Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION
Respondent: DANA MICALLEF AND DANA MICALLEF DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
Judges: ELLA JANE P. DAVIS
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: Palatka, Florida
Filed: Nov. 21, 2005
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Tuesday, March 14, 2006.
Latest Update: Dec. 25, 2024
4a} Ney fy oO
STATE OF FLORIDA By Sig, op
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULA’ Nea 4 Why
ie
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND
PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,
Petitioner,
VS. Case Nos.: 2004-045539
DANA MICALLEF AND
DANA MICALLEF DESIGN DEVELOPMENT, OS- YD. 15K”
Respondents.
/
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
Petitioner, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,
("Petitioner"), files this Administrative Complaint before the Board of Architecture and Interior
Design against DANA MICALLEF AND DANA MICALLEF DESIGN DEVELOPMENT,
("Respondents"), and says:
1. Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating the practice of architecture
and interior design pursuant to Section 20.165, Florida Statutes, and Chapters 455 and 481,
Florida Statutes.
2 The Department of Business and Professional Regulation has jurisdiction over the
“.
unlicensed practice of architecture pursuant to Section 455.228(1), and Section 481.223(1)(a),
Florida Statutes,
f i i KO
Spy, Vo, aS FY
a
493
3. At all times material hereto, Respondents were not duly registered or certified to
engage in the practice of architecture in the State of Florida pursuant to Chapter 481, Florida
Statutes.
4. Respondents’ Jast known address is 27 Hibiscus Drive, Ormond Beach, Florida
32176.
5. On or about June 9, 2003, Respondents entered into a contract with Peter Roehr to
provide architectural services for a project known as the European Village in Palm Coast,
Florida.
6. The project consisted of a 95 unit condominium complex including 35 retail units,
along with a courtyard and fountain area.
7. Throughout the contract, Respondents hold themselves out as the ‘‘Architect”.
8, Respondents entered into a contract with Robert McCrory to provide architectural
services for a project known as the La Vista Del Sol Condominiums on Atlantic Avenue in
Daytona Beach Shores, Florida.
9, In a letter dated May 26, 2004, the Respondent describes the services he provided
under the contract as “architectural design services” and demands payment in the amount of
$29,120.00.
COUNT I
10. Petitioner hereby realleges and incorporates paragraphs one (1) through nine
(9) as if fully set forth herein.
1]. Section 48 1.223(1)(a), Florida Statutes, states that a person may not knowingly
“practice architecture unless the person is an architect or a registered architect.”
ww
12. Based upon the foregoing, Respondents, have violated Section 481.223(1)(a),
Florida Stautes, by practicing architecture when they were not the holder of a valid license by
contracting to provide architectural services and accepting payment for architectural services
involving commercial property for the European Village project in Palm Coast, Florida.
COUNT I
13. Petitioner hereby realleges and incorporates paragraphs one (1) through nine
(9) as if fully set forth herein.
14, Section 481.223(1)(a), Florida Statutes, states that a person may not knowingly
“practice architecture unless the person is an architect or a registered architect.”
15. Based upon the foregoing, Respondents, have violated Section 481.223(1)(a),
Florida Statutes, by practicing architecture when they were not the holder of a valid license by
contracting to provide architectural services and accepting payment for architectural services
involving commercial property for the project known as the La Vista Del Sol Condominiums on
Atlantic Avenue in Daytona Beach Shores, Florida.
COUNT II
16. Petitioner hereby realleges and incorporates paragraphs one (1) through nine
(9) as if fully set forth herein.
17. Section 481.223(1)(c), Florida Statutes, states that a person may not knowingly
“use the name or title ‘architect’ or ‘registered architect’ or words to that effect, when the person
is not then the holder of a valid license.”
18. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondents have violated Section 481.223(1)(c),
Florida Statutes, by using the name or title “architect”, when they were not the holder of a valid
license.
COUNT IV
19. Petitioner hereby realleges and incorporates paragraphs one (1) through nine (9)
as if fully set forth herein.
20. Section 481.219(2), Florida Statutes, states a corporation, partnership, or a person
practicing under a fictitious name, offering architectural services to the public must obtain a
certificate of authorization.
21. Based upon the foregoing, Respondent, Dana Micallef Design Development has
violated Section 481.219(2), Florida Statutes, by offering architectural services when it was not
the holder of a valid certificate of authorization.
WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the Board enter an Order imposing an
administrative fine not to exceed $5,000 per count, assess costs associated with investigation and
prosecution, impose any or all penalties delineated within Section 455.227(2), Florida Statutes,
and/or any other relief that the Board is authorized to impose pursuant to Chapters 481 and 455,
Florida Statutes, and/or the rules promulgated thereunder.
. N~ —
Signed this 29° dayof_“cb-vw = , 2005,
"Pane Business fl l E D
Depura een
CLE Rye Reputation Q2N 24%.
CLERK Peptnttray, DAVID K. MINACCI
DATE Smith, Thompson, Shaw & Manausa, P.A.
2075 Centre Pointe Blvd.
222s Tallahassee, Fl 32308-4893
FL Bar No. 0056774
Ph: (850) 402-1570
Fax: (850) 402-1508
Docket for Case No: 05-004275
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Mar. 27, 2006 |
Notice of Appearance (filed by L. Griggs).
|
Mar. 14, 2006 |
Order Closing File. CASE CLOSED.
|
Feb. 27, 2006 |
Amended Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction filed.
|
Feb. 23, 2006 |
Order Granting Continuance (parties to advise status by March 8, 2006).
|
Feb. 23, 2006 |
Amended Order to Show Cause (hearing scheduled for February 23, 2006, is cancelled; Petitioner is granted until March 13, 2006, in which to show cause, in writing, filed with DOAH, why the Request for Admissions should not be deemed admitted; on or before March 8, 2006, parties shall confer and provide mutually agreeable dates for rescheduling the final hearing in April and May 2006).
|
Feb. 14, 2006 |
Order to Show Cause (hearing scheduled for February 23, 2006, is cancelled; Petitioner is granted 30 days from instant date in which to show cause why the Requests for Admission should not be deemed admitted; Petitioner`s Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction is taken under advisement pending Respondent`s response on or before March 8, 2006).
|
Feb. 10, 2006 |
Notice of Taking Deposition filed.
|
Jan. 12, 2006 |
Petitioner`s Motion to Reschedule Hearing filed.
|
Jan. 11, 2006 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
|
Jan. 11, 2006 |
Notice of Hearing (hearing set for February 23, 2006; 9:30 a.m.; Palatka, FL).
|
Jan. 05, 2006 |
Motion to Compel Responses to Interrogatories and Requests for Production filed.
|
Jan. 05, 2006 |
Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction for Hearing not Involving Disputed Issues of Material Fact filed.
|
Nov. 29, 2005 |
Respondent`s Response to Initial Order filed.
|
Nov. 22, 2005 |
Initial Order.
|
Nov. 21, 2005 |
Answer filed.
|
Nov. 21, 2005 |
Notice of Filing Petitioner`s First Set of Interrogatories, First Requests for Production and Requests for Admission filed.
|
Nov. 21, 2005 |
Election of Rights filed.
|
Nov. 21, 2005 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Nov. 21, 2005 |
Referral Letter filed.
|