Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY vs HOT HEADS, 06-001477 (2006)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 06-001477 Visitors: 9
Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY
Respondent: HOT HEADS
Judges: CAROLYN S. HOLIFIELD
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: Altamonte Springs, Florida
Filed: Apr. 25, 2006
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Thursday, May 4, 2006.

Latest Update: Dec. 23, 2024
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATIQRS COSMETOLOGY BOARD f b & if 105 ppp ~ DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND Al: PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, A ony) Vision 0g ; ; : ; ‘i Nis i 0 OF Petitioner, HE, A Rigid 7] ve VS. Case No. 2005-053130 HOT HEADS, Oo-(477 Respondent. / ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT. Petitioner, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION (“Department”), files this Administrative Complaint before the Board of Cosmetology, against HOT HEADS (“Respondent”), and says: 1. Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating the practice of cosmetology pursuant to Section 20.165, Florida Statutes, and Chapters ‘455 and 477, Florida Statutes, and the rules promulgated thereto. 2. Respondent’s address of record is 451 East Altamonte Drive #1209, Altamonte Springs, Florida 32701. 3, At all times materia] hereto, Respondent was licensed in the State of Florida as a cosmetology salon, having been issued license CE 9953433. 4, On or about October 10, 2005, Petitioner’s inspector, Evelyn Williams, conducted a routine annual inspection of Respondent salon. 5. During the inspection, Department of Business and Professional Regulation records revealed that Respondent’s license had been expired for ten months. 6. Section 477.0265(1)(b)1, Florida Statutes, states in pertinent part that it is unlawful for any person to “[o]wn, operate, maintain, open, establish, conduct, or have charge of, either alone or with another person or persons, a cosmetology salon or specialty salon: which is not licensed.” 7. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Section 477.029(1)G), Florida Statutes, by operating as a cosmetology salon with an expired license, and is thereby subject to discipline pursuant to Sections 477.029(1)(h) and (2), Florida Statutes. WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the Board of Cosmetology enter a Final Order imposing one or more of the following penalties: imposition of an administrative fine, revocation or suspension of the Respondent's license, issuance of a reprimand, placement of the Respondent on probation, restriction of Respondent's practice, and or any other relief which the Board deems appropriate. SIGNED this pt day of NM nae , 2006. Oash) t. One, Charles Tunnicliff Chief Professions Attorney Attormey for Petitioner: Charles Tunnicliff F L - . Chief Professions Attorney Department of Business and Professional Regutation Department of Business and AGENCY CLERK Professional Regulation 1940 North Monroe Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2202 Phone: (850) 487-9656 CLERK Son wh 2. (JewAwn mm Facsimile: (850) 414-6749 vate 2 2 2O0'6 CFT/tah Case # 2005-053130 7 ee cet ald

Docket for Case No: 06-001477
Issue Date Proceedings
May 04, 2006 Order Closing File. CASE CLOSED.
May 01, 2006 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed.
Apr. 25, 2006 Election of Rights filed.
Apr. 25, 2006 Administrative Complaint filed.
Apr. 25, 2006 Agency referral filed.
Apr. 25, 2006 Initial Order.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer