Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION vs FRANCIS BARBERENA, 06-002738 (2006)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 06-002738 Visitors: 22
Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION
Respondent: FRANCIS BARBERENA
Judges: ERROL H. POWELL
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: Miami, Florida
Filed: Jul. 31, 2006
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Thursday, August 17, 2006.

Latest Update: Dec. 26, 2024
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION COSMETOLOGY BOARD ie yy DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND 2106 JUL 3 | A llr 33 PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, biviern ac oi0l & Petiti ADM BIST. fa vy etitioner, HEARINGS (E vs. Case No. 2006-007681 a aN ‘/ FRANCIS BARBERENA, Oe &T3Y Respondent. / ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT. Petitioner, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION (“Department”), files this Administrative Complaint before the Board of Cosmetology, against FRANCIS BARBERENA (“Respondent”), and says: 1, Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating the practice of cosmetology pursuant to Section 20.165, Florida Statutes, and Chapters 455 and 477, Florida Statutes, and the rules promulgated thereto. 2. Respondent’s address of record is 11985 Southwest 184" Terrace, Miami, Florida 33177. 3. At all times material hereto, Respondent was unlicensed in the State of Florida as a nail specialist. 4. On or about February 3, 2006, Petitioner’s inspector, Garry Joinville, conducted an inspection of INTERNATIONAL UNISEX STYLING CORP (CE 9956462). 5. During the inspection, Petitioner’s inspector observed Respondent performing a manicure on a client. 6. During the inspection, Department of Business and Professional Regulation records revealed that Respondent was unlicensed as a nail specialist. 7. Section 477.0265(1)(a), Florida Statutes, states in pertinent part that it is unlawful for any person to “[e]ngage in the practice of cosmetology or a specialty without an active license.” 8. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Section 477.029(1)(), Florida Statutes, by performing a specialty without a license, and is thereby subject to discipline pursuant to Sections 477,029(1)(h) and (2), Florida Statutes. WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the Board of Cosmetology enter a Final Order imposing one or more of the following penalties: imposition of an administrative fine, revocation or suspension of the Respondent's license, issuance of a reprimand, placement of the Respondent on probation, restriction of Respondent's practice, and or any other relief which the Board deems appropriate. SIGNED this fl day of 8 , 2006. Alo: Qu F | Charles Tunnicliff ji jon : : Department of Business and Professional Regulatio Chief Professions Attorney AGENCY CLERK Attorney for Petitioner: Charles Tunnicliff Chief Professions Attorney Department of Business and Professional Regulation 1940 North Monroe Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2202 Phone: (850) 487-9656 Facsimile: (850) 414-6749 CFT/tah Case # 2006-007681 Vd Cet S- Ob

Docket for Case No: 06-002738
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer