Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OR REAL ESTATE
Respondent: CHARLES BATES
Judges: DANIEL M. KILBRIDE
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: Winter Haven, Florida
Filed: Apr. 03, 2006
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Tuesday, May 23, 2006.
Latest Update: Dec. 23, 2024
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL
NE
FLORIDA REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL BOAR FT E
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS &
PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,
Division of Administrative Hearings
DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE, U-~3B-0W
Petitioner,
v. CASE NO. 2003000203
CHARLES BATES, .
Respondent. O (9 - [ | ( O p C
/
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
The Florida Department of Business & Professional Regulation, Division of Real Estate
("Petitioner") files this Administrative Complaint against Charles Bates (“‘Respondent"), and alleges:
ESSENTIAL ALLEGATIONS OF MATERIAL FACT
1. Petitioner is a state government licensing and regulatory agency charged with the
responsibility and duty to prosecute Administrative Complaints pursuant to the laws of the State of
Florida, including Section 20.165 and Chapters 120, 455 and 475 of the Florida Statutes, and the
rules promulgated thereunder.
2. Respondent is currently a Florida state certified general real estate appraiser having been
issued license 1042 in accordance with Chapter 475 Part II of the Florida Statutes.
3. The last license the State issued to Respondent was as a state certified general real estate
appraiser at 4649 Caloosa Blvd., Lake Wales, Florida 33853.
4. On or about September 5, 2002, Respondent developed and communicated a complete
appraisal report (Report) for subject property commonly known as 2901 Shell Road, Lake Wales,
FDBPR v. Charles Bates Case No. 2003000203
Administrative Complaint
Florida 33853 (Subject Property). A copy of the report is attached hereto and incorporated herein
as Exhibit 1.
5. The Report fails to disclose any departures from the specific requirements of the Uniform
Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP).
6. At all times material, Subject Property was an income producing property.
7. The Report does not contain a valuation of Subject Property under the income appraoch.
8. The Report does not identify the use of the appraisal.
9. The Report does not identify the scope of work necessary to complete the assignment.
10. The Report does not identify or analyze any land use regulations in effect at the time of
appraisal assignment.
11. At the time the report was developed and communicated, the Subject Property was listed
for sale. A copy of the listing agreement is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit 2.
12. The Report does not analyze the listing.
13. The Report does not prominently state the reporting option.
14, The Report does not contain the proper signed certification.
COUNT I
Based upon the foregoing, Respondent is guilty of having failed to exercise reasonable
diligence in developing an appraisal report in violation of Section 475.624(15), Florida Statutes,
COUNT I . |
Based upon the foregoing, Respondent has violated a standard for the development or
communication of a real estate appraisal, specifically Standards 1 and 2, Ethics Rule, Departure
2
FDBPR v. Charles Bates Case No. 2003000203
Administrative Complaint
Rule, Competency, or other provision of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice
(2002) in violation of Section 475.624(14), Florida Statutes.
COUNT III
Based upon the foregoing, Respondent is guilty of failing to use proper designation in
violation of Rule 61J1-7.002, Florida Administrative Code and Section 475 .622, Florida Statutes
and, therefore, in violation of Section 475.624(4), Florida Statutes (2002).
WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requesis the Florida Real Estate Appraisal Board, or
the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, as may be appropriate, to issue a Final
Order as final agency action finding the Respondent(s) guilty as charged. The penalties which may
be imposed for violation(s) of Chapter 475 of the Florida Statutes, depending upon the severity of
the offense(s), include: revocation of the license, registration, or certificate; suspension of the
license, registration or certificate for a period not to exceed ten (10) years; imposition of an
administrative fine of up to $5,000 for each count or offense; imposition of investigative costs;
issuance of a reprimand; imposition of probation subject to terms including, but not limited to,
tequiring the licensee, registrant, or certificate holder to complete and pass additional appraisal
education courses; publication, or any combination of the foregoing which may apply. See Section
475.624, Florida Statutes and Rule 61J1-8.002, Florida Administrative Code. The penalties which
may be imposed for violation(s) of Chapter 455 of the Florida Statutes, depending upon the severity
of the offense(s), include: revocation of the license, registration, or certificate; suspension of the
license, registration, or certificate for a period not to exceed ten (10) years; imposition of an
administrative fine of up to $5,000 for each count or offense; imposition of investigative costs;
FDBPR v. Charles Bates Case No. 2003000203
Administrative Complaint
issuance of a reprimand; imposition of probation subject to terms including, but not limited to,
requiring the licensee, registrant, or certificate holder to complete and pass additional appraisal
education courses; publication; restriction of practice; injunctive or mandamus relief; imposition of
a cease and desist order; or any combination of the foregoing which may apply. See Section
455.227, Fla. Statutes and Florida Administrative Code Rule 61J1-8.002.
SIGNED this 24 _ day of Sepfauber 2004.
Qi pale strap hasabliath
Florida Department of Business and
Professional Regulation
By:
Director, Division of Real Estate
o> FILED
Pepariment of Professional Regulatia..
Division of Real Estate
ATTORNEY FOR PETITIONER
S. L. Smith, Senior Attorney
‘Bierk Fla, Bar No. 195995
7g /. 2 / Or Division of Real Estate
ue Legal Section
400 W. Robinson Street, N801
Orlando, Florida 32801-1757
(407) 481-5632
(407) 317-7260 - FAX
PCP: PB/CK 9/04
FDBPR vy. Charles Bates Case No. 2003000203
Administrative Complaint
NOTICE TO RESPONDENTS
PLEASE BE ADVISED that mediation under Section 120.573 of the Florida
Statutes, is not available for administrative disputes involving this type of agency action.
PLEASE BE FURTHER ADVISED that pursuant to this Administrative
Complaint you may request, within the time proscribed, a hearing to be conducted in this
matter in accordance with Sections 120.569 and 120.57 of the Florida Statutes; that you have
the right, at your option and expense, to be represented by counsel or other qualified
representative in this matter; and that you have the right, at your option and expense, to take
testimony, to call and cross-examine witnesses, and to have subpoena and subpoena duces
tecum issued on your behalf if a formal hearing is requested.
PLEASE BE FURTHER ADVISED that if you do not file an Election of Rights
form or some other responsive pleading with the Petitioner within twenty-one (21) days of
receipt of this Administrative Complaint, the Petitioner will file with the Florida Real Estate
Appraisal Board a motion requesting an informal hearing and entry of an appropriate Final
Order which may result in the suspension or revocation of your real estate license or
registration. Please see the enclosed Explanation of Rights and Election of Rights form.
ER |
i
He
ee
CHARLES 0. BATES, JR., P.A.
Tat
CHARLES BATES
(a
UIVISIoN oF
ADRIN| STRAT] VE State Certified General Appratser
ie
Broker
HEARINGS 0002042
LIN: DA STEADMAN
roker-Salesman
September 5, 2002 : State Certified Residentint Appraiser
0001089
DENISE SHELTON
Clerk, US District Court State Certified General Appraiser
312 Spring Street ; 002087
Los Angeles, Ca. ; RONALD KEEL
Salesman
Dear Sirs,
Tam submitting the following appraisal on the property of Mrs. Jean Doan, 2907 Shell Road,
Lake Wales, Florida 33853, a, . .
I personally inspected the property and have made the necessary investigation and analysis of the
factors.affecting value, :
Itismy opinion the market value of this property as of September 5, 2002 was:
$390,000 THREE HUNDRED NINETY THOUSAND DOLLARS
T hope this information will be sufficient for your needs. Thank you for the opportunity to serve
you.
De
les Bates, Jr,
State Certified General
Appraiser RZ, 0000142
Sj
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
EXHIBIT #1
PAGE OF
exHipit__/ pace oe
' MAIL 4649 CALOOSA BLVD * OFFICE 4628 U.S, HIGHWAY 27S « LAKE WALES, FLORIDA 33853
OFFICE (863) 638-2203 + HOME (863) 638-2158 » FAX (863) 638-0808
PURPOSE OF APPRAISAL
The object of this appraisal is to estimate the market value
of the property in question. The market value has been defined by
the Society of Real Estate Appraisers as follows:
"The price which a property will bring ina competitive
market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, which would
result from negotiations between a buyer and a seller, each
acting prudently, with knowledge and without undue stimulus."
. According to this definition, market value is that value
‘which a knowledgeable buyer and seller would arrive at provided
neither party to the sale was unduly forced into the transaction.
As the reader can see, inherent in the market value definition is
the assumption that the subject property will be sold ata price
arrived at by a prudent buyer and seller. From this concept, the
American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers has recently altered
their definition to state: "Market value. is defined as the most
probable selling price."
Value must also have a chronological base. Value of a
particular. piece of property will in all Probability change from
one year to the next and possibly from month to month. Therefore,
the value estimate which results from this abpraisal shall be
considered reliable on the day in which the subject property was
inspected and researched for this appraisal was conducted, There~
fore,the effective date of this appraisal is September 5, 2002.
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
EXHIBIT # | .
a
PAGE. 2 OF
TEER ES
EXHIBIT.__| PA
ce /&
IMPROVEMENT DATA
The property being appraised consists of various improve
ments. There are 39 mobile home rental spaces, a 1990 Homes of
Merit mobile home, a two story converted barn being used for a
club house, and a duplex. The park contains septic tanks and a
water system for the rental spaces.The larger of the permanent
buildings is a converted barn. It has two stories with an
apartment and a laundry/recreational area on the first floor. The
building is of frame construction with composition and roll
roofing, wall air/heat, units, paneled walls, and carpeted floors.
There are about 1532 Square feet under roof.
The other building is a duplex with two (2) efficiency apart
ments. The construction is frame with asbestos shingles, composi
tion shingle roof, paneled and dry wall interior walls. There is
a screened porch across the entire front of the structure. At the
rear of this building there is a small storage building.
The 39 space mobile home park has been developed with the excep
tion of sewage disposal. Septic tanks are bring utilized at the
‘present time.
The main streets are paved with a portion still made of
shell/sand. Several of the sites are rented with year round
tenent and others are seasonal.
The site is located at the intersection of Shell Road and Starr
Avenue. The site is level with the roads is irregular in shape
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
EXHIBIT #_/
PAGE gg
and contains about 8 acres MOL.
exnipit___/ - pace_/7
Woodlawn Ave
Dekle Ra
Grove Rd
= .
4
. fe B
a -
—-*e
<=
o Pees
= \ the
a ¥
RM iL |
a _
ia a,
th
\ ion ry Hammock Rd
| me
All 27 N
Martinique.
ay,
. | Nlotintain
ake Station
*,
RATE COMPLAINT
| PLAT B00K=4, PAGES-72 8,
WL HOWE’ LAO (04089 =~C*C~C
3 4S
Ne
4
= 1A
:
>
Laat
+
ag
exnipir___| pace__/7
RIGHTS APPRAISED
The ownership of real estate is actually a right to the
ownership of a group of various rights which are considered to be
the basics of land ownership. These are: (1) the right of the
user; (2) the right of the exclusion; and (3) the right of
. disposition.
The right of the user deals with the concept that the owner
of a property has the power and the right to use his land in
whatever manner he desires. However, the owner's use may be
limited by governmental regulations. In order to insure the
welfare of the general population the government may set guide
linés which favor the interest of the majority over the interests
of the individual.
Local governments may also restrict the use of land by the
power of eminent domain... Through eminent domain, the government
May take land from an owner through the courts for whatever
public purpose that it deems is for the public good. At this
point, it is irrelevant whether the owner wishes to sell the land
or not, but the government must pay the landowner a fair market
value for it.
Another of the rights inherent in land ownership is the
right of exclusion. This implies that the landowner has the power
to allow or disallow any person from entering or using the
owner's property.
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
EXHIBIT #_{
Sn
PAGE q OF
EXHIBIT | Pace_2 °
RIGHTS APPRAISED (Cont)
The last right of a landowner is the right of disposition.
This allows the owner of the property to sell, lease, give, or
will his property to any person he desires.
Aside from the outright ownership of land, there are
various other methods of acquiring rights to a Property. One of
these is the leasehold in which the owner has agreed to allow
another to borrow from him certain rights to the ‘land for which
the owner is given consideration in the form of rent or lease
Payments. Another method is by a life estate in which the owner
of the estate has the right to use the property during his
lifetime but in the event of his death, the bundle of rights
mentioned above will transfer to a stipulated receiver called the
remainderman.
It is obvious that the value of the real estate will depend
upon the type of rights that an owner or user has in that
property. Therefore, for the purposes, of this appraisal, it will
be assumed that the owner has complete rights in the property in
question. This right is called.a fee simple title and it is this
fee simple right to the subject property which will be appraised
in this report.
Den RATE COMPLAINT
EXHIBIT #
“AGE hires OF
exuipit___/ page 2/
BAroll FF
PAGE
HIGHEST AND BEST USE
Highest and best (most probable) use is defined as that
reasonable and most probable use that will support the highest
present value, as defined, as of the effective date of the
appraisal. Alternatively that use, from among those reasonably
probable and legal alternative uses, must be physically possible,
appropriately supported, financially feasible and which results
in highest land value.
The definition immediately above implies specifically to the
highest and best use of land. It-is recognized that in cases
where a site has existing improvements on it, the highest and
best use may very well be determined to be different from the
existing use. The existing use will continue; however, unless and
until land value in its highest and best use exceeds the total
value of the property in its existing use.
Within these definitions is recognition that the
contribution of that specific use must contribute to community
environment or to community development goals in addition to
_ wealth maximization of individual property owners. Also implied
is that the determination of highest and best use results from
the appraisers' judgment and analytical skill, i.e.,that the use
determined from analysis represents an opinion not a fact to be
found. In appraisal practice, the concept of highest and best use
represents the premise upon which value is based. In the context
Sof most probable selling price (market value) another appropriate
~jterm to reflect highest and best use would be most probable use.
In the context of investment value, an alternative term would be
most profitable use.
exipit__! ss pace_22-
HIGHEST AND BEST USE (con't)
From this definition, four points are essential in the
, highest and best use analysis. These points must be discussed in
terms of the subject site as vacant, as well as improved. The
site is evaluated in terms of highest and best use as if vacant
in order to provide information concerning the maximum potential
of the site, whether as currently improved or with an alternative
use. The current improvements are evaluated in this section in
order to analyze the benefits derived by the current use in terms
of maximum functional utility and maximum profitability.
The four points refer to:
(1) Possible Use ~ To what uses it is physically possible
to put the site in question
(2) Permissible Use (Legal) _- What uses are permitted,
zoning and deed restriction on the site
in question?
(3) Feasible Use - What possible and permissible use will
produce any net return to the owner of
the site?
(4) Highest and Best Use - Among the Feasible uses, which
use will produce the highest net return
. or the highest present worth?
With respect to the subject property, the highest and best
use of the land would be for a rental mobile home park. The
present improvements could enhance this usage.
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
EXHIBIT # [’ ee
PAGE 1%
3
EXHIBIT. [pace &
STATEMENT OF COMPETENCY
Re: Appraisal of a Mobile Home Park on Shell Road, Lake
Wales, Florida 33853.
The appraiser has sufficient knowledge and experience in the
valuation of commercial properties to competently -complete the
assignment on the above referenced property.
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
EXHIBIT #_{
PAGE __!3 OF
- EXHIBIT. l pace_