Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BARBER`S BOARD
Respondent: GEORGIA E. OSBORNE
Judges: SUSAN BELYEU KIRKLAND
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: Temple City, Florida
Filed: Apr. 25, 2006
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Wednesday, May 3, 2006.
Latest Update: Dec. 22, 2024
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION
BARBERS’ BOARD
if
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND 4 S
PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, Olo- 4 IGPL “my tb & f)
Petitioner, Oi Hs ‘oy 4 Ms 0
A S' ia) (of
vs. Case No. 2005-058632 “4A, fi 4 Tie
GEORGIA E. OSBORNE,
Respondent.
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
Petitioner, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION
(“Department”), files this Administrative Complaint before the Barbers’ Board, against
GEORGIA E. OSBORNE (“Respondent”), and says:
1. Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating the practice of barbering
pursuant to Section 20.165, Florida Statutes, and Chapters 455 and 476, Florida Statutes, and the
rules promulgated thereto.
2. Respondent’s address of record is P.O. Box 1419, Zephythills, Florida 33539.
3. At all times material hereto, Respondent has been licensed as a barber in the State
of Florida, holding license number BB 52917.
4. On or about October 20, 2005, Petitioner’s inspector, George Pavlich, Jr.,
conducted an inspection of Great American Barbershop based on an anonymous complaint
alleging that Respondent was operating the barbershop without a license.
5. During the inspection, Department records revealed that Great American
Barbershop was not licensed; Department records revealed that the previous license (BS 13059)
* for the barbershop‘had expired November 30, 2004.
6. After the inspection, on ot about February 20, 2006, Petitioner’s inspector
interviewed Hitomi E. Dennin, the previous owner of Great American Barbershop; during the
interview, Petitioner’s inspector learned that Respondent had purchased the barbershop in
December, 2003, or January, 2004.
7. Section 476.194(1)(e)1, Florida Statutes, provides that jt is unlawful for any
person to “[o]wn, operate, maintain, open, establish, conduct, or have charge of, either alone or
with another person or persons, a barbershop: which is not licensed under the provisions of
[Chapter 476].”
8. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Section 476.194(1)(e)1, Florida
Statutes, by operating a barbershop that was not licensed, and is therefore subject to disciplinary
action by the Barbers’ Board pursuant to Section 476.204(2), Florida Statutes.
WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the Barbers’ Board enter a Final Order
imposing one or more of the following penalties: imposition of an administrative fine, revocation
or suspension of the Respondent's license, issuance of a reprimand, placement of the Respondent
on probation, restriction of Respondent’s practice, and or any other relief which the Board deems
appropriate.
SIGNED this Mo say of fl ore , 2006.
F | L E D ; ; cv) 7
Department aha and rates Regulation @ hu bl ca Danuctth
Charles Tunnicliff
CLERK Burk & Yaa ne
DATE. -Z i 006
Chief Professions Attorney
ee
Attorney for Petitioner:
Charles Tunnicliff
Chief Professions Attorney
Office of the General Counsel
Department of Business and Professional Regulation
1940 North Monroe Street
Tallahassee, Florida, 32399-2202
Phone: (850) 487-9656
Facsimile: (850) 414-6749
CFT/tah
Case Number: 2005-058632
pe Get 3-06
Docket for Case No: 06-001479PL