Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BARBER`S BOARD vs GEORGIA E. OSBORNE, 06-001479PL (2006)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 06-001479PL Visitors: 5
Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BARBER`S BOARD
Respondent: GEORGIA E. OSBORNE
Judges: SUSAN BELYEU KIRKLAND
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: Temple City, Florida
Filed: Apr. 25, 2006
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Wednesday, May 3, 2006.

Latest Update: Dec. 22, 2024
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION BARBERS’ BOARD if DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND 4 S PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, Olo- 4 IGPL “my tb & f) Petitioner, Oi Hs ‘oy 4 Ms 0 A S' ia) (of vs. Case No. 2005-058632 “4A, fi 4 Tie GEORGIA E. OSBORNE, Respondent. ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT Petitioner, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION (“Department”), files this Administrative Complaint before the Barbers’ Board, against GEORGIA E. OSBORNE (“Respondent”), and says: 1. Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating the practice of barbering pursuant to Section 20.165, Florida Statutes, and Chapters 455 and 476, Florida Statutes, and the rules promulgated thereto. 2. Respondent’s address of record is P.O. Box 1419, Zephythills, Florida 33539. 3. At all times material hereto, Respondent has been licensed as a barber in the State of Florida, holding license number BB 52917. 4. On or about October 20, 2005, Petitioner’s inspector, George Pavlich, Jr., conducted an inspection of Great American Barbershop based on an anonymous complaint alleging that Respondent was operating the barbershop without a license. 5. During the inspection, Department records revealed that Great American Barbershop was not licensed; Department records revealed that the previous license (BS 13059) * for the barbershop‘had expired November 30, 2004. 6. After the inspection, on ot about February 20, 2006, Petitioner’s inspector interviewed Hitomi E. Dennin, the previous owner of Great American Barbershop; during the interview, Petitioner’s inspector learned that Respondent had purchased the barbershop in December, 2003, or January, 2004. 7. Section 476.194(1)(e)1, Florida Statutes, provides that jt is unlawful for any person to “[o]wn, operate, maintain, open, establish, conduct, or have charge of, either alone or with another person or persons, a barbershop: which is not licensed under the provisions of [Chapter 476].” 8. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Section 476.194(1)(e)1, Florida Statutes, by operating a barbershop that was not licensed, and is therefore subject to disciplinary action by the Barbers’ Board pursuant to Section 476.204(2), Florida Statutes. WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the Barbers’ Board enter a Final Order imposing one or more of the following penalties: imposition of an administrative fine, revocation or suspension of the Respondent's license, issuance of a reprimand, placement of the Respondent on probation, restriction of Respondent’s practice, and or any other relief which the Board deems appropriate. SIGNED this Mo say of fl ore , 2006. F | L E D ; ; cv) 7 Department aha and rates Regulation @ hu bl ca Danuctth Charles Tunnicliff CLERK Burk & Yaa ne DATE. -Z i 006 Chief Professions Attorney ee Attorney for Petitioner: Charles Tunnicliff Chief Professions Attorney Office of the General Counsel Department of Business and Professional Regulation 1940 North Monroe Street Tallahassee, Florida, 32399-2202 Phone: (850) 487-9656 Facsimile: (850) 414-6749 CFT/tah Case Number: 2005-058632 pe Get 3-06

Docket for Case No: 06-001479PL
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer