Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY vs GUADALUPE HERRERA, 06-002337PL (2006)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 06-002337PL Visitors: 2
Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY
Respondent: GUADALUPE HERRERA
Judges: ERROL H. POWELL
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: Miami, Florida
Filed: Jul. 03, 2006
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Friday, August 18, 2006.

Latest Update: Sep. 22, 2024
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION COSMETOLOGY BOARD . G a yt €€ DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND OS, p “et PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, ep a 63 Petitioner, Gekg On s Ga vs. Case No. 2006-011253 “ GUADALUPE HERRERA, Respondent. / ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT Petitioner, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION (“Department”), files this Administrative Complaint before the Board of Cosmetology, against GUADALUPE HERRERA (“Respondent”), and says: 1. Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating the practice of cosmetology pursuant to Section 20.165, Florida Statutes, and Chapters 455 and 477, Florida Statutes, and the rules promulgated thereto. 2. Respondent’s address of record is 9347 Jamaica Drive, Miami, Florida 33189. 3. At all times material hereto, Respondent was unlicensed in the State of Florida as a cosmetologist. 4. On or about February 25, 2006, Petitioner’s inspector, Idelmis Delrio, conducted a routine inspection of THE CLASSIC BARBER SHOP (CE 9964700), located at 6226 South Dixie Highway, Miami, Florida 33143. 5. During the inspection, Petitioner’s inspector observed Respondent cutting a customer’s hair for twelve dollars. 6. During the inspection, Department of Business and Professional Regulation records revealed that Respondent was unlicensed in the State of Florida. 7. Section 477.0265(1)(a), Florida Statutes, states in pertinent part that it is unlawful for any person to “[e]ngage in the practice of cosmetology or a specialty without an active license.” 8. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Section 477.029(1)(i), Florida Statutes by performing cosmetology services without a license, and is thereby subject to discipline pursuant to Sections 477.029(1)(h) and (2), Florida Statutes. WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the Board of Cosmetology enter a Final Order imposing one or more of the following penalties: imposition of an administrative fine, revocation or suspension of the Respondent's license, issuance of a reprimand, placement of the Respondent on probation, restriction of Respondent's practice, and or any other relief which the Board deems appropriate. SIGNED this tony of M Cup , 2006. NG) CE Dias yy, f L E D Charles F. ailad P- Department of Business and Professional Regulation i ions At AGENCY CLERK Chief Professions Attorney “ CLERK Seay 2. W nay DATE -24 -2Z0Ol. Attorney for Petitioner: Charles F. Tunnicliff Chief Professions Attorney Department of Business and Professional Regulation 1940 North Monroe Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2202 Phone: (850) 487-9656 Facsimile: (850) 414-6749 CFT/jjc Case # 2006-011253 PE GET S-/E-06

Docket for Case No: 06-002337PL
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer