Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION
Respondent: DANIEL ESTEVILL AND METRO CONSULTANTS, INC.
Judges: ELEANOR M. HUNTER
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: Miami, Florida
Filed: Jan. 24, 2007
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Monday, April 9, 2007.
Latest Update: Dec. 22, 2024
2
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND
PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, .
Petitioner,
vs co ; _ _DBPR Case Nos.: _ 2006-027100
* . - 2006-027048
DANIEL ESTEVILL AND O45 ae oe
METRO CONSULTANTS, INC., Ol °
Respondents. . .
/
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
Petitioner, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,
("Petitioner"), files this Administrative Complaint before the Board of Architecture and Interior
Design against DANIEL ESTEVILL and METRO CONSULTANTS, INC. ("Respondents"), and ©
says: |
1. Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating the practice of architecture
pursuant to Section 20.165, Florida Statutes, and Chapters 455 and 481, Florida Statutes.
2. The Department of Business and Professional Regulation has jurisdiction over the
unlicensed practice of architecture and interior design pursuant to Section 455.228( , and
Section 481.223(1)(a), Florida Statutes. _
3. Respondents’ last known address 12260 SW a Terrace, Miami, Florida 33184.
4. At all times material hereto, Respondents were not duly registered or certified to
‘-engage in the practice of architecture pursuant to Chapter 48 1, Florida Statutes.
5. ; . On or about September 30, 2002, Respondents entered i into a contract with
7 Maximo Gonzalez to o obtain architectural plans for a residential project located a at 3241 NW 6
, ; ;
Street, Miami, Florida,
6. The contract specifically provides that Respondents will obtain architectural ,
building plans and a building permit for the Project.
_ 7. The contract states that Respondents would receive a fee of $2,350.00 for
providing these services. .
8 Respondents received $1,762.50 urider the a and never produced plans for
“permitting.
Oo . Respondents are not licensed to practice architecture in the State of Florida and
therefore cannot offer or provide architectural building plans. . |
COUNTI
10. _ Petitioner hereby realleges and incorporates paragraphs one (1) through : nine (9)
-as if fully set forth herein.
11. Section 481 223(1)(a), Florida Statutes, states that a person may t not knowingly
“practice architecture unless the person is an architect ora registered architect. ”
12. Based upon the foregoing, Respondents have violated Section 481.223(1)(a),
Florida Statutes, by practicing architecture when they were not the holder of a valid license by
offering to Provide architectural building plans.
_ COUNT COUNT
13. Petitioner hereby realleges and incorporates paragraphs one (1) through nine °)
as if fully set forth herein.
14. Section 481.223(1)(c), Florida Statutes, states that a person may not knowingly “use
. the name or title ‘architect’ or “registered architect’ or words to that effect, when the Person is
not then the holder of a valid license.”
15, ‘Based upon the foregoing ti the Respondents have violated Section 481 234 1)(c),
Florida Statutes, by using the name or title “architect”, when they w were not the holder of. a valid
license. -
: . COUNT IT .
16. Petitioner hereby realeges a and incorporates paragraphs one Q) through nine (9) -
as if fully’ set forth herein. - : 7 ,
17. Section 481.219(2), Florida Statutes, requires a certificate of authorization for a
corporation, partnership, or fictitious name offering architectural services.
18, "Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent, ‘Metro Consultants; Inc., has violated
Section 481.219(2), Florida Statutes, by offering architectural services without a certjficate of
authorization. .
WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the Board enter an Order imposing an
administrative fine not to exceed $5,000 per count, assess costs associated with investigation and
prosecution, impose any or all penalties delineated within Section 455.227(2), Florida Statutes, |
and/or any other relief that the Board is authorized to impose pursuant to Chapters 481 and 455,
F lorida Statutes, and/or the rules promul gated thereunder.
Oo Be
Signed this - 27" day of _ Ge feber
DAVID K. MINACCI -
Smith, Thompson, Shaw & Manausa, P. A.
2075 Centre Pointe Blvd..
Tallahassee, FL 32308-4893
: a Bar No. 0056774 -
_ (850) 402-1570
Cu 7 . Fac (850) 402-1508
PCP oct 8 8 2006 ae
Docket for Case No: 07-000456
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Apr. 09, 2007 |
Order Closing File. CASE CLOSED.
|
Apr. 05, 2007 |
Motion to Continue filed.
|
Jan. 31, 2007 |
Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for April 13, 2007; 9:00 a.m.; Miami and Tallahassee, FL).
|
Jan. 31, 2007 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
|
Jan. 30, 2007 |
Respondents` Response to Initial Order filed.
|
Jan. 30, 2007 |
Petitioner`s Response to Initial Order filed.
|
Jan. 25, 2007 |
Initial Order.
|
Jan. 24, 2007 |
Answer and Affirmative Defenses filed.
|
Jan. 24, 2007 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Jan. 24, 2007 |
Referral Letter filed.
|
Jan. 24, 2007 |
Notice of Filing Petitioner`s First Set of Interrogatories, First Requests for Production and Requests for Admission filed.
|