Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

BRADLEY ROBERTS, D. D. S. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION, 05-004675MPI (2005)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 05-004675MPI Visitors: 18
Petitioner: BRADLEY ROBERTS, D. D. S.
Respondent: AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
Judges: CLAUDE B. ARRINGTON
Agency: Agency for Health Care Administration
Locations: Margate, Florida
Filed: Dec. 22, 2005
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Wednesday, January 4, 2006.

Latest Update: Nov. 13, 2024
STATE OF FLORIDA AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION BRADLEY ROBERTS, D.D.S., Petitioner, Ohy vs, CASE NO. 05-4675MPI ‘es "7p. PROVIDER NO. 073267200 org STATE OF FLORIDA, AUDIT C.I. NO. 05-3301-000 AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE Rendition No. AHCA-06- -S-MDP ADMINISTRATION, Respondent. / FINAL ORDER THE PARTIES resolved all disputed issues and executed a Settlement Agreement. The parties are directed to comply with the terms of the attached settlement agreement. Based on the foregoing, this file is CLOSED. DONE and ORDERED on this the 21 tay of _ SOBKStyeS7. , 2006, in Tallahassee, Florida. rista Lectin jones for Health Care Administration A PARTY WHO IS ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY THIS FINAL ORDER IS ENTITLED TO A JUDICIAL REVIEW WHICH SHALL BE INSTITUTED BY FILING ONE COPY OF A NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH THE AGENCY CLERK OF AHCA, AND A SECOND COPY ALONG WITH FILING FEE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW, WITH THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL IN THE APPELLATE DISTRICT WHERE THE AGENCY MAINTAINS ITS HEADQUARTERS OR WHERE A PARTY RESIDES. REVIEW PROCEEDINGS SHALL BE CONDUCTED _ IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FLORIDA APPELLATE RULES. THE NOTICE OF APPEAL MUST BE FILED WITHIN 30 DAYS OF RENDITION OF THE ORDER TO BE REVIEWED. Copies furnished to: L. William Porter II, Esquire Agency for Health Care Administration (Interoffice Mail) Julie Gallagher, Esquire Greenberg Traurig, P.A. Post Office Drawer 1838 Tallahassee, Florida 32302 (U.S. Mail) Claude Arrington Administrative Law Judge Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building 1230 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060 Tim Byrnes, Chief, Medicaid Program Integrity Glen Stone, Medicaid Program Integrity Maryann Alliegood, Finance and Accounting CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished to the above named addressees by U.S. Mail on this the ay of Se Ler , 2006. Richard Shoop, Esquire Agency Clerk State of Florida Agency for Health Care Administration 2727 Mahan Drive, Building #3 Tallahassee, Florida 32308-5403 (850) 922-5873 STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMENISTRATIVE HEARINGS fre i BRADLEY ROBERTS, D.D.S., 2b SEP 27 ATE 2b Petiti CAVISIGH QF _ ADMINISTRATIVE y. CASE NO. 05-4675MPH-ARINGS AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION, Respondent. / SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT STATE OF FLORIDA, AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION (“AHCA” or “the Agency”), and BRADLEY ROBERTS, D.D.S. (“PROVIDER”), by and through the undersigned, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. The two parties enter into this agreement for the purpose of memorializing the resolution to this matter. “2. PROVIDER is a Medicaid provider in the State of Florida, provider number 073267200 and was a provider during the audit period. 3. In its Final Agency Audit Report (final agency action) dated November 8, 2005, AHCA notified PROVIDER that review of Medicaid claims performed by Medicaid Program Integrity (MPI), Office of the AHCA Inspector General, indicated that certain claims, in whole or in part, has been inappropriately paid by Medicaid. The Agency sought recoupment of this overpayment, in the amount of $77,207.68. In response to the audit letter dated November 8, 2005, PROVIDER filed a petition for a formal administrative hearing, which was assigned DOAH Case No. 05-4675. Bradley Roberts, D.D,S. Settlement Agreement 4. Subsequent to the original audit that took place in this matter and in preparation for trial, AHCA re-reviewed the PROVIDER’s claims and evaluated additional documentation submitted by the PROVIDER. As a result, AHCA determined that the overpayment was adjusted to $59,774.85. 5. In order to resolve this matter without further administrative proceedings, PROVIDER and the AHCA expressly agree as follows: 09) (2) @) AHCA agrees to accept the payment set forth herein in settlement of the overpayment issues arising from the MPI review. Within thirty days of entry of the final order, PROVIDER agrees to make a lump sum payment of fifty nine thousand seven hundred seventy four dollars and eighty five cents ($59,774.85) in overpayment, a four thousand dollar ($4,000.00) fine and five hundred dollars ($500.00) in investigative costs, for a total of sixty four thousand two hundred seventy four dollars and eighty five cents ($64,274.85) in full and complete settlement of all claims in the proceedings before the Division of Administrative Hearings (DOAH Case No. 05-4675). AHCA retains the right to perform a 6 month follow-up review. PROVIDER and AHCA agree that full payment as set forth above will resolve and settle this case completely and release both parties from all liabilities arising from the findings in the audit referenced as C.L 05-3301- 000. Bradley Roberts, D.D.S. Settlement Agreement (4) PROVIDER agrees that it will not rebill the Medicaid Program in any manner for claims that were not covered by Medicaid, which are the subject of the audit in this case. 6. Payment shall be made to: AGENCY FOR HEALTHCARE ADMINISTRATION Medicaid Accounts Receivable Post Office Box 13749 Tallahassee, Florida 32317-3749 7. PROVIDER agrees that failure to pay any monies due and owing under the terms of this Agreement shall constitute PROVIDER’S authorization for the Agency, without further notice, to withhold the total remaining amount due under the terms of this agreement from any monies due and owing to PROVIDER for any Medicaid claims. 8. ABCA reserves the right to enforce this Agreement under the laws of the State of Florida, the Rules of the Medicaid Program, and all other applicable rules and regulations, 9. This settlement does not constitute an admission of wrongdoing or error by either party with respect to this case or any other matter. 10. Each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs, if any. With the exception that the Petitioner shail reimbursé, as part of this settlement, $500.00 in Agency costs of action. This amount is included in the calculations and demand of paragraph 5(2). 1]. The signatories to this Agreement, acting in a representative capacity, represent that they are duly authorized to enter into this Agreement on behalf of the respective parties. 12. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the provisions of the laws of Florida. Venue for any action arising from this Agreement shall be in Leon County, Florida. 13. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between PROVIDER and the AHCA, including anyone acting for, associated with or employed by them, conceming all Bradley Roberts, D.D.S. Settlement Agreement matters and supersedes any prior discussions, agreements or understandings; there are no promises, representations or agreements between PROVIDER and the AHCA other than as set forth herein. No modification or waiver of any provision shall be valid unless a written amendment to the Agreement is completed and properly executed by the parties. 14. This is an Agreement of settlement and compromise, made in recognition that the parties may have different or incorrect understandings, information and contentions, as to facts and Jaw, and with each party compromising and settling any potential correctness or incorrectness of its understandings, information and contentions as to facts and law, so that no misunderstanding or misinformation shall be a ground for rescission hereof. 15. PROVIDER expressly waives in this matter its right to any hearing pursuant to sections 120.569 or 120.57, Florida Statutes, the making of findings of fact and conclusions of law by the Agency, and all fixther and other proceedings to which it may be entitled by law or tules of the Agency regarding this proceeding and any and all issues raised herein. PROVIDER further agrees that it shall not challenge or contest any Final Order entered in this matter which is consistent with the terms of this settlement agreement in any forum now or in the future available to it, including the right to any administrative proceeding, circuit or federal court action or any appeal. 16. This Agreement is and shall be deemed jointly drafted and written by all parties to it and shall not be construed or interpreted against the party originating or preparing it. 17. To the extent that any provision of this Agreement is prohibited by law for any reason, such provision shall be effective to the extent not so prohibited, and such prohibition shall not affect any other provision of this Agreement. Bradley Roberts, D.D.S. Settlement Agreement 18. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding on each party’s successors, assigns, heirs, administrators, representatives and trustees. 19. All times stated herein are of the essence of this Agreement. 20. This Agreement shall be in full force and effect upon execution by the respective parties in counterpart. BRADLEY ROBERTS, D.D.S. B Na a by R tuk 0058 Dated: Juse % __, 2006 By: Poradley RobetTs , 29 5 (Print name) ITs: AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION 2727 Mahan Drive, Mail Stop #3 Tallahassee, FL 32308-5403. Dated: 7-2/-7 6 , 2006 Jamés D. Boyd Inspector General IBZ Dated: aL Y , 2006 William Roberts Acting General Counsel haa fete pated: 2 AE , 2006 L. William Porter If Assistant General Counsel

Docket for Case No: 05-004675MPI
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer