission of Petition filed.
|
Jun. 09, 2005 |
Respondent`s Amended Answer to Administrative Complaint, Request for Formal Hearing and Request for Mediation filed.
|
Jun. 09, 2005 |
Notice (of Agency referral) filed.
|