Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE vs TITO N. RODRIGUEZ, 06-003634PL (2006)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 06-003634PL Visitors: 30
Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE
Respondent: TITO N. RODRIGUEZ
Judges: LARRY J. SARTIN
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: Miami, Florida
Filed: Sep. 21, 2006
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Tuesday, February 27, 2007.

Latest Update: Dec. 25, 2024
“ay , STATE OF FLORIDA “ey DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL REGULATION * Y FLORIDA REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL BOARD Kiss i, he “ Gs of y Ge vy OY, ‘£ FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, & DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE, Petitioner, v. CASE NO. 2002000853 TITO M. a ) (6 -% (4 au p L / ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT The Florida Department of Business & Professional Regulation, Division of Real Estate ("Petitioner") files this Administrative Complaint against Tito M. Rodriguez (“Respondent"), and alleges: ESSENTIAL ALLEGATIONS OF MATERIAL FACT 1. Petitioner is a state government licensing and regulatory agency charged with the responsibility and duty to prosecute Administrative Complaints pursuant to the laws of the State of Florida, including Section 20.165 and Chapters 120, 455 and 475 of the Florida Statutes, and the rules promulgated thereunder. 2. Respondent is currently a Florida state certified residential real estate appraiser having been issued license 3350 in accordance with Chapter 475 Part I of the Florida Statutes. 3. The last license the State issued to Respondent was as a state certified residential real estate appraiser at 701 Three Islands Blvd. #118, Hallandale, Florida 33009. 4. On or about January 16, 2001, Respondent prepared and published an appraisal report on FDBPR v. Tito M. Rodriguez Case No. 2002000853 Administrative Complaint a property located at 92 East High Street, Oviedo, Florida. (Hereinafter referred to as the property). A copy of the report is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Administrative Complaint Exhibit 1. 5. Respondent signed the appraisal report as the supervisory appraiser for Joan Ramon Rodriguez, a registered assistant real estate appraiser. 6. Respondent states in the appraisal report that the property had a gross living area of 863 square feet. 7. Respondent appears to grossly misstate the square footage of the property. A copy of the documents are attached hereto and incorporated herein as Administrative Complaint Exhibit 2 and 3. 8. Respondent reports that comparable sale #1 was located in a site of 10,400 square feet, being 3,200 square feet larger than the property. . 9. Respondent makes an adjustment of $6,000 on comparable #1, and does not document, in the working file, the process or reason for the adjustment 10. Respondent reports that comparable sale #2 was located in a site of 6900 square feet, being 300 square feet smaller than the property. 11. Respondent makes an adjustment of $10,000 on comparable #2, and does not document, in the working file, the process or reason for the adjustment. 12. Respondent reports that comparable sale #3 was located in a site of 15,650 square feet, being 8450 square feet larger than the property. 13. Respondent makes an adjustment of $12,000 on comparable #3, and does not document, FDBPR v. Tito M. Rodriguez Case No. 2002000853 Administrative Complaint . in the working file, the process or reason for the adjustment. 14. Atno time material did Respondent document in the working file, the process used to determine the value to be used, to adjust the comparable sales for the difference in square footage of gross living area. 15. At no time material did Respondent document in the working file the process used to determined the value of the property based on the cost approached. COUNT I Based upon the foregoing, Respondent is guilty of having failed to exercise reasonable diligence in developing an appraisal report in violation of Section 475.624(15), Florida Statutes. COUNT I Based upon the foregoing, Respondent has violated a standard for the development or communication of a real estate appraisal, specifically Standard 1-1(b) and (c), or other provision of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice in violation of Section 475.624(14), Florida Statutes. WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the Florida Real Estate Appraisal Board, or - the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, as may be appropriate, to issue a Final Order as final agency action finding the Respondent(s) guilty as charged. The penalties which may be imposed for violation(s) of Chapter 475 of the Florida Statutes, depending upon the severity of the offense(s), include: revocation of the license, registration, or certificate; suspension of the license, registration or certificate for a period not to exceed ten (10) years; imposition of an administrative fine of up to $5,000 for each count or offense; imposition of investigative costs; FDBPR v. Tito M. Rodriguez Case No. 2002000853 Administrative Complaint issuance of a reprimand; imposition of probation subject to terms including, but not limited to, requiring the licensee, registrant, or certificate holder to complete and pass additional appraisal education courses; publication, or any combination of the foregoing which may apply. See Section 475.624, Florida Statutes and Rule 61J1-8.002, Florida Administrative Code. The penalties which may be imposed for violation(s) of Chapter 455 of the Florida Statutes, depending upon the severity of the offense(s), include: revocation of the license, registration, or certificate; suspension of the license, registration, or certificate for a period not to exceed ten (10) years; imposition of an administrative fine of up to $5,000 for each count or offense; imposition of investigative costs; issuance of a reprimand; imposition of probation subject to terms including, but not limited to, requiring the licensee, registrant, or certificate holder to complete and pass additional appraisal education courses; publication; restriction of practice; injunctive or mandamus relief; imposition of a cease and desist order; or any combination of the foregoing which may apply. See Section 455.227, Fla. Statutes and Florida Administrative Code Rule 61J1-8.002. SIGNED this 3 __ dayof_Mare_h_ , 2004. 1 HCA Florida Department of Busimess and Professional Regulation ir By: Jason Steele Director, Division of Real Estate FDBPR v. Tito M. Rodriguez Case No. 2002000853 Administrative Complaint ATTORNEY FOR PETITIONER A. Santana, Senior Attorney Fla. Bar No. 318360 Division of Real Estate Legal Section 400 W. Robinson Street; N801 Orlando, Florida 32801-1757 (407) 481-5632 (407) 317-7260 - FAX CP: JS/DB/JB 3/1/04 NOTICE TO RESPONDENTS PLEASE BE ADVISED that mediation under Section 120.573 of the Florida Statutes, is not available for administrative disputes involving this type of agency action. PLEASE BE FURTHER ADVISED that pursuant to this Administrative Complaint you may request, within the time proscribed, a hearing to be conducted in this matter in accordance with Sections 120.569 and 120.57 of the Florida Statutes; that you have the right, at your option and expense, to be represented by counsel or other qualified representative in this matter; and that you have the right, at your option and expense, to take testimony, to call and cross-examine witnesses, and to have subpoena and subpoena duces tecum issued on your behalf if a formal hearing is requested. PLEASE BE FURTHER ADVISED that if you do not file an Election of Rights form or some other responsive pleading with the Petitioner within twenty-one (21) days of receipt of this Administrative Complaint, the Petitioner will file with the Florida Real Estate Appraisal Board a motion requesting an informal hearing and entry of an appropriate Final Order which may result in the suspension or revocation of your real estate license or registration. Please see the enclosed Explanation of Rights and Election of Rights form. kK 2 oO. = oO Le Oo (oe) Lu = fe < It should be nated that the appralser has adjusted across the soles comparision analysts for site area dilferances. Adjusiments ig fats ware based on tax rolls assessment {and value, CickFORMS Real Estata Apptaisal Sofware by Stadiord Technologins (800) 622-8727 30! File No, 99232. ____ SKETCH ADDENDUM : . . \ Borrower Hemby Dewayne. & Kelly P - Property Address 92 © High Street ' City Oviedo County Semingle_ State Fl Zip Codg32765 Lender/Cllent Security Mortgage Group Address 37 N Orange Avenue, Orlando, FL 32801 97.0' . 7.0' . 12.0' 12.0' 16.0' Deck (©) 16.0! . ; 7.0 Play House 37.0' 478 34,0 Kitchen Laundry | go: \ . Dining 7 21.0! 21.0' 21.0 (? Cy) 1 Car Garage 19.0" Bedroom ; 178 i709 a7.0 SKETCH CALCULATIONS A1!7.0x12.0 2 84.0 Play Housa 44.0 Fatal Misc, Aron -84.0 . | Aa: 17.0% 21,0 = 969.6 Second Floar 969.6 AI: 94,0X8,0 = 272.0 x) AQS17.0xX19.05 | 221.0 First Floor (BO 493.0 Tatal Uving Aroo 862.5 1s ABII7.0X13.0= Garryt 221.0 f Detached Garaga( &) 221.0 Tota! Garago Aron 221.0 p+ _¢ _ Deck 592.0 Total Patlo/Deck Area 502.0 b J CIcKFORMS Asal Estate Approtsal Software by Braulord Tachnologias (800) 622-8727 BOA. LOCATION MAP ADDENDUM File No, 99292 00 ‘ Borrower Hemby Dewayne F & Kelly P - fcr High Street Gi Ovleda. 2B Hla County, Seminole. a State FL Zip Code3?2765. Lender/Cllent Security Morigage Group___ Address 37 N Orange Avenue, Orlando, Fl 32801. HSt 32765 CickFORMS Real Estate Appratsal Sefwara by Brndtcrd Technologies (800) 022-8727 303 PLAT MAP ADDENDUM . File No. 99232 . A Borrower Hemby Rewayne & & Kelly P. oie ‘Oviede. ‘ah Street County. Seminole Stale FL Zip Cod:G2765 JO. FL 32804 Lender/Client Security Mortgage Group______Aderess 37 N Orange Avenue, Orland: —, aa ees pee | meee CickFORMS ual Estate Appraisal Sofware by Bradiotd Tachnologles (800) 622-8727 B04 SUBJECT PHOTO ADDENDUM ~ ” File No, 99292 Borrower, Hemby Dewayne E & Kelly P - : 4 Property Address_92 F High Street City Oviedo County Seminole : State Fl... Zip Code3?765 LenderCilent Security Mortgage Grou Address mange Avenue,.Orlando, Fl 328011. FRONT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY Address 92E High Street . Oviedo REAR OF SUBJECT PROPERTY a J 7 STREET SCENE : ; uo 3 Oo lu 4 rm ‘CEchFORMS Rea! Estalo Appralxal Software by Bradiond Technologins (800) 622-8727 305 XHIBIT 7 COMPARABLES 1-2-3 PHOTO ADDENDUM FileNo, 99232 by Dewayne E.& Kelly F : 1. : City. Oviedo. county Seminole Slate FL ‘ Zip Code 92765 enderfClient Seourity.Marigage Group__ Addtess__37 N Orange Avenue. Orlando, FL 32804 COMPARABLE SALE #1 Address 547 Oak Street Oviedo COMPARABLE SALE #2 Address 908 N Lake Claire Circle Oviedo COMPARABLE SALE #3 Address 150 E High Street Oviedo CickFORMS Real Estola Appralaal Sottware by Bradiand Tachnologias {800} 622-8727 Ble DEFINITION OF MARKET VALUE: The most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller, each acting prudently, knowledgeably and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimutus. Implicit in this definition is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under condilions wheréby: (1) buyer and seller are typically motivated; (2) both parties are well informed or well advised, and each acting in what he considers his own best interest; @) a reasonable time fs allowed for exposure in the open market; (4) payment Is made in terms of cash in U. S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and (5) the price represents the normal consideration for the properly sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions" granted by anyone associated with the sale. *Adjusiments to the comparables must be made for special or creative financing or sales concessions, No adjustments are necessary for those costs which are normally pald by sellers as a result of tradition or law In a market, these costs are readily identifiable since the seller pays these costs in virtually all sales transactions. Special or creative financing adjustments can be made to the comparable property by comparisons to financing terms offered by a third party institutional lender that is not already Involved in the property or transaction. Any adjustment should not be calculated on a mechanical dollar for doltar cost of the financing or concession but the dollar amount of any adjustment should approximate the markel's reaction to the financing or concessions based on the appraiser's judgment. STATEMENT OF LIMITING CONDITIONS AND APPRAISER'S CERTIFICATION CONTINGENT AND LIMITING ‘CONDITIONS: The appraiser's certification that appears in the appraisal report is subject to the following conditlans: 1. The appraiser will not be responsible for matters of a legal nature that affect either the properly being appraised or the title to it. The appraiser assumes that the title Is good and marketable and, therefore, will not render any opinions aboul the litle. The property is appraised on the basis of it being under responsible ownership. 2. The appraiser has provided a skelch in the appralsal report to show approximate dimensions of the improvements and the sketch Is Included only to assist the reader of the report in visualizing the properly and understanding the appraiser's determination of ils size. a. The appralser has examined the available flood maps that are provided by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (or other dala sources) and has noted in the appraisal report whether the subject site is located in an identified Special Flood Hazard Area. Because the appraiser is not a surveyor, he or she makes no guarantees, express or implied, regarding this determination, 4, The appraiser will not give lestimony or appear in court because he or she made an appraisal of the properly in question, unless specific arrangements to do so have been made beforehand. . 5. The.appraiser has estimated the value of the land in the cost approach at its highest and best use and the improvements at thelr contributory value, These separale valuations of the land and improvements must not be used in conjunction with any olher appraisal and are invalid if they are so used, . 6, The appraiser has noted in the appraisal report any adverse conditions (such as, needed repairs, depreciation, the presence of hazardous wastes, toxic substances, elc.) observed during the Inspection of the subject property or that he or she became aware of during the normal research Involved in performing the appraisal. Unless otherwise stated in the appraisal report, (he appraiser has no knowledge of any hidden or unapparent conditions of the properly or adverse environmental conditions @ncluding the presence of hazardous wastes, toxic substances, etc.) that would make the property more or Jess valuable, and has assumed thal there are no such condilions and makes no guaranlees ot warranties, express or Implied, regarding the condition of the properly. The appraiser will not be responsible far any such conditions that do exist or for any engineering or testing that might be required to discover whether such conditions exist, Because the appraiser is not an expert in the field of environmental hazards, the appraisal report must not be considered as an environmental assessment of the property. 7. The appraiser obtained the information, estimates, and opinions that were expressed in the appraisal report {rom sources that he or she considers to be reliable and believes them lo be true and correct, The appraiser does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of such items that were furnished by other parties. 8. The appraiser will not disclose the contents of the appraisal report excepl as provided for in the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, . 9, The appraiser has based his or her appraisal repart and valuation conclusion for an appraisal that is subject lo satisfactory completion, repairs, or alterations on the assumption that completion of the improvements will be performed in a workmanlike manner. 10, The appraiser must provide his or her prior written consent before the lender/client specified in the appraisal report can distribute {he appraisal report (including conclusions about the property value, the appraiser's identity and professionat designations, and references lo any professional appraisal organizations or the firm with which the appraiser is associated) to anyone ofher than the borrower; the mortgagee or ils successors and assigns; the mortgage insurer; consultants; professional appraisal organizations; any state or federally approved financial institution; or any department, agency, or instrumentality of the United States or any stale or the District of Columbia; except that the Jender/client may distibute the property description section of the reporl only to data collection or reporting service(s) without having to obtain the appraiser's prior written consent. The appraiser's wrilten consent and approval must also be obtained before the appraisal can be conveyed by anyone to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales, or other media. Freddie Mac Form 439 (6-! CichFORMS Real Estalu Appraisal Soltwarn by Euadiorct Technologiae (800) 222-8727 Fannle Mae Form 10048 (6-93) 307 APPRAISER'S CERTIFICATION: The Appraiser certifies and agrees that: ‘ 1. [have researched the subject market area and have selected a minimum of three recent sales of properties most similar and proximate to the subject property for consideration in the sales comparison analysis and have made a dollar adjustment when appropriate to reflect the market reaction to those Items of significant variation, If a significant item in a compatable property is superior to, or more favorable. than, ihe subject property, | have made a negative adjustment to reduce the adjusted sales price of the camparable and, if a significant item in a comparable property ts inferior to, or less favorable than the subject property, | have made a positive adjustment to increase the adjusted sales price of the comparable, 2, | have taken info consideration the factors that have an impact on value In my development of the estimate of market value in the appraisal report. | have not knowingly withheld any significant information from the appraisal report and | believe, to the best of my knowledge, that all statements and information in the appraisal report are true and correct, 3. | stated in the appraisal report only my own personal, unbiased, and professional analysis, opinions, and conclusions, which are subject only to the contingent and limiting conditions specified in this form. 4, | have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject to this report, and | have no present or prospective personal interest or bias wilh respect lo the participants in the transaction, | did not base, either partially or completely, my analysis and/or the estimate of market value in the appraisal report on the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin of either the prospective owners or occupants of the subject property or of the present owners or occupants of the properties In the vicinity of the subject property. 5. {have no present or contemplated fulure interest in the subject property, and neither my current or future employment nar my compensation for performing this appraisal is contingent on the appraised value of the property. 6. 1 was not required to report-a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client or any related party, the amount of the value estimate, the attainment of a specific result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event In order to receive my compensation and/or employment for performing the appraisal. | did not base the appraisal report on a requested minimum valuation, a specific valuation, or the need to approve a specific mortgage joan. 7. | performed this appraisal in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice that were adopled and promulgated by the Appraisal Standards Board of The Appralsal Foundation and that were in place as of the effective dale of this appraisal, with the exception of the departure provision of those Standards, which does not apply. | acknowledge that an estimate of a reasonable lime for exposure In the open market is a condition in the definition of market value and the estimate | develaped [s consistent with the marketing time noted in the neighborhaod section of this report, unless | have otherwise stated in the reconciliation section. 8, | have personally inspected the Interior and exterior areas of the subject properly and the exterior of all properties listed as comparables in the appralsa! report. | further certify that | have noted any apparent or known adverse conditions In the subject improvements, on the subject site, or on any site within the immediate vicinity of the subject property of which | am aware and have made adjustments for these adverse condilions in my analysis of the property value to the extent that | had market evidence to support them. | have also commented about the effect of the adverse conditions on the marketablilty of the subject property, 9. | personally prepared all conclusions and opinions about the real estate that were set forth in the appraisal report, If | telied on significant professional assistance from any individual or Individuals in the performance of the appralsal.or the preparation of the appraisal report, | have named such individual(s) and disclosed the specilic tasks performed by them in the reconciliation section of this appralsal report. | cerlify that any individual so named is qualified to perform the tasks, | have not authorized anyone to make a change to any item in the report; therefore, if an unauthorized change is made to the appraisal report, | wilt take no responsibility for it. SUPERVISORY APPRAISER'S CERTIFICATION: If a supervisory appraiser signect the appraisal report, he or she certifies and agrees that: | directly supervise the appralser who prepared the appraisal report, have reviewed the appraisal report, agree with the statements and conclusions of the appraiser, agree to be bound by the appraiser's certifications numbered 4 through 7 above, and am taking full responsibility tor the appraisal and the appraisal report. ADDRESS OF PROPERTY APPRAISED: —__-___92 F High Street, Oviedo, Fl. 32765 APPRAISER: SUPERVISORY APPRAISER - (only if required) Signatere: . —= Qs tee vee. Name: ame: fito MRODBIGUEZ Dale Signet: Dale Signed; Janu TN I uary.16. 2001 State Certification 7 eg. Assist. AEA Stale Certification‘#:_" " St.Cert. Aes. REA or State License #: BLooo5496 or Stale License #: AD 0003950 _ State: EL State: FL Expiration Date of Certification or License: 11/2002__. Expiration Date of Certification or License: __ 11/2002 X] pid (2) dia not inspect Property Freddie Mac Form 439 6-93 CichFORMS Real Ealnlv Appratual Sofware by Biadford Tuchnologies (800) 622-8727 Fannie Mae Form 10048 6.83 Zor EXHIBIT #_ ex? OF ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT. PAGE i) RR Property Information County: Seminole County Parcel 1D; 45 24 34 611 OA0O 0050 MLSH: 338267 Last Sale: $80,000.00 Alt Key/Folio i: Sale Date: 1213011999 Prop, Address: 92 HIGH STE City/State: OVIEDO,FL Zip Code: 32785-9010 IMail Carrier Rte: Row Census Tract: 121170213,04 lowe jp Information Owner Name: DEWAYNE & KELLY HEMBY Co-Owner Name: jailing Address; 92 E HIGH ST ity/State: OVIEDO, FL Zip Code: 32765-9010 IMail Carrier Route: RO1B Absentee Owner: No Legal Deseriptions LEG LOT & BLK A OVIEDO HEIGHTS PB 4 PG4 Plat Book / Page: on04/0004 ec45 = Twp: 24) Rng: 34 Subd #: 611 Blk: 0A00 ~—_Lot; 0050 ubdivisian: OVIEDO' HEIGHTS — Parcel # (Polk Co.}: Assessed Value/Taxes Exemptions (Land Value: $12,000.00 Tax Amount: $921.08 improved Value: $58,466.00 ~ . Tax Year; 2000 {Total Value: $70,465.00 Millnge Rate: 20.26 just Values $70,466.00 IExemption Description; HOMESTEAD Land and Building Descriptions County Use Code: 4 County Use Description: SINGLE FAMILY [State Use Code: 4 State Use Desc: SINGLE FAMILY Land Dim Type: LT Zoning: Lot Dimensions; 0.00 X 0.00 Year Built: 1985 [Total Acreage: Effec Yr Blt: 1905 . [Bedrooms: Num Buildings: 4 Bldg Gross Area: 1,024 Putt Baths | Building Num: 4 Bldg Hite Arcus: 4,432 Irixtures: 6 Stories: 2 Bld Net Area: 41634 Building Structural Flements Gondo Information Roof: 402 GASLE/HIP Unit Location: JExt. Wall: 204 SIDING AVG Unit Floor: Int, Wall: 707 DRY WALL Unit View: Floor Finish: Unit Number; leat: 808 HT/CLN PKG IC; iB ASE 760 PEN PORCH FINISHED , 40 j|ARAGE FINISHED 352 paras STORY FINISHED . 672 Extra Feature Desc and U. (OOD DECK PATIGIAVG 490 . Sales History Date Price OR Book/Page Deed Type Owner's Name lAdd'| Part Mtg. Type Mig, Amt. Mig. Company Mig. Book/Page Int. fzsoi999 $80,000 3781-0983 WARRANTY DEED —_- HEMBY, DEWAYNE & KELLY _ _ Copyright OT99H Mid-Flonda Regional MCS, Ine.“ Wifonmation deemed Telable BT ROL _MAraMeEd — Fage 1 Sl Oe ey eee ence ee ee Uy 3 * "avr «<< GP, PARGEL DETAIL Seminole County Ploperty eetppraiter ervices TINE 8 Mrs SO Sanford (12771 407-6667 506 GENERAL : - _ 15-21-31-811-0A00- W401 Parcel fd: gasp Tax District: V1-OVIEDO VALUE SUMMARY HEMBY DEWAYNE & _ O1-SINGLE Value Method: Market Owner: KELLY Dor! FAMILY : HIGH ST Number of Building: 1 Addross; 02 F Dopreciated Bldg Value: $57,079 City,State,2ipGode: oe nen Fe oars Exemptions: 00-HOMESTEAD Deprociatad EXFT Value: $2,057 Property Address: PAtHIGH STE Land Value (Market): $12,000 Subdlvision Name: OVIEDO HEIGHTS Land Value Ag: $0 JustMarket Value: $71,146 SALES Assessed Value (GOH): $71,146 Deed Date Book Page Amount Vacilmp Exempt Value: $25,000 WARRANTY DEED 12/1899 03781 0983 $80,000 Improved Taxable Value: $46,146 WARRANTY DEED 06/1993 02860 0856 §25,700 Improved Tax Bill Amount: $921 WARRANTY DEED 07/1985 01654 0688 $53,900 Improved Find Comparable Sales within this Subdivisian =| LAND LEGAL DESCRIPTION PLAT Land Assess Method Frontage Depth Land Units Unit Price Land Value LEG LOT 5 BLICA OVIEDO HEIGHTS PB 4 PG 4 LOT 0 0 1.000 12,000.00 $12,000 BUILDING INFORMATION BldNum Bld Type = Year Bit Fixtures Gross SF Hosted SF Ext Wall Bild Value Est, Cost New 4 SINGLE FAMILY 1985 5 1,624 1,432 SIDING AVG = $57,079 $60,722 Appondage / Sqft OPEN PORCH FINISHED / 40 Appendage / Sqft GARAGE FINISHED / 352 ; Appendage / Sqft _ UPPER STORY FINISHED / 672 EXTRA FEATURE Doscripllon Year Bit Units EXFT Value Est. Cost Now wood DECK 1992” 490 S176 $1,960 WOOD UTILITY BLDG 2001 221 $a91 $928, NOTE: Assessed values shown are NOT cartified values and (therefore are subject to change before being finalized for ad valorem tax purposes. ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAI NT EXHIBIT # Ze PAGE __ {OF _._ ‘ : Bl - http://www.sepafl.org/pls/web/re_web.seminole_county_title7PARCEL=1521315110A000.. 1/22/2002

Docket for Case No: 06-003634PL
Issue Date Proceedings
Feb. 27, 2007 Order Closing Files. CASE CLOSED.
Feb. 26, 2007 Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction (Case No. 06-3634PL) filed.
Feb. 26, 2007 Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction (Case No. 06-3633PL) filed.
Jan. 08, 2007 Notice of Appearance (filed by P. Perry).
Jan. 04, 2007 Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Video Teleconference (hearing set for March 7, 2007; 9:30 a.m.; Miami and Tallahassee, FL).
Dec. 14, 2006 Respondent, Tito M.Rodriguez`s Response to Petitioner`s Motion to Continue filed.
Dec. 07, 2006 Petitioner`s Motion to Continue filed.
Dec. 04, 2006 Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for February 7, 2007; Miami and Tallahassee, FL).
Nov. 22, 2006 Respondent, Tito M. Rodriguez`s Motion for Continuance filed.
Nov. 21, 2006 Respondent, Tito M. Rodriguez`s Notice of Appearance (filed by H. Bell).
Nov. 13, 2006 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time (T. Rodriguez) filed.
Nov. 13, 2006 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time (J. Rodriguez) filed.
Nov. 09, 2006 Order Granting Petitioner`s Motion to Consolidate.
Nov. 09, 2006 Order Granting Petitioner`s Motion to Consolidate (DOAH Case Nos. 06-3633PL and 06-3634PL).
Nov. 07, 2006 Letter to T. Rodriguez from R. White advising that she would not object to a first time continuance filed.
Oct. 23, 2006 Petitioner`s Motion to Consolidate (with DOAH Case No. 06-3633PL) filed.
Oct. 06, 2006 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
Oct. 06, 2006 Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for November 28, 2006; 9:00 a.m.; Miami and Tallahassee, FL).
Oct. 05, 2006 Undeliverable envelope returned from the Post Office.
Oct. 05, 2006 Joint Response to Initial Order filed.
Sep. 21, 2006 Administrative Complaint filed.
Sep. 21, 2006 Election of Rights filed.
Sep. 21, 2006 Agency referral filed.
Sep. 21, 2006 Initial Order.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer