Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

BARBARA SALBER vs ATLASS INSURANCE, 06-003535 (2006)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 06-003535 Visitors: 13
Petitioner: BARBARA SALBER
Respondent: ATLASS INSURANCE
Judges: DANIEL M. KILBRIDE
Agency: Commissions
Locations: Viera, Florida
Filed: Sep. 19, 2006
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Thursday, February 1, 2007.

Latest Update: May 03, 2007
Summary: Whether Petitioner can prove that Respondent, Atlass Insurance, qualifies as an "employer" under Section 760.02(7), Florida Statutes (2005),1 so that the Florida Commission on Human Relations has jurisdiction to conduct an investigation under Section 760.06(5), Florida Statutes.Petitioner failed to prove that Respondent qualified as an"employer" under the statute. The company functioned as two separate entities. Recommend that the petition be dismissed.
06-3535.PDF

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


BARBARA SALBER,


Petitioner,


vs.


ATLASS INSURANCE,


Respondent.

)

)

)

)

) Case No. 06-3535

)

)

)

)

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


Pursuant to Notice, a hearing was held in this case before Daniel M. Kilbride, Administrative Law Judge of the Division of Administrative Hearings, on November 28, 2006, in Melbourne, Florida.

APPEARANCES


For Petitioner: Barbara Salber, pro se

200 South Banana River Boulevard, No. 1604 Cocoa Beach, Florida 32931


For Respondent: Kimberly A. Gilmour, Esquire

Kimberly A. Gilmour, P.A. 4179 Davie Road, Suite 101

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33314 STATEMENT OF ISSUES

Whether Petitioner can prove that Respondent, Atlass Insurance, qualifies as an "employer" under Section 760.02(7), Florida Statutes (2005),1 so that the Florida Commission on Human

Relations has jurisdiction to conduct an investigation under Section 760.06(5), Florida Statutes.

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT


Petitioner filed a charge of discrimination with the Florida Commission on Human Relations (FCHR) on February 13, 2006, alleging that Respondent, Atlass Insurance, had violated the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, on the basis of the Petitioner's age. An investigation was conducted and FCHR issued a Determination of No Jurisdiction, on August 11, 2006. It was held that the "Commission lacks jurisdiction over the Complaint of Discrimination based on the fact that the Respondent is not an "Employer" within the meaning of Section 760.02(7), Florida Statutes.

Petitioner timely filed a Petition for Relief. This matter was referred to the Division of Administrative Hearings (DOAH) on September 15, 2006, and was set for hearing. Respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss, which was denied without prejudice.

On motion of the parties, the final hearing was continued until November 28, 2006, and the issue was limited to the question of whether Petitioner can prove that Respondent was an "employer" under the statute.

At the final hearing, Petitioner testified on her own behalf, and offered Exhibits 1 through 7, which were received in evidence. An e-mail, dated January 26, 2006, was offered by

Petitioner, but was not received in evidence. Respondent called James Okonski as a witness. Respondent also entered in evidence Exhibits 1 through 4.

A transcript of the hearing was ordered and filed on December 15, 2006. Petitioner filed two letters, dated December 7 and 21, 2006, respectively, which have been considered as proposed findings of fact. Respondent filed its Proposed Recommended Order on December 18, 2006.

FINDINGS OF FACT


  1. Petitioner, Barbara Salber, was an employee of Florida Hiway Insurance, Inc., beginning in 2005 and worked at an office located at 55 Goodwin Drive, Suite 103, Merritt Island, Florida, until she was terminated in December, 2005. Early in 2005, the corporation was purchased by buyers from the Ft. Lauderdale area, who became officers and stockholders of the corporation. In May, 2005, the company changed its name to Atlass Insurance Merritt Island, Inc.

  2. Petitioner admitted that she does not know who her actual employer was, Atlass Insurance Group, Inc., or Atlass Insurance Merritt Island, Inc. Petitioner was unable to testify as to the number of employees working at the Atlass Insurance Merritt Island office in July, August, September, October, November or December of 2005.

  3. Petitioner testified that she was an employee of only one company from July through December 2005, and she only received paychecks from that company during that time period. The W-2 that Petitioner received for working in 2005 was from Florida Hiway Insurance, Inc., not Atlass Insurance Group, Inc., Jim Okonski or Frank Atlass. The name Atlass Insurance Merritt Island, Inc., did not appear on the W-2 for 2005.

  4. Jim Okonski is an officer and stockholder in the two corporations, Atlass Insurance Group, Inc., and Atlass Insurance Merritt Island, Inc.

  5. Atlass Insurance Group, Inc., is located in


    Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, and it did not employ Barbara Salber at any time. The UCT-6 forms for Atlass Insurance Group lists employees during each quarter, and Barbara Salber was never listed as an employee in 2005. The most employees during any quarter in 2005, employed by Atlass Insurance Group, Inc., was ten.

  6. Florida Hiway Insurance, Inc., was formed in 1994, and is a licensed Florida Insurance Agency. In May 2005, it changed its name to Atlass Insurance Merritt Island, Inc. Records prepared by IRS and the State of Florida still showed the former company name. Petitioner was listed on the UCT-6 form for Florida Hiway Insurance n/k/a Atlass Insurance Merritt Island, Inc. as an employee during 2005. The maximum number of

    employees Atlass Insurance Merritt Island, Inc. had in 2005, was thirteen.

  7. The UC account numbers for the two different corporations are different from each other. Each corporation has its own UC account number. The same is true for the Federal Employer Identification number. Each corporation has its own Florida Employment ID number. Separate bank accounts were kept for each corporation. There was no showing that the corporate funds were ever co-mingled.

  8. Russell Jamieson was responsible for the day-to-day operations of the Atlass Insurance Merritt Island Company in 2005, and was Petitioner's supervisor. He was not connected with the day-to-day operations of Atlass Insurance Group, Inc. in Ft. Lauderdale.

  9. The hours of operation for the two companies are different, and each company has its own workers' compensation insurance. They also have different general liability insurance policies. Although Petitioner was under the belief that there was a merger between Atlass Insurance Group, Inc., and Florida Insurance, Inc., in 2005, the best evidence showed that Frank Atlass purchased stock from Florida Hiway Insurance, Inc., and eventually the company's name was changed in May of 2005.

  10. Petitioner never worked in Ft. Lauderdale, and she never visited the Atlass Insurance Group, Inc., whose only office is located in Ft. Lauderdale.

  11. Petitioner testified that throughout 2005 and 2006 there were only eight employees in the Merritt Island office. Even when Petitioner testified as to the names of the employees in the office, while she worked there, she could not list and did not list more than ten names.

  12. Petitioner was an employee of Florida Hiway Insurance, Inc. n/k/a Atlass Insurance Merritt Island, Inc., and, during the calendar year 2005, it never employed fifteen employees or more.

    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


  13. The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this proceeding. §§ 120.569, 120.57(1), and 760.10, Fla. Stat.

  14. The FCHR is empowered to investigate complaints alleging any discriminatory employment practice under the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992. § 760.02(7), Fla. Stat.

  15. It is an unlawful employment practice for an employer to discharge or otherwise discriminate against any individual because of such individual's age. § 760.10(1)(a), Florida Statutes.

  16. In order to investigate a complaint of alleged age discrimination, the person or corporation alleged to have committed an unlawful employment practice must qualify as an "employer" under the statutes.

  17. An "employer," as that term is used in the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, is defined in, Section 760.02(7), Florida Statutes, as "any person employing 15 or more employees for each working day in each of 20 or more calendar weeks in the current or preceding calendar year, and any agent of such a person." Petitioner has the burden of proving that her employer meets this definition. Florida Department of Transportation v J. W. C. Co. Inc., 396 So. 2d 778 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).

  18. Respondent contends that Petitioner has not met her burden, that the FCHR has no jurisdiction over the employer, Atlass Insurance of Merritt Island, Inc., or over Atlass Insurance Group, Inc., since neither company had fifteen or more employees during the relevant time, and the two companies together are not a single employer or a joint employer. The evidence at the hearing demonstrates that Petitioner failed to meet her burden as to the jurisdiction of the FCHR. Petitioner was unsuccessful in providing any evidence at the hearing that either Atlass Insurance Merritt Island, Inc., or Atlass Insurance Group, Inc., had the required number of employees.

  19. It is clear from the evidence that the employer of the Petitioner was Atlass Insurance Merritt Island, Inc., and she was never employed by Atlass Insurance Group, Inc. The two corporations are separate and distinct legal entities and are not a single employer or an integrated enterprise. Cf. Lyles vs. City of Riviera Beach, Fla., 166 F.3d 1332, 1341 (11th Cir. 1999).

  20. Therefore, there is no jurisdiction for the FCHR to investigate the complaint, since Atlass Insurance Merritt Island, Inc., does not have the required number of employees pursuant to the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, and further, Atlass Insurance Group, Inc., was not the employer of the Petitioner.

RECOMMENDATIONS


Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is

RECOMMENDED that:


The Florida Commission on Human Relations enter a final order dismissing, with prejudice, the Petition for Relief because it lacks jurisdiction over the employer, Atlass Insurance Merritt Island, Inc., or Atlass Insurance Group, Inc.

DONE AND ORDERED this 1st day of February, 2007, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.

S

DANIEL M. KILBRIDE

Administrative Law Judge

Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675

Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 1st day of February, 2007.


ENDNOTE


1\ All references to Florida Statutes are to Florida Statutes (2005), unless otherwise indicated.


COPIES FURNISHED:


Denise Crawford, Agency Clerk Florida Commission on Human Relations 2009 Apalachee Parkway, Suite 100

Tallahassee, Florida 32301


Kimberly A. Gilmour, Esquire Kimberly A. Gilmour, P.A.

4179 Davie Road, Suite 101 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33314


Barbara Salber

200 South Banana River Boulevard, No. 1604 Cocoa Beach, Florida 32931

Cecil Howard, General Counsel Florida Commission on Human Relations 2009 Apalachee Parkway, Suite 100

Tallahassee, Florida 32301


NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS


All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within

15 days from the date of this recommended order. Any exceptions to this recommended order should be filed with the agency that will issue the final order in this case.


Docket for Case No: 06-003535
Issue Date Proceedings
May 03, 2007 Final Order Dismissing Petition for Relief from an Unlawful Employment Practice filed.
Feb. 12, 2007 Letter to Judge Kilbride from B. Salber regarding exceptions to the recommended order filed.
Feb. 01, 2007 Recommended Order (hearing held November 28, 2006). CASE CLOSED.
Feb. 01, 2007 Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
Dec. 21, 2006 Letter to Judge Kilbride from B. Sabler regarding information covered in the hearing filed.
Dec. 18, 2006 Letter to Judge Kilbride from K. Gilmour enclosing a written closing along with a recommended order filed.
Dec. 15, 2006 Transcript of Proceedings filed.
Dec. 15, 2006 Notice of Filing, Transcript filed.
Dec. 07, 2006 Letter to Judge Kilbride from B.Salber regarding copy of transcript filed.
Nov. 28, 2006 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Nov. 13, 2006 Agency`s court reporter confirmation letter filed with the Judge.
Nov. 08, 2006 Amended Order Re-scheduling Hearing (hearing set for November 28, 2006; 9:00 a.m.; Viera, FL).
Nov. 07, 2006 Order Re-scheduling Hearing (hearing set for November 28, 2006; 9:00 a.m.; Viera, FL).
Nov. 06, 2006 Reply to Petitioner`s Correspondence dated October 31, 2006 Regarding the Motion to Dismiss filed.
Nov. 06, 2006 Order (Respondent`s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction is denied, without prejudice; Respondent`s motion for change of venue is denied).
Oct. 31, 2006 Letter to Judge Kilbride from B. Salber enclosing documents filed.
Oct. 27, 2006 Respondents` Notice of Filing Availability for Rescheduling of the Final Hearing.
Oct. 27, 2006 Letter to Judge Kilbride from B. Salber responding to the Order Granting Continuance filed.
Oct. 20, 2006 Order Granting Continuance (parties to advise status by October 27, 2006).
Oct. 18, 2006 Witness List filed.
Oct. 18, 2006 Initial Disclosure filed.
Oct. 12, 2006 Motion for Continuance filed.
Oct. 12, 2006 Motion to Dismiss Petition for Relief filed.
Oct. 04, 2006 Agency`s court reporter confirmation letter filed with the Judge.
Oct. 03, 2006 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
Oct. 03, 2006 Notice of Hearing (hearing set for November 1, 2006; 9:00 a.m.; Viera, FL).
Sep. 27, 2006 Letter to Judge Kilbride from Petitioner responding to the Initial Order filed with attachments.
Sep. 19, 2006 Employment Complaint of Discrimination fled.
Sep. 19, 2006 Notice of Determination: No Jurisdiction filed.
Sep. 19, 2006 Determination: No Jurisdiction filed.
Sep. 19, 2006 Petition for Relief filed.
Sep. 19, 2006 Transmittal of Petition filed by the Agency.
Sep. 19, 2006 Initial Order.

Orders for Case No: 06-003535
Issue Date Document Summary
May 01, 2007 Agency Final Order
Feb. 01, 2007 Recommended Order Petitioner failed to prove that Respondent qualified as an"employer" under the statute. The company functioned as two separate entities. Recommend that the petition be dismissed.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer